Don't special-case class instances in binary expression inference (#15161)

Just like in #15045 for unary expressions: In binary expressions, we
were only looking for dunder expressions for `Type::Instance` types. We
had some special cases for coercing the various `Literal` types into
their corresponding `Instance` types before doing the lookup. But we can
side-step all of that by using the existing `Type::to_meta_type` and
`Type::to_instance` methods.

crates/red_knot_python_semantic/resources/mdtest/binary/booleans.md

@@ -46,3 +46,50 @@ reveal_type(a | b)  # revealed: Literal[True]
 reveal_type(b | a)  # revealed: Literal[True]
 reveal_type(b | b)  # revealed: Literal[False]
 ```
+
+## Arithmetic with a variable
+
+```py
+a = True
+b = False
+
+def lhs_is_int(x: int):
+    reveal_type(x + a)  # revealed: int
+    reveal_type(x - a)  # revealed: int
+    reveal_type(x * a)  # revealed: int
+    reveal_type(x // a)  # revealed: int
+    reveal_type(x / a)  # revealed: float
+    reveal_type(x % a)  # revealed: int
+
+def rhs_is_int(x: int):
+    reveal_type(a + x)  # revealed: int
+    reveal_type(a - x)  # revealed: int
+    reveal_type(a * x)  # revealed: int
+    reveal_type(a // x)  # revealed: int
+    reveal_type(a / x)  # revealed: float
+    reveal_type(a % x)  # revealed: int
+
+def lhs_is_bool(x: bool):
+    reveal_type(x + a)  # revealed: int
+    reveal_type(x - a)  # revealed: int
+    reveal_type(x * a)  # revealed: int
+    reveal_type(x // a)  # revealed: int
+    reveal_type(x / a)  # revealed: float
+    reveal_type(x % a)  # revealed: int
+
+def rhs_is_bool(x: bool):
+    reveal_type(a + x)  # revealed: int
+    reveal_type(a - x)  # revealed: int
+    reveal_type(a * x)  # revealed: int
+    reveal_type(a // x)  # revealed: int
+    reveal_type(a / x)  # revealed: float
+    reveal_type(a % x)  # revealed: int
+
+def both_are_bool(x: bool, y: bool):
+    reveal_type(x + y)  # revealed: int
+    reveal_type(x - y)  # revealed: int
+    reveal_type(x * y)  # revealed: int
+    reveal_type(x // y)  # revealed: int
+    reveal_type(x / y)  # revealed: float
+    reveal_type(x % y)  # revealed: int
+```

crates/red_knot_python_semantic/resources/mdtest/binary/classes.md

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+# Binary operations on classes
+
+## Union of two classes
+
+Unioning two classes via the `|` operator is only available in Python 3.10 and later.
+
+```toml
+[environment]
+python-version = "3.10"
+```
+
+```py
+class A: ...
+class B: ...
+
+reveal_type(A | B)  # revealed: UnionType
+```
+
+## Union of two classes (prior to 3.10)
+
+```py
+class A: ...
+class B: ...
+
+# error: "Operator `|` is unsupported between objects of type `Literal[A]` and `Literal[B]`"
+reveal_type(A | B)  # revealed: Unknown
+```

crates/red_knot_python_semantic/resources/mdtest/binary/custom.md

@@ -0,0 +1,371 @@
+# Custom binary operations
+
+## Class instances
+
+```py
+class Yes:
+    def __add__(self, other) -> Literal["+"]:
+        return "+"
+
+    def __sub__(self, other) -> Literal["-"]:
+        return "-"
+
+    def __mul__(self, other) -> Literal["*"]:
+        return "*"
+
+    def __matmul__(self, other) -> Literal["@"]:
+        return "@"
+
+    def __truediv__(self, other) -> Literal["/"]:
+        return "/"
+
+    def __mod__(self, other) -> Literal["%"]:
+        return "%"
+
+    def __pow__(self, other) -> Literal["**"]:
+        return "**"
+
+    def __lshift__(self, other) -> Literal["<<"]:
+        return "<<"
+
+    def __rshift__(self, other) -> Literal[">>"]:
+        return ">>"
+
+    def __or__(self, other) -> Literal["|"]:
+        return "|"
+
+    def __xor__(self, other) -> Literal["^"]:
+        return "^"
+
+    def __and__(self, other) -> Literal["&"]:
+        return "&"
+
+    def __floordiv__(self, other) -> Literal["//"]:
+        return "//"
+
+class Sub(Yes): ...
+class No: ...
+
+# Yes implements all of the dunder methods.
+reveal_type(Yes() + Yes())  # revealed: Literal["+"]
+reveal_type(Yes() - Yes())  # revealed: Literal["-"]
+reveal_type(Yes() * Yes())  # revealed: Literal["*"]
+reveal_type(Yes() @ Yes())  # revealed: Literal["@"]
+reveal_type(Yes() / Yes())  # revealed: Literal["/"]
+reveal_type(Yes() % Yes())  # revealed: Literal["%"]
+reveal_type(Yes() ** Yes())  # revealed: Literal["**"]
+reveal_type(Yes() << Yes())  # revealed: Literal["<<"]
+reveal_type(Yes() >> Yes())  # revealed: Literal[">>"]
+reveal_type(Yes() | Yes())  # revealed: Literal["|"]
+reveal_type(Yes() ^ Yes())  # revealed: Literal["^"]
+reveal_type(Yes() & Yes())  # revealed: Literal["&"]
+reveal_type(Yes() // Yes())  # revealed: Literal["//"]
+
+# Sub inherits Yes's implementation of the dunder methods.
+reveal_type(Sub() + Sub())  # revealed: Literal["+"]
+reveal_type(Sub() - Sub())  # revealed: Literal["-"]
+reveal_type(Sub() * Sub())  # revealed: Literal["*"]
+reveal_type(Sub() @ Sub())  # revealed: Literal["@"]
+reveal_type(Sub() / Sub())  # revealed: Literal["/"]
+reveal_type(Sub() % Sub())  # revealed: Literal["%"]
+reveal_type(Sub() ** Sub())  # revealed: Literal["**"]
+reveal_type(Sub() << Sub())  # revealed: Literal["<<"]
+reveal_type(Sub() >> Sub())  # revealed: Literal[">>"]
+reveal_type(Sub() | Sub())  # revealed: Literal["|"]
+reveal_type(Sub() ^ Sub())  # revealed: Literal["^"]
+reveal_type(Sub() & Sub())  # revealed: Literal["&"]
+reveal_type(Sub() // Sub())  # revealed: Literal["//"]
+
+# No does not implement any of the dunder methods.
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `+` is unsupported between objects of type `No` and `No`"
+reveal_type(No() + No())  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `-` is unsupported between objects of type `No` and `No`"
+reveal_type(No() - No())  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `*` is unsupported between objects of type `No` and `No`"
+reveal_type(No() * No())  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `@` is unsupported between objects of type `No` and `No`"
+reveal_type(No() @ No())  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `/` is unsupported between objects of type `No` and `No`"
+reveal_type(No() / No())  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `%` is unsupported between objects of type `No` and `No`"
+reveal_type(No() % No())  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `**` is unsupported between objects of type `No` and `No`"
+reveal_type(No() ** No())  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `<<` is unsupported between objects of type `No` and `No`"
+reveal_type(No() << No())  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `>>` is unsupported between objects of type `No` and `No`"
+reveal_type(No() >> No())  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `|` is unsupported between objects of type `No` and `No`"
+reveal_type(No() | No())  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `^` is unsupported between objects of type `No` and `No`"
+reveal_type(No() ^ No())  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `&` is unsupported between objects of type `No` and `No`"
+reveal_type(No() & No())  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `//` is unsupported between objects of type `No` and `No`"
+reveal_type(No() // No())  # revealed: Unknown
+
+# Yes does not implement any of the reflected dunder methods.
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `+` is unsupported between objects of type `No` and `Yes`"
+reveal_type(No() + Yes())  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `-` is unsupported between objects of type `No` and `Yes`"
+reveal_type(No() - Yes())  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `*` is unsupported between objects of type `No` and `Yes`"
+reveal_type(No() * Yes())  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `@` is unsupported between objects of type `No` and `Yes`"
+reveal_type(No() @ Yes())  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `/` is unsupported between objects of type `No` and `Yes`"
+reveal_type(No() / Yes())  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `%` is unsupported between objects of type `No` and `Yes`"
+reveal_type(No() % Yes())  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `**` is unsupported between objects of type `No` and `Yes`"
+reveal_type(No() ** Yes())  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `<<` is unsupported between objects of type `No` and `Yes`"
+reveal_type(No() << Yes())  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `>>` is unsupported between objects of type `No` and `Yes`"
+reveal_type(No() >> Yes())  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `|` is unsupported between objects of type `No` and `Yes`"
+reveal_type(No() | Yes())  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `^` is unsupported between objects of type `No` and `Yes`"
+reveal_type(No() ^ Yes())  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `&` is unsupported between objects of type `No` and `Yes`"
+reveal_type(No() & Yes())  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `//` is unsupported between objects of type `No` and `Yes`"
+reveal_type(No() // Yes())  # revealed: Unknown
+```
+
+## Subclass reflections override superclass dunders
+
+```py
+class Yes:
+    def __add__(self, other) -> Literal["+"]:
+        return "+"
+
+    def __sub__(self, other) -> Literal["-"]:
+        return "-"
+
+    def __mul__(self, other) -> Literal["*"]:
+        return "*"
+
+    def __matmul__(self, other) -> Literal["@"]:
+        return "@"
+
+    def __truediv__(self, other) -> Literal["/"]:
+        return "/"
+
+    def __mod__(self, other) -> Literal["%"]:
+        return "%"
+
+    def __pow__(self, other) -> Literal["**"]:
+        return "**"
+
+    def __lshift__(self, other) -> Literal["<<"]:
+        return "<<"
+
+    def __rshift__(self, other) -> Literal[">>"]:
+        return ">>"
+
+    def __or__(self, other) -> Literal["|"]:
+        return "|"
+
+    def __xor__(self, other) -> Literal["^"]:
+        return "^"
+
+    def __and__(self, other) -> Literal["&"]:
+        return "&"
+
+    def __floordiv__(self, other) -> Literal["//"]:
+        return "//"
+
+class Sub(Yes):
+    def __radd__(self, other) -> Literal["r+"]:
+        return "r+"
+
+    def __rsub__(self, other) -> Literal["r-"]:
+        return "r-"
+
+    def __rmul__(self, other) -> Literal["r*"]:
+        return "r*"
+
+    def __rmatmul__(self, other) -> Literal["r@"]:
+        return "r@"
+
+    def __rtruediv__(self, other) -> Literal["r/"]:
+        return "r/"
+
+    def __rmod__(self, other) -> Literal["r%"]:
+        return "r%"
+
+    def __rpow__(self, other) -> Literal["r**"]:
+        return "r**"
+
+    def __rlshift__(self, other) -> Literal["r<<"]:
+        return "r<<"
+
+    def __rrshift__(self, other) -> Literal["r>>"]:
+        return "r>>"
+
+    def __ror__(self, other) -> Literal["r|"]:
+        return "r|"
+
+    def __rxor__(self, other) -> Literal["r^"]:
+        return "r^"
+
+    def __rand__(self, other) -> Literal["r&"]:
+        return "r&"
+
+    def __rfloordiv__(self, other) -> Literal["r//"]:
+        return "r//"
+
+class No:
+    def __radd__(self, other) -> Literal["r+"]:
+        return "r+"
+
+    def __rsub__(self, other) -> Literal["r-"]:
+        return "r-"
+
+    def __rmul__(self, other) -> Literal["r*"]:
+        return "r*"
+
+    def __rmatmul__(self, other) -> Literal["r@"]:
+        return "r@"
+
+    def __rtruediv__(self, other) -> Literal["r/"]:
+        return "r/"
+
+    def __rmod__(self, other) -> Literal["r%"]:
+        return "r%"
+
+    def __rpow__(self, other) -> Literal["r**"]:
+        return "r**"
+
+    def __rlshift__(self, other) -> Literal["r<<"]:
+        return "r<<"
+
+    def __rrshift__(self, other) -> Literal["r>>"]:
+        return "r>>"
+
+    def __ror__(self, other) -> Literal["r|"]:
+        return "r|"
+
+    def __rxor__(self, other) -> Literal["r^"]:
+        return "r^"
+
+    def __rand__(self, other) -> Literal["r&"]:
+        return "r&"
+
+    def __rfloordiv__(self, other) -> Literal["r//"]:
+        return "r//"
+
+# Subclass reflected dunder methods take precedence over the superclass's regular dunders.
+reveal_type(Yes() + Sub())  # revealed: Literal["r+"]
+reveal_type(Yes() - Sub())  # revealed: Literal["r-"]
+reveal_type(Yes() * Sub())  # revealed: Literal["r*"]
+reveal_type(Yes() @ Sub())  # revealed: Literal["r@"]
+reveal_type(Yes() / Sub())  # revealed: Literal["r/"]
+reveal_type(Yes() % Sub())  # revealed: Literal["r%"]
+reveal_type(Yes() ** Sub())  # revealed: Literal["r**"]
+reveal_type(Yes() << Sub())  # revealed: Literal["r<<"]
+reveal_type(Yes() >> Sub())  # revealed: Literal["r>>"]
+reveal_type(Yes() | Sub())  # revealed: Literal["r|"]
+reveal_type(Yes() ^ Sub())  # revealed: Literal["r^"]
+reveal_type(Yes() & Sub())  # revealed: Literal["r&"]
+reveal_type(Yes() // Sub())  # revealed: Literal["r//"]
+
+# But for an unrelated class, the superclass regular dunders are used.
+reveal_type(Yes() + No())  # revealed: Literal["+"]
+reveal_type(Yes() - No())  # revealed: Literal["-"]
+reveal_type(Yes() * No())  # revealed: Literal["*"]
+reveal_type(Yes() @ No())  # revealed: Literal["@"]
+reveal_type(Yes() / No())  # revealed: Literal["/"]
+reveal_type(Yes() % No())  # revealed: Literal["%"]
+reveal_type(Yes() ** No())  # revealed: Literal["**"]
+reveal_type(Yes() << No())  # revealed: Literal["<<"]
+reveal_type(Yes() >> No())  # revealed: Literal[">>"]
+reveal_type(Yes() | No())  # revealed: Literal["|"]
+reveal_type(Yes() ^ No())  # revealed: Literal["^"]
+reveal_type(Yes() & No())  # revealed: Literal["&"]
+reveal_type(Yes() // No())  # revealed: Literal["//"]
+```
+
+## Classes
+
+Dunder methods defined in a class are available to instances of that class, but not to the class
+itself. (For these operators to work on the class itself, they would have to be defined on the
+class's type, i.e. `type`.)
+
+```py
+class Yes:
+    def __add__(self, other) -> Literal["+"]:
+        return "+"
+
+class Sub(Yes): ...
+class No: ...
+
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `+` is unsupported between objects of type `Literal[Yes]` and `Literal[Yes]`"
+reveal_type(Yes + Yes)  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `+` is unsupported between objects of type `Literal[Sub]` and `Literal[Sub]`"
+reveal_type(Sub + Sub)  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `+` is unsupported between objects of type `Literal[No]` and `Literal[No]`"
+reveal_type(No + No)  # revealed: Unknown
+```
+
+## Subclass
+
+```py
+class Yes:
+    def __add__(self, other) -> Literal["+"]:
+        return "+"
+
+class Sub(Yes): ...
+class No: ...
+
+def yes() -> type[Yes]:
+    return Yes
+
+def sub() -> type[Sub]:
+    return Sub
+
+def no() -> type[No]:
+    return No
+
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `+` is unsupported between objects of type `type[Yes]` and `type[Yes]`"
+reveal_type(yes() + yes())  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `+` is unsupported between objects of type `type[Sub]` and `type[Sub]`"
+reveal_type(sub() + sub())  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `+` is unsupported between objects of type `type[No]` and `type[No]`"
+reveal_type(no() + no())  # revealed: Unknown
+```
+
+## Function literals
+
+```py
+def f():
+    pass
+
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `+` is unsupported between objects of type `Literal[f]` and `Literal[f]`"
+reveal_type(f + f)  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `-` is unsupported between objects of type `Literal[f]` and `Literal[f]`"
+reveal_type(f - f)  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `*` is unsupported between objects of type `Literal[f]` and `Literal[f]`"
+reveal_type(f * f)  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `@` is unsupported between objects of type `Literal[f]` and `Literal[f]`"
+reveal_type(f @ f)  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `/` is unsupported between objects of type `Literal[f]` and `Literal[f]`"
+reveal_type(f / f)  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `%` is unsupported between objects of type `Literal[f]` and `Literal[f]`"
+reveal_type(f % f)  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `**` is unsupported between objects of type `Literal[f]` and `Literal[f]`"
+reveal_type(f**f)  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `<<` is unsupported between objects of type `Literal[f]` and `Literal[f]`"
+reveal_type(f << f)  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `>>` is unsupported between objects of type `Literal[f]` and `Literal[f]`"
+reveal_type(f >> f)  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `|` is unsupported between objects of type `Literal[f]` and `Literal[f]`"
+reveal_type(f | f)  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `^` is unsupported between objects of type `Literal[f]` and `Literal[f]`"
+reveal_type(f ^ f)  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `&` is unsupported between objects of type `Literal[f]` and `Literal[f]`"
+reveal_type(f & f)  # revealed: Unknown
+# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `//` is unsupported between objects of type `Literal[f]` and `Literal[f]`"
+reveal_type(f // f)  # revealed: Unknown
+```

crates/red_knot_python_semantic/resources/mdtest/binary/integers.md

@@ -9,6 +9,34 @@ reveal_type(3 * -1)  # revealed: Literal[-3]
 reveal_type(-3 // 3)  # revealed: Literal[-1]
 reveal_type(-3 / 3)  # revealed: float
 reveal_type(5 % 3)  # revealed: Literal[2]
+
+# TODO: We don't currently verify that the actual parameter to int.__add__ matches the declared
+# formal parameter type.
+reveal_type(2 + "f")  # revealed: int
+
+def lhs(x: int):
+    reveal_type(x + 1)  # revealed: int
+    reveal_type(x - 4)  # revealed: int
+    reveal_type(x * -1)  # revealed: int
+    reveal_type(x // 3)  # revealed: int
+    reveal_type(x / 3)  # revealed: float
+    reveal_type(x % 3)  # revealed: int
+
+def rhs(x: int):
+    reveal_type(2 + x)  # revealed: int
+    reveal_type(3 - x)  # revealed: int
+    reveal_type(3 * x)  # revealed: int
+    reveal_type(-3 // x)  # revealed: int
+    reveal_type(-3 / x)  # revealed: float
+    reveal_type(5 % x)  # revealed: int
+
+def both(x: int):
+    reveal_type(x + x)  # revealed: int
+    reveal_type(x - x)  # revealed: int
+    reveal_type(x * x)  # revealed: int
+    reveal_type(x // x)  # revealed: int
+    reveal_type(x / x)  # revealed: float
+    reveal_type(x % x)  # revealed: int
 ```
 
 ## Power
@@ -21,6 +49,11 @@ largest_u32 = 4_294_967_295
 reveal_type(2**2)  # revealed: Literal[4]
 reveal_type(1 ** (largest_u32 + 1))  # revealed: int
 reveal_type(2**largest_u32)  # revealed: int
+
+def variable(x: int):
+    reveal_type(x**2)  # revealed: @Todo(return type)
+    reveal_type(2**x)  # revealed: @Todo(return type)
+    reveal_type(x**x)  # revealed: @Todo(return type)
 ```
 
 ## Division by Zero

crates/red_knot_python_semantic/resources/mdtest/slots.md

@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ class A:
     __slots__ = ()
     __slots__ += ("a", "b")
 
-reveal_type(A.__slots__)  # revealed: @Todo(Support for more binary expressions)
+reveal_type(A.__slots__)  # revealed: @Todo(return type)
 
 class B:
     __slots__ = ("c", "d")

crates/red_knot_python_semantic/resources/mdtest/unary/custom.md

@@ -34,6 +34,10 @@ reveal_type(~No())  # revealed: Unknown
 
 ## Classes
 
+Dunder methods defined in a class are available to instances of that class, but not to the class
+itself. (For these operators to work on the class itself, they would have to be defined on the
+class's type, i.e. `type`.)
+
 ```py
 class Yes:
     def __pos__(self) -> bool:

crates/red_knot_python_semantic/src/types/infer.rs

@@ -3398,6 +3398,8 @@ impl<'db> TypeInferenceBuilder<'db> {
             // When interacting with Todo, Any and Unknown should propagate (as if we fix this
             // `Todo` in the future, the result would then become Any or Unknown, respectively.)
             (Type::Any, _, _) | (_, Type::Any, _) => Some(Type::Any),
+            (todo @ Type::Todo(_), _, _) | (_, todo @ Type::Todo(_), _) => Some(todo),
+            (Type::Never, _, _) | (_, Type::Never, _) => Some(Type::Never),
             (Type::Unknown, _, _) | (_, Type::Unknown, _) => Some(Type::Unknown),
 
             (Type::IntLiteral(n), Type::IntLiteral(m), ast::Operator::Add) => Some(
@@ -3496,54 +3498,78 @@ impl<'db> TypeInferenceBuilder<'db> {
                 Some(ty)
             }
 
-            (Type::Instance(_), Type::IntLiteral(_), op) => self.infer_binary_expression_type(
-                left_ty,
-                KnownClass::Int.to_instance(self.db()),
+            (Type::BooleanLiteral(b1), Type::BooleanLiteral(b2), ast::Operator::BitOr) => {
+                Some(Type::BooleanLiteral(b1 | b2))
+            }
+
+            (Type::BooleanLiteral(bool_value), right, op) => self.infer_binary_expression_type(
+                Type::IntLiteral(i64::from(bool_value)),
+                right,
                 op,
             ),
+            (left, Type::BooleanLiteral(bool_value), op) => {
+                self.infer_binary_expression_type(left, Type::IntLiteral(i64::from(bool_value)), op)
+            }
 
-            (Type::IntLiteral(_), Type::Instance(_), op) => self.infer_binary_expression_type(
-                KnownClass::Int.to_instance(self.db()),
-                right_ty,
+            // We've handled all of the special cases that we support for literals, so we need to
+            // fall back on looking for dunder methods on one of the operand types.
+            (
+                Type::FunctionLiteral(_)
+                | Type::ModuleLiteral(_)
+                | Type::ClassLiteral(_)
+                | Type::SubclassOf(_)
+                | Type::Instance(_)
+                | Type::KnownInstance(_)
+                | Type::Union(_)
+                | Type::Intersection(_)
+                | Type::AlwaysTruthy
+                | Type::AlwaysFalsy
+                | Type::IntLiteral(_)
+                | Type::StringLiteral(_)
+                | Type::LiteralString
+                | Type::BytesLiteral(_)
+                | Type::SliceLiteral(_)
+                | Type::Tuple(_),
+                Type::FunctionLiteral(_)
+                | Type::ModuleLiteral(_)
+                | Type::ClassLiteral(_)
+                | Type::SubclassOf(_)
+                | Type::Instance(_)
+                | Type::KnownInstance(_)
+                | Type::Union(_)
+                | Type::Intersection(_)
+                | Type::AlwaysTruthy
+                | Type::AlwaysFalsy
+                | Type::IntLiteral(_)
+                | Type::StringLiteral(_)
+                | Type::LiteralString
+                | Type::BytesLiteral(_)
+                | Type::SliceLiteral(_)
+                | Type::Tuple(_),
                 op,
-            ),
+            ) => {
+                // We either want to call lhs.__op__ or rhs.__rop__. The full decision tree from
+                // the Python spec [1] is:
+                //
+                //   - If rhs is a (proper) subclass of lhs, and it provides a different
+                //     implementation of __rop__, use that.
+                //   - Otherwise, if lhs implements __op__, use that.
+                //   - Otherwise, if lhs and rhs are different types, and rhs implements __rop__,
+                //     use that.
+                //
+                // [1] https://docs.python.org/3/reference/datamodel.html#object.__radd__
 
-            (Type::Instance(_), Type::Tuple(_), op) => self.infer_binary_expression_type(
-                left_ty,
-                KnownClass::Tuple.to_instance(self.db()),
-                op,
-            ),
-
-            (Type::Tuple(_), Type::Instance(_), op) => self.infer_binary_expression_type(
-                KnownClass::Tuple.to_instance(self.db()),
-                right_ty,
-                op,
-            ),
-
-            (Type::Instance(_), Type::StringLiteral(_) | Type::LiteralString, op) => self
-                .infer_binary_expression_type(left_ty, KnownClass::Str.to_instance(self.db()), op),
-
-            (Type::StringLiteral(_) | Type::LiteralString, Type::Instance(_), op) => self
-                .infer_binary_expression_type(KnownClass::Str.to_instance(self.db()), right_ty, op),
-
-            (Type::Instance(_), Type::BytesLiteral(_), op) => self.infer_binary_expression_type(
-                left_ty,
-                KnownClass::Bytes.to_instance(self.db()),
-                op,
-            ),
-
-            (Type::BytesLiteral(_), Type::Instance(_), op) => self.infer_binary_expression_type(
-                KnownClass::Bytes.to_instance(self.db()),
-                right_ty,
-                op,
-            ),
-
-            (Type::Instance(left), Type::Instance(right), op) => {
-                if left != right && right.is_subtype_of(self.db(), left) {
+                // Technically we don't have to check left_ty != right_ty here, since if the types
+                // are the same, they will trivially have the same implementation of the reflected
+                // dunder, and so we'll fail the inner check. But the type equality check will be
+                // faster for the common case, and allow us to skip the (two) class member lookups.
+                let left_class = left_ty.to_meta_type(self.db());
+                let right_class = right_ty.to_meta_type(self.db());
+                if left_ty != right_ty && right_ty.is_subtype_of(self.db(), left_ty) {
                     let reflected_dunder = op.reflected_dunder();
-                    let rhs_reflected = right.class.class_member(self.db(), reflected_dunder);
+                    let rhs_reflected = right_class.member(self.db(), reflected_dunder);
                     if !rhs_reflected.is_unbound()
-                        && rhs_reflected != left.class.class_member(self.db(), reflected_dunder)
+                        && rhs_reflected != left_class.member(self.db(), reflected_dunder)
                     {
                         return right_ty
                             .call_dunder(self.db(), reflected_dunder, &[right_ty, left_ty])
@@ -3557,7 +3583,7 @@ impl<'db> TypeInferenceBuilder<'db> {
                 }
 
                 let call_on_left_instance = if let Symbol::Type(class_member, _) =
-                    left.class.class_member(self.db(), op.dunder())
+                    left_class.member(self.db(), op.dunder())
                 {
                     class_member
                         .call(self.db(), &[left_ty, right_ty])
@@ -3567,11 +3593,11 @@ impl<'db> TypeInferenceBuilder<'db> {
                 };
 
                 call_on_left_instance.or_else(|| {
-                    if left == right {
+                    if left_ty == right_ty {
                         None
                     } else {
                         if let Symbol::Type(class_member, _) =
-                            right.class.class_member(self.db(), op.reflected_dunder())
+                            right_class.member(self.db(), op.reflected_dunder())
                         {
                             class_member
                                 .call(self.db(), &[right_ty, left_ty])
@@ -3582,20 +3608,6 @@ impl<'db> TypeInferenceBuilder<'db> {
                     }
                 })
             }
-
-            (Type::BooleanLiteral(b1), Type::BooleanLiteral(b2), ast::Operator::BitOr) => {
-                Some(Type::BooleanLiteral(b1 | b2))
-            }
-
-            (Type::BooleanLiteral(bool_value), right, op) => self.infer_binary_expression_type(
-                Type::IntLiteral(i64::from(bool_value)),
-                right,
-                op,
-            ),
-            (left, Type::BooleanLiteral(bool_value), op) => {
-                self.infer_binary_expression_type(left, Type::IntLiteral(i64::from(bool_value)), op)
-            }
-            _ => Some(todo_type!("Support for more binary expressions")),
         }
     }
 

crates/red_knot_workspace/tests/check.rs

@@ -272,7 +272,8 @@ impl SourceOrderVisitor<'_> for PullTypesVisitor<'_> {
 #[rustfmt::skip]
 const KNOWN_FAILURES: &[(&str, bool, bool)] = &[
     // related to circular references in class definitions
-    ("crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pyflakes/F821_26.py", true, false),
+    ("crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pyflakes/F821_26.py", true, true),
+    ("crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pyflakes/F821_27.py", true, true),
     ("crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pyflakes/F811_19.py", true, false),
     ("crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pyupgrade/UP039.py", true, false),
     // related to circular references in type aliases (salsa cycle panic):