## Summary
This PR removes the `Iterator::chain(...)` sequence in
`RuleCodePrefix::iter()` with `Vec::expand` to avoid an
overlong-recursive types.
The existing `RuleCodePrefix::iter` method chains all rule group
iterators together. This leads to very long recursive types
`Chain<Map<Chain<Map<Chain<Map.....>>>>` (proportional to the number of
rule groups).
This PR rewrites the macro to use `Vec::extend` instead, which removes
the long recursive type (at the cost of introducing a potential
allocation).
## Alternatives
An alternative would be to use a stack allocated array by unrolling the
`Linter::iter` methods (generated by `EnumIter`).
I don't think it's worth the extra complexity, considering that
`RuleCodePrefix::iter` isn't a hot function.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
Fixes#10324
This removes an overeager failure case where we would exit early if no
root directory or workspace folders were provided on server
initialization. We now fall-back to the current working directory as a
workspace for that file.
## Test Plan
N/A
## Summary
#10151 documented the deviations between Ruff and Black with the new
2024 style guide in the `ruff-python-formatter/README.md`. However,
that's not the documentation shown
on the website when navigating to [intentional
deviations](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/formatter/black/).
This PR streamlines the `ruff-python-formatter/README.md` and links to
the documentation on the website instead of repeating the same content.
The PR also makes the 2024 style guide deviations available on the
website documentation.
## Test Plan
I built the documentation locally and verified that the 2024 style guide
known deviations are now shown on the website.
## Summary
In issue https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/6785 it is reported
that a docstring in the form of `''"assert" ' SAM macro definitions '''`
is autocorrected to `"""assert" ' SAM macro definitions '''` (note the
triple quotes one only one side), which breaks the python program due
`undetermined string lateral`.
* `Q002`: Not only would docstrings in the form of `''"assert" ' SAM
macro definitions '''` (single quotes) be autofixed wrongly, but also
e.g. `""'assert' ' SAM macro definitions '''` (double quotes). The bug
is present for docstrings in all scopes (e.g. module docstrings, class
docstrings, function docstrings)
* `Q000`: The autofix error is not only present for `Q002` (docstrings),
but also for inline strings (`Q000`). Therefore `s = ''"assert" ' SAM
macro definitions '''` will also be wrongly autofixed.
Note that situation in which the first string is non-empty can be fixed,
e.g. `'123'"assert" ' SAM macro definitions '''` -> `"123""assert" ' SAM
macro definitions '''` is valid.
## What
* Change FixAvailability of `Q000` `Q002` to `Sometimes`
* Changed both rules such that docstrings/inline strings that cannot be
fixed are still reported as bad quotes via diagnostics, but no fix is
provided
## Test Plan
* For `Q000`: Add docstrings in different scopes that (partially) would
have been autofixed wrongly
* For `Q002`: Add inline strings that (partially) would have been
autofixed wrongly
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/6785
## Summary
The upstream category check here
fd26b29986/crates/ruff_linter/src/upstream_categories.rs (L54-L65)
was not working because the code is actually "E0001" not "PLE0001", I
changed it so it will detect the upstream category correctly.
I also sorted the upstream categories alphabetically, so that the
document generation will be deterministic.
## Test Plan
I compared the diff before and after the change.
Fixes#10426
## Summary
Fix rule B030 giving a false positive with Tuple operations like `+`.
[Playground](https://play.ruff.rs/17b086bc-cc43-40a7-b5bf-76d7d5fce78a)
```python
try:
...
except (ValueError,TypeError) + (EOFError,ArithmeticError):
...
```
## Reviewer notes
This is a little more convoluted than I was expecting -- because we can
have valid nested Tuples with operations done on them, the flattening
logic has become a bit more complex.
Shall I guard this behind --preview?
## Test Plan
Unit tested.
## Summary
Implement `singledispatchmethod-function` from pylint, part of #970.
This is essentially a copy paste of #8934 for `@singledispatchmethod`
decorator.
## Test Plan
Text fixture added.
## Summary
Short-circuit implementation mentioned in #10403.
I implemented this by extending C400:
- Made `UnnecessaryGeneratorList` have information of whether the the
short-circuiting occurred (to put diagnostic)
- Add additional check for whether in `unnecessary_generator_list`
function.
Please give me suggestions if you think this isn't the best way to
handle this :)
## Test Plan
Extended `C400.py` a little, and written the cases where:
- Code could be converted to one single conversion to `list` e.g.
`list(x for x in range(3))` -> `list(range(3))`
- Code couldn't be converted to one single conversion to `list` e.g.
`list(2 * x for x in range(3))` -> `[2 * x for x in range(3)]`
- `list` function is not built-in, and should not modify the code in any
way.
## Summary
Trailing ellipses in objects defined in `typing.TYPE_CHECKING` might be
meaningful (it might be declaring a stub). Thus, we should skip the
`unnecessary-placeholder` (`PIE970`) rule in such contexts.
Closes#10358.
## Test Plan
`cargo nextest run`
## Summary
Given `del X`, we'll typically add a `BindingKind::Deletion` to `X` to
shadow the current binding. However, if the deletion is inside of a
conditional operation, we _won't_, as in:
```python
def f():
global X
if X > 0:
del X
```
We will, however, track it as a reference to the binding. This PR adds
the expression context to those resolved references, so that we can
detect that the `X` in `global X` was "assigned to".
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10397.
## Summary
The previous documentation sounded as if typing a mutable default as a
`ClassVar` were optional. However, it is not, as not doing so causes a
`ValueError`. The snippet below was tested in Python's interactive
shell:
```
>>> from dataclasses import dataclass
>>> @dataclass
... class A:
... mutable_default: list[int] = []
...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/usr/lib/python3.11/dataclasses.py", line 1230, in dataclass
return wrap(cls)
^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.11/dataclasses.py", line 1220, in wrap
return _process_class(cls, init, repr, eq, order, unsafe_hash,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.11/dataclasses.py", line 958, in _process_class
cls_fields.append(_get_field(cls, name, type, kw_only))
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.11/dataclasses.py", line 815, in _get_field
raise ValueError(f'mutable default {type(f.default)} for field '
ValueError: mutable default <class 'list'> for field mutable_default is not allowed: use default_factory
>>>
```
This behavior is also documented in Python's docs, see
[here](https://docs.python.org/3/library/dataclasses.html#mutable-default-values):
> [...] the
[dataclass()](https://docs.python.org/3/library/dataclasses.html#dataclasses.dataclass)
decorator will raise a
[ValueError](https://docs.python.org/3/library/exceptions.html#ValueError)
if it detects an unhashable default parameter. The assumption is that if
a value is unhashable, it is mutable. This is a partial solution, but it
does protect against many common errors.
And
[here](https://docs.python.org/3/library/dataclasses.html#class-variables)
it is documented why it works if it is typed as a `ClassVar`:
> One of the few places where
[dataclass()](https://docs.python.org/3/library/dataclasses.html#dataclasses.dataclass)
actually inspects the type of a field is to determine if a field is a
class variable as defined in [PEP
526](https://peps.python.org/pep-0526/). It does this by checking if the
type of the field is typing.ClassVar. If a field is a ClassVar, it is
excluded from consideration as a field and is ignored by the dataclass
mechanisms. Such ClassVar pseudo-fields are not returned by the
module-level
[fields()](https://docs.python.org/3/library/dataclasses.html#dataclasses.fields)
function.
In this PR I have changed the documentation to make it a little bit
clearer that not using `ClassVar` makes the code invalid.
## Summary
Ignoring all lines until the first logical line does not match the
behavior from pycodestyle. This PR therefore removes the `if
state.is_not_first_logical_line` skipping the line check before the
first logical line, and applies it only to `E302`.
For example, in the snippet below a rule violation should be detected on
the second comment and on the import.
```python
# first comment
# second comment
import foo
```
Fixes#10374
## Test Plan
Add test cases, update the snapshots and verify the ecosystem check output
## Summary
This PR updates the `StringLike::FString` variant to use `ExprFString`
instead of `FStringLiteralElement`.
For context, the reason it used `FStringLiteralElement` is that the node
is actually the string part of an f-string ("foo" in `f"foo{x}"`). But,
this is inconsistent with other variants where the captured value is the
_entire_ string.
This is also problematic w.r.t. implicitly concatenated strings. Any
rules which work with `StringLike::FString` doesn't account for the
string part in an implicitly concatenated f-strings. For example, we
don't flag confusable character in the first part of `"𝐁ad" f"𝐁ad
string"`, but only the second part
(https://play.ruff.rs/16071c4c-a1dd-4920-b56f-e2ce2f69c843).
### Update `PYI053`
_This is included in this PR because otherwise it requires a temporary
workaround to be compatible with the old logic._
This PR also updates the `PYI053` (`string-or-bytes-too-long`) rule for
f-string to consider _all_ the visible characters in a f-string,
including the ones which are implicitly concatenated. This is consistent
with implicitly concatenated strings and bytes.
For example,
```python
def foo(
# We count all the characters here
arg1: str = '51 character ' 'stringgggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg',
# But not here because of the `{x}` replacement field which _breaks_ them up into two chunks
arg2: str = f'51 character {x} stringgggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg',
) -> None: ...
```
This PR fixes it to consider all _visible_ characters inside an f-string
which includes expressions as well.
fixes: #10310fixes: #10307
## Test Plan
Add new test cases and update the snapshots.
## Review
To facilitate the review process, the change have been split into two
commits: one which has the code change while the other has the test
cases and updated snapshots.
## Summary
Fixes#10367.
While the server is still in an unstable state, requiring a `--preview`
flag would be a good way to indicate this to end users.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Adds a successful check message after no errors were found
Implements #8553
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
Ran a check on a test file with `cargo run -p ruff_cli -- check test.py
--no-cache` and outputted as expected.
Ran the same check with `cargo run -p ruff_cli -- check test.py
--no-cache --silent` and the command was gone as expected.
<!-- How was it tested? -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
Re-implementation of https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/5845 but
instead of deprecating the option I toggle the default. Now users can
_opt-in_ via the setting which will give them an unsafe fix to remove
the import. Otherwise, we raise violations but do not offer a fix. The
setting is a bit of a misnomer in either case, maybe we'll want to
remove it still someday.
As discussed there, I think the safe fix should be to import it as an
alias. I'm not sure. We need support for offering multiple fixes for
ideal behavior though? I think we should remove the fix entirely and
consider it separately.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/5697
Supersedes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/5845
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
## Summary
This PR adds methods on `FString` to iterate over the two different kind
of elements it can have - literals and expressions. This is similar to
the methods we have on `ExprFString`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
## Summary
Fix "TRIO115 false positive with with sleep(var) where var starts as 0"
#9935 based on the discussion in the issue.
## Test Plan
Issue code added to fixture
## Summary
I used `codespell` and `gramma` to identify mispellings and grammar
errors throughout the codebase and fixed them. I tried not to make any
controversial changes, but feel free to revert as you see fit.
## Summary
We had a report of a test failure on a specific architecture, and
looking into it, I think the test assumes that the hash keys are
iterated in a specific order. This PR thus adds a variant to our
settings display macro specifically for maps and sets. Like `CacheKey`,
it sorts the keys when printing.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10359.
## Summary
Fixes#10351
It seems the bug was caused by this section of code
b669306c87/crates/ruff_python_index/src/indexer.rs (L55-L58)
It's true that newline tokens cannot be immediately followed by line
continuations, but only outside parentheses. e.g. the exception
```
(
1
\
+ 2)
```
But why was this check put there in the first place? Is it guarding
against something else?
## Test Plan
New test was added to indexer
## Summary
When negating an expression like `a or b`, we need to wrap it in
parentheses, e.g., `not (a or b)` instead of `not a or b`, due to
operator precedence.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10335.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
This PR fixes the following false positive in a `.pyi` stub file:
```py
x: int
y = x # F821 currently emitted here, but shouldn't be in a stub file
```
In a `.py` file, this is invalid regardless of whether `from __future__ import annotations` is enabled or not. In a `.pyi` stub file, however, it's always valid, as an annotation counts as a binding in a stub file even if no value is assigned to the variable.
I also added more test coverage for `.pyi` stub files in various edge cases where ruff's behaviour is currently correct, but where `.pyi` stub files do slightly different things to `.py` files.
## Summary
Fixes#10295.
`E225` (`Missing whitespace around operator`) and `E275` (`Missing
whitespace after keyword`) try to add a white space even when the next
character is a `)` (which is a syntax error in most cases, the
exceptions already being handled). This causes `E202` (`Whitespace
before close bracket`) to try to remove the added whitespace, resulting
in an infinite loop when `E225`/`E275` re-add it.
This PR adds an exception in `E225` and `E275` to not trigger in case
the next token is a `)`. It is a bit simplistic, but it solves the
example given in the issue without introducing a change in behavior
(according to the fixtures).
## Test Plan
`cargo test` and the `ruff-ecosystem` check were used to check that the
PR's changes do not have side-effects.
A new fixture was added to check that running the 3 rules on the example
given in the issue does not cause ruff to fail to converge.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
This PR introduces the `ruff_server` crate and a new `ruff server`
command. `ruff_server` is a re-implementation of
[`ruff-lsp`](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-lsp), written entirely in
Rust. It brings significant performance improvements, much tighter
integration with Ruff, a foundation for supporting entirely new language
server features, and more!
This PR is an early version of `ruff_lsp` that we're calling the
**pre-release** version. Anyone is more than welcome to use it and
submit bug reports for any issues they encounter - we'll have some
documentation on how to set it up with a few common editors, and we'll
also provide a pre-release VSCode extension for those interested.
This pre-release version supports:
- **Diagnostics for `.py` files**
- **Quick fixes**
- **Full-file formatting**
- **Range formatting**
- **Multiple workspace folders**
- **Automatic linter/formatter configuration** - taken from any
`pyproject.toml` files in the workspace.
Many thanks to @MichaReiser for his [proof-of-concept
work](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/7262), which was important
groundwork for making this PR possible.
## Architectural Decisions
I've made an executive choice to go with `lsp-server` as a base
framework for the LSP, in favor of `tower-lsp`. There were several
reasons for this:
1. I would like to avoid `async` in our implementation. LSPs are mostly
computationally bound rather than I/O bound, and `async` adds a lot of
complexity to the API, while also making harder to reason about
execution order. This leads into the second reason, which is...
2. Any handlers that mutate state should be blocking and run in the
event loop, and the state should be lock-free. This is the approach that
`rust-analyzer` uses (also with the `lsp-server`/`lsp-types` crates as a
framework), and it gives us assurances about data mutation and execution
order. `tower-lsp` doesn't support this, which has caused some
[issues](https://github.com/ebkalderon/tower-lsp/issues/284) around data
races and out-of-order handler execution.
3. In general, I think it makes sense to have tight control over
scheduling and the specifics of our implementation, in exchange for a
slightly higher up-front cost of writing it ourselves. We'll be able to
fine-tune it to our needs and support future LSP features without
depending on an upstream maintainer.
## Test Plan
The pre-release of `ruff_server` will have snapshot tests for common
document editing scenarios. An expanded test suite is on the roadmap for
future version of `ruff_server`.
## Summary
Fix#10282
This PR updates the Python grammar to include the `*` character in
`*args` `**kwargs` in the range of the `Parameter`
```
def f(*args, **kwargs): pass
# ~~~~ ~~~~~~ <-- range before the PR
# ^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^ <-- range after
```
The invalid syntax `def f(*, **kwargs): ...` is also now correctly
reported.
## Test Plan
Test cases were added to `function.rs`.
## Summary
This PR changes how we format `with` statements with a single with item
for Python 3.8 or older. This change is not compatible with Black.
This is how we format a single-item with statement today
```python
def run(data_path, model_uri):
with pyspark.sql.SparkSession.builder.config(
key="spark.python.worker.reuse", value=True
).config(key="spark.ui.enabled", value=False).master(
"local-cluster[2, 1, 1024]"
).getOrCreate():
# ignore spark log output
spark.sparkContext.setLogLevel("OFF")
print(score_model(spark, data_path, model_uri))
```
This is different than how we would format the same expression if it is
inside any other clause header (`while`, `if`, ...):
```python
def run(data_path, model_uri):
while (
pyspark.sql.SparkSession.builder.config(
key="spark.python.worker.reuse", value=True
)
.config(key="spark.ui.enabled", value=False)
.master("local-cluster[2, 1, 1024]")
.getOrCreate()
):
# ignore spark log output
spark.sparkContext.setLogLevel("OFF")
print(score_model(spark, data_path, model_uri))
```
Which seems inconsistent to me.
This PR changes the formatting of the single-item with Python 3.8 or
older to match that of other clause headers.
```python
def run(data_path, model_uri):
with (
pyspark.sql.SparkSession.builder.config(
key="spark.python.worker.reuse", value=True
)
.config(key="spark.ui.enabled", value=False)
.master("local-cluster[2, 1, 1024]")
.getOrCreate()
):
# ignore spark log output
spark.sparkContext.setLogLevel("OFF")
print(score_model(spark, data_path, model_uri))
```
According to our versioning policy, this style change is gated behind a
preview flag.
## Test Plan
See added tests.
Added
## Summary
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10267
The issue with the current formatting is that the formatter flips
between the `SingleParenthesizedContextManager` and
`ParenthesizeIfExpands` or `SingleWithTarget` because the layouts use
incompatible formatting ( `SingleParenthesizedContextManager`:
`maybe_parenthesize_expression(context)` vs `ParenthesizeIfExpands`:
`parenthesize_if_expands(item)`, `SingleWithTarget`:
`optional_parentheses(item)`.
The fix is to ensure that the layouts between which the formatter flips
when adding or removing parentheses are the same. I do this by
introducing a new `SingleWithoutTarget` layout that uses the same
formatting as `SingleParenthesizedContextManager` if it has no target
and prefer `SingleWithoutTarget` over using `ParenthesizeIfExpands` or
`SingleWithTarget`.
## Formatting change
The downside is that we now use `maybe_parenthesize_expression` over
`parenthesize_if_expands` for expressions where
`can_omit_optional_parentheses` returns `false`. This can lead to stable
formatting changes. I only found one formatting change in our ecosystem
check and, unfortunately, this is necessary to fix the instability (and
instability fixes are okay to have as part of minor changes according to
our versioning policy)
The benefit of the change is that `with` items with a single context
manager and without a target are now formatted identically to how the
same expression would be formatted in other clause headers.
## Test Plan
I ran the ecosystem check locally
## Summary
This PR refactors the with item formatting to use more explicit layouts
to make it easier to understand the different formatting cases.
The benefit of the explicit layout is that it makes it easier to reasons
about layout transition between format runs. For example, today it's
possible that `SingleWithTarget` or `ParenthesizeIfExpands` add
parentheses around the with items for `with aaaaaaaaaa + bbbbbbbbbbbb:
pass`, resulting in `with (aaaaaaaaaa + bbbbbbbbbbbb): pass`. The
problem with this is that the next formatting pass uses the
`SingleParenthesizedContextExpression` layout that uses
`maybe_parenthesize_expression` which is different from
`parenthesize_if_expands(&expr)` or `optional_parentheses(&expr)`.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
I ran the ecosystem checks locally and there are no changes.
