diff --git a/crates/ruff_python_ast/src/nodes.rs b/crates/ruff_python_ast/src/nodes.rs
index b0eb7f3e8a..f210c08b70 100644
--- a/crates/ruff_python_ast/src/nodes.rs
+++ b/crates/ruff_python_ast/src/nodes.rs
@@ -1273,6 +1273,15 @@ impl FStringValue {
         matches!(self.inner, FStringValueInner::Concatenated(_))
     }
 
+    /// Returns the single [`FString`] if the f-string isn't implicitly concatenated, [`None`]
+    /// otherwise.
+    pub fn as_single(&self) -> Option<&FString> {
+        match &self.inner {
+            FStringValueInner::Single(FStringPart::FString(fstring)) => Some(fstring),
+            _ => None,
+        }
+    }
+
     /// Returns a slice of all the [`FStringPart`]s contained in this value.
     pub fn as_slice(&self) -> &[FStringPart] {
         match &self.inner {
diff --git a/crates/ruff_python_formatter/resources/test/fixtures/ruff/expression/binary.py b/crates/ruff_python_formatter/resources/test/fixtures/ruff/expression/binary.py
index 83c6f0ff9f..818dca0bc7 100644
--- a/crates/ruff_python_formatter/resources/test/fixtures/ruff/expression/binary.py
+++ b/crates/ruff_python_formatter/resources/test/fixtures/ruff/expression/binary.py
@@ -418,3 +418,9 @@ if True:
                     "permissions to manage this role, or else members of this role won't receive "
                     "a notification."
                 )
+
+# This f-string should be flattened
+xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx = f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa {
+    expression } bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb" + (
+    yyyyyyyyyyyyyy + zzzzzzzzzzz
+)
diff --git a/crates/ruff_python_formatter/resources/test/fixtures/ruff/expression/fstring.py b/crates/ruff_python_formatter/resources/test/fixtures/ruff/expression/fstring.py
index e61467cfea..9da1aa403e 100644
--- a/crates/ruff_python_formatter/resources/test/fixtures/ruff/expression/fstring.py
+++ b/crates/ruff_python_formatter/resources/test/fixtures/ruff/expression/fstring.py
@@ -313,6 +313,321 @@ f"{  # comment 26
     # comment 28
 } woah {x}"
 
+# Assignment statement
+
+# Even though this f-string has multiline expression, thus allowing us to break it at the
+# curly braces, the f-string fits on a single line if it's moved inside the parentheses.
+# We should prefer doing that instead.
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"
+
+# Same as above
+xxxxxxx = f"{
+    {'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa', 'bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb', 'cccccccccccccccccccccccccc'}
+}"
+
+# Similar to the previous example, but the f-string will exceed the line length limit,
+# we shouldn't add any parentheses here.
+xxxxxxx = f"{
+    {'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa', 'bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb', 'cccccccccccccccccccccccccc'}
+}"
+
+# Same as above but with an inline comment. The f-string should be formatted inside the
+# parentheses and the comment should be part of the line inside the parentheses.
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"  # comment
+
+# Similar to the previous example but this time parenthesizing doesn't work because it
+# exceeds the line length. So, avoid parenthesizing this f-string.
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"  # comment loooooooong
+
+# Similar to the previous example but we start with the parenthesized layout. This should
+# remove the parentheses and format the f-string on a single line. This shows that the
+# final layout for the formatter is same for this and the previous case. The only
+# difference is that in the previous case the expression is already mulitline which means
+# the formatter can break it further at the curly braces.
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"  # comment loooooooong
+)
+
+# The following f-strings are going to break because of the trailing comma so we should
+# avoid using the best fit layout and instead use the default layout.
+# left-to-right
+aaaa = f"aaaa {[
+    1, 2,
+]} bbbb"
+# right-to-left
+aaaa, bbbb = f"aaaa {[
+    1, 2,
+]} bbbb"
+
+# Using the right-to-left assignment statement variant.
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, bbbbbbbbbbb = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"  # comment
+
+# Here, the f-string layout is flat but it exceeds the line length limit. This shouldn't
+# try the custom best fit layout because the f-string doesn't have any split points.
+aaaaaaaaaaaa["bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb"] = (
+    f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa {aaaaaaaaa + bbbbbbbbbbb + cccccccccccccc} ddddddddddddddddddd"
+)
+# Same as above but without the parentheses to test that it gets formatted to the same
+# layout as the previous example.
+aaaaaaaaaaaa["bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb"] = f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa {aaaaaaaaa + bbbbbbbbbbb + cccccccccccccc} ddddddddddddddddddd"
+
+# But, the following f-string does have a split point because of the multiline expression.
+aaaaaaaaaaaa["bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb"] = (
+    f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa {
+        aaaaaaaaa + bbbbbbbbbbb + cccccccccccccc} ddddddddddddddddddd"
+)
+aaaaaaaaaaaa["bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb"] = (
+    f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa {
+        aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa + bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb + cccccccccccccccccccccc + dddddddddddddddddddddddddddd} ddddddddddddddddddd"
+)
+
+# This is an implicitly concatenated f-string but it cannot be joined because otherwise
+# it'll exceed the line length limit. So, the two f-strings will be inside parentheses
+# instead and the inline comment should be outside the parentheses.
+a = f"test{
+    expression
+}flat" f"can be {
+    joined
+} togethereeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee" # inline
+
+# Similar to the above example but this fits within the line length limit.
+a = f"test{
+    expression
+}flat" f"can be {
+    joined
+} togethereeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee" # inline
+
+# The following test cases are adopted from implicit string concatenation but for a
+# single f-string instead.
+
+# Don't inline f-strings that contain expressions that are guaranteed to split, e.g. because of a magic trailing comma
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+[a,]
+}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee" # comment
+
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+[a,]
+}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee" # comment
+)
+
+aaaaa[aaaaaaaaaaa] = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+[a,]
+}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee" # comment
+
+aaaaa[aaaaaaaaaaa] = (f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+[a,]
+}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee" # comment
+)
+
+# Don't inline f-strings that contain commented expressions
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{[
+        a  # comment
+    ]}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+)
+
+aaaaa[aaaaaaaaaaa] = (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{[
+        a  # comment
+    ]}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+)
+
+# Don't inline f-strings with multiline debug expressions or format specifiers
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    a=}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+)
+
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{a +
+    b=}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+)
+
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{a
+    =}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+)
+
+aaaaa[aaaaaaaaaaa] = (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    a=}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+)
+
+aaaaa[aaaaaaaaaaa] = (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{a
+    =}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+)
+
+# This is not a multiline f-string even though it has a newline after the format specifier.
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    a:.3f
+    }moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    a:.3f
+    }moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+)
+
+# The newline is only considered when it's a tripled-quoted f-string.
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"""testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    a:.3f
+    }moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"""  # comment
+
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = (
+    f"""testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    a:.3f
+    }moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"""  # comment
+)
+
+# Remove the parentheses here
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{[a, b,
+    # comment
+    ]}moee" # comment
+)
+# ... but not here because of the ownline comment
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{[a, b,
+    ]}moee"
+    # comment
+)
+
+# F-strings in other positions
+
+if f"aaaaaaaaaaa {ttttteeeeeeeeest} more {
+    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+}": pass
+
+if (
+    f"aaaaaaaaaaa {ttttteeeeeeeeest} more {
+        aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+    }"
+): pass
+
+if f"aaaaaaaaaaa {ttttteeeeeeeeest} more {
+    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+}": pass
+
+if f"aaaaaaaaaaa {ttttteeeeeeeeest} more {  # comment
+    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+}": pass
+
+if f"aaaaaaaaaaa {[ttttteeeeeeeeest,]} more {
+    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+}":
+    pass
+
+if (
+    f"aaaaaaaaaaa {[ttttteeeeeeeeest,]} more {
+        aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+    }"
+):
+    pass
+
+if f"aaaaaaaaaaa {[ttttteeeeeeeeest,]} more {
+    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+}":
+    pass
+
+# For loops
+for a in f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+        expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee":
+    pass
+
+for a in f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee":
+    pass
+
+for a in f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+        expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee":
+    pass
+
+for a in (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"
+):
+    pass
+
+# With statements
+with f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+        expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee":
+    pass
+
+with f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee":
+    pass
+
+with f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+        expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee":
+    pass
+
+with (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"
+):
+    pass
+
+# Assert statements
+assert f"aaaaaaaaa{
+        expression}bbbbbbbbbbbb", f"cccccccccc{
+                expression}dddddddddd"
+
+assert f"aaaaaaaaa{expression}bbbbbbbbbbbb", f"cccccccccccccccc{
+        expression}dddddddddddddddd"
+
+assert f"aaaaaaaaa{expression}bbbbbbbbbbbb", f"cccccccccccccccc{expression}dddddddddddddddd"
+
+assert f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa{
+        expression}bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb", f"ccccccc{expression}dddddddddd"
+
+assert f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa{expression}bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb", f"ccccccc{expression}dddddddddd"
+
+assert f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa{
+        expression}bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb", f"ccccccccccccccccccccc {
+                expression} dddddddddddddddddddddddddd"
+
+assert f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa{expression}bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb", f"cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc {expression} ddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd"
+
+# F-strings as a single argument to a call expression to test whether it's huggable or not.
+call(f"{
+    testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
+}")
+
+call(f"{
+    testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
+}")
+
+call(f"{  # comment
+    testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
+}")
+
+call(f"""aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa bbbbbbbbbb {testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee}""")
+
+call(f"""aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa bbbbbbbbbb {testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
+                }""")
+
+call(f"""aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+     bbbbbbbbbb {testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
+                }""")
+
+call(f"""aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+     bbbbbbbbbb {testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee  # comment
+                }""")
+
+call(
+    f"""aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+     bbbbbbbbbb {testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee  # comment
+                }"""
+)
+
+call(f"{
+    aaaaaa
+    + '''test
+    more'''
+}")
+
 # Indentation
 
 # What should be the indentation?
diff --git a/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/expression/expr_bin_op.rs b/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/expression/expr_bin_op.rs
index 15b2b32814..dcd4721860 100644
--- a/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/expression/expr_bin_op.rs
+++ b/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/expression/expr_bin_op.rs
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ impl NeedsParentheses for ExprBinOp {
         } else if let Ok(string) = StringLike::try_from(&*self.left) {
             // Multiline strings are guaranteed to never fit, avoid adding unnecessary parentheses
             if !string.is_implicit_concatenated()
-                && string.is_multiline(context.source())
+                && string.is_multiline(context)
                 && has_parentheses(&self.right, context).is_some()
                 && !context.comments().has_dangling(self)
                 && !context.comments().has(string)
diff --git a/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/expression/expr_bytes_literal.rs b/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/expression/expr_bytes_literal.rs
index 92d2af2d1f..15c0a6e4bf 100644
--- a/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/expression/expr_bytes_literal.rs
+++ b/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/expression/expr_bytes_literal.rs
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ impl NeedsParentheses for ExprBytesLiteral {
     ) -> OptionalParentheses {
         if self.value.is_implicit_concatenated() {
             OptionalParentheses::Multiline
-        } else if StringLike::Bytes(self).is_multiline(context.source()) {
+        } else if StringLike::Bytes(self).is_multiline(context) {
             OptionalParentheses::Never
         } else {
             OptionalParentheses::BestFit
diff --git a/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/expression/expr_compare.rs b/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/expression/expr_compare.rs
index 13f072cde5..0b10ccaa31 100644
--- a/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/expression/expr_compare.rs
+++ b/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/expression/expr_compare.rs
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ impl NeedsParentheses for ExprCompare {
         } else if let Ok(string) = StringLike::try_from(&*self.left) {
             // Multiline strings are guaranteed to never fit, avoid adding unnecessary parentheses
             if !string.is_implicit_concatenated()
-                && string.is_multiline(context.source())
+                && string.is_multiline(context)
                 && !context.comments().has(string)
                 && self.comparators.first().is_some_and(|right| {
                     has_parentheses(right, context).is_some() && !context.comments().has(right)
diff --git a/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/expression/expr_f_string.rs b/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/expression/expr_f_string.rs
index dd67fd1bea..a003a31577 100644
--- a/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/expression/expr_f_string.rs
+++ b/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/expression/expr_f_string.rs
@@ -4,10 +4,12 @@ use ruff_text_size::TextSlice;
 use crate::expression::parentheses::{
     in_parentheses_only_group, NeedsParentheses, OptionalParentheses,
 };
-use crate::other::f_string::FormatFString;
+use crate::other::f_string::{FStringLayout, FormatFString};
 use crate::prelude::*;
-use crate::string::implicit::FormatImplicitConcatenatedStringFlat;
-use crate::string::{implicit::FormatImplicitConcatenatedString, Quoting, StringLikeExtensions};
+use crate::string::implicit::{
+    FormatImplicitConcatenatedString, FormatImplicitConcatenatedStringFlat,
+};
+use crate::string::{Quoting, StringLikeExtensions};
 
 #[derive(Default)]
 pub struct FormatExprFString;
@@ -45,26 +47,11 @@ impl NeedsParentheses for ExprFString {
     ) -> OptionalParentheses {
         if self.value.is_implicit_concatenated() {
             OptionalParentheses::Multiline
-        }
-        // TODO(dhruvmanila): Ideally what we want here is a new variant which
-        // is something like:
-        // - If the expression fits by just adding the parentheses, then add them and
-        //   avoid breaking the f-string expression. So,
-        //   ```
-        //   xxxxxxxxx = (
-        //       f"aaaaaaaaaaaa { xxxxxxx + yyyyyyyy } bbbbbbbbbbbbb"
-        //   )
-        //   ```
-        // - But, if the expression is too long to fit even with parentheses, then
-        //   don't add the parentheses and instead break the expression at `soft_line_break`.
-        //   ```
-        //   xxxxxxxxx = f"aaaaaaaaaaaa {
-        //       xxxxxxxxx + yyyyyyyyyy
-        //   } bbbbbbbbbbbbb"
-        //   ```
-        // This isn't decided yet, refer to the relevant discussion:
-        // https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/discussions/9785
-        else if StringLike::FString(self).is_multiline(context.source()) {
+        } else if StringLike::FString(self).is_multiline(context)
+            || self.value.as_single().is_some_and(|f_string| {
+                FStringLayout::from_f_string(f_string, context.source()).is_multiline()
+            })
+        {
             OptionalParentheses::Never
         } else {
             OptionalParentheses::BestFit
diff --git a/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/expression/expr_string_literal.rs b/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/expression/expr_string_literal.rs
index 9813958de5..429e55bad0 100644
--- a/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/expression/expr_string_literal.rs
+++ b/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/expression/expr_string_literal.rs
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ impl NeedsParentheses for ExprStringLiteral {
     ) -> OptionalParentheses {
         if self.value.is_implicit_concatenated() {
             OptionalParentheses::Multiline
-        } else if StringLike::String(self).is_multiline(context.source()) {
+        } else if StringLike::String(self).is_multiline(context) {
             OptionalParentheses::Never
         } else {
             OptionalParentheses::BestFit
diff --git a/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/other/arguments.rs b/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/other/arguments.rs
index 6e50f1cf01..8dc079fce9 100644
--- a/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/other/arguments.rs
+++ b/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/other/arguments.rs
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 use ruff_formatter::{write, FormatContext};
-use ruff_python_ast::{ArgOrKeyword, Arguments, Expr, StringLike};
+use ruff_python_ast::{ArgOrKeyword, Arguments, Expr, StringFlags, StringLike};
 use ruff_python_trivia::{PythonWhitespace, SimpleTokenKind, SimpleTokenizer};
 use ruff_text_size::{Ranged, TextLen, TextRange, TextSize};
 
@@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ fn is_single_argument_parenthesized(argument: &Expr, call_end: TextSize, source:
 
     false
 }
+
 /// Returns `true` if the arguments can hug directly to the enclosing parentheses in the call, as
 /// in Black's `hug_parens_with_braces_and_square_brackets` preview style behavior.
 ///
@@ -223,7 +224,13 @@ fn is_huggable_string_argument(
     arguments: &Arguments,
     context: &PyFormatContext,
 ) -> bool {
-    if string.is_implicit_concatenated() || !string.is_multiline(context.source()) {
+    if string.is_implicit_concatenated()
+        || !string.is_multiline(context)
+        || !string
+            .parts()
+            .next()
+            .is_some_and(|part| part.flags().is_triple_quoted())
+    {
         return false;
     }
 
diff --git a/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/other/f_string.rs b/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/other/f_string.rs
index 409697dfad..067c4378d1 100644
--- a/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/other/f_string.rs
+++ b/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/other/f_string.rs
@@ -140,6 +140,10 @@ impl FStringLayout {
         }
     }
 
+    pub(crate) const fn is_flat(self) -> bool {
+        matches!(self, FStringLayout::Flat)
+    }
+
     pub(crate) const fn is_multiline(self) -> bool {
         matches!(self, FStringLayout::Multiline)
     }
diff --git a/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/statement/stmt_assign.rs b/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/statement/stmt_assign.rs
index 7ad90cd025..51e355d6cd 100644
--- a/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/statement/stmt_assign.rs
+++ b/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/statement/stmt_assign.rs
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 use ruff_formatter::{format_args, write, FormatError, RemoveSoftLinesBuffer};
 use ruff_python_ast::{
-    AnyNodeRef, Expr, ExprAttribute, ExprCall, Operator, StmtAssign, StringLike, TypeParams,
+    AnyNodeRef, Expr, ExprAttribute, ExprCall, FStringPart, Operator, StmtAssign, StringLike,
+    TypeParams,
 };
 
 use crate::builders::parenthesize_if_expands;
@@ -8,6 +9,7 @@ use crate::comments::{
     trailing_comments, Comments, LeadingDanglingTrailingComments, SourceComment,
 };
 use crate::context::{NodeLevel, WithNodeLevel};
+use crate::expression::expr_f_string::f_string_quoting;
 use crate::expression::parentheses::{
     is_expression_parenthesized, optional_parentheses, NeedsParentheses, OptionalParentheses,
     Parentheses, Parenthesize,
@@ -16,12 +18,16 @@ use crate::expression::{
     can_omit_optional_parentheses, has_own_parentheses, has_parentheses,
     maybe_parenthesize_expression,
 };
-use crate::preview::is_join_implicit_concatenated_string_enabled;
+use crate::other::f_string::{FStringLayout, FormatFString};
+use crate::preview::{
+    is_f_string_formatting_enabled, is_join_implicit_concatenated_string_enabled,
+};
 use crate::statement::trailing_semicolon;
 use crate::string::implicit::{
     FormatImplicitConcatenatedStringExpanded, FormatImplicitConcatenatedStringFlat,
     ImplicitConcatenatedLayout,
 };
+use crate::string::StringLikeExtensions;
 use crate::{has_skip_comment, prelude::*};
 
 #[derive(Default)]
@@ -183,6 +189,7 @@ impl Format<PyFormatContext<'_>> for FormatTargetWithEqualOperator<'_> {
 ///
 /// This logic isn't implemented in [`place_comment`] by associating trailing statement comments to the expression because
 /// doing so breaks the suite empty lines formatting that relies on trailing comments to be stored on the statement.
+#[derive(Debug)]
 pub(super) enum FormatStatementsLastExpression<'a> {
     /// Prefers to split what's left of `value` before splitting the value.
     ///
@@ -286,11 +293,18 @@ impl Format<PyFormatContext<'_>> for FormatStatementsLastExpression<'_> {
         match self {
             FormatStatementsLastExpression::LeftToRight { value, statement } => {
                 let can_inline_comment = should_inline_comments(value, *statement, f.context());
-                let format_implicit_flat = StringLike::try_from(*value).ok().and_then(|string| {
+
+                let string_like = StringLike::try_from(*value).ok();
+                let format_f_string =
+                    string_like.and_then(|string| format_f_string_assignment(string, f.context()));
+                let format_implicit_flat = string_like.and_then(|string| {
                     FormatImplicitConcatenatedStringFlat::new(string, f.context())
                 });
 
-                if !can_inline_comment && format_implicit_flat.is_none() {
+                if !can_inline_comment
+                    && format_implicit_flat.is_none()
+                    && format_f_string.is_none()
+                {
                     return maybe_parenthesize_expression(
                         value,
                         *statement,
@@ -436,6 +450,79 @@ impl Format<PyFormatContext<'_>> for FormatStatementsLastExpression<'_> {
                         best_fitting![single_line, joined_parenthesized, implicit_expanded]
                             .with_mode(BestFittingMode::AllLines)
                             .fmt(f)?;
+                    } else if let Some(format_f_string) = format_f_string {
+                        inline_comments.mark_formatted();
+
+                        let f_string_flat = format_with(|f| {
+                            let mut buffer = RemoveSoftLinesBuffer::new(&mut *f);
+
+                            write!(buffer, [format_f_string])
+                        })
+                        .memoized();
+
+                        // F-String containing an expression with a magic trailing comma, a comment, or a
+                        // multiline debug expression should never be joined. Use the default layout.
+                        // ```python
+                        // aaaa = f"aaaa {[
+                        //     1, 2,
+                        // ]} bbbb"
+                        // ```
+                        if f_string_flat.inspect(f)?.will_break() {
+                            inline_comments.mark_unformatted();
+
+                            return write!(
+                                f,
+                                [maybe_parenthesize_expression(
+                                    value,
+                                    *statement,
+                                    Parenthesize::IfBreaks,
+                                )]
+                            );
+                        }
+
+                        // Considering the following example:
+                        // ```python
+                        // aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+                        //     expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"
+                        // ```
+
+                        // Flatten the f-string.
+                        // ```python
+                        // aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"
+                        // ```
+                        let single_line =
+                            format_with(|f| write!(f, [f_string_flat, inline_comments]));
+
+                        // Parenthesize the f-string and flatten the f-string.
+                        // ```python
+                        // aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = (
+                        //     f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"
+                        // )
+                        // ```
+                        let joined_parenthesized = format_with(|f| {
+                            group(&format_args![
+                                token("("),
+                                soft_block_indent(&format_args![f_string_flat, inline_comments]),
+                                token(")"),
+                            ])
+                            .with_group_id(Some(group_id))
+                            .should_expand(true)
+                            .fmt(f)
+                        });
+
+                        // Avoid flattening or parenthesizing the f-string, keep the original
+                        // f-string formatting.
+                        // ```python
+                        // aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+                        //     expression
+                        // }moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"
+                        // ```
+                        let format_f_string =
+                            format_with(|f| write!(f, [format_f_string, inline_comments]));
+
+                        best_fitting![single_line, joined_parenthesized, format_f_string]
+                            .with_mode(BestFittingMode::AllLines)
+                            .fmt(f)?;
                     } else {
                         best_fit_parenthesize(&format_once(|f| {
                             inline_comments.mark_formatted();
@@ -474,7 +561,11 @@ impl Format<PyFormatContext<'_>> for FormatStatementsLastExpression<'_> {
                 statement,
             } => {
                 let should_inline_comments = should_inline_comments(value, *statement, f.context());
-                let format_implicit_flat = StringLike::try_from(*value).ok().and_then(|string| {
+
+                let string_like = StringLike::try_from(*value).ok();
+                let format_f_string =
+                    string_like.and_then(|string| format_f_string_assignment(string, f.context()));
+                let format_implicit_flat = string_like.and_then(|string| {
                     FormatImplicitConcatenatedStringFlat::new(string, f.context())
                 });
 
@@ -482,6 +573,7 @@ impl Format<PyFormatContext<'_>> for FormatStatementsLastExpression<'_> {
                 if !should_inline_comments
                     && !should_non_inlineable_use_best_fit(value, *statement, f.context())
                     && format_implicit_flat.is_none()
+                    && format_f_string.is_none()
                 {
                     return write!(
                         f,
@@ -503,7 +595,10 @@ impl Format<PyFormatContext<'_>> for FormatStatementsLastExpression<'_> {
                 let expression_comments = comments.leading_dangling_trailing(*value);
 
                 // Don't inline comments for attribute and call expressions for black compatibility
-                let inline_comments = if should_inline_comments || format_implicit_flat.is_some() {
+                let inline_comments = if should_inline_comments
+                    || format_implicit_flat.is_some()
+                    || format_f_string.is_some()
+                {
                     OptionalParenthesesInlinedComments::new(
                         &expression_comments,
                         *statement,
@@ -542,7 +637,8 @@ impl Format<PyFormatContext<'_>> for FormatStatementsLastExpression<'_> {
                 // This is mainly a performance optimisation that avoids unnecessary memoization
                 // and using the costly `BestFitting` layout if it is already known that only the last variant
                 // can ever fit because the left breaks.
-                if format_implicit_flat.is_none() && last_target_breaks {
+                if format_implicit_flat.is_none() && format_f_string.is_none() && last_target_breaks
+                {
                     return write!(
                         f,
                         [
@@ -568,6 +664,11 @@ impl Format<PyFormatContext<'_>> for FormatStatementsLastExpression<'_> {
                         } else {
                             format_implicit_flat.fmt(f)
                         }
+                    } else if let Some(format_f_string) = format_f_string.as_ref() {
+                        // Similar to above, remove any soft line breaks emitted by the f-string
+                        // formatting.
+                        let mut buffer = RemoveSoftLinesBuffer::new(&mut *f);
+                        write!(buffer, [format_f_string])
                     } else {
                         value.format().with_options(Parentheses::Never).fmt(f)
                     }
@@ -805,6 +906,132 @@ impl Format<PyFormatContext<'_>> for FormatStatementsLastExpression<'_> {
                         .with_mode(BestFittingMode::AllLines)
                         .fmt(f)
                     }
+                } else if let Some(format_f_string) = &format_f_string {
+                    // F-String containing an expression with a magic trailing comma, a comment, or a
+                    // multiline debug expression should never be joined. Use the default layout.
+                    //
+                    // ```python
+                    // aaaa, bbbb = f"aaaa {[
+                    //     1, 2,
+                    // ]} bbbb"
+                    // ```
+                    if format_value.inspect(f)?.will_break() {
+                        inline_comments.mark_unformatted();
+
+                        return write!(
+                            f,
+                            [
+                                before_operator,
+                                space(),
+                                operator,
+                                space(),
+                                maybe_parenthesize_expression(
+                                    value,
+                                    *statement,
+                                    Parenthesize::IfBreaks
+                                )
+                            ]
+                        );
+                    }
+
+                    let format_f_string =
+                        format_with(|f| write!(f, [format_f_string, inline_comments])).memoized();
+
+                    // Considering the following initial source:
+                    //
+                    // ```python
+                    // aaaaaaaaaaaa["bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb"] = (
+                    //     f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa {
+                    //         aaaaaaaaa + bbbbbbbbbbb + cccccccccccccc} ddddddddddddddddddd"
+                    // )
+                    // ```
+                    //
+                    // Keep the target flat, and use the regular f-string formatting.
+                    //
+                    // ```python
+                    // aaaaaaaaaaaa["bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb"] = f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa {
+                    //     aaaaaaaaa + bbbbbbbbbbb + cccccccccccccc
+                    // } ddddddddddddddddddd"
+                    // ```
+                    let flat_target_regular_f_string = format_with(|f| {
+                        write!(
+                            f,
+                            [last_target, space(), operator, space(), format_f_string]
+                        )
+                    });
+
+                    // Expand the parent and parenthesize the flattened f-string.
+                    //
+                    // ```python
+                    // aaaaaaaaaaaa[
+                    //     "bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb"
+                    // ] = (
+                    //     f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa {aaaaaaaaa + bbbbbbbbbbb + cccccccccccccc} ddddddddddddddddddd"
+                    // )
+                    // ```
+                    let split_target_value_parenthesized_flat = format_with(|f| {
+                        write!(
+                            f,
+                            [
+                                group(&last_target).should_expand(true),
+                                space(),
+                                operator,
+                                space(),
+                                token("("),
+                                group(&soft_block_indent(&format_args![
+                                    format_value,
+                                    inline_comments
+                                ]))
+                                .should_expand(true),
+                                token(")")
+                            ]
+                        )
+                    });
+
+                    // Expand the parent, and use the regular f-string formatting.
+                    //
+                    // ```python
+                    // aaaaaaaaaaaa[
+                    //     "bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb"
+                    // ] = f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa {
+                    //     aaaaaaaaa + bbbbbbbbbbb + cccccccccccccc
+                    // } ddddddddddddddddddd"
+                    // ```
+                    let split_target_regular_f_string = format_with(|f| {
+                        write!(
+                            f,
+                            [
+                                group(&last_target).should_expand(true),
+                                space(),
+                                operator,
+                                space(),
+                                format_f_string,
+                            ]
+                        )
+                    });
+
+                    // This is only a perf optimisation. No point in trying all the "flat-target"
+                    // variants if we know that the last target must break.
+                    if last_target_breaks {
+                        best_fitting![
+                            split_target_flat_value,
+                            split_target_value_parenthesized_flat,
+                            split_target_regular_f_string,
+                        ]
+                        .with_mode(BestFittingMode::AllLines)
+                        .fmt(f)
+                    } else {
+                        best_fitting![
+                            single_line,
+                            flat_target_parenthesize_value,
+                            flat_target_regular_f_string,
+                            split_target_flat_value,
+                            split_target_value_parenthesized_flat,
+                            split_target_regular_f_string,
+                        ]
+                        .with_mode(BestFittingMode::AllLines)
+                        .fmt(f)
+                    }
                 } else {
                     best_fitting![
                         single_line,
@@ -818,6 +1045,95 @@ impl Format<PyFormatContext<'_>> for FormatStatementsLastExpression<'_> {
     }
 }
 
+/// Formats an f-string that is at the value position of an assignment statement.
+///
+/// This is just a wrapper around [`FormatFString`] while considering a special case when the
+/// f-string is at an assignment statement's value position.
+///
+/// This is necessary to prevent an instability where an f-string contains a multiline expression
+/// and the f-string fits on the line, but only when it's surrounded by parentheses.
+///
+/// ```python
+/// aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+///     expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"
+/// ```
+///
+/// Without the special handling, this would get formatted to:
+/// ```python
+/// aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+///     expression
+/// }moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"
+/// ```
+///
+/// However, if the parentheses already existed in the source like:
+/// ```python
+/// aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = (
+///     f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"
+/// )
+/// ```
+///
+/// Then, it would remain unformatted because it fits on the line. This means that even in the
+/// first example, the f-string should be formatted by surrounding it with parentheses.
+///
+/// One might ask why not just use the `BestFit` layout in this case. Consider the following
+/// example in which the f-string doesn't fit on the line even when surrounded by parentheses:
+/// ```python
+/// xxxxxxx = f"{
+///     {'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa', 'bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb', 'cccccccccccccccccccccccccc'}
+/// }"
+/// ```
+///
+/// The `BestFit` layout will format this as:
+/// ```python
+/// xxxxxxx = (
+///     f"{
+///         {
+///             'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa',
+///             'bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb',
+///             'cccccccccccccccccccccccccc',
+///         }
+///     }"
+/// )
+/// ```
+///
+/// The reason for this is because (a) f-string already has a multiline expression thus it tries to
+/// break the expression and (b) the `BestFit` layout doesn't considers the layout where the
+/// multiline f-string isn't surrounded by parentheses.
+fn format_f_string_assignment<'a>(
+    string: StringLike<'a>,
+    context: &PyFormatContext,
+) -> Option<FormatFString<'a>> {
+    if !is_f_string_formatting_enabled(context) {
+        return None;
+    }
+
+    let StringLike::FString(expr) = string else {
+        return None;
+    };
+
+    let [FStringPart::FString(f_string)] = expr.value.as_slice() else {
+        return None;
+    };
+
+    // If the f-string is flat, there are no breakpoints from which it can be made multiline.
+    // This is the case when the f-string has no expressions or if it does then the expressions
+    // are flat (no newlines).
+    if FStringLayout::from_f_string(f_string, context.source()).is_flat() {
+        return None;
+    }
+
+    // This checks whether the f-string is multi-line and it can *never* be flattened. Thus,
+    // it's useless to try the flattened layout.
+    if string.is_multiline(context) {
+        return None;
+    }
+
+    Some(FormatFString::new(
+        f_string,
+        f_string_quoting(expr, context.source()),
+    ))
+}
+
 #[derive(Debug, Default)]
 struct OptionalParenthesesInlinedComments<'a> {
     expression: &'a [SourceComment],
diff --git a/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/string/implicit.rs b/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/string/implicit.rs
index 10489e1e0a..3db5fc7f9c 100644
--- a/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/string/implicit.rs
+++ b/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/string/implicit.rs
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ impl<'a> FormatImplicitConcatenatedStringFlat<'a> {
             }
 
             // Multiline strings can never fit on a single line.
-            if !string.is_fstring() && string.is_multiline(context.source()) {
+            if string.is_multiline(context) {
                 return None;
             }
 
@@ -187,25 +187,6 @@ impl<'a> FormatImplicitConcatenatedStringFlat<'a> {
                 }
 
                 if let StringLikePart::FString(fstring) = part {
-                    if fstring.elements.iter().any(|element| match element {
-                        // Same as for other literals. Multiline literals can't fit on a single line.
-                        FStringElement::Literal(literal) => {
-                            context.source().contains_line_break(literal.range())
-                        }
-                        FStringElement::Expression(expression) => {
-                            if is_f_string_formatting_enabled(context) {
-                                // Expressions containing comments can't be joined.
-                                context.comments().contains_comments(expression.into())
-                            } else {
-                                // Multiline f-string expressions can't be joined if the f-string formatting is disabled because
-                                // the string gets inserted in verbatim preserving the newlines.
-                                context.source().contains_line_break(expression.range())
-                            }
-                        }
-                    }) {
-                        return None;
-                    }
-
                     if context.options().target_version().supports_pep_701() {
                         if is_fstring_with_quoted_format_spec_and_debug(fstring, context) {
                             if preserve_quotes_requirement
diff --git a/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/string/mod.rs b/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/string/mod.rs
index eaff5efac2..cc6cc7766c 100644
--- a/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/string/mod.rs
+++ b/crates/ruff_python_formatter/src/string/mod.rs
@@ -1,16 +1,18 @@
 use memchr::memchr2;
-
 pub(crate) use normalize::{normalize_string, NormalizedString, StringNormalizer};
 use ruff_python_ast::str::Quote;
+use ruff_python_ast::StringLikePart;
 use ruff_python_ast::{
     self as ast,
     str_prefix::{AnyStringPrefix, StringLiteralPrefix},
     AnyStringFlags, StringFlags,
 };
+use ruff_source_file::LineRanges;
 use ruff_text_size::Ranged;
 
 use crate::expression::expr_f_string::f_string_quoting;
 use crate::prelude::*;
+use crate::preview::is_f_string_formatting_enabled;
 use crate::QuoteStyle;
 
 pub(crate) mod docstring;
@@ -90,7 +92,7 @@ impl From<Quote> for QuoteStyle {
 pub(crate) trait StringLikeExtensions {
     fn quoting(&self, source: &str) -> Quoting;
 
-    fn is_multiline(&self, source: &str) -> bool;
+    fn is_multiline(&self, context: &PyFormatContext) -> bool;
 }
 
 impl StringLikeExtensions for ast::StringLike<'_> {
@@ -101,15 +103,59 @@ impl StringLikeExtensions for ast::StringLike<'_> {
         }
     }
 
-    fn is_multiline(&self, source: &str) -> bool {
-        match self {
-            Self::String(_) | Self::Bytes(_) => self.parts().any(|part| {
+    fn is_multiline(&self, context: &PyFormatContext) -> bool {
+        self.parts().any(|part| match part {
+            StringLikePart::String(_) | StringLikePart::Bytes(_) => {
                 part.flags().is_triple_quoted()
-                    && memchr2(b'\n', b'\r', source[self.range()].as_bytes()).is_some()
-            }),
-            Self::FString(fstring) => {
-                memchr2(b'\n', b'\r', source[fstring.range].as_bytes()).is_some()
+                    && context.source().contains_line_break(part.range())
             }
-        }
+            StringLikePart::FString(f_string) => {
+                fn contains_line_break_or_comments(
+                    elements: &ast::FStringElements,
+                    context: &PyFormatContext,
+                ) -> bool {
+                    elements.iter().any(|element| match element {
+                        ast::FStringElement::Literal(literal) => {
+                            context.source().contains_line_break(literal.range())
+                        }
+                        ast::FStringElement::Expression(expression) => {
+                            if is_f_string_formatting_enabled(context) {
+                                // Expressions containing comments can't be joined.
+                                //
+                                // Format specifiers needs to be checked as well. For example, the
+                                // following should be considered multiline because the literal
+                                // part of the format specifier contains a newline at the end
+                                // (`.3f\n`):
+                                //
+                                // ```py
+                                // x = f"hello {a + b + c + d:.3f
+                                // } world"
+                                // ```
+                                context.comments().contains_comments(expression.into())
+                                    || expression.format_spec.as_deref().is_some_and(|spec| {
+                                        contains_line_break_or_comments(&spec.elements, context)
+                                    })
+                                    || expression.debug_text.as_ref().is_some_and(|debug_text| {
+                                        memchr2(b'\n', b'\r', debug_text.leading.as_bytes())
+                                            .is_some()
+                                            || memchr2(b'\n', b'\r', debug_text.trailing.as_bytes())
+                                                .is_some()
+                                    })
+                            } else {
+                                // Multiline f-string expressions can't be joined if the f-string
+                                // formatting is disabled because the string gets inserted in
+                                // verbatim preserving the newlines.
+                                //
+                                // We don't need to check format specifiers or debug text here
+                                // because the expression range already includes them.
+                                context.source().contains_line_break(expression.range())
+                            }
+                        }
+                    })
+                }
+
+                contains_line_break_or_comments(&f_string.elements, context)
+            }
+        })
     }
 }
diff --git a/crates/ruff_python_formatter/tests/snapshots/format@expression__binary.py.snap b/crates/ruff_python_formatter/tests/snapshots/format@expression__binary.py.snap
index 82d426ac70..5f2072ff10 100644
--- a/crates/ruff_python_formatter/tests/snapshots/format@expression__binary.py.snap
+++ b/crates/ruff_python_formatter/tests/snapshots/format@expression__binary.py.snap
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
 ---
 source: crates/ruff_python_formatter/tests/fixtures.rs
 input_file: crates/ruff_python_formatter/resources/test/fixtures/ruff/expression/binary.py
-snapshot_kind: text
 ---
 ## Input
 ```python
@@ -425,6 +424,12 @@ if True:
                     "permissions to manage this role, or else members of this role won't receive "
                     "a notification."
                 )
+
+# This f-string should be flattened
+xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx = f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa {
+    expression } bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb" + (
+    yyyyyyyyyyyyyy + zzzzzzzzzzz
+)
 ```
 
 ## Output
@@ -897,4 +902,24 @@ if True:
                     "permissions to manage this role, or else members of this role won't receive "
                     "a notification."
                 )
+
+# This f-string should be flattened
+xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx = f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa {
+    expression } bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb" + (yyyyyyyyyyyyyy + zzzzzzzzzzz)
+```
+
+
+## Preview changes
+```diff
+--- Stable
++++ Preview
+@@ -468,5 +468,6 @@
+                 )
+ 
+ # This f-string should be flattened
+-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx = f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa {
+-    expression } bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb" + (yyyyyyyyyyyyyy + zzzzzzzzzzz)
++xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx = f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa {expression} bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb" + (
++    yyyyyyyyyyyyyy + zzzzzzzzzzz
++)
 ```
diff --git a/crates/ruff_python_formatter/tests/snapshots/format@expression__fstring.py.snap b/crates/ruff_python_formatter/tests/snapshots/format@expression__fstring.py.snap
index e00cd01460..d466502233 100644
--- a/crates/ruff_python_formatter/tests/snapshots/format@expression__fstring.py.snap
+++ b/crates/ruff_python_formatter/tests/snapshots/format@expression__fstring.py.snap
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
 ---
 source: crates/ruff_python_formatter/tests/fixtures.rs
 input_file: crates/ruff_python_formatter/resources/test/fixtures/ruff/expression/fstring.py
-snapshot_kind: text
 ---
 ## Input
 ```python
@@ -320,6 +319,321 @@ f"{  # comment 26
     # comment 28
 } woah {x}"
 
+# Assignment statement
+
+# Even though this f-string has multiline expression, thus allowing us to break it at the
+# curly braces, the f-string fits on a single line if it's moved inside the parentheses.
+# We should prefer doing that instead.
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"
+
+# Same as above
+xxxxxxx = f"{
+    {'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa', 'bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb', 'cccccccccccccccccccccccccc'}
+}"
+
+# Similar to the previous example, but the f-string will exceed the line length limit,
+# we shouldn't add any parentheses here.
+xxxxxxx = f"{
+    {'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa', 'bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb', 'cccccccccccccccccccccccccc'}
+}"
+
+# Same as above but with an inline comment. The f-string should be formatted inside the
+# parentheses and the comment should be part of the line inside the parentheses.
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"  # comment
+
+# Similar to the previous example but this time parenthesizing doesn't work because it
+# exceeds the line length. So, avoid parenthesizing this f-string.
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"  # comment loooooooong
+
+# Similar to the previous example but we start with the parenthesized layout. This should
+# remove the parentheses and format the f-string on a single line. This shows that the
+# final layout for the formatter is same for this and the previous case. The only
+# difference is that in the previous case the expression is already mulitline which means
+# the formatter can break it further at the curly braces.
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"  # comment loooooooong
+)
+
+# The following f-strings are going to break because of the trailing comma so we should
+# avoid using the best fit layout and instead use the default layout.
+# left-to-right
+aaaa = f"aaaa {[
+    1, 2,
+]} bbbb"
+# right-to-left
+aaaa, bbbb = f"aaaa {[
+    1, 2,
+]} bbbb"
+
+# Using the right-to-left assignment statement variant.
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, bbbbbbbbbbb = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"  # comment
+
+# Here, the f-string layout is flat but it exceeds the line length limit. This shouldn't
+# try the custom best fit layout because the f-string doesn't have any split points.
+aaaaaaaaaaaa["bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb"] = (
+    f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa {aaaaaaaaa + bbbbbbbbbbb + cccccccccccccc} ddddddddddddddddddd"
+)
+# Same as above but without the parentheses to test that it gets formatted to the same
+# layout as the previous example.
+aaaaaaaaaaaa["bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb"] = f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa {aaaaaaaaa + bbbbbbbbbbb + cccccccccccccc} ddddddddddddddddddd"
+
+# But, the following f-string does have a split point because of the multiline expression.
+aaaaaaaaaaaa["bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb"] = (
+    f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa {
+        aaaaaaaaa + bbbbbbbbbbb + cccccccccccccc} ddddddddddddddddddd"
+)
+aaaaaaaaaaaa["bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb"] = (
+    f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa {
+        aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa + bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb + cccccccccccccccccccccc + dddddddddddddddddddddddddddd} ddddddddddddddddddd"
+)
+
+# This is an implicitly concatenated f-string but it cannot be joined because otherwise
+# it'll exceed the line length limit. So, the two f-strings will be inside parentheses
+# instead and the inline comment should be outside the parentheses.
+a = f"test{
+    expression
+}flat" f"can be {
+    joined
+} togethereeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee" # inline
+
+# Similar to the above example but this fits within the line length limit.
+a = f"test{
+    expression
+}flat" f"can be {
+    joined
+} togethereeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee" # inline
+
+# The following test cases are adopted from implicit string concatenation but for a
+# single f-string instead.
+
+# Don't inline f-strings that contain expressions that are guaranteed to split, e.g. because of a magic trailing comma
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+[a,]
+}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee" # comment
+
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+[a,]
+}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee" # comment
+)
+
+aaaaa[aaaaaaaaaaa] = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+[a,]
+}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee" # comment
+
+aaaaa[aaaaaaaaaaa] = (f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+[a,]
+}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee" # comment
+)
+
+# Don't inline f-strings that contain commented expressions
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{[
+        a  # comment
+    ]}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+)
+
+aaaaa[aaaaaaaaaaa] = (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{[
+        a  # comment
+    ]}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+)
+
+# Don't inline f-strings with multiline debug expressions or format specifiers
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    a=}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+)
+
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{a +
+    b=}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+)
+
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{a
+    =}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+)
+
+aaaaa[aaaaaaaaaaa] = (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    a=}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+)
+
+aaaaa[aaaaaaaaaaa] = (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{a
+    =}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+)
+
+# This is not a multiline f-string even though it has a newline after the format specifier.
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    a:.3f
+    }moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    a:.3f
+    }moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+)
+
+# The newline is only considered when it's a tripled-quoted f-string.
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"""testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    a:.3f
+    }moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"""  # comment
+
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = (
+    f"""testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    a:.3f
+    }moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"""  # comment
+)
+
+# Remove the parentheses here
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{[a, b,
+    # comment
+    ]}moee" # comment
+)
+# ... but not here because of the ownline comment
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{[a, b,
+    ]}moee"
+    # comment
+)
+
+# F-strings in other positions
+
+if f"aaaaaaaaaaa {ttttteeeeeeeeest} more {
+    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+}": pass
+
+if (
+    f"aaaaaaaaaaa {ttttteeeeeeeeest} more {
+        aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+    }"
+): pass
+
+if f"aaaaaaaaaaa {ttttteeeeeeeeest} more {
+    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+}": pass
+
+if f"aaaaaaaaaaa {ttttteeeeeeeeest} more {  # comment
+    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+}": pass
+
+if f"aaaaaaaaaaa {[ttttteeeeeeeeest,]} more {
+    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+}":
+    pass
+
+if (
+    f"aaaaaaaaaaa {[ttttteeeeeeeeest,]} more {
+        aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+    }"
+):
+    pass
+
+if f"aaaaaaaaaaa {[ttttteeeeeeeeest,]} more {
+    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+}":
+    pass
+
+# For loops
+for a in f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+        expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee":
+    pass
+
+for a in f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee":
+    pass
+
+for a in f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+        expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee":
+    pass
+
+for a in (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"
+):
+    pass
+
+# With statements
+with f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+        expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee":
+    pass
+
+with f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee":
+    pass
+
+with f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+        expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee":
+    pass
+
+with (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"
+):
+    pass
+
+# Assert statements
+assert f"aaaaaaaaa{
+        expression}bbbbbbbbbbbb", f"cccccccccc{
+                expression}dddddddddd"
+
+assert f"aaaaaaaaa{expression}bbbbbbbbbbbb", f"cccccccccccccccc{
+        expression}dddddddddddddddd"
+
+assert f"aaaaaaaaa{expression}bbbbbbbbbbbb", f"cccccccccccccccc{expression}dddddddddddddddd"
+
+assert f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa{
+        expression}bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb", f"ccccccc{expression}dddddddddd"
+
+assert f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa{expression}bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb", f"ccccccc{expression}dddddddddd"
+
+assert f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa{
+        expression}bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb", f"ccccccccccccccccccccc {
+                expression} dddddddddddddddddddddddddd"
+
+assert f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa{expression}bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb", f"cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc {expression} ddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd"
+
+# F-strings as a single argument to a call expression to test whether it's huggable or not.
+call(f"{
+    testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
+}")
+
+call(f"{
+    testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
+}")
+
+call(f"{  # comment
+    testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
+}")
+
+call(f"""aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa bbbbbbbbbb {testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee}""")
+
+call(f"""aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa bbbbbbbbbb {testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
+                }""")
+
+call(f"""aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+     bbbbbbbbbb {testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
+                }""")
+
+call(f"""aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+     bbbbbbbbbb {testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee  # comment
+                }""")
+
+call(
+    f"""aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+     bbbbbbbbbb {testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee  # comment
+                }"""
+)
+
+call(f"{
+    aaaaaa
+    + '''test
+    more'''
+}")
+
 # Indentation
 
 # What should be the indentation?
@@ -521,9 +835,9 @@ x = f"aaaaa { {'aaaaaa', 'bbbbbbb', 'ccccccccc'}:.3f} bbbbbb"
 
 # But, in this case, we would split the expression itself because it exceeds the line
 # length limit so we need not add the extra space.
-xxxxxxx = f"{
-    {'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa', 'bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb', 'ccccccccccccccccccccc'}
-}"
+xxxxxxx = (
+    f"{ {'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa', 'bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb', 'ccccccccccccccccccccc'} }"
+)
 # And, split the expression itself because it exceeds the line length.
 xxxxxxx = f"{
     {
@@ -698,6 +1012,356 @@ f"{  # comment 26
     # comment 28
 } woah {x}"
 
+# Assignment statement
+
+# Even though this f-string has multiline expression, thus allowing us to break it at the
+# curly braces, the f-string fits on a single line if it's moved inside the parentheses.
+# We should prefer doing that instead.
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"
+)
+
+# Same as above
+xxxxxxx = (
+    f"{ {'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa', 'bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb', 'cccccccccccccccccccccccccc'} }"
+)
+
+# Similar to the previous example, but the f-string will exceed the line length limit,
+# we shouldn't add any parentheses here.
+xxxxxxx = f"{
+    {
+        'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa',
+        'bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb',
+        'cccccccccccccccccccccccccc',
+    }
+}"
+
+# Same as above but with an inline comment. The f-string should be formatted inside the
+# parentheses and the comment should be part of the line inside the parentheses.
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"  # comment
+)
+
+# Similar to the previous example but this time parenthesizing doesn't work because it
+# exceeds the line length. So, avoid parenthesizing this f-string.
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    expression
+}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"  # comment loooooooong
+
+# Similar to the previous example but we start with the parenthesized layout. This should
+# remove the parentheses and format the f-string on a single line. This shows that the
+# final layout for the formatter is same for this and the previous case. The only
+# difference is that in the previous case the expression is already mulitline which means
+# the formatter can break it further at the curly braces.
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"  # comment loooooooong
+
+# The following f-strings are going to break because of the trailing comma so we should
+# avoid using the best fit layout and instead use the default layout.
+# left-to-right
+aaaa = f"aaaa {
+    [
+        1,
+        2,
+    ]
+} bbbb"
+# right-to-left
+aaaa, bbbb = f"aaaa {
+    [
+        1,
+        2,
+    ]
+} bbbb"
+
+# Using the right-to-left assignment statement variant.
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, bbbbbbbbbbb = (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"  # comment
+)
+
+# Here, the f-string layout is flat but it exceeds the line length limit. This shouldn't
+# try the custom best fit layout because the f-string doesn't have any split points.
+aaaaaaaaaaaa["bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb"] = (
+    f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa {aaaaaaaaa + bbbbbbbbbbb + cccccccccccccc} ddddddddddddddddddd"
+)
+# Same as above but without the parentheses to test that it gets formatted to the same
+# layout as the previous example.
+aaaaaaaaaaaa["bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb"] = (
+    f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa {aaaaaaaaa + bbbbbbbbbbb + cccccccccccccc} ddddddddddddddddddd"
+)
+
+# But, the following f-string does have a split point because of the multiline expression.
+aaaaaaaaaaaa["bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb"] = f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa {
+    aaaaaaaaa + bbbbbbbbbbb + cccccccccccccc
+} ddddddddddddddddddd"
+aaaaaaaaaaaa["bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb"] = f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa {
+    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+    + bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
+    + cccccccccccccccccccccc
+    + dddddddddddddddddddddddddddd
+} ddddddddddddddddddd"
+
+# This is an implicitly concatenated f-string but it cannot be joined because otherwise
+# it'll exceed the line length limit. So, the two f-strings will be inside parentheses
+# instead and the inline comment should be outside the parentheses.
+a = (
+    f"test{expression}flat"
+    f"can be {joined} togethereeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"
+)  # inline
+
+# Similar to the above example but this fits within the line length limit.
+a = f"test{expression}flatcan be {joined} togethereeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"  # inline
+
+# The following test cases are adopted from implicit string concatenation but for a
+# single f-string instead.
+
+# Don't inline f-strings that contain expressions that are guaranteed to split, e.g. because of a magic trailing comma
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    [
+        a,
+    ]
+}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"  # comment
+
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    [
+        a,
+    ]
+}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"  # comment
+
+aaaaa[aaaaaaaaaaa] = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    [
+        a,
+    ]
+}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"  # comment
+
+aaaaa[aaaaaaaaaaa] = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    [
+        a,
+    ]
+}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"  # comment
+
+# Don't inline f-strings that contain commented expressions
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    [
+        a  # comment
+    ]
+}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+
+aaaaa[aaaaaaaaaaa] = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    [
+        a  # comment
+    ]
+}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+
+# Don't inline f-strings with multiline debug expressions or format specifiers
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    a=}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{a +
+    b=}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{a
+    =}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+
+aaaaa[aaaaaaaaaaa] = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    a=}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+
+aaaaa[aaaaaaaaaaa] = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{a
+    =}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+
+# This is not a multiline f-string even though it has a newline after the format specifier.
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{a:.3f}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+)
+
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{a:.3f}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+)
+
+# The newline is only considered when it's a tripled-quoted f-string.
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"""testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{a:.3f
+    }moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"""  # comment
+
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"""testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{a:.3f
+    }moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"""  # comment
+
+# Remove the parentheses here
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    [
+        a,
+        b,
+        # comment
+    ]
+}moee"  # comment
+# ... but not here because of the ownline comment
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+        [
+            a,
+            b,
+        ]
+    }moee"
+    # comment
+)
+
+# F-strings in other positions
+
+if f"aaaaaaaaaaa {ttttteeeeeeeeest} more {
+    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+}":
+    pass
+
+if f"aaaaaaaaaaa {ttttteeeeeeeeest} more {
+    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+}":
+    pass
+
+if f"aaaaaaaaaaa {ttttteeeeeeeeest} more {aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa}":
+    pass
+
+if f"aaaaaaaaaaa {ttttteeeeeeeeest} more {  # comment
+    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+}":
+    pass
+
+if f"aaaaaaaaaaa {
+    [
+        ttttteeeeeeeeest,
+    ]
+} more {aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa}":
+    pass
+
+if f"aaaaaaaaaaa {
+    [
+        ttttteeeeeeeeest,
+    ]
+} more {
+    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+}":
+    pass
+
+if f"aaaaaaaaaaa {
+    [
+        ttttteeeeeeeeest,
+    ]
+} more {
+    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+}":
+    pass
+
+# For loops
+for a in f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee":
+    pass
+
+for a in (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"
+):
+    pass
+
+for a in f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    expression
+}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee":
+    pass
+
+for a in (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"
+):
+    pass
+
+# With statements
+with f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee":
+    pass
+
+with (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"
+):
+    pass
+
+with f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    expression
+}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee":
+    pass
+
+with (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"
+):
+    pass
+
+# Assert statements
+assert f"aaaaaaaaa{expression}bbbbbbbbbbbb", f"cccccccccc{expression}dddddddddd"
+
+assert f"aaaaaaaaa{expression}bbbbbbbbbbbb", f"cccccccccccccccc{
+    expression
+}dddddddddddddddd"
+
+assert f"aaaaaaaaa{expression}bbbbbbbbbbbb", (
+    f"cccccccccccccccc{expression}dddddddddddddddd"
+)
+
+assert f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa{
+    expression
+}bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb", f"ccccccc{expression}dddddddddd"
+
+assert (
+    f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa{expression}bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb"
+), f"ccccccc{expression}dddddddddd"
+
+assert f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa{
+    expression
+}bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb", f"ccccccccccccccccccccc {
+    expression
+} dddddddddddddddddddddddddd"
+
+assert (
+    f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa{expression}bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb"
+), (
+    f"cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc {expression} ddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd"
+)
+
+# F-strings as a single argument to a call expression to test whether it's huggable or not.
+call(f"{testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee}")
+
+call(
+    f"{testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee}"
+)
+
+call(
+    f"{  # comment
+        testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
+    }"
+)
+
+call(
+    f"""aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa bbbbbbbbbb {testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee}"""
+)
+
+call(
+    f"""aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa bbbbbbbbbb {
+        testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
+    }"""
+)
+
+call(f"""aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+     bbbbbbbbbb {testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee}""")
+
+call(f"""aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+     bbbbbbbbbb {
+    testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee  # comment
+}""")
+
+call(
+    f"""aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+     bbbbbbbbbb {
+        testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee  # comment
+    }"""
+)
+
+call(
+    f"{
+        aaaaaa
+        + '''test
+    more'''
+    }"
+)
+
 # Indentation
 
 # What should be the indentation?
@@ -1064,6 +1728,320 @@ f"{  # comment 26
     # comment 28
 } woah {x}"
 
+# Assignment statement
+
+# Even though this f-string has multiline expression, thus allowing us to break it at the
+# curly braces, the f-string fits on a single line if it's moved inside the parentheses.
+# We should prefer doing that instead.
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"
+
+# Same as above
+xxxxxxx = f"{
+    {'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa', 'bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb', 'cccccccccccccccccccccccccc'}
+}"
+
+# Similar to the previous example, but the f-string will exceed the line length limit,
+# we shouldn't add any parentheses here.
+xxxxxxx = f"{
+    {'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa', 'bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb', 'cccccccccccccccccccccccccc'}
+}"
+
+# Same as above but with an inline comment. The f-string should be formatted inside the
+# parentheses and the comment should be part of the line inside the parentheses.
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"  # comment
+
+# Similar to the previous example but this time parenthesizing doesn't work because it
+# exceeds the line length. So, avoid parenthesizing this f-string.
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"  # comment loooooooong
+
+# Similar to the previous example but we start with the parenthesized layout. This should
+# remove the parentheses and format the f-string on a single line. This shows that the
+# final layout for the formatter is same for this and the previous case. The only
+# difference is that in the previous case the expression is already mulitline which means
+# the formatter can break it further at the curly braces.
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"  # comment loooooooong
+
+# The following f-strings are going to break because of the trailing comma so we should
+# avoid using the best fit layout and instead use the default layout.
+# left-to-right
+aaaa = f"aaaa {[
+    1, 2,
+]} bbbb"
+# right-to-left
+aaaa, bbbb = f"aaaa {[
+    1, 2,
+]} bbbb"
+
+# Using the right-to-left assignment statement variant.
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, bbbbbbbbbbb = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"  # comment
+
+# Here, the f-string layout is flat but it exceeds the line length limit. This shouldn't
+# try the custom best fit layout because the f-string doesn't have any split points.
+aaaaaaaaaaaa["bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb"] = (
+    f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa {aaaaaaaaa + bbbbbbbbbbb + cccccccccccccc} ddddddddddddddddddd"
+)
+# Same as above but without the parentheses to test that it gets formatted to the same
+# layout as the previous example.
+aaaaaaaaaaaa["bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb"] = (
+    f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa {aaaaaaaaa + bbbbbbbbbbb + cccccccccccccc} ddddddddddddddddddd"
+)
+
+# But, the following f-string does have a split point because of the multiline expression.
+aaaaaaaaaaaa["bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb"] = f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa {
+        aaaaaaaaa + bbbbbbbbbbb + cccccccccccccc} ddddddddddddddddddd"
+aaaaaaaaaaaa["bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb"] = f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa {
+        aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa + bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb + cccccccccccccccccccccc + dddddddddddddddddddddddddddd} ddddddddddddddddddd"
+
+# This is an implicitly concatenated f-string but it cannot be joined because otherwise
+# it'll exceed the line length limit. So, the two f-strings will be inside parentheses
+# instead and the inline comment should be outside the parentheses.
+a = (
+    f"test{
+    expression
+}flat"
+    f"can be {
+    joined
+} togethereeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"
+)  # inline
+
+# Similar to the above example but this fits within the line length limit.
+a = (
+    f"test{
+    expression
+}flat"
+    f"can be {
+    joined
+} togethereeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"
+)  # inline
+
+# The following test cases are adopted from implicit string concatenation but for a
+# single f-string instead.
+
+# Don't inline f-strings that contain expressions that are guaranteed to split, e.g. because of a magic trailing comma
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+[a,]
+}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"  # comment
+
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+[a,]
+}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"  # comment
+
+aaaaa[aaaaaaaaaaa] = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+[a,]
+}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"  # comment
+
+aaaaa[aaaaaaaaaaa] = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+[a,]
+}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"  # comment
+
+# Don't inline f-strings that contain commented expressions
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{[
+        a  # comment
+    ]}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+
+aaaaa[aaaaaaaaaaa] = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{[
+        a  # comment
+    ]}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+
+# Don't inline f-strings with multiline debug expressions or format specifiers
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    a=}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{a +
+    b=}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{a
+    =}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+
+aaaaa[aaaaaaaaaaa] = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    a=}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+
+aaaaa[aaaaaaaaaaa] = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{a
+    =}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+
+# This is not a multiline f-string even though it has a newline after the format specifier.
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    a:.3f
+    }moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    a:.3f
+    }moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+
+# The newline is only considered when it's a tripled-quoted f-string.
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"""testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    a:.3f
+    }moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"""  # comment
+
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"""testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+    a:.3f
+    }moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"""  # comment
+
+# Remove the parentheses here
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{[a, b,
+    # comment
+    ]}moee"  # comment
+# ... but not here because of the ownline comment
+aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{[a, b,
+    ]}moee"
+    # comment
+)
+
+# F-strings in other positions
+
+if f"aaaaaaaaaaa {ttttteeeeeeeeest} more {
+    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+}":
+    pass
+
+if f"aaaaaaaaaaa {ttttteeeeeeeeest} more {
+        aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+    }":
+    pass
+
+if f"aaaaaaaaaaa {ttttteeeeeeeeest} more {
+    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+}":
+    pass
+
+if f"aaaaaaaaaaa {ttttteeeeeeeeest} more {  # comment
+    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+}":
+    pass
+
+if f"aaaaaaaaaaa {[ttttteeeeeeeeest,]} more {
+    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+}":
+    pass
+
+if f"aaaaaaaaaaa {[ttttteeeeeeeeest,]} more {
+        aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+    }":
+    pass
+
+if f"aaaaaaaaaaa {[ttttteeeeeeeeest,]} more {
+    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+}":
+    pass
+
+# For loops
+for a in f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+        expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee":
+    pass
+
+for a in (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"
+):
+    pass
+
+for a in f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+        expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee":
+    pass
+
+for a in (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"
+):
+    pass
+
+# With statements
+with f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+        expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee":
+    pass
+
+with (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"
+):
+    pass
+
+with f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+        expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee":
+    pass
+
+with (
+    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"
+):
+    pass
+
+# Assert statements
+assert f"aaaaaaaaa{
+        expression}bbbbbbbbbbbb", f"cccccccccc{
+                expression}dddddddddd"
+
+assert f"aaaaaaaaa{expression}bbbbbbbbbbbb", f"cccccccccccccccc{
+        expression}dddddddddddddddd"
+
+assert (
+    f"aaaaaaaaa{expression}bbbbbbbbbbbb"
+), f"cccccccccccccccc{expression}dddddddddddddddd"
+
+assert f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa{
+        expression}bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb", (
+    f"ccccccc{expression}dddddddddd"
+)
+
+assert (
+    f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa{expression}bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb"
+), f"ccccccc{expression}dddddddddd"
+
+assert f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa{
+        expression}bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb", f"ccccccccccccccccccccc {
+                expression} dddddddddddddddddddddddddd"
+
+assert f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa{expression}bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb", f"cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc {expression} ddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd"
+
+# F-strings as a single argument to a call expression to test whether it's huggable or not.
+call(
+    f"{
+    testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
+}"
+)
+
+call(
+    f"{
+    testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
+}"
+)
+
+call(
+    f"{  # comment
+    testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
+}"
+)
+
+call(
+    f"""aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa bbbbbbbbbb {testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee}"""
+)
+
+call(f"""aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa bbbbbbbbbb {testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
+                }""")
+
+call(f"""aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+     bbbbbbbbbb {testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
+                }""")
+
+call(f"""aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+     bbbbbbbbbb {testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee  # comment
+                }""")
+
+call(
+    f"""aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+     bbbbbbbbbb {testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee  # comment
+                }"""
+)
+
+call(
+    f"{
+    aaaaaa
+    + '''test
+    more'''
+}"
+)
+
 # Indentation
 
 # What should be the indentation?
@@ -1238,8 +2216,16 @@ f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa {10**27} bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb ccccccccccccccc
  x = f"{    # comment 13
      {'x': 1, 'y': 2} = }"
  # But, if there's a format specifier or a conversion flag then we don't need to add
-@@ -141,7 +149,11 @@
- }"
+@@ -136,12 +144,16 @@
+ 
+ # But, in this case, we would split the expression itself because it exceeds the line
+ # length limit so we need not add the extra space.
+-xxxxxxx = f"{
+-    {'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa', 'bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb', 'ccccccccccccccccccccc'}
+-}"
++xxxxxxx = (
++    f"{ {'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa', 'bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb', 'ccccccccccccccccccccc'} }"
++)
  # And, split the expression itself because it exceeds the line length.
  xxxxxxx = f"{
 -    {'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa', 'bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb', 'cccccccccccccccccccccccccc'}
@@ -1453,7 +2439,435 @@ f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa {10**27} bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb ccccccccccccccc
      # comment 27
      # comment 28
  } woah {x}"
-@@ -318,29 +330,29 @@
+@@ -314,29 +326,36 @@
+ # Even though this f-string has multiline expression, thus allowing us to break it at the
+ # curly braces, the f-string fits on a single line if it's moved inside the parentheses.
+ # We should prefer doing that instead.
+-aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+-    expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"
++aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = (
++    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"
++)
+ 
+ # Same as above
+-xxxxxxx = f"{
+-    {'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa', 'bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb', 'cccccccccccccccccccccccccc'}
+-}"
++xxxxxxx = (
++    f"{ {'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa', 'bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb', 'cccccccccccccccccccccccccc'} }"
++)
+ 
+ # Similar to the previous example, but the f-string will exceed the line length limit,
+ # we shouldn't add any parentheses here.
+ xxxxxxx = f"{
+-    {'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa', 'bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb', 'cccccccccccccccccccccccccc'}
++    {
++        'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa',
++        'bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb',
++        'cccccccccccccccccccccccccc',
++    }
+ }"
+ 
+ # Same as above but with an inline comment. The f-string should be formatted inside the
+ # parentheses and the comment should be part of the line inside the parentheses.
+-aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+-    expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"  # comment
++aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = (
++    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"  # comment
++)
+ 
+ # Similar to the previous example but this time parenthesizing doesn't work because it
+ # exceeds the line length. So, avoid parenthesizing this f-string.
+ aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+-    expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"  # comment loooooooong
++    expression
++}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"  # comment loooooooong
+ 
+ # Similar to the previous example but we start with the parenthesized layout. This should
+ # remove the parentheses and format the f-string on a single line. This shows that the
+@@ -348,17 +367,24 @@
+ # The following f-strings are going to break because of the trailing comma so we should
+ # avoid using the best fit layout and instead use the default layout.
+ # left-to-right
+-aaaa = f"aaaa {[
+-    1, 2,
+-]} bbbb"
++aaaa = f"aaaa {
++    [
++        1,
++        2,
++    ]
++} bbbb"
+ # right-to-left
+-aaaa, bbbb = f"aaaa {[
+-    1, 2,
+-]} bbbb"
++aaaa, bbbb = f"aaaa {
++    [
++        1,
++        2,
++    ]
++} bbbb"
+ 
+ # Using the right-to-left assignment statement variant.
+-aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, bbbbbbbbbbb = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+-    expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"  # comment
++aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, bbbbbbbbbbb = (
++    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"  # comment
++)
+ 
+ # Here, the f-string layout is flat but it exceeds the line length limit. This shouldn't
+ # try the custom best fit layout because the f-string doesn't have any split points.
+@@ -373,60 +399,66 @@
+ 
+ # But, the following f-string does have a split point because of the multiline expression.
+ aaaaaaaaaaaa["bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb"] = f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa {
+-        aaaaaaaaa + bbbbbbbbbbb + cccccccccccccc} ddddddddddddddddddd"
++    aaaaaaaaa + bbbbbbbbbbb + cccccccccccccc
++} ddddddddddddddddddd"
+ aaaaaaaaaaaa["bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb"] = f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa {
+-        aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa + bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb + cccccccccccccccccccccc + dddddddddddddddddddddddddddd} ddddddddddddddddddd"
++    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
++    + bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
++    + cccccccccccccccccccccc
++    + dddddddddddddddddddddddddddd
++} ddddddddddddddddddd"
+ 
+ # This is an implicitly concatenated f-string but it cannot be joined because otherwise
+ # it'll exceed the line length limit. So, the two f-strings will be inside parentheses
+ # instead and the inline comment should be outside the parentheses.
+ a = (
+-    f"test{
+-    expression
+-}flat"
+-    f"can be {
+-    joined
+-} togethereeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"
++    f"test{expression}flat"
++    f"can be {joined} togethereeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"
+ )  # inline
+ 
+ # Similar to the above example but this fits within the line length limit.
+-a = (
+-    f"test{
+-    expression
+-}flat"
+-    f"can be {
+-    joined
+-} togethereeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"
+-)  # inline
++a = f"test{expression}flatcan be {joined} togethereeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"  # inline
+ 
+ # The following test cases are adopted from implicit string concatenation but for a
+ # single f-string instead.
+ 
+ # Don't inline f-strings that contain expressions that are guaranteed to split, e.g. because of a magic trailing comma
+ aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+-[a,]
++    [
++        a,
++    ]
+ }moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"  # comment
+ 
+ aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+-[a,]
++    [
++        a,
++    ]
+ }moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"  # comment
+ 
+ aaaaa[aaaaaaaaaaa] = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+-[a,]
++    [
++        a,
++    ]
+ }moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"  # comment
+ 
+ aaaaa[aaaaaaaaaaa] = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+-[a,]
++    [
++        a,
++    ]
+ }moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"  # comment
+ 
+ # Don't inline f-strings that contain commented expressions
+-aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{[
++aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
++    [
+         a  # comment
+-    ]}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
++    ]
++}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+ 
+-aaaaa[aaaaaaaaaaa] = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{[
++aaaaa[aaaaaaaaaaa] = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
++    [
+         a  # comment
+-    ]}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
++    ]
++}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+ 
+ # Don't inline f-strings with multiline debug expressions or format specifiers
+ aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+@@ -445,31 +477,37 @@
+     =}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
+ 
+ # This is not a multiline f-string even though it has a newline after the format specifier.
+-aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+-    a:.3f
+-    }moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
++aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = (
++    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{a:.3f}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
++)
+ 
+-aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+-    a:.3f
+-    }moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
++aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = (
++    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{a:.3f}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"  # comment
++)
+ 
+ # The newline is only considered when it's a tripled-quoted f-string.
+-aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"""testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+-    a:.3f
++aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"""testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{a:.3f
+     }moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"""  # comment
+ 
+-aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"""testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+-    a:.3f
++aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"""testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{a:.3f
+     }moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetest"""  # comment
+ 
+ # Remove the parentheses here
+-aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{[a, b,
+-    # comment
+-    ]}moee"  # comment
++aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
++    [
++        a,
++        b,
++        # comment
++    ]
++}moee"  # comment
+ # ... but not here because of the ownline comment
+ aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa = (
+-    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{[a, b,
+-    ]}moee"
++    f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
++        [
++            a,
++            b,
++        ]
++    }moee"
+     # comment
+ )
+ 
+@@ -481,13 +519,11 @@
+     pass
+ 
+ if f"aaaaaaaaaaa {ttttteeeeeeeeest} more {
+-        aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+-    }":
++    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
++}":
+     pass
+ 
+-if f"aaaaaaaaaaa {ttttteeeeeeeeest} more {
+-    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+-}":
++if f"aaaaaaaaaaa {ttttteeeeeeeeest} more {aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa}":
+     pass
+ 
+ if f"aaaaaaaaaaa {ttttteeeeeeeeest} more {  # comment
+@@ -495,24 +531,33 @@
+ }":
+     pass
+ 
+-if f"aaaaaaaaaaa {[ttttteeeeeeeeest,]} more {
+-    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+-}":
++if f"aaaaaaaaaaa {
++    [
++        ttttteeeeeeeeest,
++    ]
++} more {aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa}":
+     pass
+ 
+-if f"aaaaaaaaaaa {[ttttteeeeeeeeest,]} more {
+-        aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+-    }":
++if f"aaaaaaaaaaa {
++    [
++        ttttteeeeeeeeest,
++    ]
++} more {
++    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
++}":
+     pass
+ 
+-if f"aaaaaaaaaaa {[ttttteeeeeeeeest,]} more {
++if f"aaaaaaaaaaa {
++    [
++        ttttteeeeeeeeest,
++    ]
++} more {
+     aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+ }":
+     pass
+ 
+ # For loops
+-for a in f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+-        expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee":
++for a in f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee":
+     pass
+ 
+ for a in (
+@@ -521,7 +566,8 @@
+     pass
+ 
+ for a in f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+-        expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee":
++    expression
++}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee":
+     pass
+ 
+ for a in (
+@@ -530,8 +576,7 @@
+     pass
+ 
+ # With statements
+-with f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+-        expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee":
++with f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee":
+     pass
+ 
+ with (
+@@ -540,7 +585,8 @@
+     pass
+ 
+ with f"testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee{
+-        expression}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee":
++    expression
++}moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee":
+     pass
+ 
+ with (
+@@ -549,78 +595,80 @@
+     pass
+ 
+ # Assert statements
+-assert f"aaaaaaaaa{
+-        expression}bbbbbbbbbbbb", f"cccccccccc{
+-                expression}dddddddddd"
++assert f"aaaaaaaaa{expression}bbbbbbbbbbbb", f"cccccccccc{expression}dddddddddd"
+ 
+ assert f"aaaaaaaaa{expression}bbbbbbbbbbbb", f"cccccccccccccccc{
+-        expression}dddddddddddddddd"
++    expression
++}dddddddddddddddd"
+ 
+-assert (
+-    f"aaaaaaaaa{expression}bbbbbbbbbbbb"
+-), f"cccccccccccccccc{expression}dddddddddddddddd"
++assert f"aaaaaaaaa{expression}bbbbbbbbbbbb", (
++    f"cccccccccccccccc{expression}dddddddddddddddd"
++)
+ 
+ assert f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa{
+-        expression}bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb", (
+-    f"ccccccc{expression}dddddddddd"
+-)
++    expression
++}bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb", f"ccccccc{expression}dddddddddd"
+ 
+ assert (
+     f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa{expression}bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb"
+ ), f"ccccccc{expression}dddddddddd"
+ 
+ assert f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa{
+-        expression}bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb", f"ccccccccccccccccccccc {
+-                expression} dddddddddddddddddddddddddd"
++    expression
++}bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb", f"ccccccccccccccccccccc {
++    expression
++} dddddddddddddddddddddddddd"
+ 
+-assert f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa{expression}bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb", f"cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc {expression} ddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd"
++assert (
++    f"aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa{expression}bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb"
++), (
++    f"cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc {expression} ddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd"
++)
+ 
+ # F-strings as a single argument to a call expression to test whether it's huggable or not.
+-call(
+-    f"{
+-    testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
+-}"
+-)
++call(f"{testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee}")
+ 
+ call(
+-    f"{
+-    testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
+-}"
++    f"{testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee}"
+ )
+ 
+ call(
+     f"{  # comment
+-    testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
+-}"
++        testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
++    }"
+ )
+ 
+ call(
+     f"""aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa bbbbbbbbbb {testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee}"""
+ )
+ 
+-call(f"""aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa bbbbbbbbbb {testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
+-                }""")
++call(
++    f"""aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa bbbbbbbbbb {
++        testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
++    }"""
++)
+ 
+ call(f"""aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+-     bbbbbbbbbb {testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
+-                }""")
++     bbbbbbbbbb {testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee}""")
+ 
+ call(f"""aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+-     bbbbbbbbbb {testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee  # comment
+-                }""")
++     bbbbbbbbbb {
++    testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee  # comment
++}""")
+ 
+ call(
+     f"""aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+-     bbbbbbbbbb {testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee  # comment
+-                }"""
++     bbbbbbbbbb {
++        testeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee  # comment
++    }"""
+ )
+ 
+ call(
+     f"{
+-    aaaaaa
+-    + '''test
++        aaaaaa
++        + '''test
+     more'''
+-}"
++    }"
+ )
+ 
+ # Indentation
+@@ -632,29 +680,29 @@
          if indent2:
              foo = f"""hello world
  hello {