diff --git a/check_ruff_pattern.md b/check_ruff_pattern.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 5253b69..0000000
--- a/check_ruff_pattern.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,94 +0,0 @@
-# OUTDATED - See ARCHITECTURE_INSIGHTS.md for current solution
-
-## This document is preserved for historical context but is OUTDATED
-## We found the StorageHandle solution that solves the Send+Sync issue
-
-# Key Findings from Ruff's Architecture
-
-Based on the exploration, here's what we discovered:
-
-## Current Django LS Architecture
-
-### What We Have:
-1. `Database` struct with `#[derive(Clone)]` and Salsa storage
-2. `WorkspaceDatabase` that wraps `Database` and uses `DashMap` for thread-safe file storage
-3. `Session` that owns `WorkspaceDatabase` directly (not wrapped in Arc<Mutex>)
-4. Tower-LSP server that requires `Send + Sync` for async handlers
-
-### The Problem:
-- `Database` is not `Sync` due to `RefCell<QueryStack>` and `UnsafeCell<HashMap>` in Salsa's `ZalsaLocal`
-- This prevents `Session` from being `Sync`, which breaks tower-lsp async handlers
-
-## Ruff's Solution (From Analysis)
-
-### They Don't Make Database Sync!
-The key insight is that Ruff **doesn't actually make the database Send + Sync**. Instead:
-
-1. **Clone for Background Work**: They clone the database for each background task
-2. **Move Not Share**: The cloned database is *moved* into the task (requires Send, not Sync)
-3. **Message Passing**: Results are sent back via channels
-
-### Critical Difference:
-- Ruff uses a custom LSP implementation that doesn't require `Sync` on the session
-- Tower-LSP *does* require `Sync` because handlers take `&self`
-
-## The Real Problem
-
-Tower-LSP's `LanguageServer` trait requires:
-```rust
-async fn initialize(&self, ...) -> ... 
-//                  ^^^^^ This requires self to be Sync!
-```
-
-But with Salsa's current implementation, the Database can never be Sync.
-
-## Solution Options
-
-### Option 1: Wrap Database in Arc<Mutex> (Current Workaround)
-```rust
-pub struct Session {
-    database: Arc<Mutex<WorkspaceDatabase>>,
-    // ...
-}
-```
-Downsides: Lock contention, defeats purpose of Salsa's internal optimization
-
-### Option 2: Move Database Out of Session
-```rust
-pub struct Session {
-    // Don't store database here
-    file_index: Arc<DashMap<Url, FileContent>>,
-    settings: Settings,
-}
-
-// Create database on demand for each request
-impl LanguageServer for Server {
-    async fn some_handler(&self) {
-        let db = create_database_from_index(&self.session.file_index);
-        // Use db for this request
-    }
-}
-```
-
-### Option 3: Use Actor Pattern
-```rust
-pub struct DatabaseActor {
-    database: WorkspaceDatabase,
-    rx: mpsc::Receiver<DatabaseCommand>,
-}
-
-pub struct Session {
-    db_tx: mpsc::Sender<DatabaseCommand>,
-}
-```
-
-### Option 4: Custom unsafe Send/Sync implementation
-This is risky but possible if we ensure single-threaded access patterns.
-
-## The Salsa Version Mystery
-
-We're using the exact same Salsa commit as Ruff, with the same features. The issue is NOT the Salsa version, but how tower-lsp forces us to use it.
-
-Ruff likely either:
-1. Doesn't use tower-lsp (has custom implementation)
-2. Or structures their server differently to avoid needing Sync on the database