improved error messages for function definitions

This commit is contained in:
Folkert 2020-07-20 21:38:21 +02:00
parent 1d2251b064
commit e93c04a8ce
4 changed files with 267 additions and 79 deletions

View file

@ -953,6 +953,45 @@ fn to_pattern_report<'b>(
}
PExpected::ForReason(reason, expected_type, region) => match reason {
PReason::TypedArg { opt_name, index } => {
let name = match opt_name {
Some(n) => alloc.symbol_unqualified(n),
None => alloc.text(" this definition "),
};
let doc = alloc.stack(vec![
alloc
.text("The ")
.append(alloc.text(index.ordinal()))
.append(alloc.text(" argument to "))
.append(name.clone())
.append(alloc.text(" is weird:")),
alloc.region(region),
pattern_type_comparision(
alloc,
found,
expected_type,
add_pattern_category(
alloc,
alloc.text("The argument is a pattern that matches"),
&category,
),
alloc.concat(vec![
alloc.text("But the annotation on "),
name,
alloc.text(" says the "),
alloc.text(index.ordinal()),
alloc.text(" argument should be:"),
]),
vec![],
),
]);
Report {
filename,
title: "TYPE MISMATCH".to_string(),
doc,
}
}
PReason::WhenMatch { index } => {
if index == Index::FIRST {
let doc = alloc.stack(vec![
@ -1295,10 +1334,17 @@ pub fn to_doc<'b>(
alloc,
fields
.into_iter()
.map(|(k, v)| {
.map(|(k, value)| {
(
alloc.string(k.as_str().to_string()),
to_doc(alloc, Parens::Unnecessary, v.into_inner()),
match value {
RecordField::Optional(v) => {
RecordField::Optional(to_doc(alloc, Parens::Unnecessary, v))
}
RecordField::Required(v) => {
RecordField::Required(to_doc(alloc, Parens::Unnecessary, v))
}
},
)
})
.collect(),
@ -1594,12 +1640,18 @@ fn diff_record<'b>(
left: (
field.clone(),
alloc.string(field.as_str().to_string()),
diff.left,
match t1 {
RecordField::Optional(_) => RecordField::Optional(diff.left),
RecordField::Required(_) => RecordField::Required(diff.left),
},
),
right: (
field.clone(),
alloc.string(field.as_str().to_string()),
diff.right,
match t2 {
RecordField::Optional(_) => RecordField::Optional(diff.right),
RecordField::Required(_) => RecordField::Required(diff.right),
},
),
status: diff.status,
}
@ -1608,7 +1660,7 @@ fn diff_record<'b>(
(
field.clone(),
alloc.string(field.as_str().to_string()),
to_doc(alloc, Parens::Unnecessary, tipe.clone().into_inner()),
tipe.map(|t| to_doc(alloc, Parens::Unnecessary, t.clone())),
)
};
let shared_keys = fields1
@ -1661,11 +1713,12 @@ fn diff_record<'b>(
let ext_diff = ext_to_diff(alloc, ext1, ext2);
let mut fields_diff: Diff<Vec<(Lowercase, RocDocBuilder<'b>, RocDocBuilder<'b>)>> = Diff {
left: vec![],
right: vec![],
status: Status::Similar,
};
let mut fields_diff: Diff<Vec<(Lowercase, RocDocBuilder<'b>, RecordField<RocDocBuilder<'b>>)>> =
Diff {
left: vec![],
right: vec![],
status: Status::Similar,
};
for diff in both {
fields_diff.left.push(diff.left);
@ -1938,7 +1991,7 @@ mod report_text {
pub fn record<'b>(
alloc: &'b RocDocAllocator<'b>,
entries: Vec<(RocDocBuilder<'b>, RocDocBuilder<'b>)>,
entries: Vec<(RocDocBuilder<'b>, RecordField<RocDocBuilder<'b>>)>,
opt_ext: Option<RocDocBuilder<'b>>,
) -> RocDocBuilder<'b> {
let ext_doc = if let Some(t) = opt_ext {
@ -1951,8 +2004,15 @@ mod report_text {
alloc.text("{}").append(ext_doc)
} else {
let entry_to_doc =
|(field_name, field_type): (RocDocBuilder<'b>, RocDocBuilder<'b>)| {
field_name.append(alloc.text(" : ")).append(field_type)
|(field_name, field_type): (RocDocBuilder<'b>, RecordField<RocDocBuilder<'b>>)| {
match field_type {
RecordField::Required(field) => {
field_name.append(alloc.text(" : ")).append(field)
}
RecordField::Optional(field) => {
field_name.append(alloc.text(" ? ")).append(field)
}
}
};
let starts =

View file

@ -1630,6 +1630,21 @@ mod test_reporting {
#[test]
fn bad_double_rigid() {
// this previously reported the message below, not sure which is better
//
// Something is off with the body of the `f` definition:
//
// 1 ┆ f : a, b -> a
// 2 ┆ f = \x, y -> if True then x else y
// ┆ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
//
// The body is an anonymous function of type:
//
// a, a -> a
//
// But the type annotation on `f` says it should be:
//
// a, b -> a
report_problem_as(
indoc!(
r#"
@ -1643,21 +1658,22 @@ mod test_reporting {
r#"
-- TYPE MISMATCH ---------------------------------------------------------------
Something is off with the body of the `f` definition:
This `if` has an `else` branch with a different type from its `then` branch:
1 f : a, b -> a
2 f = \x, y -> if True then x else y
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^
The body is an anonymous function of type:
This `y` value is a:
a, a -> a
b
But the type annotation on `f` says it should be:
but the `then` branch has the type:
a, b -> a
a
Hint: Your type annotation uses `a` and `b` as separate type variables.
I need all branches in an `if` to have the same type!
Hint: Your type annotation uses `b` and `a` as separate type variables.
Your code seems to be saying they are the same though. Maybe they
should be the same your type annotation? Maybe your code uses them in
a weird way?
@ -1958,27 +1974,17 @@ mod test_reporting {
r#"
-- TYPE MISMATCH ---------------------------------------------------------------
Something is off with the body of the `f` definition:
The `r` record does not have a `.foo` field:
1 f : { fo: Int }ext -> Int
2 > f = \r ->
3 > r2 = { r & foo: r.fo }
4 >
5 > r2.fo
3 r2 = { r & foo: r.fo }
^^^^^^^^^
The body is an anonymous function of type:
This is usually a typo. Here are the `r` fields that are most similar:
{ fo : Int, foo : Int }a -> Int
{ fo : Int
}ext
But the type annotation on `f` says it should be:
{ fo : Int }ext -> Int
Hint: Seems like a record field typo. Maybe `foo` should be `fo`?
Hint: Can more type annotations be added? Type annotations always help
me give more specific messages, and I think they could help a lot in
this case
So maybe `.foo` should be `.fo`?
"#
),
)
@ -3492,7 +3498,7 @@ mod test_reporting {
indoc!(
r#"
f : { x : Int, y ? Int } -> Int
f = \{ x, y ? "foo" } -> x + y
f = \{ x, y ? "foo" } -> (\g, _ -> g) x y
f
"#
@ -3501,18 +3507,18 @@ mod test_reporting {
r#"
-- TYPE MISMATCH ---------------------------------------------------------------
The 2nd argument to `add` is not what I expect:
The 1st argument to `f` is weird:
2 f = \{ x, y ? "foo" } -> x + y
^
2 f = \{ x, y ? "foo" } -> (\g, _ -> g) x y
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This `y` value is a:
The argument is a pattern that matches record values of type:
Str
{ x : Int, y ? Str }
But `add` needs the 2nd argument to be:
But the annotation on `f` says the 1st argument should be:
Num a
{ x : Int, y ? Int }
"#
),
)
@ -3538,21 +3544,18 @@ mod test_reporting {
r#"
-- TYPE MISMATCH ---------------------------------------------------------------
Something is off with the body of the `f` definition:
The 1st pattern in this `when` is causing a mismatch:
1 f : { x : Int, y : Int } -> Int
2 > f = \r ->
3 > when r is
4 > { x, y : "foo" } -> x + 0
5 > _ -> 0
4 { x, y : "foo" } -> x + 0
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The body is an anonymous function of type:
The first pattern is trying to match record values of type:
{ x : Num Integer, y : Str } -> Num Integer
{ x : Int, y : Str }
But the type annotation on `f` says it should be:
But the expression between `when` and `is` has the type:
{ x : Int, y : Int } -> Int
{ x : Int, y : Int }
"#
),
)
@ -3579,21 +3582,18 @@ mod test_reporting {
r#"
-- TYPE MISMATCH ---------------------------------------------------------------
Something is off with the body of the `f` definition:
The 1st pattern in this `when` is causing a mismatch:
1 f : { x : Int, y ? Int } -> Int
2 > f = \r ->
3 > when r is
4 > { x, y ? "foo" } -> (\g, _ -> g) x y
5 > _ -> 0
4 { x, y ? "foo" } -> (\g, _ -> g) x y
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The body is an anonymous function of type:
The first pattern is trying to match record values of type:
{ x : Num Integer, y : Str } -> Num Integer
{ x : Int, y ? Str }
But the type annotation on `f` says it should be:
But the expression between `when` and `is` has the type:
{ x : Int, y : Int } -> Int
{ x : Int, y ? Int }
"#
),
)