## Summary
It is a convention to use the `_()` alias for `gettext()`. We want to
avoid
statement expressions and assignments related to aliases of the gettext
API.
See https://docs.python.org/3/library/gettext.html for details. When one
uses `_() to mark a string for translation, the tools look for these
markers
and replace the original string with its translated counterpart. If the
string contains variable placeholders or formatting, it can complicate
the
translation process, lead to errors or incorrect translations.
## Test Plan
* Test file `RUF027_1.py` was extended such that the test reproduces the
false-positive
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10023.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
The original implementation of this applied the runtime-required context
to definitions _within_ the function, but not the signature itself. (We
had test coverage; the snapshot was just correctly showing the wrong
outcome.)
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10089.
## Summary
Update PLR1714 to ignore `sys.platform` and `sys.version` checks.
I'm not sure if these checks or if we need to add more. Please advise.
Fixes#10017
## Test Plan
Added a new test case and ran `cargo nextest run`
## Summary
Allows, e.g.:
```python
import os
os.environ["WORLD_SIZE"] = "1"
os.putenv("CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES", "4")
import torch
```
For now, this is only allowed in preview.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10059
## Summary
Closes#10031
- Detect commented out `case` statements. Playground repro:
https://play.ruff.rs/5a305aa9-6e5c-4fa4-999a-8fc427ab9a23
- Add more support for one-line commented out code.
## Test Plan
Unit tested and tested with
```sh
cargo run -p ruff -- check crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/eradicate/ERA001.py --no-cache --preview --select ERA001
```
TODO:
- [x] `cargo insta test`
## Summary
Part of #7595
This PR moves the `RUF001` and `RUF002` rules to the AST checker. This
removes the use of docstring detection from these rules.
## Test Plan
As this is just a refactor, make sure existing test cases pass.
## Summary
Fixes#9895
The cause for this panic came from an offset error in the code. When
analyzing a hypothetical f-string, we attempt to re-parse it as an
f-string, and use the AST data to determine, among other things, whether
the format specifiers are correct. To determine the 'correctness' of a
format specifier, we actually have to re-parse the format specifier, and
this is where the issue lies. To get the source text for the specifier,
we were taking a slice from the original file source text... even though
the AST data for the specifier belongs to the standalone parsed f-string
expression, meaning that the ranges are going to be way off. In a file
with Unicode, this can cause panics if the slice is inside a char
boundary.
To fix this, we now slice from the temporary source we created earlier
to parse the literal as an f-string.
## Test Plan
The RUF027 snapshot test was amended to include a string with format
specifiers which we _should_ be calling out. This is to ensure we do
slice format specifiers from the source text correctly.
## Summary
_This is preview only feature and is available using the `--preview`
command-line flag._
With the implementation of [PEP 701] in Python 3.12, f-strings can now
be broken into multiple lines, can contain comments, and can re-use the
same quote character. Currently, no other Python formatter formats the
f-strings so there's some discussion which needs to happen in defining
the style used for f-string formatting. Relevant discussion:
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/discussions/9785
The goal for this PR is to add minimal support for f-string formatting.
This would be to format expression within the replacement field without
introducing any major style changes.
### Newlines
The heuristics for adding newline is similar to that of
[Prettier](https://prettier.io/docs/en/next/rationale.html#template-literals)
where the formatter would only split an expression in the replacement
field across multiple lines if there was already a line break within the
replacement field.
In other words, the formatter would not add any newlines unless they
were already present i.e., they were added by the user. This makes
breaking any expression inside an f-string optional and in control of
the user. For example,
```python
# We wouldn't break this
aaaaaaaaaaa = f"asaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa { aaaaaaaaaaaa + bbbbbbbbbbbb + ccccccccccccccc } cccccccccc"
# But, we would break the following as there's already a newline
aaaaaaaaaaa = f"asaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa {
aaaaaaaaaaaa + bbbbbbbbbbbb + ccccccccccccccc } cccccccccc"
```
If there are comments in any of the replacement field of the f-string,
then it will always be a multi-line f-string in which case the formatter
would prefer to break expressions i.e., introduce newlines. For example,
```python
x = f"{ # comment
a }"
```
### Quotes
The logic for formatting quotes remains unchanged. The existing logic is
used to determine the necessary quote char and is used accordingly.
Now, if the expression inside an f-string is itself a string like, then
we need to make sure to preserve the existing quote and not change it to
the preferred quote unless it's 3.12. For example,
```python
f"outer {'inner'} outer"
# For pre 3.12, preserve the single quote
f"outer {'inner'} outer"
# While for 3.12 and later, the quotes can be changed
f"outer {"inner"} outer"
```
But, for triple-quoted strings, we can re-use the same quote char unless
the inner string is itself a triple-quoted string.
```python
f"""outer {"inner"} outer""" # valid
f"""outer {'''inner'''} outer""" # preserve the single quote char for the inner string
```
### Debug expressions
If debug expressions are present in the replacement field of a f-string,
then the whitespace needs to be preserved as they will be rendered as it
is (for example, `f"{ x = }"`. If there are any nested f-strings, then
the whitespace in them needs to be preserved as well which means that
we'll stop formatting the f-string as soon as we encounter a debug
expression.
```python
f"outer { x = !s :.3f}"
# ^^
# We can remove these whitespaces
```
Now, the whitespace doesn't need to be preserved around conversion spec
and format specifiers, so we'll format them as usual but we won't be
formatting any nested f-string within the format specifier.
### Miscellaneous
- The
[`hug_parens_with_braces_and_square_brackets`](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8279)
preview style isn't implemented w.r.t. the f-string curly braces.
- The
[indentation](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/discussions/9785#discussioncomment-8470590)
is always relative to the f-string containing statement
## Test Plan
* Add new test cases
* Review existing snapshot changes
* Review the ecosystem changes
[PEP 701]: https://peps.python.org/pep-0701/
## Summary
Ignore `async for` loops when checking the SIM113 rule.
Closes#9995
## Test Plan
A new test case was added to SIM113.py with an async for loop.
## Summary
This PR is a small refactor to extract out the logic for normalizing
string in the formatter from the `StringPart` struct. It also separates
the quote selection into a separate method on the new
`StringNormalizer`. Both of these will help in the f-string formatting
to use `StringPart` and `choose_quotes` irrespective of normalization.
The reason for having separate quote selection and normalization step is
so that the f-string formatting can perform quote selection on its own.
Unlike string and byte literals, the f-string formatting would require
that the normalization happens only for the literal elements of it i.e.,
the "foo" and "bar" in `f"foo {x + y} bar"`. This will automatically be
handled by the already separate `normalize_string` function.
Another use-case in the f-string formatting is to extract out the
relevant information from the `StringPart` like quotes and prefix which
is to be passed as context while formatting each element of an f-string.
## Test Plan
Ensure that clippy is happy and all tests pass.
## Summary
This PR introduces a new semantic model flag `DOCSTRING` which suggests
that the model is currently in a module / class / function docstring.
This is the first step in eliminating the docstring detection state
machine which is prone to bugs as stated in #7595.
## Test Plan
~TODO: Is there a way to add a test case for this?~
I tested this using the following code snippet and adding a print
statement in the `string_like` analyzer to print if we're currently in a
docstring or not.
<details><summary>Test code snippet:</summary>
<p>
```python
"Docstring" ", still a docstring"
"Not a docstring"
def foo():
"Docstring"
"Not a docstring"
if foo:
"Not a docstring"
pass
class Foo:
"Docstring"
"Not a docstring"
foo: int
"Unofficial variable docstring"
def method():
"Docstring"
"Not a docstring"
pass
def bar():
"Not a docstring".strip()
def baz():
_something_else = 1
"""Not a docstring"""
```
</p>
</details>
## Summary
Implement [implicit readlines
(FURB129)](https://github.com/dosisod/refurb/blob/master/refurb/checks/iterable/implicit_readlines.py)
lint.
## Notes
I need a help/an opinion about suggested implementations.
This implementation differs from the original one from `refurb` in the
following way. This implementation checks syntactically the call of the
method with the name `readlines()` inside `for` {loop|generator
expression}. The implementation from refurb also
[checks](https://github.com/dosisod/refurb/blob/master/refurb/checks/iterable/implicit_readlines.py#L43)
that callee is a variable with a type `io.TextIOWrapper` or
`io.BufferedReader`.
- I do not see a simple way to implement the same logic.
- The best I can have is something like
```rust
checker.semantic().binding(checker.semantic().resolve_name(attr_expr.value.as_name_expr()?)?).statement(checker.semantic())
```
and analyze cases. But this will be not about types, but about guessing
the type by assignment (or with) expression.
- Also this logic has several false negatives, when the callee is not a
variable, but the result of function call (e.g. `open(...)`).
- On the other side, maybe it is good to lint this on other things,
where this suggestion is not safe, and push the developers to change
their interfaces to be less surprising, comparing with the standard
library.
- Anyway while the current implementation has false-positives (I
mentioned some of them in the test) I marked the fixes to be unsafe.
## Summary
Accept 0.0 and 1.0 as common magic values. This is in line with the
pylint behaviour, and I think makes sense conceptually.
## Test Plan
Test cases were added to
`crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pylint/magic_value_comparison.py`
## Summary
I was surprised to learn that we treat `x` in `[_ for x in y]` as an
"assignment" binding kind, rather than a dedicated comprehension
variable.
The docs previously mentioned an irrelevant config option, but were
missing a link to the relevant `ignore-init-module-imports` config
option which _is_ actually used.
Additionally, this commit adds a link to the documentation to explain
the conventions around a module interface which includes using a
redundant import alias to preserve an unused import.
(noticed this while filing #9962)
## Summary
This PR renames the semantic model flag `MODULE_DOCSTRING` to
`MODULE_DOCSTRING_BOUNDARY`. The main reason is for readability and for
the new semantic model flag `DOCSTRING` which tracks that the model is
in a module / class / function docstring.
I got confused earlier with the name until I looked at the use case and
it seems that the `_BOUNDARY` prefix is more appropriate for the
use-case and is consistent with other flags.
## Summary
This PR fixes the `DebugText` implementation to use the expression range
instead of the parenthesized range.
Taking the following code snippet as an example:
```python
x = 1
print(f"{ ( x ) = }")
```
The output of running it would be:
```
( x ) = 1
```
Notice that the whitespace between the parentheses and the expression is
preserved as is.
Currently, we don't preserve this information in the AST which defeats
the purpose of `DebugText` as the main purpose of the struct is to
preserve whitespaces _around_ the expression.
This is also problematic when generating the code from the AST node as
then the generator has no information about the parentheses the
whitespaces between them and the expression which would lead to the
removal of the parentheses in the generated code.
I noticed this while working on the f-string formatting where the debug
text would be used to preserve the text surrounding the expression in
the presence of debug expression. The parentheses were being dropped
then which made me realize that the problem is instead in the parser.
## Test Plan
1. Add a test case for the parser
2. Add a test case for the generator
## Summary
This PR ensures that if a list `x` is modified within a `for` loop, we
avoid flagging `list(x)` as unnecessary. Previously, we only detected
calls to exactly `.append`, and they couldn't be nested within other
statements.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9925.
## Summary
If these are defined within class scopes, they're actually attributes of
the class, and can be accessed through the class itself.
(We preserve our existing behavior for `.pyi` files.)
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9948.
Fixes#8368
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9186
## Summary
Arbitrary TOML strings can be provided via the command-line to override
configuration options in `pyproject.toml` or `ruff.toml`. As an example:
to run over typeshed and respect typeshed's `pyproject.toml`, but
override a specific isort setting and enable an additional pep8-naming
setting:
```
cargo run -- check ../typeshed --no-cache --config ../typeshed/pyproject.toml --config "lint.isort.combine-as-imports=false" --config "lint.extend-select=['N801']"
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
Currently these rules apply the heuristic that if the original sequence
doesn't have a newline in between the final sequence item and the
closing parenthesis, the autofix won't add one for you. The feedback
from @ThiefMaster, however, was that this was producing slightly unusual
formatting -- things like this:
```py
__all__ = [
"b", "c",
"a", "d"]
```
were being autofixed to this:
```py
__all__ = [
"a",
"b",
"c",
"d"]
```
When, if it was _going_ to be exploded anyway, they'd prefer something
like this (with the closing parenthesis on its own line, and a trailing comma added):
```py
__all__ = [
"a",
"b",
"c",
"d",
]
```
I'm still pretty skeptical that we'll be able to please everybody here
with the formatting choices we make; _but_, on the other hand, this
_specific_ change is pretty easy to make.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`. I also ran the autofixes for RUF022 and RUF023 on CPython
to check how they looked; they looked fine to me.
## Summary
If a generic appears multiple times on the right-hand side, we should
only include it once on the left-hand side when rewriting.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9904.
