Commit graph

6387 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Wei Lee
1a79722ee0
[airflow] Extend AIR311 rules (#17422)
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:

- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->

## Summary

<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->

* Extend the following AIR311 rules
* `airflow.io.path.ObjectStoragePath` → `airflow.sdk.ObjectStoragePath`
    * `airflow.io.storage.attach` → `airflow.sdk.io.attach`
    * `airflow.models.dag.DAG` → `airflow.sdk.DAG`
    * `airflow.models.DAG` → `airflow.sdk.DAG`
    * `airflow.decorators.dag` → `airflow.sdk.dag`
    * `airflow.decorators.task` → `airflow.sdk.task`
    * `airflow.decorators.task_group` → `airflow.sdk.task_group`
    * `airflow.decorators.setup` → `airflow.sdk.setup`
    * `airflow.decorators.teardown` → `airflow.sdk.teardown`

## Test Plan

<!-- How was it tested? -->

The test case has been added to the button of the existing test
fixtures, confirmed to be correct and later reorgnaized
2025-04-16 12:40:15 -04:00
Carl Meyer
b67590bfde
[red-knot] simplify union size limit handling (#17429) 2025-04-16 09:22:16 -07:00
Wei Lee
e6a2de3ac6
[airflow] Extract AIR311 from AIR301 rules (AIR301, AIR311) (#17310)
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:

- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->

## Summary

<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->

As discussed in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/14626#issuecomment-2766146129,
we're to separate suggested changes from required changes.

The following symbols have been moved to AIR311 from AIR301. They still
work in Airflow 3.0, but they're suggested to be changed as they're
expected to be removed in a future version.

* arguments
    * `airflow..DAG | dag`
        * `sla_miss_callback`
    * operators
        * `sla`
* name
* `airflow.Dataset] | [airflow.datasets.Dataset` → `airflow.sdk.Asset`
    * `airflow.datasets, rest @ ..`
        * `DatasetAlias` → `airflow.sdk.AssetAlias`
        * `DatasetAll` → `airflow.sdk.AssetAll`
        * `DatasetAny` → `airflow.sdk.AssetAny`
* `expand_alias_to_datasets` → `airflow.sdk.expand_alias_to_assets`
        * `metadata.Metadata` → `airflow.sdk.Metadata`
    <!--airflow.models.baseoperator-->
    * `airflow.models.baseoperator.chain` → `airflow.sdk.chain`
* `airflow.models.baseoperator.chain_linear` →
`airflow.sdk.chain_linear`
* `airflow.models.baseoperator.cross_downstream` →
`airflow.sdk.cross_downstream`
* `airflow.models.baseoperatorlink.BaseOperatorLink` →
`airflow.sdk.definitions.baseoperatorlink.BaseOperatorLink`
    * `airflow.timetables, rest @ ..`
* `datasets.DatasetOrTimeSchedule` → *
`airflow.timetables.assets.AssetOrTimeSchedule`
    * `airflow.utils, rest @ ..`
        <!--airflow.utils.dag_parsing_context-->
* `dag_parsing_context.get_parsing_context` →
`airflow.sdk.get_parsing_context`

## Test Plan

<!-- How was it tested? -->

The test fixture has been updated acccordingly
2025-04-16 11:06:57 -04:00
Carl Meyer
c7b5067ef8
[red-knot] set a size limit on unions of literals (#17419)
## Summary

Until we optimize our full union/intersection representation to
efficiently handle large numbers of same-kind literal types "as a
block", set a fairly low limit on the size of unions of literals.

We will want to increase this limit once we've made the broader
efficiency improvement (tracked in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/17420).

## Test Plan

`cargo bench --bench red_knot`
2025-04-16 14:23:11 +00:00
Carl Meyer
5a115e750d
[red-knot] make large-union benchmark slow again (#17418)
## Summary

Now that we've made the large-unions benchmark fast, let's make it slow
again!

This adds a following operation (checking `len`) on the large union,
which is slow, even though building the large union is now fast. (This
is also observed in a real-world code sample.) It's slow because for
every element of the union, we fetch its `__len__` method and check it
for compatibility with `Sized`.

We can make this fast by extending the grouped-types approach, as
discussed in https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/17403, so that we
can do this `__len__` operation (which is identical for every literal
string) just once for all literal strings, instead of once per literal
string type in the union.

Until we do that, we can make this acceptably fast again for now by
setting a lowish limit on union size, which we can increase in the
future when we make it fast. This is what I'll do in the next PR.

## Test Plan

`cargo bench --bench red_knot`
2025-04-16 14:05:42 +00:00
Carl Meyer
a1f361949e
[red-knot] optimize building large unions of literals (#17403)
## Summary

Special-case literal types in `UnionBuilder` to speed up building large
unions of literals.

This optimization is extremely effective at speeding up building even a
very large union (it improves the large-unions benchmark by 41x!). The
problem we can run into is that it is easy to then run into another
operation on the very large union (for instance, narrowing may add it to
an intersection, which then distributes it over the intersection) which
is still slow.

I think it is possible to avoid this by extending this optimized
"grouped" representation throughout not just `UnionBuilder`, but all of
our union and intersection representations. I have some work in this
direction, but rather than spending more time on it right now, I'd
rather just land this much, along with a limit on the size of these
unions (to avoid building really big unions quickly and then hitting
issues where they are used.)

## Test Plan

Existing tests and benchmarks.

---------

Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
2025-04-16 13:55:37 +00:00
Matthew Mckee
13ea4e5d0e
[red-knot] Fix comments in type_api.md (#17425) 2025-04-16 11:19:48 +00:00
Matthew Mckee
a2a7b1e268
[red-knot] Do not assume that x != 0 if x inhabits ~Literal[0] (#17370)
## Summary

Fixes incorrect negated type eq and ne assertions in
infer_binary_intersection_type_comparison

fixes #17360

## Test Plan

Remove and update some now incorrect tests
2025-04-15 22:27:27 -07:00
Carl Meyer
1dedcb9e0d
[red-knot] make large-union benchmark more challenging (#17416) 2025-04-15 18:04:57 -07:00
Douglas Creager
807a8a7a29
[red-knot] Acknowledge that T & anything is assignable to T (#17413)
This reworks the assignability/subtyping relations a bit to handle
typevars better:

1. For the most part, types are not assignable to typevars, since
there's no guarantee what type the typevar will be specialized to.

2. An intersection is an exception, if it contains the typevar itself as
one of the positive elements. This should fall out from the other
clauses automatically, since a typevar is assignable to itself, and an
intersection is assignable to something if any positive element is
assignable to that something.

3. Constrained typevars are an exception, since they must be specialized
to _exactly_ one of the constraints, not to a _subtype_ of a constraint.
If a type is assignable to every constraint, then the type is also
assignable to the constrained typevar.

We already had a special case for (3), but the ordering of it relative
to the intersection clauses meant we weren't catching (2) correctly. To
fix this, we keep the special case for (3), but fall through to the
other match arms for non-constrained typevars and if the special case
isn't true for a constrained typevar.

Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/17364
2025-04-15 16:34:07 -04:00
Dhruv Manilawala
bfc17fecaa
Raise syntax error when \ is at end of file (#17409)
## Summary

This PR fixes a bug in the lexer specifically around line continuation
character at end of file.

The reason this was occurring is because the lexer wouldn't check for
EOL _after_ consuming the escaped newline but only if the EOL was right
after the line continuation character.

fixes: #17398 

## Test Plan

Add tests for the scenarios where this should occur mainly (a) when the
state is `AfterNewline` and (b) when the state is `Other`.
2025-04-15 21:26:12 +05:30
cake-monotone
942cb9e3ad
[red-knot] Add regression tests for narrowing constraints cycles (#17408)
## Summary

closes #17215 

This PR adds regression tests for the following cycled queries:
- all_narrowing_constraints_for_expression
- all_negative_narrowing_constraints_for_expression

The following test files are included:
-
`red_knot_project/resources/test/corpus/cycle_narrowing_constraints.py`
-
`red_knot_project/resources/test/corpus/cycle_negative_narrowing_constraints.py`

These test names don't follow the existing naming convention based on
Cinder.
However, I’ve chosen these names to clearly reflect the regression
cases.
Let me know if you’d prefer to align more closely with the existing
Cinder-based style.

## Test Plan

```sh
git checkout 1a6a10b30
cargo test --package red_knot_project  -- corpus
```
2025-04-15 07:27:54 -07:00
Alex Waygood
312a487ea7
[red-knot] Add some knowledge of __all__ to *-import machinery (#17373) 2025-04-15 12:56:40 +01:00
Andrew Gallant
1d49e71ddd dependencies: switch from chrono to jiff
We weren't really using `chrono` for anything other than getting the
current time and formatting it for logs.

Unfortunately, this doesn't quite get us to a point where `chrono`
can be removed. From what I can tell, we're still bringing it via
[`tracing-subscriber`](https://docs.rs/tracing-subscriber/latest/tracing_subscriber/)
and
[`quick-junit`](https://docs.rs/quick-junit/latest/quick_junit/).
`tracing-subscriber` does have an
[issue open about Jiff](https://github.com/tokio-rs/tracing/discussions/3128),
but there's no movement on it.

Normally I'd suggest holding off on this since it doesn't get us all of
the way there and it would be better to avoid bringing in two datetime
libraries, but we are, it appears, already there. In particular,
`env_logger` brings in Jiff. So this PR doesn't really make anything
worse, but it does bring us closer to an all-Jiff world.
2025-04-15 07:47:55 -04:00
Alex Waygood
79b921179c
[red-knot] Further optimize *-import visibility constraints (#17375) 2025-04-15 12:32:22 +01:00
David Peter
1f85e0d0a0
[red-knot] Minor 'member_lookup_with_policy' fix (#17407)
## Summary

Couldn't really think of a regression test, but it's probably better to
fix this if we ever add new member-lookup-policies.
2025-04-15 13:28:51 +02:00
David Peter
03adae80dc
[red-knot] Initial support for dataclasses (#17353)
## Summary

Add very early support for dataclasses. This is mostly to make sure that
we do not emit false positives on dataclass construction, but it also
lies some foundations for future extensions.

This seems like a good initial step to merge to me, as it basically
removes all false positives on dataclass constructor calls. This allows
us to use the ecosystem checks for making sure we don't introduce new
false positives as we continue to work on dataclasses.

## Ecosystem analysis

I re-ran the mypy_primer evaluation of [the `__init__`
PR](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/16512) locally with our
current mypy_primer version and project selection. It introduced 1597
new diagnostics. Filtering those by searching for `__init__` and
rejecting those that contain `invalid-argument-type` (those could not
possibly be solved by this PR) leaves 1281 diagnostics. The current
version of this PR removes 1171 diagnostics, which leaves 110
unaccounted for. I extracted the lint + file path for all of these
diagnostics and generated a diff (of diffs), to see which
`__init__`-diagnostics remain. I looked at a subset of these: There are
a lot of `SomeClass(*args)` calls where we don't understand the
unpacking yet (this is not even related to `__init__`). Some others are
related to `NamedTuple`, which we also don't support yet. And then there
are some errors related to `@attrs.define`-decorated classes, which
would probably require support for `dataclass_transform`, which I made
no attempt to include in this PR.

## Test Plan

New Markdown tests.
2025-04-15 10:39:21 +02:00
github-actions[bot]
4894f52bae
Sync vendored typeshed stubs (#17402)
Close and reopen this PR to trigger CI

---------

Co-authored-by: typeshedbot <>
Co-authored-by: David Peter <mail@david-peter.de>
2025-04-15 09:16:42 +02:00
Mike Perlov
3b24fe5c07
[red-knot] improve function/bound method type display (#17294)
## Summary

* Partial #17238
* Flyby from discord discussion - `todo_type!` now statically checks for
no parens in the message to avoid issues between debug & release build
tests

## Test Plan

many mdtests are changing
2025-04-14 15:56:18 -07:00
Dhruv Manilawala
b5d529e976
[red-knot] Move relation methods from CallableType to Signature (#17365)
## Summary

This PR moves all the relation methods from `CallableType` to
`Signature`.

The main reason for this is that `Signature` is going to be the common
denominator between normal and overloaded callables and the core logic
to check a certain relationship is going to just require the information
that would exists on `Signature`. For example, to check whether an
overloaded callable is a subtype of a normal callable, we need to check
whether _every_ overloaded signature is a subtype of the normal
callable's signature. This "every" logic would become part of the
`CallableType` and the core logic of checking the subtyping would exists
on `Signature`.
2025-04-15 03:32:25 +05:30
Brent Westbrook
014bb526f4
[syntax-errors] await outside async functions (#17363)
Summary
--

This PR implements detecting the use of `await` expressions outside of
async functions. This is a reimplementation of
[await-outside-async
(PLE1142)](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/await-outside-async/) as a
semantic syntax error.

Despite the rule name, PLE1142 also applies to `async for` and `async
with`, so these are covered here too.

Test Plan
--

Existing PLE1142 tests.

I also deleted more code from the `SemanticSyntaxCheckerVisitor` to
avoid changes in other parser tests.
2025-04-14 13:01:48 -04:00
Carl Meyer
e2a38e4c00
[red-knot] optimize is_subtype_of for literals (#17394)
## Summary

Allows us to establish that two literals do not have a subtype
relationship with each other, without having to fallback to a typeshed
Instance type, which is comparatively slow.

Improves the performance of the many-string-literals union benchmark by
5x.

## Test Plan

`cargo test -p red_knot_python_semantic` and `cargo bench --bench
red_knot`.
2025-04-14 09:42:44 -07:00
Carl Meyer
9bee9429de
[red-knot] add a large-union-of-string-literals benchmark (#17393)
## Summary

Add a benchmark for a large-union case that currently has exponential
blow-up in execution time.

## Test Plan

`cargo bench --bench red_knot`
2025-04-14 09:40:46 -07:00
David Peter
850360a0b4
[red-knot] Document limitations of diagnostics-silencing in unreachable code (#17387)
## Summary

Document the limitations of our current approach to silencing only a
subset of diagnostics in unreachable sections.
2025-04-14 12:55:14 +02:00
Shunsuke Shibayama
dfd8eaeb32
[red-knot] detect unreachable attribute assignments (#16852)
## Summary

This PR closes #15967.

Attribute assignments that are statically known to be unreachable are
excluded from consideration for implicit instance attribute type
inference. If none of the assignments are found to be reachable, an
`unresolved-attribute` error is reported.

## Test Plan

[A test
case](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/blob/main/crates/red_knot_python_semantic/resources/mdtest/attributes.md#attributes-defined-in-statically-known-to-be-false-branches)
marked as TODO now work as intended, and new test cases have been added.

---------

Co-authored-by: David Peter <mail@david-peter.de>
2025-04-14 09:23:20 +02:00
Dhruv Manilawala
3aa3ee8b89
[red-knot] Use concise message for the server (#17367)
## Summary

This is mainly a follow-up from
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/17357 to use the
`concise_message` method for the red-knot server which I noticed
recently while testing the overload implementation.
2025-04-12 04:49:28 +00:00
David Peter
f0c3abd198
[red-knot] Minor followup on str.startswith (#17362)
## Summary

Minor follow-up to https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/17351, thank
you @AlexWaygood.
2025-04-11 18:40:08 +00:00
Dhruv Manilawala
e5026c0877
Use concise message to show diagnostics in playground (#17357)
## Summary

This PR fixes the playground to use the new `concise_diagnostic` method.

## Test plan

**Before:**

<img width="1728" alt="Screenshot 2025-04-11 at 11 37 34 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cbfcbc52-2e70-4277-9363-ba197711390e"
/>

**After:**

<img width="1728" alt="Screenshot 2025-04-11 at 11 38 03 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/356ec63c-50d9-49a8-8df4-84000b46fb6d"
/>
2025-04-11 22:44:24 +05:30
Brent Westbrook
da32a83c9f
[syntax-errors] return outside function (#17300)
Summary
--

This PR reimplements [return-outside-function
(F706)](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/return-outside-function/) as a
semantic syntax error.

These changes are very similar to those in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/17298.

Test Plan
--

New linter tests, plus existing F706 tests.
2025-04-11 17:05:54 +00:00
Andrew Gallant
7d11ef1564 red_knot_python_semantic: make TextRange required for reporting a lint diagnostic
This commit shuffles the reporting API around a little bit such that a
range is required, up front, when reporting a lint diagnostic. This in
turn enables us to make suppression checking eager.

In order to avoid callers needing to provide the range twice, we create
a primary annotation *without* a message inside the `Diagnostic`
encapsulated by the guard. We do this instead of requiring the message
up front because we're concerned about API complexity and the effort
involved in creating the message.

In order to provide a means of attaching a message to the primary
annotation, we expose a convenience API on `LintDiagnosticGuard` for
setting the message. This isn't generally possible for a `Diagnostic`,
but since a `LintDiagnosticGuard` knows how the `Diagnostic` was
constructed, we can offer this API correctly.

It strikes me that it might be easy to forget to attach a primary
annotation message, btu I think this the "least" bad failure mode. And
in particular, it should be somewhat obvious that it's missing once one
adds a snapshot test for how the diagnostic renders.

Otherwise, this API gives us the ability to eagerly check whether a
diagnostic should be reported with nearly minimal information. It also
shouldn't have any footguns since it guarantees that the primary
annotation is tied to the file in the typing context. And it keeps
things pretty simple: callers only need to provide what is actually
strictly necessary to make a diagnostic.
2025-04-11 12:36:36 -04:00
Andrew Gallant
b79d43a852 ruff_db: add primary annotation message mutators on Diagnostic
This will enable us to provide an API on `LintDiagnosticGuard` for
setting the primary annotation message. It will require an `unwrap()`,
but due to how `LintDiagnosticGuard` will build a `Diagnostic`, this
`unwrap()` will be guaranteed to succeed. (And it won't bubble out to
every user of `LintDiagnosticGuard`.)
2025-04-11 12:36:36 -04:00
Andrew Gallant
a4d3c4bf8b red_knot_python_semantic: make the guards implement DerefMut
This is the payoff from removing a bit of indirection. The types still
exist, but now callers don't need to do builder -> reporter ->
diagnostic. They can just conceptually think of it as builder ->
diagnostic.
2025-04-11 12:36:36 -04:00
Andrew Gallant
f3cc287a40 red_knot_python_semantic: tweak naming
We're going to make the guards deref to `Diagnostic` in order to remove
a layer of indirection in the reporter API. (Well, technically the layer
is not removed since the types still exist, but in actual _usage_ the
layer will be removed. We'll see how it shakes out in the next commit.)
2025-04-11 12:36:36 -04:00
Andrew Gallant
bd5b8a9ec6 ruff_db: tweak APIs accepting a diagnostic message
This expands the set of types accepted for diagnostic messages. Instead
of only `std::fmt::Display` impls, we now *also* accept a concrete
`DiagnosticMessage`.

This will be useful to avoid unnecessary copies of every single
diagnostic message created via `InferContext::report_lint`. (I'll call
out how this helps in a subsequent commit.)
2025-04-11 12:36:36 -04:00
David Peter
47956db567
[red-knot] Specialize str.startswith for string literals (#17351)
## Summary

Infer precise Boolean literal types for `str.startswith` calls where the
instance and the prefix are both string literals. This allows us to
understand `sys.platform.startswith(…)` branches.

## Test Plan

New Markdown tests
2025-04-11 16:26:45 +02:00
Brent Westbrook
ffef71d106
[syntax-errors] yield, yield from, and await outside functions (#17298)
Summary
--

This PR reimplements [yield-outside-function
(F704)](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/yield-outside-function/) as a
semantic syntax error. Despite the name, this rule covers `yield from`
and `await` in addition to `yield`.

Test Plan
--

New linter tests, along with the existing F704 test.

---------

Co-authored-by: Dhruv Manilawala <dhruvmanila@gmail.com>
2025-04-11 10:16:23 -04:00
Micha Reiser
7e571791c0
[red-knot] Refresh diagnostics when changing related files (#17350) 2025-04-11 15:50:28 +02:00
Brent Westbrook
8e11c53310
Add Checker::import_from_typing (#17340)
Summary
--

This PR replaces uses of version-dependent imports from `typing` or
`typing_extensions` with a centralized `Checker::import_from_typing`
method.

The idea here is to make the fix for #9761 (whatever it ends up being)
applicable to all of the rules performing similar checks.

Test Plan
--

Existing tests for the affected rules.
2025-04-11 13:37:55 +00:00
Max Mynter
1aad180aae
Don't add chaperone space after escaped quote in triple quote (#17216)
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
2025-04-11 10:21:47 +02:00
David Peter
1a3b73720c
[red-knot] Silence errors in unreachable type annotations / class bases (#17342)
## Summary

For silencing `invalid-type-form` diagnostics in unreachable code, we
use the same approach that we use before and check the reachability that
we already record.

For silencing `invalid-bases`, we simply check if the type of the base
is `Never`. If so, we silence the diagnostic with the argument that the
class construction would never happen.

## Test Plan

Updated Markdown tests.
2025-04-10 22:47:47 +02:00
David Peter
8b2727cf67
[red-knot] Silence unresolved-import in unreachable code (#17336)
## Summary

Similar to what we did for `unresolved-reference` and
`unresolved-attribute`, we now also silence `unresolved-import`
diagnostics if the corresponding `import` statement is unreachable.

This addresses the (already closed) issue #17049.

## Test Plan

Adapted Markdown tests.
2025-04-10 21:13:28 +02:00
Andrew Gallant
410aa4b8fd red_knot_python_semantic: move TODO comment
It fits with reporting lint diagnostics much better than reporting
general diagnostics.
2025-04-10 13:21:00 -04:00
Andrew Gallant
bd58135b0d red_knot_python_semantic: rename lint() and report()
... to `report_lint()` and `report_diagnostic()`. And rename the old
`report_lint()` to `report_lint_old()`.
2025-04-10 13:21:00 -04:00
Andrew Gallant
81045758d3 ruff_db: use Annotation::get_message in more places
I added this accessor because tests want it, but we can also use it in
other places internally. It's a little nicer because it does the
`as_deref()` for you.
2025-04-10 13:21:00 -04:00
Andrew Gallant
0b2a5b5cd3 red_knot_python_semantic: tweak docs on building reporter builders 2025-04-10 13:21:00 -04:00
Andrew Gallant
7d958a9ee5 red_knot_python_semantic: remove the "old" secondary message type
This finally completes the deletion of all old diagnostic types.

We do this by migrating the second (and last) use of secondary
diagnostic messages: to highlight the return type of a function
definition when its return value is inconsistent with the type.

Like the last diagnostic, we do actually change the message here a bit.
We don't need a sub-diagnostic here, and we can instead just add a
secondary annotation to highlight the return type.
2025-04-10 13:21:00 -04:00
Andrew Gallant
7e2eb591bc red_knot_python_semantic: replace one use of "old" secondary diagnostic messages
This is the first use of the new `lint()` reporter.

I somewhat skipped a step here and also modified the actual diagnostic
message itself. The snapshots should tell the story.

We couldn't do this before because we had no way of differentiating
between "message for the diagnostic as a whole" and "message for a
specific code annotation." Now we can, so we can write more precise
messages based on the assumption that users are also seeing the code
snippet.

The downside here is that the actual message text can become quite vague
in the absence of the code snippet. This occurs, for example, with
concise diagnostic formatting. It's unclear if we should do anything
about it. I don't really see a way to make it better that doesn't
involve creating diagnostics with messages for each mode, which I think
would be a major PITA.

The upside is that this code gets a bit simpler, and we very
specifically avoid doing extra work if this specific lint is disabled.
2025-04-10 13:21:00 -04:00
Andrew Gallant
ba408f4231 red_knot_python_semantic: update revealed type snapshots
This required a bit of surgery in the diagnostic matching and more
faffing about using a "concise" message from a diagnostic instead of
only printing the "primary" message.
2025-04-10 13:21:00 -04:00
Andrew Gallant
28b64064f5 ruff_db: tweak how the revealed type diagnostic is rendered
In the new diagnostic data model, we really should have a main
diagnostic message *and* a primary span (with an optional message
attached to it) for every diagnostic.

In this commit, I try to make this true for the "revealed type"
diagnostic. Instead of the annotation saying both "revealed type is"
and also the revealed type itself, the annotation is now just the
revealed type and the main diagnostic message is "Revealed type."

I expect this may be controversial. I'm open to doing something
different. I tried to avoid redundancy, but maybe this is a special case
where we want the redundancy. I'm honestly not sure. I do *like* how it
looks with this commit, but I'm not working with Red Knot's type
checking daily, so my opinion doesn't count for much.

This did also require some tweaking to concise diagnostic formatting in
order to preserve the essential information.

This commit doesn't update every relevant snapshot. Just a few. I split
the rest out into the next commit.
2025-04-10 13:21:00 -04:00
Andrew Gallant
75b15ea2d0 red_knot: add explicit test for concise reveal_type diagnostic
This test reflects the status quo before we change things.
2025-04-10 13:21:00 -04:00