1. Removes the access check callback, which was kind of confusing.
1. Requires `CheckedPath` for everything in the `FileSystem` trait to
ensure we're always checking permissions.
Since `rust 1.87.0` reported `undefined symbol:
ring::pbkdf2::PBKDF2_HMAC_SHA1::*` in CI and it was difficult to debug
locally, use `rust 1.86.0` in CI tests for troubleshoot the errors
Fixes#27264. Fixes https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/28161.
Currently the new lockfile version is gated behind an unstable flag
(`--unstable-lockfile-v5`) until the next minor release, where it will
become the default.
The main motivation here is that it improves startup performance when
using the global cache or `--node-modules-dir=auto`.
In a create-next-app project, running an empty file:
```
❯ hyperfine --warmup 25 -N --setup "rm -f deno.lock" "deno run --node-modules-dir=auto -A empty.js" "deno-this-pr run --node-modules-dir=auto -A empty.js" "deno-this-pr run --node-modules-dir=auto --unstable-lockfile-v5 empty.js" "deno run --node-modules-dir=manual -A empty.js" "deno-this-pr run --node-modules-dir=manual -A empty.js"
Benchmark 1: deno run --node-modules-dir=auto -A empty.js
Time (mean ± σ): 247.6 ms ± 1.7 ms [User: 228.7 ms, System: 19.0 ms]
Range (min … max): 245.5 ms … 251.5 ms 12 runs
Benchmark 2: deno-this-pr run --node-modules-dir=auto -A empty.js
Time (mean ± σ): 169.8 ms ± 1.0 ms [User: 152.9 ms, System: 17.9 ms]
Range (min … max): 168.9 ms … 172.5 ms 17 runs
Benchmark 3: deno-this-pr run --node-modules-dir=auto --unstable-lockfile-v5 empty.js
Time (mean ± σ): 16.2 ms ± 0.7 ms [User: 12.3 ms, System: 5.7 ms]
Range (min … max): 15.2 ms … 19.2 ms 185 runs
Benchmark 4: deno run --node-modules-dir=manual -A empty.js
Time (mean ± σ): 16.2 ms ± 0.8 ms [User: 11.6 ms, System: 5.5 ms]
Range (min … max): 14.9 ms … 19.7 ms 187 runs
Benchmark 5: deno-this-pr run --node-modules-dir=manual -A empty.js
Time (mean ± σ): 16.0 ms ± 0.9 ms [User: 12.0 ms, System: 5.5 ms]
Range (min … max): 14.8 ms … 22.3 ms 190 runs
Warning: Statistical outliers were detected. Consider re-running this benchmark on a quiet system without any interferences from other programs. It might help to use the '--warmup' or '--prepare' options.
Summary
deno-this-pr run --node-modules-dir=manual -A empty.js ran
1.01 ± 0.08 times faster than deno run --node-modules-dir=manual -A empty.js
1.01 ± 0.07 times faster than deno-this-pr run --node-modules-dir=auto --unstable-lockfile-v5 empty.js
10.64 ± 0.60 times faster than deno-this-pr run --node-modules-dir=auto -A empty.js
15.51 ± 0.88 times faster than deno run --node-modules-dir=auto -A empty.js
```
When using the new lockfile version, this leads to a 15.5x faster
startup time compared to the current deno version.
Install times benefit as well, though to a lesser degree.
`deno install` on a create-next-app project, with everything cached
(just setting up node_modules from scratch):
```
❯ hyperfine --warmup 5 -N --prepare "rm -rf node_modules" --setup "rm -rf deno.lock" "deno i" "deno-this-pr i" "deno-this-pr i --unstable-lockfile-v5"
Benchmark 1: deno i
Time (mean ± σ): 464.4 ms ± 8.8 ms [User: 227.7 ms, System: 217.3 ms]
Range (min … max): 452.6 ms … 478.3 ms 10 runs
Benchmark 2: deno-this-pr i
Time (mean ± σ): 368.8 ms ± 22.0 ms [User: 150.8 ms, System: 198.1 ms]
Range (min … max): 344.8 ms … 397.6 ms 10 runs
Benchmark 3: deno-this-pr i --unstable-lockfile-v5
Time (mean ± σ): 211.9 ms ± 17.1 ms [User: 7.1 ms, System: 177.2 ms]
Range (min … max): 191.3 ms … 233.4 ms 10 runs
Summary
deno-this-pr i --unstable-lockfile-v5 ran
1.74 ± 0.17 times faster than deno-this-pr i
2.19 ± 0.18 times faster than deno i
```
With lockfile v5, a 2.19x faster install time compared to the current
deno.
Updates to use rust 1.85. Doesn't move to the 2024 edition, as that's a
fair bit more involved.
A nice side benefit is that the new rustc version seems to lead to a
slight reduction in binary size (at least on mac):
```
FILE SIZE
--------------
+4.3% +102Ki __DATA_CONST,__const
[NEW] +69.3Ki __TEXT,__literals
[NEW] +68.5Ki Rebase Info
+5.0% +39.9Ki __TEXT,__unwind_info
+57% +8.85Ki [__TEXT]
[NEW] +8.59Ki Lazy Binding Info
[NEW] +5.16Ki __TEXT,__stub_helper
[NEW] +3.58Ki Export Info
[NEW] +3.42Ki __DATA,__la_symbol_ptr
-0.1% -726 [12 Others]
-21.4% -3.10Ki [__DATA_CONST]
-95.8% -3.39Ki __DATA_CONST,__got
-20.9% -3.43Ki [__DATA]
-0.5% -4.52Ki Code Signature
-100.0% -11.6Ki [__LINKEDIT]
-1.0% -43.5Ki Symbol Table
-1.6% -44.0Ki __TEXT,__gcc_except_tab
-0.2% -48.1Ki __TEXT,__const
-3.3% -78.6Ki __TEXT,__eh_frame
-0.7% -320Ki __TEXT,__text
-1.5% -334Ki String Table
-0.5% -586Ki TOTAL
```
This is achieved by storing CJS export analysis ahead of time in the
executable, which should also improve the performance of `denort` by
this never being done anymore (I'm too lazy atm to bench this, but it
will be significant for some programs).
This slightly degrades the performance of CJS export analysis on
subsequent runs because I changed it to no longer cache in the DENO_DIR
with this PR (denort now properly has no idea about the DENO_DIR). We'll
have to change it to embed this data in the binary and that will also
allow us to get rid of swc in denort (will do that in a follow-up PR).
