Handle trailing end-of-line comments in-between-bodies (#4812)

<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing, please consider the following:

- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->

## Summary

And more custom logic around comments in bodies... uff. 

Let's say we have the following code

```python
if x == y:
    pass # trailing comment of pass
else: # trailing comment of `else`
    print("I have no comments")
```

Right now, the formatter attaches the `# trailing comment of `else` as a trailing comment of `pass` because it doesn't "see" that there's an `else` keyword in between (because the else body is just a Vec and not a node). 

This PR adds custom logic that attaches the trailing comments after the `else` as dangling comments to the `if` statement. The if statement must then split the dangling comments by `comments.text_position()`:
* All comments up to the first end-of-line comment are leading comments of the `else` keyword.
* All end-of-line comments coming after are `trailing` comments for the `else` keyword.


## Test Plan

I added new unit tests.

crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/comments/snapshots/ruff_python_formatter__comments__tests__while_trailing_else_end_of_line_comment.snap

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+---
+source: crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/comments/mod.rs
+expression: comments.debug(test_case.source_code)
+---
+{
+    Node {
+        kind: StmtWhile,
+        range: 0..54,
+        source: `while True:⏎`,
+    }: {
+        "leading": [],
+        "dangling": [
+            SourceComment {
+                text: "# trailing comment",
+                position: EndOfLine,
+                formatted: false,
+            },
+        ],
+        "trailing": [],
+    },
+}