fix(cli): Respect implied BYONM from DENO_FUTURE in deno task (#24652)

Regression from
04f9db5b22

Originally I thought to fix the issue in the PR we needed to explicitly
pass through the `node-modules-dir` flag, but after applying the correct
fix that david pointed out (setting `NPM_PROCESS_STATE`) that wasn't
necessary (or correct).

We had a test for deno task with BYONM, but it only tested with
`"unstable": ["byonm"]` in deno.json, so it didn't catch this.
This commit is contained in:
Nathan Whitaker 2024-07-19 11:59:04 -07:00 committed by GitHub
parent f6c7c13764
commit a4c76add56
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
4 changed files with 67 additions and 30 deletions

View file

@ -282,12 +282,8 @@ fn resolve_baseline_custom_commands(
custom_commands
.insert("npm".to_string(), Rc::new(crate::task_runner::NpmCommand));
custom_commands.insert(
"node".to_string(),
Rc::new(crate::task_runner::NodeCommand {
force_node_modules_dir: true,
}),
);
custom_commands
.insert("node".to_string(), Rc::new(crate::task_runner::NodeCommand));
custom_commands.insert(
"node-gyp".to_string(),