This example from @sharkdp shows how terminal statements can appear in
statically known branches:
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/15676#issuecomment-2618809716
```py
def _(cond: bool):
x = "a"
if cond:
x = "b"
if True:
return
reveal_type(x) # revealed: "a", "b"; should be "a"
```
We now use visibility constraints to track reachability, which allows us
to model this correctly. There are two related changes as a result:
- New bindings are not assumed to be visible; they inherit the current
"scope start" visibility, which effectively means that new bindings are
visible if/when the current flow is reachable
- When simplifying visibility constraints after branching control flow,
we only simplify if none of the intervening branches included a terminal
statement. That is, earlier unaffected bindings are only _actually_
unaffected if all branches make it to the merge point.
## Summary
Allow for literate style in Markdown tests and merge multiple (unnamed)
code blocks into a single embedded file.
closes#15941
## Test Plan
- Interactively made sure that error-lines were reported correctly in
multi-snippet sections.
## Summary
Resolves#15695, rework of #15704.
This change modifies the Mdtests framework so that:
* Paths must now be specified in a separate preceding line:
`````markdown
`a.py`:
```py
x = 1
```
`````
If the path of a file conflicts with its `lang`, an error will be
thrown.
* Configs are no longer accepted. The pattern still take them into
account, however, to avoid "Unterminated code block" errors.
* Unnamed files are now assigned unique, `lang`-respecting paths
automatically.
Additionally, all legacy usages have been updated.
## Test Plan
Unit tests and Markdown tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
## Summary
This is not strictly required yet, but makes these tests future-proof.
They need a `python-version` requirement as they rely on language
features that are not available in 3.9.
## Summary
This is the second PR out of three that adds support for
enabling/disabling lint rules in Red Knot. You may want to take a look
at the [first PR](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/14869) in this
stack to familiarize yourself with the used terminology.
This PR adds a new syntax to define a lint:
```rust
declare_lint! {
/// ## What it does
/// Checks for references to names that are not defined.
///
/// ## Why is this bad?
/// Using an undefined variable will raise a `NameError` at runtime.
///
/// ## Example
///
/// ```python
/// print(x) # NameError: name 'x' is not defined
/// ```
pub(crate) static UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE = {
summary: "detects references to names that are not defined",
status: LintStatus::preview("1.0.0"),
default_level: Level::Warn,
}
}
```
A lint has a name and metadata about its status (preview, stable,
removed, deprecated), the default diagnostic level (unless the
configuration changes), and documentation. I use a macro here to derive
the kebab-case name and extract the documentation automatically.
This PR doesn't yet add any mechanism to discover all known lints. This
will be added in the next and last PR in this stack.
## Documentation
I documented some rules but then decided that it's probably not my best
use of time if I document all of them now (it also means that I play
catch-up with all of you forever). That's why I left some rules
undocumented (marked with TODO)
## Where is the best place to define all lints?
I'm not sure. I think what I have in this PR is fine but I also don't
love it because most lints are in a single place but not all of them. If
you have ideas, let me know.
## Why is the message not part of the lint, unlike Ruff's `Violation`
I understand that the main motivation for defining `message` on
`Violation` in Ruff is to remove the need to repeat the same message
over and over again. I'm not sure if this is an actual problem. Most
rules only emit a diagnostic in a single place and they commonly use
different messages if they emit diagnostics in different code paths,
requiring extra fields on the `Violation` struct.
That's why I'm not convinced that there's an actual need for it and
there are alternatives that can reduce the repetition when creating a
diagnostic:
* Create a helper function. We already do this in red knot with the
`add_xy` methods
* Create a custom `Diagnostic` implementation that tailors the entire
diagnostic and pre-codes e.g. the message
Avoiding an extra field on the `Violation` also removes the need to
allocate intermediate strings as it is commonly the place in Ruff.
Instead, Red Knot can use a borrowed string with `format_args`
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
Adds meta information to `Type::Todo`, allowing developers to easily
trace back the origin of a particular `@Todo` type they encounter.
Instead of `Type::Todo`, we now write either `type_todo!()` which
creates a `@Todo[path/to/source.rs:123]` type with file and line
information, or using `type_todo!("PEP 604 unions not supported")`,
which creates a variant with a custom message.
`Type::Todo` now contains a `TodoType` field. In release mode, this is
just a zero-sized struct, in order not to create any overhead. In debug
mode, this is an `enum` that contains the meta information.
`Type` implements `Copy`, which means that `TodoType` also needs to be
copyable. This limits the design space. We could intern `TodoType`, but
I discarded this option, as it would require us to have access to the
salsa DB everywhere we want to use `Type::Todo`. And it would have made
the macro invocations less ergonomic (requiring us to pass `db`).
So for now, the meta information is simply a `&'static str` / `u32` for
the file/line variant, or a `&'static str` for the custom message.
Anything involving a chain/backtrace of several `@Todo`s or similar is
therefore currently not implemented. Also because we currently don't see
any direct use cases for this, and because all of this will eventually
go away.
Note that the size of `Type` increases from 16 to 24 bytes, but only in
debug mode.
## Test Plan
- Observed the changes in Markdown tests.
- Added custom messages for all `Type::Todo`s that were revealed in the
tests
- Ran red knot in release and debug mode on the following Python file:
```py
def f(x: int) -> int:
reveal_type(x)
```
Prints `@Todo` in release mode and `@Todo(function parameter type)` in
debug mode.
## Summary
Add a typed representation of function signatures (parameters and return
type) and infer it correctly from a function.
Convert existing usage of function return types to use the signature
representation.
This does not yet add inferred types for parameters within function body
scopes based on the annotations, but it should be easy to add as a next
step.
Part of #14161 and #13693.
## Test Plan
Added tests.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
- Remove `Type::Unbound`
- Handle (potential) unboundness as a concept orthogonal to the type
system (see new `Symbol` type)
- Improve existing and add new diagnostics related to (potential)
unboundness
closes#13671
## Test Plan
- Update existing markdown-based tests
- Add new tests for added/modified functionality
Minor cleanup and consistent formatting of the Markdown-based tests.
- Removed lots of unnecessary `a`, `b`, `c`, … variables.
- Moved test assertions (`# revealed:` comments) closer to the tested
object.
- Always separate `# revealed` and `# error` comments from the code by
two spaces, according to the discussion
[here](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/13746/files#r1799385758).
This trades readability for consistency in some cases.
- Fixed some headings
## Summary
Fixes the bug described in #13514 where an unbound public type defaulted
to the type or `Unknown`, whereas it should only be the type if unbound.
## Test Plan
Added a new test case
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
## Summary
Porting infer tests to new markdown tests framework.
Link to the corresponding issue: #13696
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
