From 2d25aaeaa2bc741c8bdd9f5bfd2ce6757e8ad179 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: GiGaGon <107241144+MeGaGiGaGon@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 11:38:13 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [`flake8-pie`] Small docs fix to `PIE794` (#18829)

<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff/ty! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:

- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title? (Please prefix
with `[ty]` for ty pull
  requests.)
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->

## Summary

<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->

I noticed this since my code for finding missing safety fix sections
flagged it, there is a missing `/` causing part of the new changes to be
a normal comment instead of a doc comment

## Test Plan

<!-- How was it tested? -->

N/A, no functionality/tests affected
---
 .../rules/flake8_pie/rules/duplicate_class_field_definition.rs  | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/flake8_pie/rules/duplicate_class_field_definition.rs b/crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/flake8_pie/rules/duplicate_class_field_definition.rs
index 003cf23b13..b045e382d8 100644
--- a/crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/flake8_pie/rules/duplicate_class_field_definition.rs
+++ b/crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/flake8_pie/rules/duplicate_class_field_definition.rs
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ use crate::{AlwaysFixableViolation, Fix};
 ///
 /// ## Fix Safety
 /// This fix is always marked as unsafe since we cannot know
-//  for certain which assignment was intended.
+/// for certain which assignment was intended.
 #[derive(ViolationMetadata)]
 pub(crate) struct DuplicateClassFieldDefinition {
     name: String,