mirror of
https://github.com/roc-lang/roc.git
synced 2025-08-04 04:08:19 +00:00
Implement unspecialized lambda set unification as list merging
This commit is contained in:
parent
fe864a445d
commit
bda52b0d39
1 changed files with 172 additions and 79 deletions
|
@ -1198,10 +1198,11 @@ fn separate_union_lambdas<M: MetaCollector>(
|
|||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Arrange into partitions of (_, member, region).
|
||||
// Within each partition, place flex-able vars at the end of the partition.
|
||||
// Amongst all flex-able vars, sort by their root key, so that identical vars are next
|
||||
// to each other.
|
||||
/// ULS-SORT-ORDER:
|
||||
/// - Arrange into partitions of (_, member, region), in ascending order of (member, region).
|
||||
/// - Within each partition, place flex-able vars at the end of the partition.
|
||||
/// - Amongst all flex-able vars, sort by their root key, so that identical vars are next to each other.
|
||||
#[inline(always)]
|
||||
fn unspecialized_lambda_set_sorter(subs: &Subs, uls1: Uls, uls2: Uls) -> std::cmp::Ordering {
|
||||
let Uls(var1, sym1, region1) = uls1;
|
||||
let Uls(var2, sym2, region2) = uls2;
|
||||
|
@ -1230,106 +1231,198 @@ fn unspecialized_lambda_set_sorter(subs: &Subs, uls1: Uls, uls2: Uls) -> std::cm
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[inline(always)]
|
||||
fn sort_unspecialized_lambda_sets(subs: &Subs, mut uls: Vec<Uls>) -> Vec<Uls> {
|
||||
uls.sort_by(|&uls1, &uls2| unspecialized_lambda_set_sorter(subs, uls1, uls2));
|
||||
uls
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[inline(always)]
|
||||
fn is_sorted_unspecialized_lamba_set_list(subs: &Subs, uls: &[Uls]) -> bool {
|
||||
uls == sort_unspecialized_lambda_sets(subs, uls.to_vec())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn unify_unspecialized_lambdas<M: MetaCollector>(
|
||||
env: &mut Env,
|
||||
pool: &mut Pool,
|
||||
uls1: SubsSlice<Uls>,
|
||||
uls2: SubsSlice<Uls>,
|
||||
uls_left: SubsSlice<Uls>,
|
||||
uls_right: SubsSlice<Uls>,
|
||||
) -> Result<(SubsSlice<Uls>, Outcome<M>), Outcome<M>> {
|
||||
// For now we merge all variables of unspecialized lambdas in a lambda set that share the same
|
||||
// ability member/region.
|
||||
// See the section "A property that's lost, and how we can hold on to it" of
|
||||
// solve/docs/ambient_lambda_set_specialization.md to see how we can loosen this restriction.
|
||||
|
||||
// Note that we don't need to update the bookkeeping of variable -> lambda set to be resolved,
|
||||
// because if we had v1 -> lset1, and now lset1 ~ lset2, then afterward either lset1 still
|
||||
// resolves to itself or re-points to lset2.
|
||||
// In either case the merged unspecialized lambda sets will be there.
|
||||
match (uls1.is_empty(), uls2.is_empty()) {
|
||||
(true, true) => Ok((SubsSlice::default(), Default::default())),
|
||||
(false, true) => Ok((uls1, Default::default())),
|
||||
(true, false) => Ok((uls2, Default::default())),
|
||||
(false, false) => {
|
||||
let all_uls = (env.subs.get_subs_slice(uls1).iter())
|
||||
.chain(env.subs.get_subs_slice(uls2))
|
||||
.map(|&Uls(var, sym, region)| {
|
||||
// Take the root key to deduplicate
|
||||
Uls(env.subs.get_root_key_without_compacting(var), sym, region)
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect::<Vec<_>>();
|
||||
let (uls_left, uls_right) = match (uls_left.is_empty(), uls_right.is_empty()) {
|
||||
(true, true) => return Ok((SubsSlice::default(), Default::default())),
|
||||
(false, true) => return Ok((uls_left, Default::default())),
|
||||
(true, false) => return Ok((uls_right, Default::default())),
|
||||
(false, false) => (
|
||||
env.subs.get_subs_slice(uls_left).to_vec(),
|
||||
env.subs.get_subs_slice(uls_right).to_vec(),
|
||||
),
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// Sort the unspecialized lambda sets prior to merging.
|
||||
let mut all_uls = sort_unspecialized_lambda_sets(env.subs, all_uls);
|
||||
// Unfortunately, it is not an invariant that `uls_left` and `uls_right` obey ULS-SORT-ORDER before
|
||||
// merging.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// That's because flex-able variables in unspecialized lambda sets may be unified at any time,
|
||||
// and unification of flex-able variables may change their root keys, which ULS-SORT-ORDER
|
||||
// considers.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// As such, we must sort beforehand. In practice these sets are very, very small (<5 elements).
|
||||
let uls_left = sort_unspecialized_lambda_sets(env.subs, uls_left);
|
||||
let uls_right = sort_unspecialized_lambda_sets(env.subs, uls_right);
|
||||
|
||||
// Now merge the variables of unspecialized lambdas pointing to the same
|
||||
// member/region.
|
||||
let mut whole_outcome = Outcome::default();
|
||||
let mut j = 1;
|
||||
while j < all_uls.len() {
|
||||
let i = j - 1;
|
||||
let Uls(var_i, sym_i, region_i) = all_uls[i];
|
||||
let Uls(var_j, sym_j, region_j) = all_uls[j];
|
||||
if sym_i == sym_j && region_i == region_j {
|
||||
use Content::*;
|
||||
let (mut uls_left, mut uls_right) = (uls_left.iter().peekable(), uls_right.iter().peekable());
|
||||
let mut merged_uls = Vec::with_capacity(uls_left.len() + uls_right.len());
|
||||
let mut whole_outcome = Outcome::default();
|
||||
|
||||
match (
|
||||
env.subs.get_content_without_compacting(var_i),
|
||||
env.subs.get_content_without_compacting(var_j),
|
||||
) {
|
||||
(
|
||||
FlexAbleVar(..) | RigidAbleVar(..),
|
||||
FlexAbleVar(..) | RigidAbleVar(..),
|
||||
) => {
|
||||
// If the types are root-equivalent, de-duplicate them.
|
||||
// Otherwise, the type variables are disjoint, and we want to keep both
|
||||
// of them, for purposes of disjoint variable lambda specialization.
|
||||
loop {
|
||||
let (uls_l, uls_r) = match (uls_left.peek(), uls_right.peek()) {
|
||||
(Some(uls_l), Some(uls_r)) => (**uls_l, **uls_r),
|
||||
(Some(_), None) => {
|
||||
merged_uls.push(*uls_left.next().unwrap());
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
(None, Some(_)) => {
|
||||
merged_uls.push(*uls_right.next().unwrap());
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
(None, None) => break,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
if env.subs.equivalent_without_compacting(var_i, var_j) {
|
||||
// Keep the one in position `i` and drop the one in `j`, then move
|
||||
// on.
|
||||
all_uls.remove(j);
|
||||
let Uls(var_l, sym_l, region_l) = uls_l;
|
||||
let Uls(var_r, sym_r, region_r) = uls_r;
|
||||
|
||||
use std::cmp::Ordering::*;
|
||||
match (sym_l, region_l).cmp(&(sym_r, region_r)) {
|
||||
Less => {
|
||||
// Left needs to catch up to right, add it to the merged lambdas.
|
||||
merged_uls.push(*uls_left.next().unwrap());
|
||||
}
|
||||
Greater => {
|
||||
// Right needs to catch up to left, add it to the merged lambdas.
|
||||
merged_uls.push(*uls_right.next().unwrap());
|
||||
}
|
||||
Equal => {
|
||||
// The interesting case - both point to the same specialization.
|
||||
use Content::*;
|
||||
match (
|
||||
env.subs.get_content_without_compacting(var_l),
|
||||
env.subs.get_content_without_compacting(var_r),
|
||||
) {
|
||||
(FlexAbleVar(..) | RigidAbleVar(..), FlexAbleVar(..) | RigidAbleVar(..)) => {
|
||||
// If the types are root-equivalent, de-duplicate them.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Otherwise, the type variables are disjoint, and we want to keep both
|
||||
// of them, for purposes of disjoint variable lambda specialization.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// For more information, see "A Property that’s lost, and how we can hold on to it"
|
||||
// in solve/docs/ambient_lambda_set_specialization.md.
|
||||
|
||||
if env.subs.equivalent_without_compacting(var_l, var_r) {
|
||||
// ... a1 ...
|
||||
// ... b1=a1 ...
|
||||
// => ... a1 ...
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Keep the one on the left, drop the one on the right.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Then progress both, because the invariant tells us they must be
|
||||
// disjoint, and if there were any concrete variables, they would have
|
||||
// appeared earlier.
|
||||
let _dropped = uls_right.next().unwrap();
|
||||
let kept = uls_left.next().unwrap();
|
||||
merged_uls.push(*kept);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// ... a1 ...
|
||||
// ... b1 ...
|
||||
// => ... a1, b1 ...
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Keep both. But, we have to be careful about how we do this -
|
||||
// immediately add the one with the lower root, and advance that side;
|
||||
// keep the other as-is, because the next variable on the advanced side
|
||||
// might be lower than the current non-advanced variable. For example:
|
||||
//
|
||||
// ... 640 645 ...
|
||||
// ... 670 ...
|
||||
//
|
||||
// we want to add `640` to the merged list and advance to
|
||||
//
|
||||
// ... 645 ...
|
||||
// ... 670 ...
|
||||
//
|
||||
// rather than adding both `640` and `670`, and skipping the comparison
|
||||
// of `645` with `670`.
|
||||
if env.subs.get_root_key(var_l) < env.subs.get_root_key(var_r) {
|
||||
let kept = uls_left.next().unwrap();
|
||||
merged_uls.push(*kept);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// Keep both.
|
||||
j += 1;
|
||||
let kept = uls_right.next().unwrap();
|
||||
merged_uls.push(*kept);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
(_, _) => {
|
||||
// Any other two types - unify them.
|
||||
|
||||
let outcome = unify_pool(env, pool, var_i, var_j, Mode::EQ);
|
||||
if !outcome.mismatches.is_empty() {
|
||||
return Err(outcome);
|
||||
}
|
||||
whole_outcome.union(outcome);
|
||||
// Keep the Uls in position `i` and remove the one in position `j`.
|
||||
// Then continue to compare `i` and the one behind `j`.
|
||||
all_uls.remove(j);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// Keep both Uls since they correspond to different specialization
|
||||
// member/regions, and look at the next pair.
|
||||
j += 1;
|
||||
(FlexAbleVar(..) | RigidAbleVar(..), _) => {
|
||||
// ... a1 ...
|
||||
// ... {foo: _} ...
|
||||
// => ... {foo: _} ...
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Unify them, then advance the merged flex var.
|
||||
|
||||
let outcome = unify_pool(env, pool, var_l, var_r, Mode::EQ);
|
||||
if !outcome.mismatches.is_empty() {
|
||||
return Err(outcome);
|
||||
}
|
||||
whole_outcome.union(outcome);
|
||||
|
||||
let _dropped = uls_right.next().unwrap();
|
||||
}
|
||||
(_, FlexAbleVar(..) | RigidAbleVar(..)) => {
|
||||
// ... {foo: _} ...
|
||||
// ... a1 ...
|
||||
// => ... {foo: _} ...
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Unify them, then advance the merged flex var.
|
||||
|
||||
let outcome = unify_pool(env, pool, var_l, var_r, Mode::EQ);
|
||||
if !outcome.mismatches.is_empty() {
|
||||
return Err(outcome);
|
||||
}
|
||||
whole_outcome.union(outcome);
|
||||
|
||||
let _dropped = uls_left.next().unwrap();
|
||||
}
|
||||
(_, _) => {
|
||||
// ... {foo: _} ...
|
||||
// ... {foo: _} ...
|
||||
// => ... {foo: _} ...
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Unify them, then advance one.
|
||||
// (the choice is arbitrary, so we choose the left)
|
||||
|
||||
let outcome = unify_pool(env, pool, var_l, var_r, Mode::EQ);
|
||||
if !outcome.mismatches.is_empty() {
|
||||
return Err(outcome);
|
||||
}
|
||||
whole_outcome.union(outcome);
|
||||
|
||||
let _dropped = uls_left.next().unwrap();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
debug_assert_eq!(
|
||||
all_uls,
|
||||
sort_unspecialized_lambda_sets(env.subs, all_uls.clone()),
|
||||
"sorting or merging of unspecialized lambda sets not idempotent!"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
Ok((
|
||||
SubsSlice::extend_new(&mut env.subs.unspecialized_lambda_sets, all_uls),
|
||||
whole_outcome,
|
||||
))
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
debug_assert!(
|
||||
is_sorted_unspecialized_lamba_set_list(env.subs, &merged_uls),
|
||||
"merging of unspecialized lambda sets does not preserve sort! {:?}",
|
||||
merged_uls
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
Ok((
|
||||
SubsSlice::extend_new(&mut env.subs.unspecialized_lambda_sets, merged_uls),
|
||||
whole_outcome,
|
||||
))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn unify_lambda_set_help<M: MetaCollector>(
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue