## Summary
This PR moves the `has_comments` function from `Indexer` to
`CommentRanges`. The main motivation is that the `CommentRanges` will
now be built by the parser which is shared between the linter and the
formatter. Thus, the `CommentRanges` will be removed from the `Indexer`.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
This PR removes the cyclic dev dependency some of the crates had with
the parser crate.
The cyclic dependencies are:
* `ruff_python_ast` has a **dev dependency** on `ruff_python_parser` and
`ruff_python_parser` directly depends on `ruff_python_ast`
* `ruff_python_trivia` has a **dev dependency** on `ruff_python_parser`
and `ruff_python_parser` has an indirect dependency on
`ruff_python_trivia` (`ruff_python_parser` - `ruff_python_ast` -
`ruff_python_trivia`)
Specifically, this PR does the following:
* Introduce two new crates
* `ruff_python_ast_integration_tests` and move the tests from the
`ruff_python_ast` crate which uses the parser in this crate
* `ruff_python_trivia_integration_tests` and move the tests from the
`ruff_python_trivia` crate which uses the parser in this crate
### Motivation
The main motivation for this PR is to help development. Before this PR,
`rust-analyzer` wouldn't provide any intellisense in the
`ruff_python_parser` crate regarding the symbols in `ruff_python_ast`
crate.
```
[ERROR][2024-05-03 13:47:06] .../vim/lsp/rpc.lua:770 "rpc" "/Users/dhruv/.cargo/bin/rust-analyzer" "stderr" "[ERROR project_model::workspace] cyclic deps: ruff_python_parser(Idx::<CrateData>(50)) -> ruff_python_ast(Idx::<CrateData>(37)), alternative path: ruff_python_ast(Idx::<CrateData>(37)) -> ruff_python_parser(Idx::<CrateData>(50))\n"
```
## Test Plan
Check the logs of `rust-analyzer` to not see any signs of cyclic
dependency.
## Summary
Often, when fixing, we need to dedent a block of code (e.g., if we
remove an `if` and dedent its body). Today, we use LibCST to parse and
adjust the indentation, which is really expensive -- but this is only
really necessary if the block contains a multiline string, since naively
adjusting the indentation for such a string can change the whitespace
_within_ the string.
This PR uses a simple dedent implementation for cases in which the block
doesn't intersect with a multi-line string (or an f-string, since we
don't support tracking multi-line strings for f-strings right now).
We could improve this even further by using the ranges to guide the
dedent function, such that we don't apply the dedent if the line starts
within a multiline string. But that would also need to take f-strings
into account, which is a little tricky.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
Part of #970.
This adds Pylint's [R0244
empty_comment](https://pylint.pycqa.org/en/latest/user_guide/messages/refactor/empty-comment.html)
lint as well as an always-safe fix.
## Test Plan
The included snapshot verifies the following:
- A line containing only a non-empty comment is not changed
- A line containing leading whitespace before a non-empty comment is not
changed
- A line containing only an empty comment has its content deleted
- A line containing only leading whitespace before an empty comment has
its content deleted
- A line containing only leading and trailing whitespace on an empty
comment has its content deleted
- A line containing trailing whitespace after a non-empty comment is not
changed
- A line containing only a single newline character (i.e. a blank line)
is not changed
- A line containing code followed by a non-empty comment is not changed
- A line containing code followed by an empty comment has its content
deleted after the last non-whitespace character
- Lines containing code and no comments are not changed
- Empty comment lines within block comments are ignored
- Empty comments within triple-quoted sections are ignored
## Comparison to Pylint
Running Ruff and Pylint 3.0.3 with Python 3.12.0 against the
`empty_comment.py` file added in this PR, we see the following:
* Identical behavior:
* empty_comment.py:3:0: R2044: Line with empty comment (empty-comment)
* empty_comment.py:4:0: R2044: Line with empty comment (empty-comment)
* empty_comment.py:5:0: R2044: Line with empty comment (empty-comment)
* empty_comment.py:18:0: R2044: Line with empty comment (empty-comment)
* Differing behavior:
* Pylint doesn't ignore empty comments in block comments commonly used
for visual spacing; I decided these were fine in this implementation
since many projects use these and likely do not want them removed.
* empty_comment.py:28:0: R2044: Line with empty comment (empty-comment)
* Pylint detects "empty comments" within the triple-quoted section at
the bottom of the file, which is arguably a bug in the Pylint
implementation since these are not truly comments. These are ignored by
this implementation.
* empty_comment.py:37:0: R2044: Line with empty comment (empty-comment)
* empty_comment.py:38:0: R2044: Line with empty comment (empty-comment)
* empty_comment.py:39:0: R2044: Line with empty comment (empty-comment)
## Summary
The tokenizer was split into a forward and a backwards tokenizer. The
backwards tokenizer uses the same names as the forwards ones (e.g.
`next_token`). The backwards tokenizer gets the comment ranges that we
already built to skip comments.
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
