## Summary
This PR makes `whitespace-before-punctuation` (`E203`) compatible with
the formatter by relaxing the rule a bit, as compared to the pycodestyle
implementation. It's also more consistent with PEP 8, which says:
> However, in a slice the colon acts like a binary operator, and should
have equal amounts on either side (treating it as the operator with the
lowest priority).
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7259.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8642.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
- Close#7487
In the spirit of `flake8-boolean-trap`, any positional argument that can
accept a boolean should raise `FBT001`.
Raise `FBT001` for all annotations that accept booleans (e.g.
`Optional[bool]`, `Union[int, bool]`).
## Test Plan
Add a fixture, with an annotation using `|`, `Optional`, and `Union`,
and containing a boolean.
## Summary
Adds an extra check to F632 to check for any `is` comparisons to a
mutable initialisers.
Implements #8589 .
Example:
```Python
named_var = {}
if named_var is {}: # F632 (fix)
pass
```
The if condition will always evaluate to False because it checks on
identity and it's impossible to take the same identity as a hard coded
list/set/dict initializer.
## Test Plan
Multiple test cases were added to ensure the rule works + doesn't flag
false positives + the fix works correctly.
## Summary
This fixes the bug where the `flake8-commas` rules weren't taking the
new f-string tokens into account.
## Test Plan
Add new test cases around f-strings for all of `flake8-commas`'s rules.
fixes: #8556
## Summary
This brings ruff's behavior in line with what `pep8-naming` already does
and thus closes#8397.
I had initially implemented this to look at the last segment of a dotted
path only when the entry in the `*-decorators` setting started with a
`.`, but in the end I thought it's better to remain consistent w/
`pep8-naming` and doing a match against the last segment of the
decorator name in any case.
If you prefer to diverge from this in favor of less ambiguity in the
configuration let me know and I'll change it so you would need to put
e.g. `.expression` in the `classmethod-decorators` list.
## Test Plan
Tested against the file in the issue linked below, plus the new testcase
added in this PR.
~Improves detection of types imported from `typing_extensions`. Removes
the hard-coded list of supported types in `typing_extensions`; instead
assuming all types could be imported from `typing`, `_typeshed`, or
`typing_extensions`.~
~The typing extensions package appears to re-export types even if they
do not need modification.~
Adds detection of `if typing_extensions.TYPE_CHECKING` blocks. Avoids
inserting a new `if TYPE_CHECKING` block and `from typing import
TYPE_CHECKING` if `typing_extensions.TYPE_CHECKING` is used (closes
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8427)
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
This PR fixes the bug where the generated fix for `EM*` rules would
replace a
triple-quoted (f-)string with a single-quoted (f-)string. This changes
the
semantic of the string in case it contains a single-quoted string
literal. This
is especially evident with f-strings where the expression could contain
another
string within it. For example,
```python
f"""normal {"another"} normal"""
```
## Test Plan
Add test case for triple-quoted string and update the snapshots.
fixes: #6988fixes: #7736
## Summary
Fixes bug in `TRIO115` where it would not `return` for values that were
not a `NumberLiteral` so
```python
x = "bla"
trio.sleep(x)
```
would set off a false positive
## Test Plan
Added test case to fixture
## Summary
Given `key in obj.keys()`, `obj` _could_ be a dictionary, or it could be
another type that defines
a `.keys()` method. In the latter case, removing the `.keys()` attribute
could lead to a runtime error.
Previously, we marked all `SIM118` fixes as unsafe for this reason;
however, in preview, we now mark them as safe if we can
infer that the expression is a dictionary.
## Test Plan
Added a preview fixture.
## Summary
We have this pattern in a bunch of places, where we find the _only_
binding to a name (and return `None`) if it's bound multiple times. This
PR DRYs it up into a method on `SemanticModel`.
## Summary
Implement
[`no-is-type-none`](https://github.com/dosisod/refurb/blob/master/refurb/checks/builtin/no_is_type_none.py)
as `type-none-comparison` (`FURB169`).
Auto-fixes comparisons that use `type` to compare the type of an object
to `type(None)` to a `None` identity check. For example,
```python
type(foo) is type(None)
```
becomes
```python
foo is None
```
Related to #1348.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
Black and Ruff's preview styles now collapse statements like:
```python
from contextlib import nullcontext
ctx = nullcontext()
with ctx: ...
```
Historically, we made an exception here for classes
(https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/2837). This PR extends it to
other statement kinds for consistency with the formatter.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8496.
## Summary
Adds `TRIO105` from the [flake8-trio
plugin](https://github.com/Zac-HD/flake8-trio). The `MethodName` logic
mirrors that of `TRIO100` to stay consistent within the plugin.
It is at 95% parity with the exception of upstream also checking for a
slightly more complex scenario where a call to `start()` on a
`trio.Nursery` context should also be immediately awaited. Upstream
plugin appears to just check for anything named `nursery` judging from
[the relevant issue](https://github.com/Zac-HD/flake8-trio/issues/56).
Unsure if we want to do so something similar or, alternatively, if there
is some capability in ruff to check for calls made on this context some
other way
## Test Plan
Added a new fixture, based on [the one from upstream
plugin](https://github.com/Zac-HD/flake8-trio/blob/main/tests/eval_files/trio105.py)
## Issue link
Refers: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8451
## Summary
Adds `memoryview` to the list of typeclasses that `fn is_type()` uses
for type comparison checks so that it raises a violation if `is`, `is
not` or `isinstance()` are not used.
## Test Plan
Added examples to existing fixture
## Issue Link
Closes: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8483
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Hi! Currently NumPy Python API is undergoing a cleanup process that will
be delivered in NumPy 2.0 (release is planned for the end of the year).
Most changes are rather simple (renaming, removing or moving a member of
the main namespace to a new place), and they could be flagged/fixed by
an additional ruff rule for numpy (e.g. changing occurrences of
`np.float_` to `np.float64`).
Would you accept such rule?
I named it `NPY201` in the existing group, so people will receive a
heads-up for changes arriving in 2.0 before actually migrating to it.
~~This is still a draft PR.~~ I'm not an expert in rust so if any part
of code can be done better please share!
NumPy 2.0 migration guide:
https://numpy.org/devdocs/numpy_2_0_migration_guide.html
NEP 52: https://numpy.org/neps/nep-0052-python-api-cleanup.html
NumPy cleanup tracking issue:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/23999
## Test Plan
A unit test is provided that checks all rule's fix cases.
## Summary
By using `set`, we were setting the bracket flag to `false` if another
operator was visited.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8379.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
We were considering the `{` within an f-string to be a left brace, which
caused the "space-after-colon" rule to trigger incorrectly.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8299.
## Summary
Implements pylint C0415 (import-outside-toplevel) — imports should be at
the top level of a file.
The great debate I had on this implementation is whether "top-level" is
one word or two (`toplevel` or `top_level`). I opted for 2 because that
seemed to be how it is used in the codebase but the rule string itself
uses one-word "toplevel." 🤷 I'd be happy to change it as desired.
I suppose this could be auto-fixed by moving the import to the
top-level, but it seems likely that the author's intent was to actually
import this dynamically, so I view the main point of this rule is to
force some sort of explanation, and auto-fixing might be annoying.
For reference, this is what "pylint" reports:
```
> pylint crates/ruff/resources/test/fixtures/pylint/import_outside_top_level.py
************* Module import_outside_top_level
...
crates/ruff/resources/test/fixtures/pylint/import_outside_top_level.py:4:4: C0415: Import outside toplevel (string) (import-outside-toplevel)
```
ruff would now report:
```
import_outside_top_level.py:4:5: PLC0415 `import` should be used only at the top level of a file
|
3 | def import_outside_top_level():
4 | import string # [import-outside-toplevel]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ PLC0415
|
```
Contributes to https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/970.
## Test Plan
Snapshot test.
## Summary
Implement
[`no-isinstance-type-none`](https://github.com/dosisod/refurb/blob/master/refurb/checks/builtin/no_isinstance_type_none.py)
as `isinstance-type-none` (`FURB168`).
Auto-fixes calls to `isinstance` to check if an object is `None` to a
`None` identity check. For example,
```python
isinstance(foo, type(None))
```
becomes
```python
foo is None
```
Related to #1348.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
This rule is now unsafe if we can't verify that the `obj` in `raise
obj()` is a class or builtin. (If we verify that it's a function, we
don't raise at all, as before.)
See the documentation change for motivation behind the unsafe edit.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8228.
## Summary
Python 3.12 added the `__buffer__()`/`__release_buffer_()` special
methods, which are incorrectly flagged as invalid dunder methods by
`PLW3201`.
## Test Plan
Added definitions to the test suite, and confirmed they failed without
the fix and are ignored after the fix was done.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Close#8123
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
New test cases
---------
Signed-off-by: harupy <hkawamura0130@gmail.com>
