996 commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Ayaz Hafiz	13d1232f7d	Erased functions do not take a func spec	2023-07-12 14:44:17 -05:00
Ayaz Hafiz	cd64134b0a	Allow direct packing, unpacking of erased types	2023-07-12 14:43:25 -05:00
Ayaz Hafiz	1d1db83cc7	Add needed file	2023-07-12 14:43:24 -05:00
Ayaz Hafiz	dc56a0ffef	First pass update erasure IR	2023-07-12 14:43:24 -05:00
Ayaz Hafiz	7ea85e44d2	Add Layout::Erased	2023-07-12 14:43:24 -05:00
Ayaz Hafiz	283b9d53d6	Add Expr::ErasedLoad	2023-07-12 14:42:46 -05:00
Ayaz Hafiz	2c838aa5c2	Add mono Expr::ErasedMake	2023-07-12 14:40:16 -05:00
Ayaz Hafiz	3e3d3cc7f3	Type fixes	2023-07-12 14:21:28 -05:00
Ayaz Hafiz	b2d3b52bd5	First compile of erased lambdas	2023-07-12 14:21:28 -05:00
Ayaz Hafiz	cf74f849e1	Unpack erased captures	2023-07-12 14:21:28 -05:00
Ayaz Hafiz	fbad6bcb90	First pass at specialized erased	2023-07-12 14:21:28 -05:00
Ayaz Hafiz	2cb2e37fd7	Specialize erased	2023-07-12 14:21:28 -05:00
Ayaz Hafiz	d17d8c72ad	Exercise building erased function	2023-07-12 14:21:28 -05:00
Ayaz Hafiz	a1eb641bb6	how to build an erased fn	2023-07-12 14:21:27 -05:00
Ayaz Hafiz	cf30f02e01	Expr::FunctionPointer	2023-07-12 14:21:27 -05:00
Ayaz Hafiz	55fa8098d3	add a todo impl	2023-07-12 14:17:58 -05:00
Ayaz Hafiz	63db2c0eea	Add erased layout	2023-07-12 14:17:57 -05:00
Ayaz Hafiz	510a421748	Call erased functions	2023-07-12 14:14:25 -05:00
Ayaz Hafiz	a6bb3ab03c	Get started on calling erased functions	2023-07-12 14:14:25 -05:00
Ayaz Hafiz	6312d75ee0	Add FunctionPointer layout	2023-07-12 13:59:50 -05:00
Ayaz Hafiz	a9e3f967a8	First pass at erased function layouts	2023-07-12 13:57:19 -05:00
Ayaz Hafiz	6e5a308557	Content variant ErasedLambda	2023-07-12 13:57:17 -05:00
Ayaz Hafiz	c459757062	Thread simple model of "ErasedLambdas" through proc layouts ... But none of these paths are yet exercised.	2023-07-12 13:53:52 -05:00
Folkert	a50f013fce	cleanup after review	2023-07-12 17:55:21 +02:00
Folkert	da9482b7fa	inline pattern match	2023-07-10 21:17:58 +02:00
Folkert	8c666edbec	use explicit stack to prevent stack overflow in drop specialization	2023-07-10 21:14:30 +02:00
Folkert	2d616d1fe9	manual clippy fixes	2023-07-10 18:27:10 +02:00
Folkert	ef39bad7c6	auto clippy fixes	2023-07-10 18:27:08 +02:00
Anton-4	72c85efc83	switch to rust 1.67	2023-07-10 18:25:52 +02:00
Folkert	bb97c384bb	preserve semantics in the glue generation	2023-07-09 15:47:28 +02:00
Folkert	6d2d65bb1e	remove Boxed layout	2023-07-09 15:47:28 +02:00
Folkert	d64930c17f	remove box and unbox expressions	2023-07-09 15:47:28 +02:00
Folkert	a9813aeae7	use a NonNullableUnwrapped union for Box	2023-07-09 15:47:27 +02:00
Ayaz	f2e013a4e0	Merge pull request #5628 from roc-lang/i5617 ... Do not drop uninhabited captures from lambda sets	2023-07-01 13:15:14 -05:00
Folkert	3b18494ddd	use Ptr instead of Boxed in the code-gen-help	2023-06-30 15:57:33 +02:00
Ayaz Hafiz	a5e1558a6e	Do not drop uninhabited captures from lambda sets ... Previously, we would drop uninhabited captures from lambda sets' runtime representations, which meant sets like ``` [L1 {a: Str}, L2 {a: []}] ``` had runtime representation ``` {Str} ``` rather than ``` Union({Str}, {[]}) ``` if we drop unreachable lambdas from the representation, then the reachable lambdas are somewhat more efficient to compile (as there are less material tag options), but the compiler complexity increases because we must represent voided capture sets in the lambda set. Even if a lambda has voided captures, we must specialize it, because failing to do so opens us up to losing relevant specializations needed later on. See 2f7020aa31 for a previous occurence of that. As such, simply keep voided layouts in place during lambda set compilation. The optimizer should elide them anyway.	2023-06-29 17:32:50 -05:00
Folkert	0308e02ba9	update some logic and comments	2023-06-29 18:40:27 +02:00
Folkert	b29e612a4d	refactor	2023-06-29 18:40:26 +02:00
Folkert	f27cb83a02	remove Reuse	2023-06-29 18:40:26 +02:00
Folkert	1daf975391	use Tag instead of Reuse constructor	2023-06-29 18:40:26 +02:00
Folkert	463f739c06	add reuse info to normal Tag ir constructor	2023-06-29 18:40:26 +02:00
Folkert	48e6ef79a4	we no longer care where a tag layout stores the tag id	2023-06-27 20:55:28 +02:00
Folkert	e95d093461	in dev/wasm backends, always clear tag id bits from a reset pointer	2023-06-27 20:50:43 +02:00
Folkert	fc3004da58	free or reuse unconditionally when value is unique	2023-06-27 17:37:45 +02:00
Folkert	ae47cc5171	in TRMC, still apply normal TCE	2023-06-24 19:45:44 +02:00
Folkert	9d10389c2b	make trmc candidate set cheaper to clone	2023-06-24 14:49:58 +02:00
Folkert	654cf7b861	changes after review	2023-06-24 14:49:57 +02:00
Folkert	e19f0ae6d6	don't capture from outside join point for the dev backend	2023-06-24 14:49:55 +02:00
Folkert	c87519c209	search for multiple TRMC opportunities	2023-06-24 14:49:55 +02:00
Folkert	bc64e4b92b	fix layout check issue	2023-06-24 14:49:53 +02:00