Commit graph

21 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Charlie Marsh
2d505e2b04
Remove suite body tracking from SemanticModel (#5848)
## Summary

The `SemanticModel` currently stores the "body" of a given `Suite`,
along with the current statement index. This is used to support "next
sibling" queries, but we only use this in exactly one place -- the rule
that simplifies constructs like this to `any` or `all`:

```python
for x in y:
    if x == 0:
        return True
return False
```

Instead of tracking the state, we can just do a (slightly more
expensive) traversal, by finding the node within its parent and
returning the next node in the body.

Note that we'll only have to do this extremely rarely -- namely, for
functions that contain something like:

```python
for x in y:
    if x == 0:
        return True
```
2023-07-18 18:58:31 -04:00
konsti
730e6b2b4c
Refactor StmtIf: Formatter and Linter (#5459)
## Summary

Previously, `StmtIf` was defined recursively as
```rust
pub struct StmtIf {
    pub range: TextRange,
    pub test: Box<Expr>,
    pub body: Vec<Stmt>,
    pub orelse: Vec<Stmt>,
}
```
Every `elif` was represented as an `orelse` with a single `StmtIf`. This
means that this representation couldn't differentiate between
```python
if cond1:
    x = 1
else:
    if cond2:
        x = 2
```
and 
```python
if cond1:
    x = 1
elif cond2:
    x = 2
```
It also makes many checks harder than they need to be because we have to
recurse just to iterate over an entire if-elif-else and because we're
lacking nodes and ranges on the `elif` and `else` branches.

We change the representation to a flat

```rust
pub struct StmtIf {
    pub range: TextRange,
    pub test: Box<Expr>,
    pub body: Vec<Stmt>,
    pub elif_else_clauses: Vec<ElifElseClause>,
}

pub struct ElifElseClause {
    pub range: TextRange,
    pub test: Option<Expr>,
    pub body: Vec<Stmt>,
}
```
where `test: Some(_)` represents an `elif` and `test: None` an else.

This representation is different tradeoff, e.g. we need to allocate the
`Vec<ElifElseClause>`, the `elif`s are now different than the `if`s
(which matters in rules where want to check both `if`s and `elif`s) and
the type system doesn't guarantee that the `test: None` else is actually
last. We're also now a bit more inconsistent since all other `else`,
those from `for`, `while` and `try`, still don't have nodes. With the
new representation some things became easier, e.g. finding the `elif`
token (we can use the start of the `ElifElseClause`) and formatting
comments for if-elif-else (no more dangling comments splitting, we only
have to insert the dangling comment after the colon manually and set
`leading_alternate_branch_comments`, everything else is taken of by
having nodes for each branch and the usual placement.rs fixups).

## Merge Plan

This PR requires coordination between the parser repo and the main ruff
repo. I've split the ruff part, into two stacked PRs which have to be
merged together (only the second one fixes all tests), the first for the
formatter to be reviewed by @michareiser and the second for the linter
to be reviewed by @charliermarsh.

* MH: Review and merge
https://github.com/astral-sh/RustPython-Parser/pull/20
* MH: Review and merge or move later in stack
https://github.com/astral-sh/RustPython-Parser/pull/21
* MH: Review and approve
https://github.com/astral-sh/RustPython-Parser/pull/22
* MH: Review and approve formatter PR
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/5459
* CM: Review and approve linter PR
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/5460
* Merge linter PR in formatter PR, fix ecosystem checks (ecosystem
checks can't run on the formatter PR and won't run on the linter PR, so
we need to merge them first)
 * Merge https://github.com/astral-sh/RustPython-Parser/pull/22
 * Create tag in the parser, update linter+formatter PR
 * Merge linter+formatter PR https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/5459

---------

Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
2023-07-18 13:40:15 +02:00
Charlie Marsh
fa1b85b3da
Remove prelude from ruff_python_ast (#5369)
## Summary

Per @MichaReiser, this is causing more confusion than it is helpful.
2023-06-26 11:43:49 -04:00
Charlie Marsh
5ea3e42513
Always use identifier ranges to store bindings (#5110)
## Summary

At present, when we store a binding, we include a `TextRange` alongside
it. The `TextRange` _sometimes_ matches the exact range of the
identifier to which the `Binding` is linked, but... not always.

For example, given:

```python
x = 1
```

The binding we create _will_ use the range of `x`, because the left-hand
side is an `Expr::Name`, which has a valid range on it.

However, given:

```python
try:
  pass
except ValueError as e:
  pass
```

When we create a binding for `e`, we don't have a `TextRange`... The AST
doesn't give us one. So we end up extracting it via lexing.

This PR extends that pattern to the rest of the binding kinds, to ensure
that whenever we create a binding, we always use the range of the bound
name. This leads to better diagnostics in cases like pattern matching,
whereby the diagnostic for "unused variable `x`" here used to include
`*x`, instead of just `x`:

```python
def f(provided: int) -> int:
    match provided:
        case [_, *x]:
            pass
```

This is _also_ required for symbol renames, since we track writes as
bindings -- so we need to know the ranges of the bound symbols.

By storing these bindings precisely, we can also remove the
`binding.trimmed_range` abstraction -- since bindings already use the
"trimmed range".

To implement this behavior, I took some of our existing utilities (like
the code we had for `except ValueError as e` above), migrated them from
a full lexer to a zero-allocation lexer that _only_ identifies
"identifiers", and moved the behavior into a trait, so we can now do
`stmt.identifier(locator)` to get the range for the identifier.

Honestly, we might end up discarding much of this if we decide to put
ranges on all identifiers
(https://github.com/astral-sh/RustPython-Parser/pull/8). But even if we
do, this will _still_ be a good change, because the lexer introduced
here is useful beyond names (e.g., we use it find the `except` keyword
in an exception handler, to find the `else` after a `for` loop, and so
on). So, I'm fine committing this even if we end up changing our minds
about the right approach.

Closes #5090.

## Benchmarks

No significant change, with one statistically significant improvement
(-2.1654% on `linter/all-rules/large/dataset.py`):

```
linter/default-rules/numpy/globals.py
                        time:   [73.922 µs 73.955 µs 73.986 µs]
                        thrpt:  [39.882 MiB/s 39.898 MiB/s 39.916 MiB/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [-0.5579% -0.4732% -0.3980%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [+0.3996% +0.4755% +0.5611%]
                        Change within noise threshold.
Found 6 outliers among 100 measurements (6.00%)
  4 (4.00%) low severe
  1 (1.00%) low mild
  1 (1.00%) high mild
linter/default-rules/pydantic/types.py
                        time:   [1.4909 ms 1.4917 ms 1.4926 ms]
                        thrpt:  [17.087 MiB/s 17.096 MiB/s 17.106 MiB/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [+0.2140% +0.2741% +0.3392%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [-0.3380% -0.2734% -0.2136%]
                        Change within noise threshold.
Found 4 outliers among 100 measurements (4.00%)
  3 (3.00%) high mild
  1 (1.00%) high severe
linter/default-rules/numpy/ctypeslib.py
                        time:   [688.97 µs 691.34 µs 694.15 µs]
                        thrpt:  [23.988 MiB/s 24.085 MiB/s 24.168 MiB/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [-1.3282% -0.7298% -0.1466%] (p = 0.02 < 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [+0.1468% +0.7351% +1.3461%]
                        Change within noise threshold.
Found 15 outliers among 100 measurements (15.00%)
  1 (1.00%) low mild
  2 (2.00%) high mild
  12 (12.00%) high severe
linter/default-rules/large/dataset.py
                        time:   [3.3872 ms 3.4032 ms 3.4191 ms]
                        thrpt:  [11.899 MiB/s 11.954 MiB/s 12.011 MiB/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [-0.6427% -0.2635% +0.0906%] (p = 0.17 > 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [-0.0905% +0.2642% +0.6469%]
                        No change in performance detected.
Found 20 outliers among 100 measurements (20.00%)
  1 (1.00%) low severe
  2 (2.00%) low mild
  4 (4.00%) high mild
  13 (13.00%) high severe

linter/all-rules/numpy/globals.py
                        time:   [148.99 µs 149.21 µs 149.42 µs]
                        thrpt:  [19.748 MiB/s 19.776 MiB/s 19.805 MiB/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [-0.7340% -0.5068% -0.2778%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [+0.2785% +0.5094% +0.7395%]
                        Change within noise threshold.
Found 2 outliers among 100 measurements (2.00%)
  1 (1.00%) low mild
  1 (1.00%) high severe
linter/all-rules/pydantic/types.py
                        time:   [3.0362 ms 3.0396 ms 3.0441 ms]
                        thrpt:  [8.3779 MiB/s 8.3903 MiB/s 8.3997 MiB/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [-0.0957% +0.0618% +0.2125%] (p = 0.45 > 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [-0.2121% -0.0618% +0.0958%]
                        No change in performance detected.
Found 11 outliers among 100 measurements (11.00%)
  1 (1.00%) low severe
  3 (3.00%) low mild
  5 (5.00%) high mild
  2 (2.00%) high severe
linter/all-rules/numpy/ctypeslib.py
                        time:   [1.6879 ms 1.6894 ms 1.6909 ms]
                        thrpt:  [9.8478 MiB/s 9.8562 MiB/s 9.8652 MiB/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [-0.2279% -0.0888% +0.0436%] (p = 0.18 > 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [-0.0435% +0.0889% +0.2284%]
                        No change in performance detected.
Found 5 outliers among 100 measurements (5.00%)
  4 (4.00%) low mild
  1 (1.00%) high severe
linter/all-rules/large/dataset.py
                        time:   [7.1520 ms 7.1586 ms 7.1654 ms]
                        thrpt:  [5.6777 MiB/s 5.6831 MiB/s 5.6883 MiB/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [-2.5626% -2.1654% -1.7780%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [+1.8102% +2.2133% +2.6300%]
                        Performance has improved.
Found 2 outliers among 100 measurements (2.00%)
  1 (1.00%) low mild
  1 (1.00%) high mild
```
2023-06-15 18:43:19 +00:00
Charlie Marsh
1d756dc3a7
Move Python whitespace utilities into new ruff_python_whitespace crate (#4993)
## Summary

`ruff_newlines` becomes `ruff_python_whitespace`, and includes the
existing "universal newline" handlers alongside the Python
whitespace-specific utilities.
2023-06-10 00:59:57 +00:00
Micha Reiser
19abee086b
Introduce AnyFunctionDefinition Node (#4898) 2023-06-06 20:37:46 +02:00
Charlie Marsh
9d0ffd33ca
Move universal newline handling into its own crate (#4729) 2023-05-31 12:00:47 -04:00
Micha Reiser
154439728a
Add AnyNode and AnyNodeRef unions (#4578) 2023-05-23 08:53:22 +02:00
Charlie Marsh
fd34797d0f
Add a specialized StatementVisitor (#4349) 2023-05-10 12:42:20 -04:00
Charlie Marsh
c1f0661225
Replace parents statement stack with a Nodes abstraction (#4233) 2023-05-06 16:12:41 +00:00
Charlie Marsh
d919adc13c
Introduce a ruff_python_semantic crate (#3865) 2023-04-04 16:50:47 +00:00
Charlie Marsh
d822e08111
Move CallPath into its own module (#3847) 2023-04-01 11:25:04 -04:00
Charlie Marsh
88308ef9cc
Move Binding structs out of scope.rs (#3842) 2023-03-31 23:49:48 -04:00
Charlie Marsh
6d80c79bac
Combine operations.rs and helpers.rs (#3841) 2023-04-01 03:40:34 +00:00
Charlie Marsh
2fbc620ad3
Move __all__ utilities to all.rs (#3840) 2023-04-01 03:31:15 +00:00
Charlie Marsh
f79506f5a4
Move some generic structs out of isort (#3788) 2023-03-30 08:58:01 -04:00
Micha Reiser
000394f428
perf(pycodestyle): Introduce TokenKind (#3745) 2023-03-28 11:22:39 +02:00
Micha Reiser
dedf4cbdeb
refactor: Move scope and binding types to scope.rs (#3573) 2023-03-17 17:31:33 +01:00
Charlie Marsh
c2750a59ab
Implement an iterator for universal newlines (#3454)
# Summary

We need to support CR line endings (as opposed to LF and CRLF line endings, which are already supported). They're rare, but they do appear in Python code, and we tend to panic on any file that uses them.

Our `Locator` abstraction now supports CR line endings. However, Rust's `str#lines` implementation does _not_.

This PR adds a `UniversalNewlineIterator` implementation that respects all of CR, LF, and CRLF line endings, and plugs it into most of the `.lines()` call sites.

As an alternative design, it could be nice if we could leverage `Locator` for this. We've already computed all of the line endings, so we could probably iterate much more efficiently?

# Test Plan

Largely relying on automated testing, however, also ran over some known failure cases, like #3404.
2023-03-13 00:01:29 -04:00
Charlie Marsh
ff2c0dd491
Use shared leading_quote implementation in ruff_python_formatter (#3396) 2023-03-08 18:21:59 +00:00
Charlie Marsh
bad6bdda1f
Create a rust_python_ast crate (#3370)
This PR productionizes @MichaReiser's suggestion in https://github.com/charliermarsh/ruff/issues/1820#issuecomment-1440204423, by creating a separate crate for the `ast` module (`rust_python_ast`). This will enable us to further split up the `ruff` crate, as we'll be able to create (e.g.) separate sub-linter crates that have access to these common AST utilities.

This was mostly a straightforward copy (with adjustments to module imports), as the few dependencies that _did_ require modifications were handled in #3366, #3367, and #3368.
2023-03-07 15:18:40 +00:00
Renamed from crates/ruff/src/ast/mod.rs (Browse further)