[refurb] Implement readlines_in_for lint (FURB129) (#9880)

## Summary
Implement [implicit readlines
(FURB129)](https://github.com/dosisod/refurb/blob/master/refurb/checks/iterable/implicit_readlines.py)
lint.

## Notes
I need a help/an opinion about suggested implementations.

This implementation differs from the original one from `refurb` in the
following way. This implementation checks syntactically the call of the
method with the name `readlines()` inside `for` {loop|generator
expression}. The implementation from refurb also
[checks](https://github.com/dosisod/refurb/blob/master/refurb/checks/iterable/implicit_readlines.py#L43)
that callee is a variable with a type `io.TextIOWrapper` or
`io.BufferedReader`.

- I do not see a simple way to implement the same logic.
- The best I can have is something like
```rust
checker.semantic().binding(checker.semantic().resolve_name(attr_expr.value.as_name_expr()?)?).statement(checker.semantic())
```
and analyze cases. But this will be not about types, but about guessing
the type by assignment (or with) expression.
- Also this logic has several false negatives, when the callee is not a
variable, but the result of function call (e.g. `open(...)`).
- On the other side, maybe it is good to lint this on other things,
where this suggestion is not safe, and push the developers to change
their interfaces to be less surprising, comparing with the standard
library.
- Anyway while the current implementation has false-positives (I
mentioned some of them in the test) I marked the fixes to be unsafe.
This commit is contained in:
Aleksei Latyshev 2024-02-13 04:28:35 +01:00 committed by GitHub
parent 609d0a9a65
commit dd0ba16a79
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
10 changed files with 484 additions and 7 deletions

View file

@ -1025,6 +1025,7 @@ pub fn code_to_rule(linter: Linter, code: &str) -> Option<(RuleGroup, Rule)> {
#[allow(deprecated)]
(Refurb, "113") => (RuleGroup::Nursery, rules::refurb::rules::RepeatedAppend),
(Refurb, "118") => (RuleGroup::Preview, rules::refurb::rules::ReimplementedOperator),
(Refurb, "129") => (RuleGroup::Preview, rules::refurb::rules::ReadlinesInFor),
#[allow(deprecated)]
(Refurb, "131") => (RuleGroup::Nursery, rules::refurb::rules::DeleteFullSlice),
#[allow(deprecated)]