## Summary
This PR is a spin-off from https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/19415.
It enables replacing the severity and lint name in a ty-style
diagnostic:
```
error[unused-import]: `os` imported but unused
```
with the noqa code and optional fix availability icon for a Ruff
diagnostic:
```
F401 [*] `os` imported but unused
F821 Undefined name `a`
```
or nothing at all for a Ruff syntax error:
```
SyntaxError: Expected one or more symbol names after import
```
Ruff adds the `SyntaxError` prefix to these messages manually.
Initially (d912458), I just passed a `hide_severity` flag through a
bunch of calls to get it into `annotate-snippets`, but after looking at
it again today, I think reusing the `None` severity/level gave a nicer
result. As I note in a lengthy code comment, I think all of this code
should be temporary and reverted when Ruff gets real severities, so
hopefully it's okay if it feels a little hacky.
I think the main visible downside of this approach is that we can't
style the asterisk in the fix availabilty icon in cyan, as in Ruff's
current output. It's part of the message in this PR and any styling gets
overwritten in `annotate-snippets`.
<img width="400" height="342" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/57542ec9-a81c-4a01-91c7-bd6d7ec99f99"
/>
Hmm, I guess reusing `Level::None` also means the `F401` isn't red
anymore. Maybe my initial approach was better after all. In any case,
the rest of the PR should be basically the same, it just depends how we
want to toggle the severity.
## Test Plan
New `ruff_db` tests. These snapshots should be compared to the two tests
just above them (`hide_severity_output` vs `output` and
`hide_severity_syntax_errors` against `syntax_errors`).
## Summary
This PR is a collaboration with @AlexWaygood from our pairing session
last Friday.
The main goal here is removing `ruff_linter::message::OldDiagnostic` in
favor of
using `ruff_db::diagnostic::Diagnostic` directly. This involved a few
major steps:
- Transferring the fields
- Transferring the methods and trait implementations, where possible
- Converting some constructor methods to free functions
- Moving the `SecondaryCode` struct
- Updating the method names
I'm hoping that some of the methods, especially those in the
`expect_ruff_*`
family, won't be necessary long-term, but I avoided trying to replace
them
entirely for now to keep the already-large diff a bit smaller.
### Related refactors
Alex and I noticed a few refactoring opportunities while looking at the
code,
specifically the very similar implementations for
`create_parse_diagnostic`,
`create_unsupported_syntax_diagnostic`, and
`create_semantic_syntax_diagnostic`.
We combined these into a single generic function, which I then copied
into
`ruff_linter::message` with some small changes and a TODO to combine
them in the
future.
I also deleted the `DisplayParseErrorType` and `TruncateAtNewline` types
for
reporting parse errors. These were added in #4124, I believe to work
around the
error messages from LALRPOP. Removing these didn't affect any tests, so
I think
they were unnecessary now that we fully control the error messages from
the
parser.
On a more minor note, I factored out some calls to the
`OldDiagnostic::filename`
(now `Diagnostic::expect_ruff_filename`) function to avoid repeatedly
allocating
`String`s in some places.
### Snapshot changes
The `show_statistics_syntax_errors` integration test changed because the
`OldDiagnostic::name` method used `syntax-error` instead of
`invalid-syntax`
like in ty. I think this (`--statistics`) is one of the only places we
actually
use this name for syntax errors, so I hope this is okay. An alternative
is to
use `syntax-error` in ty too.
The other snapshot changes are from removing this code, as discussed on
[Discord](1388252408):
34052a1185/crates/ruff_linter/src/message/mod.rs (L128-L135)
I think both of these are technically breaking changes, but they only
affect
syntax errors and are very narrow in scope, while also pretty
substantially
simplifying the refactor, so I hope they're okay to include in a patch
release.
## Test plan
Existing tests, with the adjustments mentioned above
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
## Summary
I think this should be the last step before combining `OldDiagnostic`
and `ruff_db::Diagnostic`. We can't store a `NoqaCode` on
`ruff_db::Diagnostic`, so I converted the `noqa_code` field to an
`Option<String>` and then propagated this change to all of the callers.
I tried to use `&str` everywhere it was possible, so I think the
remaining `to_string` calls are necessary. I spent some time trying to
convert _everything_ to `&str` but ran into lifetime issues, especially
in the `FixTable`. Maybe we can take another look at that if it causes a
performance regression, but hopefully these paths aren't too hot. We
also avoid some `to_string` calls, so it might even out a bit too.
## Test Plan
Existing tests
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
Summary
--
This PR unifies the remaining differences between `OldDiagnostic` and
`Message` (`OldDiagnostic` was only missing an optional `noqa_offset`
field) and
replaces `Message` with `OldDiagnostic`.
The biggest functional difference is that the combined `OldDiagnostic`
kind no
longer implements `AsRule` for an infallible conversion to `Rule`. This
was
pretty easy to work around with `is_some_and` and `is_none_or` in the
few places
it was needed. In `LintContext::report_diagnostic_if_enabled` we can
just use
the new `Violation::rule` method, which takes care of most cases.
Most of the interesting changes are in [this
range](8156992540)
before I started renaming.
Test Plan
--
Existing tests
Future Work
--
I think it's time to start shifting some of these fields to the new
`Diagnostic`
kind. I believe we want `Fix` for sure, but I'm less sure about the
others. We
may want to keep a thin wrapper type here anyway to implement a `rule`
method,
so we could leave some of these fields on that too.
## Summary
As the title says, this PR removes the `Message::to_rule` method by
replacing related uses of `Rule` with `NoqaCode` (or the rule's name in
the case of the cache). Where it seemed a `Rule` was really needed, we
convert back to the `Rule` by parsing either the rule name (with
`str::parse`) or the `NoqaCode` (with `Rule::from_code`).
I thought this was kind of like cheating and that it might not resolve
this part of Micha's
[comment](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/18391#issuecomment-2933764275):
> because we can't add Rule to Diagnostic or **have it anywhere in our
shared rendering logic**
but after looking again, the only remaining `Rule` conversion in
rendering code is for the SARIF output format. The other two non-test
`Rule` conversions are for caching and writing a fix summary, which I
don't think fall into the shared rendering logic. That leaves the SARIF
format as the only real problem, but maybe we can delay that for now.
The motivation here is that we won't be able to store a `Rule` on the
new `Diagnostic` type, but we should be able to store a `NoqaCode`,
likely as a string.
## Test Plan
Existing tests
##
[Benchmarks](https://codspeed.io/astral-sh/ruff/branches/brent%2Fremove-to-rule)
Almost no perf regression, only -1% on
`linter/default-rules[large/dataset.py]`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
## Summary
This PR unifies the ruff `Message` enum variants for syntax errors and
rule violations into a single `Message` struct consisting of a shared
`db::Diagnostic` and some additional, optional fields used for some rule
violations.
This version of `Message` is nearly a drop-in replacement for
`ruff_diagnostics::Diagnostic`, which is the next step I have in mind
for the refactor.
I think this is also a useful checkpoint because we could possibly add
some of these optional fields to the new `Diagnostic` type. I think
we've previously discussed wanting support for `Fix`es, but the other
fields seem less relevant, so we may just need to preserve the `Message`
wrapper for a bit longer.
## Test plan
Existing tests
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
## Summary
This PR is a first step toward integration of the new `Diagnostic` type
into ruff. There are two main changes:
- A new `UnifiedFile` enum wrapping `File` for red-knot and a
`SourceFile` for ruff
- ruff's `Message::SyntaxError` variant is now a `Diagnostic` instead of
a `SyntaxErrorMessage`
The second of these changes was mostly just a proof of concept for the
first, and it went pretty smoothly. Converting `DiagnosticMessage`s will
be most of the work in replacing `Message` entirely.
## Test Plan
Existing tests, which show no changes.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
## Summary
This PR updates the way syntax errors are handled throughout the linter.
The main change is that it's now not considered as a rule which involves
the following changes:
* Update `Message` to be an enum with two variants - one for diagnostic
message and the other for syntax error message
* Provide methods on the new message enum to query information required
by downstream usages
This means that the syntax errors cannot be hidden / disabled via any
disablement methods. These are:
1. Configuration via `select`, `ignore`, `per-file-ignores`, and their
`extend-*` variants
```console
$ cargo run -- check ~/playground/ruff/src/lsp.py --extend-select=E999
--no-preview --no-cache
Finished `dev` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.10s
Running `target/debug/ruff check /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/src/lsp.py
--extend-select=E999 --no-preview --no-cache`
warning: Rule `E999` is deprecated and will be removed in a future
release. Syntax errors will always be shown regardless of whether this
rule is selected or not.
/Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/src/lsp.py:1:8: F401 [*] `abc` imported but
unused
|
1 | import abc
| ^^^ F401
2 | from pathlib import Path
3 | import os
|
= help: Remove unused import: `abc`
```
3. Command-line flags via `--select`, `--ignore`, `--per-file-ignores`,
and their `--extend-*` variants
```console
$ cargo run -- check ~/playground/ruff/src/lsp.py --no-cache
--config=~/playground/ruff/pyproject.toml
Finished `dev` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.11s
Running `target/debug/ruff check /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/src/lsp.py
--no-cache --config=/Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/pyproject.toml`
warning: Rule `E999` is deprecated and will be removed in a future
release. Syntax errors will always be shown regardless of whether this
rule is selected or not.
/Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/src/lsp.py:1:8: F401 [*] `abc` imported but
unused
|
1 | import abc
| ^^^ F401
2 | from pathlib import Path
3 | import os
|
= help: Remove unused import: `abc`
```
This also means that the **output format** needs to be updated:
1. The `code`, `noqa_row`, `url` fields in the JSON output is optional
(`null` for syntax errors)
2. Other formats are changed accordingly
For each format, a new test case specific to syntax errors have been
added. Please refer to the snapshot output for the exact format for
syntax error message.
The output of the `--statistics` flag will have a blank entry for syntax
errors:
```
315 F821 [ ] undefined-name
119 [ ] syntax-error
103 F811 [ ] redefined-while-unused
```
The **language server** is updated to consider the syntax errors by
convert them into LSP diagnostic format separately.
### Preview
There are no quick fixes provided to disable syntax errors. This will
automatically work for `ruff-lsp` because the `noqa_row` field will be
`null` in that case.
<img width="772" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-26 at 14 57 08"
src="aaac827e-4777-4ac8-8c68-eaf9f2c36774">
Even with `noqa` comment, the syntax error is displayed:
<img width="763" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-26 at 14 59 51"
src="ba1afb68-7eaf-4b44-91af-6d93246475e2">
Rule documentation page:
<img width="1371" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-26 at 16 48 07"
src="524f01df-d91f-4ac0-86cc-40e76b318b24">
## Test Plan
- [x] Disablement methods via config shows a warning
- [x] `select`, `extend-select`
- [ ] ~`ignore`~ _doesn't show any message_
- [ ] ~`per-file-ignores`, `extend-per-file-ignores`~ _doesn't show any
message_
- [x] Disablement methods via command-line flag shows a warning
- [x] `--select`, `--extend-select`
- [ ] ~`--ignore`~ _doesn't show any message_
- [ ] ~`--per-file-ignores`, `--extend-per-file-ignores`~ _doesn't show
any message_
- [x] File with syntax errors should exit with code 1
- [x] Language server
- [x] Should show diagnostics for syntax errors
- [x] Should not recommend a quick fix edit for adding `noqa` comment
- [x] Same for `ruff-lsp`
resolves: #8447
