This PR removes several uses of `unsafe`. I generally limited myself to
low hanging fruit that I could see. There are still a few remaining uses
of `unsafe` that looked a bit more difficult to remove (if possible at
all). But this gets rid of a good chunk of them.
I put each `unsafe` removal into its own commit with a justification for
why I did it. So I would encourage reviewing this PR commit-by-commit.
That way, we can legislate them independently. It's no problem to drop a
commit if we feel the `unsafe` should stay in that case.
Update to [Rust
1.74](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2023/11/16/Rust-1.74.0.html) and use
the new clippy lints table.
The update itself introduced a new clippy lint about superfluous hashes
in raw strings, which got removed.
I moved our lint config from `rustflags` to the newly stabilized
[workspace.lints](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/cargo/reference/workspaces.html#the-lints-table).
One consequence is that we have to `unsafe_code = "warn"` instead of
"forbid" because the latter now actually bans unsafe code:
```
error[E0453]: allow(unsafe_code) incompatible with previous forbid
--> crates/ruff_source_file/src/newlines.rs:62:17
|
62 | #[allow(unsafe_code)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ overruled by previous forbid
|
= note: `forbid` lint level was set on command line
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7448
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7892
I've removed automatic dangling comment formatting, we're doing manual
dangling comment formatting everywhere anyway (the
assert-all-comments-formatted ensures this) and dangling comments would
break the formatting there.
## Test Plan
New test file.
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
I noticed that `tracing::instrument` wasn't available with only the
`"std"` feature enabled when trying to run `cargo doc -p
ruff_formatter`.
I could be misunderstanding something, but I couldn't even run the tests
for the crate.
```
ruff on ruff-formatter-tracing [$] is 📦 v0.0.292 via 🦀 v1.72.0
❯ cargo test -p ruff_formatter
Compiling ruff_formatter v0.0.0 (/Users/chrispryer/github/ruff/crates/ruff_formatter)
error[E0433]: failed to resolve: could not find `instrument` in `tracing`
--> crates/ruff_formatter/src/printer/mod.rs:57:16
|
57 | #[tracing::instrument(name = "Printer::print", skip_all)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^ could not find `instrument` in `tracing`
|
note: found an item that was configured out
--> /Users/chrispryer/.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/tracing-0.1.37/src/lib.rs:959:29
|
959 | pub use tracing_attributes::instrument;
| ^^^^^^^^^^
= note: the item is gated behind the `attributes` feature
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0433`.
error: could not compile `ruff_formatter` (lib) due to previous error
warning: build failed, waiting for other jobs to finish...
error: could not compile `ruff_formatter` (lib test) due to previous error
```
Maybe the idea is to keep this crate minimal, but I figured I'd at least
point this out.
## Summary
The motivation here is that this enables us to implement `Ranged` in
crates that don't depend on `ruff_python_ast`.
Largely a mechanical refactor with a lot of regex, Clippy help, and
manual fixups.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
We already support preserving the end-of-line comment in calls and type
parameters, as in:
```python
foo( # comment
bar,
)
```
This PR adds the same behavior for lists, sets, comprehensions, etc.,
such that we preserve:
```python
[ # comment
1,
2,
3,
]
```
And related cases.
