A "late specialization" of a type is an ability specialization that
is not visible or needed until after type-specialization; i.e. during
monomorphization.
The `Inspect.toInspector` ability is special-cased for opaques that do
not claim or explicitly implement `Inspect`. In such cases, they are
treated as structural types, and given the immediate specialization of
`Inpect.inspectOpaque`.
However, prior to this commit, that special-casing would only be applied
during early specialiation (i.e. specializations visible during
generalized type inference). This commit applies the special case to
late specialization as well - the specialization decision for an opaque
type is always the specialization of the opaque type in the late case,
but now, when we go to look up the ambient lambda set of the
specialization, if it does not exist and corresponds to
`Inspect.toInspector`, we fall back to the immediate.
One concern I have here is that in a case like
```
Op := {}
x =
dbg (@Op {})
```
the specialization of `Inspect.toInspector` for `Op` should be known
early. Indeed, the program
```
Op := {}
x =
Inspect.toInspector (@Op {}) |> Inspect.apply (Inspect.init {}) |> Inspect.toDbgStr
```
Compiles fine without this change. This makes me suspect there is an
issue with the implementation of `dbg`'s desugaring. If possible, this
should be addressed sooner rather than later.
Closes#6127
If a specialization of an ability member has a lambda set that is not
reflected in the unspecialized lambda sets of the member's prototype
signature, then the specialization lambda set is deemed to be immaterial
to the specialization lambda set mapping, and we don't need to associate
it with a particular region from the prototype signature.
This can happen when an opaque contains functions that are some specific
than the generalized prototype signature; for example, when we are
defining a custom impl for an opaque with functions.
Addresses a bug found in 8c3158c3e0
