## Summary
Running `cargo test -p red_knot_python_semantic` failed because of a
missing serde feature. This PR enables the `ruff_python_ast`'`s `serde`
if the crate's `serde` feature is enabled
## Test Plan
`cargo test -p red_knot_python_semantic` compiles again
When adjusting the existing tests, I aimed to avoid dealing with the
special case in other tests if it's not necessary to do so (that is,
avoid using `float` and `complex` as examples where we just need "some
type"), and keep the tests for the special case mostly collected in the
mdtest dedicated to that purpose.
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/14932
## Summary
This PR moves the `PythonVersion` struct from the
`red_knot_python_semantic` crate to the `ruff_python_ast` crate so that
it can be used more easily in the syntax error detection work. Compared
to that [prototype](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/16090/) these
changes reduce us from 2 `PythonVersion` structs to 1.
This does not unify any of the `PythonVersion` *enums*, but I hope to
make some progress on that in a follow-up.
## Test Plan
Existing tests, this should not change any external behavior.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
## Summary
This PR refactors the symbol lookup APIs to better facilitate the
re-export implementation. Specifically,
* Add `module_type_symbol` which returns the `Symbol` that's a member of
`types.ModuleType`
* Rename `symbol` -> `symbol_impl`; add `symbol` which delegates to
`symbol_impl` with `RequireExplicitReExport::No`
* Update `global_symbol` to do `symbol_impl` -> fall back to
`module_type_symbol` and default to `RequireExplicitReExport::No`
* Add `imported_symbol` to do `symbol_impl` with
`RequireExplicitReExport` as `Yes` if the module is in a stub file else
`No`
* Update `known_module_symbol` to use `imported_symbol` with a fallback
to `module_type_symbol`
* Update `ModuleLiteralType::member` to use `imported_symbol` with a
custom fallback
We could potentially also update `symbol_from_declarations` and
`symbol_from_bindings` to avoid passing in the `RequireExplicitReExport`
as it would be always `No` if called directly. We could add
`symbol_from_declarations_impl` and `symbol_from_bindings_impl`.
Looking at the `_impl` functions, I think we should move all of these
symbol related logic into `symbol.rs` where `Symbol` is defined and the
`_impl` could be private while we expose the public APIs at the crate
level. This would also make the `RequireExplicitReExport` an
implementation detail and the caller doesn't need to worry about it.
This is an alternative implementation to #15848.
## Summary
This PR adds support for re-export conventions for imports for stub
files.
**How does this work?**
* Add a new flag on the `Import` and `ImportFrom` definitions to
indicate whether they're being exported or not
* Add a new enum to indicate whether the symbol lookup is happening
within the same file or is being queried from another file (e.g., an
import statement)
* When a `Symbol` is being queried, we'll skip the definitions that are
(a) coming from a stub file (b) external lookup and (c) check the
re-export flag on the definition
This implementation does not yet support `__all__` and `*` imports as
both are features that needs to be implemented independently.
closes: #14099closes: #15476
## Test Plan
Add test cases, update existing ones if required.
## Summary
After I was asked twice within the same day, I thought it would be a
good idea to write some *user facing* documentation that explains our
reasoning behind inferring `Unknown | T_inferred` for public uses of
undeclared symbols. This is a major deviation from the behavior of other
type checkers and it seems like a good practice to defend our choice
like this.
This essentially makes it impossible to construct a `Diagnostic`
that has a `TextRange` but no `File`.
This is meant to be a precursor to multi-span support.
(Note that I consider this more of a prototyping-change and not
necessarily what this is going to look like longer term.)
Reviewers can probably review this PR as one big diff instead of
commit-by-commit.
## Summary
This is a follow up to
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/15763#discussion_r1949681336
It reverts the change to using ptr equality for `AstNodeRef`s, which in
turn removes the `Eq`, `PartialEq`, and `Hash` implementations for
`AstNodeRef`s parametrized with AST nodes.
Cheap comparisons shouldn't be needed because the node field is
generally marked as `[#tracked]` and `#[no_eq]` and removing the
implementations even enforces that those
attributes are set on all `AstNodeRef` fields (which is good).
The only downside this has is that we technically wouldn't have to mark
the `Unpack::target` as `#[tracked]` because
the `target` field is accessed in every query accepting `Unpack` as an
argument.
Overall, enforcing the use of `#[tracked]` seems like a good trade off,
espacially considering that it's very likely that
we'd probably forget to mark the `Unpack::target` field as tracked if we
add a new `Unpack` query that doesn't access the target.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
Transition to using coarse-grained tracked structs (depends on
https://github.com/salsa-rs/salsa/pull/657). For now, this PR doesn't
add any `#[tracked]` fields, meaning that any changes cause the entire
struct to be invalidated. It also changes `AstNodeRef` to be
compared/hashed by pointer address, instead of performing a deep AST
comparison.
## Test Plan
This yields a 10-15% improvement on my machine (though weirdly some runs
were 5-10% without being flagged as inconsistent by criterion, is there
some non-determinism involved?). It's possible that some of this is
unrelated, I'll try applying the patch to the current salsa version to
make sure.
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
## Summary
- Simplify unions with `object` to `object`.
- Add a new `Type::object(db)` constructor to abbreviate
`KnownClass::Object.to_instance(db)` in some places.
- Add a `Type::is_object` and `Class::is_object` function to make some
tests for a bit easier to read.
closes#16084
## Test Plan
New Markdown tests.
## Summary
This PR adds support for user-level configurations
(`~/.config/knot/knot.toml`) to Red Knot.
Red Knot will watch the user-level configuration file for changes but
only if it exists
when the process start. It doesn't watch for new configurations,
mainly to simplify things for now (it would require watching the entire
`.config` directory because the `knot` subfolder might not exist
either).
The new `ConfigurationFile` struct seems a bit overkill for now but I
plan to use it for
hierarchical configurations as well.
Red Knot uses the same strategy as uv and Ruff by using the etcetera
crate.
## Test Plan
Added CLI and file watching test
## Summary
This PR adds a new `user_configuration_directory` method to `System`. We
need it to resolve where to lookup a user-level `knot.toml`
configuration file.
The method belongs to `System` because not all platforms have a
convention of where to store such configuration files (e.g. wasm).
I refactored `TestSystem` to be a simple wrapper around an `Arc<dyn
System...>` and use the `System.as_any` method instead to cast it down
to an `InMemory` system. I also removed some `System` specific methods
from `InMemoryFileSystem`, they don't belong there.
This PR removes the `os` feature as a default feature from `ruff_db`.
Most crates depending on `ruff_db` don't need it because they only
depend on `System` or only depend on `os` for testing. This was
necessary to fix a compile error with `red_knot_wasm`
## Test Plan
I'll make use of the method in my next PR. So I guess we won't know if
it works before then but I copied the code from Ruff/uv, so I have high
confidence that it is correct.
`cargo test`
## Summary
This PR generalize the idea that we may want to emit diagnostics for
invalid or incompatible configuration values similar to how we already
do it for `rules`.
This PR introduces a new `Settings` struct that is similar to `Options`
but, unlike
`Options`, are fields have their default values filled in and they use a
representation optimized for reads.
The diagnostics created during loading the `Settings` are stored on the
`Project` so that we can emit them when calling `check`.
The motivation for this work is that it simplifies adding new settings.
That's also why I went ahead and added the `terminal.error-on-warning`
setting to demonstrate how new settings are added.
## Test Plan
Existing tests, new CLI test.
## Summary
No functional change here; this is another simplification split out from
my outcome-refactor branch to reduce the diff there. This merges
`TypeInferenceBuilder::infer_name_load` and
`TypeInferenceBuilder::lookup_name`. This removes the need to have
extensive doc-comments about the purpose of
`TypeInferenceBuilder::lookup_name`, since the method only makes sense
when called from the specific context of
`TypeInferenceBuilder::infer_name_load`.
## Test Plan
`cargo test -p red_knot_python_semantic`
## Summary
- Do not return `Option<Type<…>>` from `Unpacker::get`, but just `Type`.
Panic otherwise.
- Rename `Unpacker::get` to `Unpacker::expression_type`
## Summary
* Support assignments to attributes in more cases:
- assignments in `for` loops
- in unpacking assignments
* Add test for multi-target assignments
* Add tests for all other possible assignments to attributes that could
possibly occur (in decreasing order of likeliness):
- augmented attribute assignments
- attribute assignments in `with` statements
- attribute assignments in comprehensions
- Note: assignments to attributes in named expressions are not
syntactically allowed
closes#15962
## Test Plan
New Markdown tests
## Summary
This PR reverts the behavior changes from
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/15990
But it isn't just a revert, it also:
* Adds a test covering this specific behavior
* Preserves the improvement to use `saturating_sub` in the package case
to avoid overflows in the case of invalid syntax
* Use `ancestors` instead of a `for` loop
## Test Plan
Added test
## Summary
Adds a JSON schema generation step for Red Knot. This PR doesn't yet add
a publishing step because it's still a bit early for that
## Test plan
I tested the schema in Zed, VS Code and PyCharm:
* PyCharm: You have to manually add a schema mapping (settings JSON
Schema Mappings)
* Zed and VS code support the inline schema specification
```toml
#:schema /Users/micha/astral/ruff/knot.schema.json
[environment]
extra-paths = []
[rules]
call-possibly-unbound-method = "error"
unknown-rule = "error"
# duplicate-base = "error"
```
```json
{
"$schema": "file:///Users/micha/astral/ruff/knot.schema.json",
"environment": {
"python-version": "3.13",
"python-platform": "linux2"
},
"rules": {
"unknown-rule": "error"
}
}
```
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a18fcd96-7cbe-4110-985b-9f1935584411
The Schema overall works but all editors have their own quirks:
* PyCharm: Hovering a name always shows the section description instead
of the description of the specific setting. But it's the same for other
settings in `pyproject.toml` files 🤷
* VS Code (JSON): Using the generated schema in a JSON file gives
exactly the experience I want
* VS Code (TOML):
* Properties with multiple possible values are repeated during
auto-completion without giving any hint how they're different. 
* The property description mushes together the description of the
property and the value, which looks sort of ridiculous. 
* Autocompletion and documentation hovering works (except the
limitations mentioned above)
* Zed:
* Very similar to VS Code with the exception that it uses the
description attribute to distinguish settings with multiple possible
values 
I don't think there's much we can do here other than hope (or help)
editors improve their auto completion. The same short comings also apply
to ruff, so this isn't something new. For now, I think this is good
enough
## Summary
I noticed that the diagnostic range in specific unpacking assignments is
wrong. For this example
```py
a, b = 1
```
we previously got (see first commit):
```
error: lint:not-iterable
--> /src/mdtest_snippet.py:1:1
|
1 | a, b = 1
| ^^^^ Object of type `Literal[1]` is not iterable
|
```
and with this change, we get:
```
error: lint:not-iterable
--> /src/mdtest_snippet.py:1:8
|
1 | a, b = 1
| ^ Object of type `Literal[1]` is not iterable
|
```
## Test Plan
New snapshot tests.
## Summary
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/15989
Red Knot failed to resolve relative imports if the importing module is
located at a search path root.
The issue was that the module resolver returned an `Err(TooManyDots)` as
soon as the parent of the current module is `None` (which is the case
for a module at the search path root).
However, this is incorrect if a `tail` (a module name) exists.
## Summary
- Minor wording update
- Code improvement (thanks Alex)
- Removed all unnecessary filenames throughout our Markdown tests (two
new ones were added in the meantime)
- Minor rewording of the statically-known-branches introduction
This example from @sharkdp shows how terminal statements can appear in
statically known branches:
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/15676#issuecomment-2618809716
```py
def _(cond: bool):
x = "a"
if cond:
x = "b"
if True:
return
reveal_type(x) # revealed: "a", "b"; should be "a"
```
We now use visibility constraints to track reachability, which allows us
to model this correctly. There are two related changes as a result:
- New bindings are not assumed to be visible; they inherit the current
"scope start" visibility, which effectively means that new bindings are
visible if/when the current flow is reachable
- When simplifying visibility constraints after branching control flow,
we only simplify if none of the intervening branches included a terminal
statement. That is, earlier unaffected bindings are only _actually_
unaffected if all branches make it to the merge point.
## Summary
Allow for literate style in Markdown tests and merge multiple (unnamed)
code blocks into a single embedded file.
closes#15941
## Test Plan
- Interactively made sure that error-lines were reported correctly in
multi-snippet sections.
This causes the diagnostic to highlight the actual unresovable import
instead of the entire `from ... import ...` statement.
While we're here, we expand the test coverage to cover all of the
possible ways that an `import` or a `from ... import` can fail.
Some considerations:
* The first commit in this PR adds a regression test for the current
behavior.
* This creates a new `mdtest/diagnostics` directory. Are folks cool
with this? I guess the idea is to put tests more devoted to diagnostics
than semantics in this directory. (Although I'm guessing there will
be some overlap.)
Fixes#15866
## Summary
This is a first step towards creating a test suite for
[descriptors](https://docs.python.org/3/howto/descriptor.html). It does
not (yet) aim to be exhaustive.
relevant ticket: #15966
## Test Plan
Compared desired behavior with the runtime behavior and the behavior of
existing type checkers.
---------
Co-authored-by: Mike Perlov <mishamsk@gmail.com>
This ties together everything from the previous commits.
Some interesting bits here are how the snapshot is generated
(where we include relevant info to make it easier to review
the snapshots) and also a tweak to how inline assertions are
processed.
This commit also includes some example snapshots just to get
a sense of what they look like. Follow-up work should add
more of these I think.
This makes it possible for callers to set where snapshots
should be stored. In general, I think we expect this to
always be set, since otherwise snapshots will end up in
`red_knot_test`, which is where the tests are actually run.
But that's overall counter-intuitive. This permits us to
store snapshots from mdtests alongside the mdtests themselves.
## Summary
This PR adds `Type::call_bound` method for calls that should follow
descriptor protocol calling convention. The PR is intentionally shallow
in scope and only fixes#15672
Couple of obvious things that weren't done:
* Switch to `call_bound` everywhere it should be used
* Address the fact, that red_knot resolves `__bool__ = bool` as a Union,
which includes `Type::Dynamic` and hence fails to infer that the
truthiness is always false for such a class (I've added a todo comment
in mdtests)
* Doesn't try to invent a new type for descriptors, although I have a
gut feeling it may be more convenient in the end, instead of doing
method lookup each time like I did in `call_bound`
## Test Plan
* extended mdtests with 2 examples from the issue
* cargo neatest run
We now use ternary decision diagrams (TDDs) to represent visibility
constraints. A TDD is just like a BDD ([_binary_ decision
diagram](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_decision_diagram)), but
with "ambiguous" as an additional allowed value. Unlike the previous
representation, TDDs are strongly normalizing, so equivalent ternary
formulas are represented by exactly the same graph node, and can be
compared for equality in constant time.
We currently have a slight 1-3% performance regression with this in
place, according to local testing. However, we also have a _5× increase_
in performance for pathological cases, since we can now remove the
recursion limit when we evaluate visibility constraints.
As follow-on work, we are now closer to being able to remove the
`simplify_visibility_constraint` calls in the semantic index builder. In
the vast majority of cases, we now see (for instance) that the
visibility constraint after an `if` statement, for bindings of symbols
that weren't rebound in any branch, simplifies back to `true`. But there
are still some cases we generate constraints that are cyclic. With
fixed-point cycle support in salsa, or with some careful analysis of the
still-failing cases, we might be able to remove those.
## Summary
I experimented with [not trimming trailing newlines in code
snippets](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/15926#discussion_r1940992090),
but since came to the conclusion that the current behavior is better
because otherwise, there is no way to write snippets without a trailing
newline at all. And when you copy the code from a Markdown snippet in
GitHub, you also don't get a trailing newline.
I was surprised to see some test failures when I played with this
though, and decided to make this test independent from this
implementation detail.
## Summary
This is a follow-up to #15726, #15778, and #15794 to preserve the triple
quote and prefix flags in plain strings, bytestrings, and f-strings.
I also added a `StringLiteralFlags::without_triple_quotes` method to
avoid passing along triple quotes in rules like SIM905 where it might
not make sense, as discussed
[here](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/15726#discussion_r1930532426).
## Test Plan
Existing tests, plus many new cases in the `generator::tests::quote`
test that should cover all combinations of quotes and prefixes, at least
for simple string bodies.
Closes#7799 when combined with #15694, #15726, #15778, and #15794.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
## Summary
Resolves#15695, rework of #15704.
This change modifies the Mdtests framework so that:
* Paths must now be specified in a separate preceding line:
`````markdown
`a.py`:
```py
x = 1
```
`````
If the path of a file conflicts with its `lang`, an error will be
thrown.
* Configs are no longer accepted. The pattern still take them into
account, however, to avoid "Unterminated code block" errors.
* Unnamed files are now assigned unique, `lang`-respecting paths
automatically.
Additionally, all legacy usages have been updated.
## Test Plan
Unit tests and Markdown tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
This extracts some pure refactoring noise from
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/15861. This changes the API for
creating and evaluating visibility constraints, but does not change how
they are respresented internally. There should be no behavioral or
performance changes in this PR.
Changes:
- Hide the internal representation isn't changed, so that we can make
changes to it in #15861.
- Add a separate builder type for visibility constraints. (With TDDs, we
will have some additional builder state that we can throw away once
we're done constructing.)
- Remove a layer of helper methods from `UseDefMapBuilder`, making
`SemanticIndexBuilder` responsible for constructing whatever visibility
constraints it needs.
## Summary
Add support for implicitly-defined instance attributes, i.e. support
type inference for cases like this:
```py
class C:
def __init__(self) -> None:
self.x: int = 1
self.y = None
reveal_type(C().x) # int
reveal_type(C().y) # Unknown | None
```
## Benchmarks
Codspeed reports no change in a cold-cache benchmark, and a -1%
regression in the incremental benchmark. On `black`'s `src` folder, I
don't see a statistically significant difference between the branches:
| Command | Mean [ms] | Min [ms] | Max [ms] | Relative |
|:---|---:|---:|---:|---:|
| `./red_knot_main check --project /home/shark/black/src` | 133.7 ± 9.5 | 126.7 | 164.7 | 1.01 ± 0.08 |
| `./red_knot_feature check --project /home/shark/black/src` | 132.2 ± 5.1 | 118.1 | 140.9 | 1.00 |
## Test Plan
Updated and new Markdown tests
## Summary
Related to #15848, this PR adds the imports explicitly as we'll now flag
these symbols as undefined.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
This mimics a simplification we have on the OR side, where we simplify
`A ∨ !A` to true. This requires changes to how we add `while` statements
to the semantic index, since we now need distinct
`VisibilityConstraint`s if we need to model evaluating a `Constraint`
multiple times at different points in the execution of the program.
Something Alex and I threw together during our 1:1 this morning. Allows
us to collect statistics on the prevalence of various types in a file,
most usefully TODO types or other dynamic types.
`FlowSnapshot` now tracks a `reachable` bool, which indicates whether we
have encountered a terminal statement on that control flow path. When
merging flow states together, we skip any that have been marked
unreachable. This ensures that bindings that can only be reached through
unreachable paths are not considered visible.
## Test Plan
The new mdtests failed (with incorrect `reveal_type` results, and
spurious `possibly-unresolved-reference` errors) before adding the new
visibility constraints.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
## Summary
When we discussed the plan on how to proceed with instance attributes,
we said that we should first extend our research into the behavior of
existing type checkers. The result of this research is summarized in the
newly added / modified tests in this PR. The TODO comments align with
existing behavior of other type checkers. If we deviate from the
behavior, it is described in a comment.
