## Summary
This PR attempts to improve `builtin-attribute-shadowing` (`A003`), a
rule which has been repeatedly criticized, but _does_ have value (just
not in the current form).
Historically, this rule would flag cases like:
```python
class Class:
id: int
```
This led to an increasing number of exceptions and special-cases to the
rule over time to try and improve it's specificity (e.g., ignore
`TypedDict`, ignore `@override`).
The crux of the issue is that given the above, referencing `id` will
never resolve to `Class.id`, so the shadowing is actually fine. There's
one exception, however:
```python
class Class:
id: int
def do_thing() -> id:
pass
```
Here, `id` actually resolves to the `id` attribute on the class, not the
`id` builtin.
So this PR completely reworks the rule around this _much_ more targeted
case, which will almost always be a mistake: when you reference a class
member from within the class, and that member shadows a builtin.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/6524.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7806.
Fixes#8721
## Summary
This implements the rule proposed in #8721, as RUF021. `and` always
binds more tightly than `or` when chaining the two together.
(This should definitely be autofixable, but I'm leaving that to a
followup PR for now.)
## Test Plan
`cargo test` / `cargo insta review`
## Summary
On `main`, we flag redefinitions in cases like:
```python
import os
x = 1
if x > 0:
import os
```
That is, we consider these to be in the "same branch", since they're not
in disjoint branches. This matches Flake8's behavior, but it seems to
lead to false positives.
## Summary
Given a docstring like:
```python
def func(x: int, args: tuple[int]):
"""Toggle the gizmo.
Args:
x: Some argument.
args: Some other arguments.
"""
```
We were considering the `args:` descriptor to be an indented docstring
section header (since `Args:`) is a valid header name. This led to very
confusing diagnostics.
This PR makes the parsing a bit more lax in this case, such that if we
see a nested header that's more deeply indented than the preceding
header, and the preceding section allows sub-items (like `Args:`), we
avoid treating the nested item as a section header.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9426.
I just fixed this false negative in flake8-pyi
(https://github.com/PyCQA/flake8-pyi/pull/460), and then realised ruff
has the exact same bug! Luckily it's a very easy fix.
(The bug is that unused protocols go undetected if they're generic.)
## Summary
Ensures that any lint rules that include line locations render them as
relative to the cell (and include the cell number) when inside a Jupyter
notebook.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/6672.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
This PR adds an autofix for the newly added PYI058 rule (added in
#9313). ~~The PR's current implementation is that the fix is only
available if the fully qualified name of `Generator` or `AsyncGenerator`
is being used:~~
- ~~`-> typing.Generator` is converted to `-> typing.Iterator`;~~
- ~~`-> collections.abc.AsyncGenerator[str, Any]` is converted to `->
collections.abc.AsyncIterator[str]`;~~
- ~~but `-> Generator` is _not_ converted to `-> Iterator`. (It would
require more work to figure out if `Iterator` was already imported or
not. And if it wasn't, where should we import it from? `typing`,
`typing_extensions`, or `collections.abc`? It seems much more
complicated.)~~
The fix is marked as always safe for `__iter__` or `__aiter__` methods
in `.pyi` files, but unsafe for all such methods in `.py` files that
have more than one statement in the method body.
This felt slightly fiddly to accomplish, but I couldn't _see_ any
utilities in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/tree/main/crates/ruff_linter/src/fix
that would have made it simpler to implement. Lmk if I'm missing
something, though -- my first time implementing an autofix! :)
## Test Plan
`cargo test` / `cargo insta review`.
## Summary
We had an early `continue` in this loop, and we weren't setting
`comparator = next;` when continuing... This PR removes the early
continue altogether for clarity.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9374.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
This PR implements Y058 from flake8-pyi -- this is a new flake8-pyi rule
that was released as part of `flake8-pyi 23.11.0`. I've followed the
Python implementation as closely as possible (see
858c0918a8),
except that for the Ruff version, the rule also applies to `.py` files
as well as for `.pyi` files. (For `.py` files, we only emit the
diagnostic in very specific situations, however, as there's a much
higher likelihood of emitting false positives when applying this rule to
a `.py` file.)
## Test Plan
`cargo test`/`cargo insta review`
## Summary
Historically, we encoded this list by extracting the `__all__`. I went
to update it, but... is there really any value in it? Seems easier to
just treat `typing_extensions` as an alias for `typing`.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9334.
## Summary
The logic that detects continuations assumed that tokens themselves
cannot span multiple lines. However, strings _can_ -- even single-quoted
strings.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9323.
## Summary
This PR modifies the semantics of `runtime-evaluated-decorators` to
respect decorators on both classes _and_ functions. Historically, this
only respected classes, since the common use-case is (e.g.)
`pydantic.BaseModel` -- but functions are equally valid.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9312.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
Given:
```python
from somewhere import get_cfg
def lookup_cfg(cfg_description):
cfg = get_cfg(cfg_description)
if cfg is not None:
return cfg
raise AttributeError(f"No cfg found matching {cfg_description}")
```
We were analyzing the method from last-to-first statement. So we saw the
`raise`, then assumed the method _always_ raised. In reality, though, it
_might_ return. This PR improves the branch analysis to respect these
mixed cases.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9269.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9304.
## Summary
Part of #970.
This adds Pylint's [R0244
empty_comment](https://pylint.pycqa.org/en/latest/user_guide/messages/refactor/empty-comment.html)
lint as well as an always-safe fix.
## Test Plan
The included snapshot verifies the following:
- A line containing only a non-empty comment is not changed
- A line containing leading whitespace before a non-empty comment is not
changed
- A line containing only an empty comment has its content deleted
- A line containing only leading whitespace before an empty comment has
its content deleted
- A line containing only leading and trailing whitespace on an empty
comment has its content deleted
- A line containing trailing whitespace after a non-empty comment is not
changed
- A line containing only a single newline character (i.e. a blank line)
is not changed
- A line containing code followed by a non-empty comment is not changed
- A line containing code followed by an empty comment has its content
deleted after the last non-whitespace character
- Lines containing code and no comments are not changed
- Empty comment lines within block comments are ignored
- Empty comments within triple-quoted sections are ignored
## Comparison to Pylint
Running Ruff and Pylint 3.0.3 with Python 3.12.0 against the
`empty_comment.py` file added in this PR, we see the following:
* Identical behavior:
* empty_comment.py:3:0: R2044: Line with empty comment (empty-comment)
* empty_comment.py:4:0: R2044: Line with empty comment (empty-comment)
* empty_comment.py:5:0: R2044: Line with empty comment (empty-comment)
* empty_comment.py:18:0: R2044: Line with empty comment (empty-comment)
* Differing behavior:
* Pylint doesn't ignore empty comments in block comments commonly used
for visual spacing; I decided these were fine in this implementation
since many projects use these and likely do not want them removed.
* empty_comment.py:28:0: R2044: Line with empty comment (empty-comment)
* Pylint detects "empty comments" within the triple-quoted section at
the bottom of the file, which is arguably a bug in the Pylint
implementation since these are not truly comments. These are ignored by
this implementation.
* empty_comment.py:37:0: R2044: Line with empty comment (empty-comment)
* empty_comment.py:38:0: R2044: Line with empty comment (empty-comment)
* empty_comment.py:39:0: R2044: Line with empty comment (empty-comment)
## Summary
Hey there 👋 thanks for this great project!
On python code looking like the following
```
import yaml
from yaml.loader import SafeLoader
with MY_FILE_PATH.open("r") as my_file:
my_data = yaml.load(my_file, Loader=SafeLoader)
```
ruff reports this error:
```
S506 Probable use of unsafe loader `SafeLoader` with `yaml.load`. Allows instantiation of arbitrary objects. Consider `yaml.safe_load`.
```
This PR is an attempt to support SafeLoader being imported for either
`yaml` or `yaml.loader`
Disclaimer:
I am not familiar with Rust so this is likely not the better way of
doing it. Interested in hearing how to adapt this PR to provide similar
behavior in a better way
## Test Plan
The S506.py file was updated accordingly to cover the use cases and test
were confirmed to pass with this change.
## Summary
If `RUF100` is ignored via `per-file-ignores`, we need to avoid raising
it. `RUF100` has special "self-ignore" logic, since the rule itself
deals with `# noqa` directives. This PR wires up `per-file-ignores` to
that "self-ignore" logic.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9297.
We should avoid adding `-> None` to stubs in `.pyi` files, along with a
few other cases. (We already ignore abstract methods.)
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9270.
## Summary
Adds a rule to detect unions that include `typing.NoReturn` or
`typing.Never`. In such cases, the use of the bottom type is redundant.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9113.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
fixes#6956
details in issue
Following an advice in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/6956#issuecomment-1817672585,
this change separates expressions to 3 levels of "constant likelihood":
* literals, empty dict and tuples... (definitely constant, level 2)
* CONSTANT_CASE vars (probably constant, 1)
* all other expressions (0)
a comparison is marked yoda if the level is strictly higher on its left
hand side
following
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/6956#issuecomment-1697107822
marking compound expressions of literals (e.g. `60 * 60` ) as constants
this change current behaviour on
`SomeClass().settings.SOME_CONSTANT_VALUE > (60 * 60)` in the fixture
from error to ok
## Summary
Given a function like:
```python
def func(x: int):
if not x:
raise ValueError
else:
raise TypeError
```
We now correctly use `NoReturn` as the return type, rather than `None`.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9201.
## Summary
Part of #8771. flake8-pyi will emit a Y018 error for unused TypeVars,
ParamSpecs or TypeVarTuples; Ruff currently only emits PYI018 for unused
TypeVars.
This is my first "proper" Ruff PR -- let me know if there's a better way
of doing this! Not sure if the repeated calls to `match_typing_expr()`
are ideal.
## Test Plan
I manually updated the fixtures to add some unused ParamSpecs and
TypeVarTuples, and then updated the snapshots using `cargo insta
review`. All tests then passed when run using `cargo test`.
