mirror of
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff.git
synced 2025-09-29 13:25:17 +00:00
[red-knot] Add control flow for try/except blocks (#13729)
This commit is contained in:
parent
d25673f664
commit
6282402a8c
4 changed files with 867 additions and 24 deletions
|
@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
|
|||
use std::sync::Arc;
|
||||
|
||||
use except_handlers::TryNodeContextStackManager;
|
||||
use rustc_hash::FxHashMap;
|
||||
|
||||
use ruff_db::files::File;
|
||||
|
@ -32,6 +33,8 @@ use super::definition::{
|
|||
MatchPatternDefinitionNodeRef, WithItemDefinitionNodeRef,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
mod except_handlers;
|
||||
|
||||
pub(super) struct SemanticIndexBuilder<'db> {
|
||||
// Builder state
|
||||
db: &'db dyn Db,
|
||||
|
@ -45,6 +48,8 @@ pub(super) struct SemanticIndexBuilder<'db> {
|
|||
current_match_case: Option<CurrentMatchCase<'db>>,
|
||||
/// Flow states at each `break` in the current loop.
|
||||
loop_break_states: Vec<FlowSnapshot>,
|
||||
/// Per-scope contexts regarding nested `try`/`except` statements
|
||||
try_node_context_stack_manager: TryNodeContextStackManager,
|
||||
|
||||
/// Flags about the file's global scope
|
||||
has_future_annotations: bool,
|
||||
|
@ -71,6 +76,7 @@ impl<'db> SemanticIndexBuilder<'db> {
|
|||
current_assignments: vec![],
|
||||
current_match_case: None,
|
||||
loop_break_states: vec![],
|
||||
try_node_context_stack_manager: TryNodeContextStackManager::default(),
|
||||
|
||||
has_future_annotations: false,
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -111,6 +117,7 @@ impl<'db> SemanticIndexBuilder<'db> {
|
|||
kind: node.scope_kind(),
|
||||
descendents: children_start..children_start,
|
||||
};
|
||||
self.try_node_context_stack_manager.enter_nested_scope();
|
||||
|
||||
let file_scope_id = self.scopes.push(scope);
|
||||
self.symbol_tables.push(SymbolTableBuilder::new());
|
||||
|
@ -140,6 +147,7 @@ impl<'db> SemanticIndexBuilder<'db> {
|
|||
let children_end = self.scopes.next_index();
|
||||
let scope = &mut self.scopes[id];
|
||||
scope.descendents = scope.descendents.start..children_end;
|
||||
self.try_node_context_stack_manager.exit_scope();
|
||||
id
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -228,6 +236,10 @@ impl<'db> SemanticIndexBuilder<'db> {
|
|||
DefinitionCategory::Binding => use_def.record_binding(symbol, definition),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let mut try_node_stack_manager = std::mem::take(&mut self.try_node_context_stack_manager);
|
||||
try_node_stack_manager.record_definition(self);
|
||||
self.try_node_context_stack_manager = try_node_stack_manager;
|
||||
|
||||
definition
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -781,40 +793,104 @@ where
|
|||
is_star,
|
||||
range: _,
|
||||
}) => {
|
||||
// Save the state prior to visiting any of the `try` block.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Potentially none of the `try` block could have been executed prior to executing
|
||||
// the `except` block(s) and/or the `finally` block.
|
||||
// We will merge this state with all of the intermediate
|
||||
// states during the `try` block before visiting those suites.
|
||||
let pre_try_block_state = self.flow_snapshot();
|
||||
|
||||
self.try_node_context_stack_manager.push_context();
|
||||
|
||||
// Visit the `try` block!
|
||||
self.visit_body(body);
|
||||
|
||||
for except_handler in handlers {
|
||||
let ast::ExceptHandler::ExceptHandler(except_handler) = except_handler;
|
||||
let ast::ExceptHandlerExceptHandler {
|
||||
name: symbol_name,
|
||||
type_: handled_exceptions,
|
||||
body: handler_body,
|
||||
range: _,
|
||||
} = except_handler;
|
||||
let mut post_except_states = vec![];
|
||||
|
||||
if let Some(handled_exceptions) = handled_exceptions {
|
||||
self.visit_expr(handled_exceptions);
|
||||
// Take a record also of all the intermediate states we encountered
|
||||
// while visiting the `try` block
|
||||
let try_block_snapshots = self.try_node_context_stack_manager.pop_context();
|
||||
|
||||
if !handlers.is_empty() {
|
||||
// Save the state immediately *after* visiting the `try` block
|
||||
// but *before* we prepare for visiting the `except` block(s).
|
||||
//
|
||||
// We will revert to this state prior to visiting the the `else` block,
|
||||
// as there necessarily must have been 0 `except` blocks executed
|
||||
// if we hit the `else` block.
|
||||
let post_try_block_state = self.flow_snapshot();
|
||||
|
||||
// Prepare for visiting the `except` block(s)
|
||||
self.flow_restore(pre_try_block_state);
|
||||
for state in try_block_snapshots {
|
||||
self.flow_merge(state);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If `handled_exceptions` above was `None`, it's something like `except as e:`,
|
||||
// which is invalid syntax. However, it's still pretty obvious here that the user
|
||||
// *wanted* `e` to be bound, so we should still create a definition here nonetheless.
|
||||
if let Some(symbol_name) = symbol_name {
|
||||
let symbol = self.add_symbol(symbol_name.id.clone());
|
||||
let pre_except_state = self.flow_snapshot();
|
||||
let num_handlers = handlers.len();
|
||||
|
||||
self.add_definition(
|
||||
symbol,
|
||||
DefinitionNodeRef::ExceptHandler(ExceptHandlerDefinitionNodeRef {
|
||||
handler: except_handler,
|
||||
is_star: *is_star,
|
||||
}),
|
||||
);
|
||||
for (i, except_handler) in handlers.iter().enumerate() {
|
||||
let ast::ExceptHandler::ExceptHandler(except_handler) = except_handler;
|
||||
let ast::ExceptHandlerExceptHandler {
|
||||
name: symbol_name,
|
||||
type_: handled_exceptions,
|
||||
body: handler_body,
|
||||
range: _,
|
||||
} = except_handler;
|
||||
|
||||
if let Some(handled_exceptions) = handled_exceptions {
|
||||
self.visit_expr(handled_exceptions);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If `handled_exceptions` above was `None`, it's something like `except as e:`,
|
||||
// which is invalid syntax. However, it's still pretty obvious here that the user
|
||||
// *wanted* `e` to be bound, so we should still create a definition here nonetheless.
|
||||
if let Some(symbol_name) = symbol_name {
|
||||
let symbol = self.add_symbol(symbol_name.id.clone());
|
||||
|
||||
self.add_definition(
|
||||
symbol,
|
||||
DefinitionNodeRef::ExceptHandler(ExceptHandlerDefinitionNodeRef {
|
||||
handler: except_handler,
|
||||
is_star: *is_star,
|
||||
}),
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
self.visit_body(handler_body);
|
||||
// Each `except` block is mutually exclusive with all other `except` blocks.
|
||||
post_except_states.push(self.flow_snapshot());
|
||||
|
||||
// It's unnecessary to do the `self.flow_restore()` call for the final except handler,
|
||||
// as we'll immediately call `self.flow_restore()` to a different state
|
||||
// as soon as this loop over the handlers terminates.
|
||||
if i < (num_handlers - 1) {
|
||||
self.flow_restore(pre_except_state.clone());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
self.visit_body(handler_body);
|
||||
// If we get to the `else` block, we know that 0 of the `except` blocks can have been executed,
|
||||
// and the entire `try` block must have been executed:
|
||||
self.flow_restore(post_try_block_state);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
self.visit_body(orelse);
|
||||
|
||||
for post_except_state in post_except_states {
|
||||
self.flow_merge(post_except_state);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: there's lots of complexity here that isn't yet handled by our model.
|
||||
// In order to accurately model the semantics of `finally` suites, we in fact need to visit
|
||||
// the suite twice: once under the (current) assumption that either the `try + else` suite
|
||||
// ran to completion or exactly one `except` branch ran to completion, and then again under
|
||||
// the assumption that potentially none of the branches ran to completion and we in fact
|
||||
// jumped from a `try`, `else` or `except` branch straight into the `finally` branch.
|
||||
// This requires rethinking some fundamental assumptions semantic indexing makes.
|
||||
// For more details, see:
|
||||
// - https://astral-sh.notion.site/Exception-handler-control-flow-11348797e1ca80bb8ce1e9aedbbe439d
|
||||
// - https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/13633#discussion_r1788626702
|
||||
self.visit_body(finalbody);
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue