mirror of
https://github.com/denoland/deno.git
synced 2025-09-26 12:19:12 +00:00
fix(cli): Respect implied BYONM from DENO_FUTURE in deno task
(#24652)
Regression from
04f9db5b22
Originally I thought to fix the issue in the PR we needed to explicitly
pass through the `node-modules-dir` flag, but after applying the correct
fix that david pointed out (setting `NPM_PROCESS_STATE`) that wasn't
necessary (or correct).
We had a test for deno task with BYONM, but it only tested with
`"unstable": ["byonm"]` in deno.json, so it didn't catch this.
This commit is contained in:
parent
f6c7c13764
commit
a4c76add56
4 changed files with 67 additions and 30 deletions
|
@ -282,12 +282,8 @@ fn resolve_baseline_custom_commands(
|
|||
custom_commands
|
||||
.insert("npm".to_string(), Rc::new(crate::task_runner::NpmCommand));
|
||||
|
||||
custom_commands.insert(
|
||||
"node".to_string(),
|
||||
Rc::new(crate::task_runner::NodeCommand {
|
||||
force_node_modules_dir: true,
|
||||
}),
|
||||
);
|
||||
custom_commands
|
||||
.insert("node".to_string(), Rc::new(crate::task_runner::NodeCommand));
|
||||
|
||||
custom_commands.insert(
|
||||
"node-gyp".to_string(),
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue