The bug has been fixed by updating the regex to ensure that the shebang
characters (#!) are no longer excluded. This allows the shebang to be
retained and parsed correctly.
---------
Co-authored-by: David Sherret <dsherret@users.noreply.github.com>
This is the release commit being forwarded back to main for 2.2.10
Co-authored-by: nathanwhit <nathanwhit@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Nathan Whitaker <nathan@deno.com>
Fixes#28891
We were checking if the node_modules entry for the package was present,
but then reading from the global cache.
Instead, read from the package.json in node_modules. As a fallback(which
in theory should only really happen if the node_modules dir is somehow
messed up), take the more expensive (but likely to work) path of reading
from the registry.json.
This is where deno_lockfile gets the info for the transform from 4->5.
So while we were doing this optimization on new v5 lockfiles, we weren't
doing it correctly for ones migrated from earlier versions.
Testing this is kinda hard because our tests don't use the default
registry, hmm
Apparently things like the `bin` field can appear in the version info
from the registry, but not the package's `package.json`. I'm still not
sure how you actually achieve this, but it's the case for
`esbuild-wasm`. This fixes the following panic:
```
❯ deno i --node-modules-dir npm:esbuild-wasm
Add npm:esbuild-wasm@0.25.2
Initialize ⣯ [00:00]
- esbuild-wasm@0.25.2
============================================================
Deno has panicked. This is a bug in Deno. Please report this
at https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/new.
If you can reliably reproduce this panic, include the
reproduction steps and re-run with the RUST_BACKTRACE=1 env
var set and include the backtrace in your report.
Platform: macos aarch64
Version: 2.2.8+58c6c0b
Args: ["deno", "i", "--node-modules-dir", "npm:esbuild-wasm"]
View stack trace at:
https://panic.deno.com/v2.2.8+58c6c0bc9c1b4ee08645be936ff9268f17028f0f/aarch64-apple-darwin/g4h6Jo393pB4k4kqBo-3kqBg6klqBogtyLg13yLw_t0Lw549Hgj8-Hgw__H428-F4yv_HgjkpKww7gIon4gIw54rKwi5MorzMw5y7G42g7Iw---I40s-I4vu4Jw2rEw8z7Dwnr6J4tp7Bo_vvK
thread 'main' panicked at cli/npm/installer/common/bin_entries.rs:108:30:
called `Option::unwrap()` on a `None` value
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
```
Support for decorators in the lint plugin AST was a bit half baked. This
PR goes through all the places where decorators can be set in TS and
supports these.
Fixes https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/28830
In our JS lint plugin API each node has a `.parent` property to access
its parent. But I forgot to skip group nodes, which lead to an invalid
node being returned.
Fixes: https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/28799
This commit enabled [explicit resource management]
(https://github.com/tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-management)
proposal for JavaScript code.
This is done by upgrading `deno_ast` to a version that no longer
transpiles TS files with `using` keyword, and instead enables
a V8 flag that provides native support.
Closes https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/20821
---------
Co-authored-by: Luca Casonato <hello@lcas.dev>
Co-authored-by: Divy Srivastava <dj.srivastava23@gmail.com>
Noticed that the `.parent` type was missing for AST nodes for our JS
lint API. Whenever possible I've only specified the limited
possibilities of parent types, but when it's too complex I defaulted to
just `Node`.
Fixes#27264. Fixes https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/28161.
Currently the new lockfile version is gated behind an unstable flag
(`--unstable-lockfile-v5`) until the next minor release, where it will
become the default.
The main motivation here is that it improves startup performance when
using the global cache or `--node-modules-dir=auto`.
In a create-next-app project, running an empty file:
```
❯ hyperfine --warmup 25 -N --setup "rm -f deno.lock" "deno run --node-modules-dir=auto -A empty.js" "deno-this-pr run --node-modules-dir=auto -A empty.js" "deno-this-pr run --node-modules-dir=auto --unstable-lockfile-v5 empty.js" "deno run --node-modules-dir=manual -A empty.js" "deno-this-pr run --node-modules-dir=manual -A empty.js"
Benchmark 1: deno run --node-modules-dir=auto -A empty.js
Time (mean ± σ): 247.6 ms ± 1.7 ms [User: 228.7 ms, System: 19.0 ms]
Range (min … max): 245.5 ms … 251.5 ms 12 runs
Benchmark 2: deno-this-pr run --node-modules-dir=auto -A empty.js
Time (mean ± σ): 169.8 ms ± 1.0 ms [User: 152.9 ms, System: 17.9 ms]
Range (min … max): 168.9 ms … 172.5 ms 17 runs
Benchmark 3: deno-this-pr run --node-modules-dir=auto --unstable-lockfile-v5 empty.js
Time (mean ± σ): 16.2 ms ± 0.7 ms [User: 12.3 ms, System: 5.7 ms]
Range (min … max): 15.2 ms … 19.2 ms 185 runs
Benchmark 4: deno run --node-modules-dir=manual -A empty.js
Time (mean ± σ): 16.2 ms ± 0.8 ms [User: 11.6 ms, System: 5.5 ms]
Range (min … max): 14.9 ms … 19.7 ms 187 runs
Benchmark 5: deno-this-pr run --node-modules-dir=manual -A empty.js
Time (mean ± σ): 16.0 ms ± 0.9 ms [User: 12.0 ms, System: 5.5 ms]
Range (min … max): 14.8 ms … 22.3 ms 190 runs
Warning: Statistical outliers were detected. Consider re-running this benchmark on a quiet system without any interferences from other programs. It might help to use the '--warmup' or '--prepare' options.
Summary
deno-this-pr run --node-modules-dir=manual -A empty.js ran
1.01 ± 0.08 times faster than deno run --node-modules-dir=manual -A empty.js
1.01 ± 0.07 times faster than deno-this-pr run --node-modules-dir=auto --unstable-lockfile-v5 empty.js
10.64 ± 0.60 times faster than deno-this-pr run --node-modules-dir=auto -A empty.js
15.51 ± 0.88 times faster than deno run --node-modules-dir=auto -A empty.js
```
When using the new lockfile version, this leads to a 15.5x faster
startup time compared to the current deno version.
Install times benefit as well, though to a lesser degree.
`deno install` on a create-next-app project, with everything cached
(just setting up node_modules from scratch):
```
❯ hyperfine --warmup 5 -N --prepare "rm -rf node_modules" --setup "rm -rf deno.lock" "deno i" "deno-this-pr i" "deno-this-pr i --unstable-lockfile-v5"
Benchmark 1: deno i
Time (mean ± σ): 464.4 ms ± 8.8 ms [User: 227.7 ms, System: 217.3 ms]
Range (min … max): 452.6 ms … 478.3 ms 10 runs
Benchmark 2: deno-this-pr i
Time (mean ± σ): 368.8 ms ± 22.0 ms [User: 150.8 ms, System: 198.1 ms]
Range (min … max): 344.8 ms … 397.6 ms 10 runs
Benchmark 3: deno-this-pr i --unstable-lockfile-v5
Time (mean ± σ): 211.9 ms ± 17.1 ms [User: 7.1 ms, System: 177.2 ms]
Range (min … max): 191.3 ms … 233.4 ms 10 runs
Summary
deno-this-pr i --unstable-lockfile-v5 ran
1.74 ± 0.17 times faster than deno-this-pr i
2.19 ± 0.18 times faster than deno i
```
With lockfile v5, a 2.19x faster install time compared to the current
deno.
This is the release commit being forwarded back to main for 2.2.7
Signed-off-by: Divy Srivastava <dj.srivastava23@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Divy Srivastava <dj.srivastava23@gmail.com>
