## Summary
I want to include URLs to the rule documentation in the LSP (the LSP has
a native `code_description` field for this, which, if specified, causes
the source to be rendered as a link to the docs). This PR exposes the
URL to the documentation in the Ruff JSON output.
## Summary
Maintain consistency while deserializing Jupyter notebook to JSON. The
following changes were made:
1. Use string array to store the source value as that's the default
(5781720423/nbformat/v4/nbjson.py (L56-L57))
2. Remove unused structs and enums
3. Reorder the keys in alphabetical order as that's the default.
(5781720423/nbformat/v4/nbjson.py (L51))
### Side effect
Removing the `preserve_order` feature means that the order of keys in
JSON output (`--format json`) will be in alphabetical order. This is
because the value is represented using `serde_json::Value` which
internally is a `BTreeMap`, thus sorting it as per the string key. For
posterity if this turns out to be not ideal, then we could define a
struct representing the JSON object and the order of struct fields will
determine the order in the JSON string.
## Test Plan
Add a test case to assert the raw JSON string.
I noticed in the byte-offsets refactor that the `JsonEmitter` uses one indexed column numbers for the diagnostic start and end locations but not for `edits`.
This PR changes the `JsonEmitter` to emit one-indexed column numbers for edits, as we already do for `Message::location` and `Message::end_location`.
## Open questions
~We'll need to change the LSP to subtract 1 from the columns in `_parse_fix`~
6e44fadf8a/ruff_lsp/server.py (L129-L150)
~@charliermarsh is there a way to get the ruff version in that method? If not, then I recommend adding a `version` that we increment whenever we make incompatible changes to the serialized message. We can then use it in the LSP to correctly compute the column offset.~
I'll use the presence of the `Fix::applicability` field to detect if the Ruff version uses one or zero-based column indices.
See https://github.com/charliermarsh/ruff-lsp/pull/103
In ruff-lsp (https://github.com/charliermarsh/ruff-lsp/pull/76) we want to add a "Disable \<rule\> for this line" quickfix. However, finding the correct line into which the `noqa` comment should be inserted is non-trivial (multi-line strings for example).
Ruff already has this info, so expose it in the JSON output for use by ruff-lsp.
