We were only doing the new output on the top level install (`deno
install` with no args or flags), we now do it on `deno install
npm:chalk`, `deno add npm:chalk`, `deno cache ./foo.ts`, "deno install
--entrypoint ./foo.ts"`.
Additionally the scripts and deprecation warnings were printing above
the output, now they're deferred and displayed below
Currently we only warn once. With this PR, we continue to warn about
not-run scripts on explicit `deno install` (or cache). For `run` (or
other subcommands) we only warn the once, as we do currently.
Refactors the lifecycle scripts code to extract out the common
functionality and then uses that to provide a warning in the global
resolver.
While ideally we would still support them with the global cache, for now
a warning is at least better than the status quo (where people are
unaware why their packages aren't working).
`--allow-run` even with an allow list has essentially been
`--allow-all`... this locks it down more.
1. Resolves allow list for `--allow-run=` on startup to an absolute
path, then uses these paths when evaluating if a command can execute.
Also, adds these paths to `--deny-write`
1. Resolves the environment (cwd and env vars) before evaluating
permissions and before executing a command. Then uses this environment
to evaluate the permissions and then evaluate the command.
This commit effectively turns Deno into Deno 2.0.
This is done by forcing `DENO_FUTURE=1` env var, that was available in
the past few months to try Deno 2 changes.
This commit contains several breaking changes scheduled for Deno 2:
- all deprecated JavaScript APIs are not available any more, mostly
`Deno.*` APIs
- `window` global is removed
- FFI, WebGPU and FS APIs are now stable and don't require
`--unstable-*` flags
- import assertions are no longer supported
- "bring your own node modules" is enabled by default
This is the first commit in a series that are scheduled before the Deno
2 release.
Follow up work is tracked in
https://github.com/denoland/deno/issues/25241.
---------
Co-authored-by: Asher Gomez <ashersaupingomez@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Nayeem Rahman <nayeemrmn99@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Nathan Whitaker <nathan@deno.com>
Two small changes:
- In our BYONM errors, suggest running `deno install` instead of `npm
install` if `DENO_FUTURE` is set
- Only emit warning about `deno install` changes if you do `deno install
<foo>` with deno_future unset
Regression from
04f9db5b22
Originally I thought to fix the issue in the PR we needed to explicitly
pass through the `node-modules-dir` flag, but after applying the correct
fix that david pointed out (setting `NPM_PROCESS_STATE`) that wasn't
necessary (or correct).
We had a test for deno task with BYONM, but it only tested with
`"unstable": ["byonm"]` in deno.json, so it didn't catch this.
NPM inserts a default install script when a package has a `binding.gyp`
file.
It's possible, however, for the package to exclude the `binding.gyp`
file when they publish, and in this case the install script will never
succeed for a user of the package.
This happens with `fsevents`, for instance. They don't include the
`binding.gyp` file in their published tarball, but the default install
script appears in the manifest served by `npm`.
This causes us to warn that `fsevents` has an install script, but when
you try to run it it fails due to `binding.gyp` not existing.
Previously when we printed out the packages that skipped install
scripts, we didn't prefix them with `npm:`. When you pass
`--allow-scripts` though, we require `npm:`, which means you can't just
copy paste the package name from the warning message.
Adds support for running npm package lifecycle scripts, opted into via a
new `--allow-scripts` flag.
With this PR, when running `deno cache` (or `DENO_FUTURE=1 deno
install`) you can specify the `--allow-scripts=pkg1,pkg2` flag to run
lifecycle scripts attached to the given packages.
Note at the moment this only works when `nodeModulesDir` is true (using
the local resolver).
When a package with un-run lifecycle scripts is encountered, we emit a
warning suggesting things may not work and to try running lifecycle
scripts. Additionally, if a package script implicitly requires
`node-gyp` and it's not found on the system, we emit a warning.
Extra things in this PR:
- Extracted out bits of `task.rs` into a separate module for reuse
- Added a couple fields to `process.config` in order to support
`node-gyp` (it relies on a few variables being there)
- Drive by fix to downloading new npm packages to test registry
---
TODO:
- [x] validation for allow-scripts args (make sure it looks like an npm
package)
- [x] make allow-scripts matching smarter
- [ ] figure out what issues this closes
---
Review notes:
- This adds a bunch of deps to our test registry due to using
`node-gyp`, so it's pretty noisy