mirror of
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff.git
synced 2025-10-29 03:02:27 +00:00
[ty] Improve error messages for unresolved attribute diagnostics (#20963)
## Summary - Type checkers (and type-checker authors) think in terms of types, but I think most Python users think in terms of values. Rather than saying that a _type_ `X` "has no attribute `foo`" (which I think sounds strange to many users), say that "an object of type `X` has no attribute `foo`" - Special-case certain types so that the diagnostic messages read more like normal English: rather than saying "Type `<class 'Foo'>` has no attribute `bar`" or "Object of type `<class 'Foo'>` has no attribute `bar`", just say "Class `Foo` has no attribute `bar`" ## Test Plan Mdtests and snapshots updated
This commit is contained in:
parent
b6b96d75eb
commit
1f8297cfe6
19 changed files with 102 additions and 63 deletions
|
|
@ -26,9 +26,9 @@ def _(flag: bool):
|
|||
|
||||
reveal_type(A.union_declared) # revealed: int | str
|
||||
|
||||
# error: [possibly-missing-attribute] "Attribute `possibly_unbound` on type `<class 'A'>` may be missing"
|
||||
# error: [possibly-missing-attribute] "Attribute `possibly_unbound` may be missing on class `A`"
|
||||
reveal_type(A.possibly_unbound) # revealed: str
|
||||
|
||||
# error: [unresolved-attribute] "Type `<class 'A'>` has no attribute `non_existent`"
|
||||
# error: [unresolved-attribute] "Class `A` has no attribute `non_existent`"
|
||||
reveal_type(A.non_existent) # revealed: Unknown
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue