Resolves https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/11313
## Summary
PLR0912(too-many-branches) did not count branches inside with: blocks.
With this fix, the branches inside with statements are also counted.
## Test Plan
Added a new test case.
## Summary
While I was here, I also updated the rule to use
`function_type::classify` rather than hard-coding `staticmethod` and
friends.
Per Carl:
> Enum instances are already referred to by the class, forming a cycle
that won't get collected until the class itself does. At which point the
`lru_cache` itself would be collected, too.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9912.
## Summary
Historically, we only ignored `flake8-blind-except` if you re-raised or
logged the exception as a _direct_ child statement; but it could be
nested somewhere. This was just a known limitation at the time of adding
the previous logic.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/11289.
## Summary
In #9218 `Rule::NeverUnion` was partially removed from a
`checker.any_enabled` call. This makes the change consistent.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
Resolves#10390 and starts to address #10391
# Changes to behavior
* In `__init__.py` we now offer some fixes for unused imports.
* If the import binding is first-party this PR suggests a fix to turn it
into a redundant alias.
* If the import binding is not first-party, this PR suggests a fix to
remove it from the `__init__.py`.
* The fix-titles are specific to these new suggested fixes.
* `checker.settings.ignore_init_module_imports` setting is
deprecated/ignored. There is probably a documentation change to make
that complete which I haven't done.
---
<details><summary>Old description of implementation changes</summary>
# Changes to the implementation
* In the body of the loop over import statements that contain unused
bindings, the bindings are partitioned into `to_reexport` and
`to_remove` (according to how we want to resolve the fact they're
unused) with the following predicate:
```rust
in_init && is_first_party(checker, &import.qualified_name().to_string())
// true means make it a reexport
```
* Instead of generating a single fix per import statement, we now
generate up to two fixes per import statement:
```rust
(fix_by_removing_imports(checker, node_id, &to_remove, in_init).ok(),
fix_by_reexporting(checker, node_id, &to_reexport, dunder_all).ok())
```
* The `to_remove` fixes are unsafe when `in_init`.
* The `to_explicit` fixes are safe. Currently, until a future PR, we
make them redundant aliases (e.g. `import a` would become `import a as
a`).
## Other changes
* `checker.settings.ignore_init_module_imports` is deprecated/ignored.
Instead, all fixes are gated on `checker.settings.preview.is_enabled()`.
* Got rid of the pattern match on the import-binding bound by the inner
loop because it seemed less readable than referencing fields on the
binding.
* [x] `// FIXME: rename "imports" to "bindings"` if reviewer agrees (see
code)
* [x] `// FIXME: rename "node_id" to "import_statement"` if reviewer
agrees (see code)
<details>
<summary><h2>Scope cut until a future PR</h2></summary>
* (Not implemented) The `to_explicit` fixes will be added to `__all__`
unless it doesn't exist. When `__all__` doesn't exist they're resolved
by converting to redundant aliases (e.g. `import a` would become `import
a as a`).
---
</details>
# Test plan
* [x] `crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pyflakes/F401_24`
contains an `__init__.py` with*out* `__all__` that exercises the
features in this PR, but it doesn't pass.
* [x]
`crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pyflakes/F401_25_dunder_all`
contains an `__init__.py` *with* `__all__` that exercises the features
in this PR, but it doesn't pass.
* [x] Write unit tests for the new edit functions in
`fix::edits::make_redundant_alias`.
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
## Summary
This PR removes the `ImportMap` implementation and all its routing
through ruff.
The import map was added in https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/3243
but we then never ended up using it to do cross file analysis.
We are now working on adding multifile analysis to ruff, and revisit
import resolution as part of it.
```
hyperfine --warmup 10 --runs 20 --setup "./target/release/ruff clean" \
"./target/release/ruff check crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/cpython -e -s --extend-select=I" \
"./target/release/ruff-import check crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/cpython -e -s --extend-select=I"
Benchmark 1: ./target/release/ruff check crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/cpython -e -s --extend-select=I
Time (mean ± σ): 37.6 ms ± 0.9 ms [User: 52.2 ms, System: 63.7 ms]
Range (min … max): 35.8 ms … 39.8 ms 20 runs
Benchmark 2: ./target/release/ruff-import check crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/cpython -e -s --extend-select=I
Time (mean ± σ): 36.0 ms ± 0.7 ms [User: 50.3 ms, System: 58.4 ms]
Range (min … max): 34.5 ms … 37.6 ms 20 runs
Summary
./target/release/ruff-import check crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/cpython -e -s --extend-select=I ran
1.04 ± 0.03 times faster than ./target/release/ruff check crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/cpython -e -s --extend-select=I
```
I suspect that the performance improvement should even be more
significant for users that otherwise don't have any diagnostics.
```
hyperfine --warmup 10 --runs 20 --setup "cd ../ecosystem/airflow && ../../ruff/target/release/ruff clean" \
"./target/release/ruff check ../ecosystem/airflow -e -s --extend-select=I" \
"./target/release/ruff-import check ../ecosystem/airflow -e -s --extend-select=I"
Benchmark 1: ./target/release/ruff check ../ecosystem/airflow -e -s --extend-select=I
Time (mean ± σ): 53.7 ms ± 1.8 ms [User: 68.4 ms, System: 63.0 ms]
Range (min … max): 51.1 ms … 58.7 ms 20 runs
Benchmark 2: ./target/release/ruff-import check ../ecosystem/airflow -e -s --extend-select=I
Time (mean ± σ): 50.8 ms ± 1.4 ms [User: 50.7 ms, System: 60.9 ms]
Range (min … max): 48.5 ms … 55.3 ms 20 runs
Summary
./target/release/ruff-import check ../ecosystem/airflow -e -s --extend-select=I ran
1.06 ± 0.05 times faster than ./target/release/ruff check ../ecosystem/airflow -e -s --extend-select=I
```
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
I think the check included here does make sense, but I don't see why we
would allow it if a value is provided for the attribute -- since, in
that case, isn't it _not_ abstract?
Closes: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/11208.
## Summary
This PR adds an override to the fixer to ensure that we apply any
`redefined-while-unused` fixes prior to `unused-import`.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10905.
## Summary
Implement duplicate code detection as part of `RUF100`, mirroring the
behavior of `flake8-noqa` (`NQA005`) mentioned in #850. The idea to
merge the rule into `RUF100` was suggested by @MichaReiser
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/10325#issuecomment-2025535444.
## Test Plan
Test cases were added to the fixture.
This syntax wasn't "deprecated" in Python 3; it was removed.
I started looking at this rule because I was curious how Ruff could even
detect this without a Python 2 parser. Then I realized that
"print >> f, x" is actually valid Python 3 syntax: it creates a tuple
containing a right-shifted version of the print function.
## Summary
Based on discussion in #10850.
As it stands today `RUF100` will attempt to replace code redirects with
their target codes even though this is not the "goal" of `RUF100`. This
behavior is confusing and inconsistent, since code redirects which don't
otherwise violate `RUF100` will not be updated. The behavior is also
undocumented. Additionally, users who want to use `RUF100` but do not
want to update redirects have no way to opt out.
This PR explicitly detects redirects with a new rule `RUF101` and
patches `RUF100` to keep original codes in fixes and reporting.
## Test Plan
Added fixture.
## Summary
Resolves#11102
The error stems from these lines
f5c7a62aa6/crates/ruff_linter/src/noqa.rs (L697-L702)
I don't really understand the purpose of incrementing the last index,
but it makes the resulting range invalid for indexing into `contents`.
For now I just detect if the index is too high in `blanket_noqa` and
adjust it if necessary.
## Test Plan
Created fixture from issue example.
## Summary
This allows `raise from` in BLE001.
```python
try:
...
except Exception as e:
raise ValueError from e
```
Fixes#10806
## Test Plan
Test case added.
## Summary
This PR refactors unary expression parsing with the following changes:
* Ability to get `OperatorPrecedence` from a unary operator (`UnaryOp`)
* Implement methods on `TokenKind`
* Add `as_unary_operator` which returns an `Option<UnaryOp>`
* Add `as_unary_arithmetic_operator` which returns an `Option<UnaryOp>`
(used for pattern parsing)
* Rename `is_unary` to `is_unary_arithmetic_operator` (used in the
linter)
resolves: #10752
## Test Plan
Verify that the existing test cases pass, no ecosystem changes, run the
Python based fuzzer on 3000 random inputs and run it on dozens of
open-source repositories.
## Summary
Fixes#10463
Add `FURB192` which detects violations like this:
```python
# Bad
a = sorted(l)[0]
# Good
a = min(l)
```
There is a caveat that @Skylion007 has pointed out, which is that
violations with `reverse=True` technically aren't compatible with this
change, in the edge case where the unstable behavior is intended. For
example:
```python
from operator import itemgetter
data = [('red', 1), ('blue', 1), ('red', 2), ('blue', 2)]
min(data, key=itemgetter(0)) # ('blue', 1)
sorted(data, key=itemgetter(0))[0] # ('blue', 1)
sorted(data, key=itemgetter(0), reverse=True)[-1] # ('blue, 2')
```
This seems like a rare edge case, but I can make the `reverse=True`
fixes unsafe if that's best.
## Test Plan
This is unit tested.
## References
https://github.com/dosisod/refurb/pull/333/files
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
The `operator.itemgetter` behavior changes where there's more than one
argument, such that `operator.itemgetter(0)` yields `r[0]`, rather than
`(r[0],)`.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/11075.
## Summary
There is no class `integer` in python, nor is there a type `integer`, so
I updated the docs to remove the backticks on these references, such
that it is the representation of an integer, and not a reference.
## Summary
Move `blanket-noqa` rule from the token checker to the noqa checker.
This allows us to make use of the line directives already computed in
the noqa checker.
## Test Plan
Verified test results are unchanged.
Resolves#10187
<details>
<summary>Old PR description; accurate through commit e86dd7d; probably
best to leave this fold closed</summary>
## Description of change
In the case of a printf-style format string with only one %-placeholder
and a variable at right (e.g. `"%s" % var`):
* The new behavior attempts to dereference the variable and then match
on the bound expression to distinguish between a 1-tuple (fix), n-tuple
(bug 🐛), or a non-tuple (fix). Dereferencing is via
`analyze::typing::find_binding_value`.
* If the variable cannot be dereferenced, then the type-analysis routine
is called to distinguish only tuple (no-fix) or non-tuple (fix). Type
analysis is via `analyze::typing::is_tuple`.
* If any of the above fails, the rule still fires, but no fix is
offered.
## Alternatives
* If the reviewers think that singling out the 1-tuple case is too
complicated, I will remove that.
* The ecosystem results show that no new fixes are detected. So I could
probably delete all the variable dereferencing code and code that tries
to generate fixes, tbh.
## Changes to existing behavior
**All the previous rule-firings and fixes are unchanged except for** the
"false negatives" in
`crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pyupgrade/UP031_1.py`. Those
previous "false negatives" are now true positives and so I moved them to
`crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pyupgrade/UP031_0.py`.
<details>
<summary>Existing false negatives that are now true positives</summary>
```
crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pyupgrade/UP031_0.py:134:1: UP031 Use format specifiers instead of percent format
|
133 | # UP031 (no longer false negatives)
134 | 'Hello %s' % bar
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ UP031
135 |
136 | 'Hello %s' % bar.baz
|
= help: Replace with format specifiers
crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pyupgrade/UP031_0.py:136:1: UP031 Use format specifiers instead of percent format
|
134 | 'Hello %s' % bar
135 |
136 | 'Hello %s' % bar.baz
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ UP031
137 |
138 | 'Hello %s' % bar['bop']
|
= help: Replace with format specifiers
crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pyupgrade/UP031_0.py:138:1: UP031 Use format specifiers instead of percent format
|
136 | 'Hello %s' % bar.baz
137 |
138 | 'Hello %s' % bar['bop']
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ UP031
|
= help: Replace with format specifiers
```
One of them newly offers a fix.
```
# UP031 (no longer false negatives)
-'Hello %s' % bar
+'Hello {}'.format(bar)
```
This fix occurs because the new code dereferences `bar` to where it was
defined earlier in the file as a non-tuple:
```python
bar = {"bar": y}
```
---
</details>
## Behavior requiring new tests
Additionally, we now handle a few cases that we didn't previously test.
These cases are when a string has a single %-placeholder and the
righthand operand to the modulo operator is a variable **which can be
dereferenced.** One of those was shown in the previous section (the
"dereference non-tuple" case).
<details>
<summary>New cases handled</summary>
```
crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pyupgrade/UP031_0.py:126:1: UP031 [*] Use format specifiers instead of percent format
|
125 | t1 = (x,)
126 | "%s" % t1
| ^^^^^^^^^ UP031
127 | # UP031: deref t1 to 1-tuple, offer fix
|
= help: Replace with format specifiers
crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pyupgrade/UP031_0.py:130:1: UP031 Use format specifiers instead of percent format
|
129 | t2 = (x,y)
130 | "%s" % t2
| ^^^^^^^^^ UP031
131 | # UP031: deref t2 to n-tuple, this is a bug
|
= help: Replace with format specifiers
```
One of these offers a fix.
```
t1 = (x,)
-"%s" % t1
+"{}".format(t1[0])
# UP031: deref t1 to 1-tuple, offer fix
```
The other doesn't offer a fix because it's a bug.
---
</details>
---
</details>
## Changes to existing behavior
In the case of a string with a single %-placeholder and a single
ambiguous righthand argument to the modulo operator, (e.g. `"%s" % var`)
the rule now fires and offers a fix. We explain about this in the "fix
safety" section of the updated documentation.
## Documentation changes
I swapped the order of the "known problems" and the "examples" sections
so that the examples which describe the rule are first, before the
exceptions to the rule are described. I also tweaked the language to be
more explicit, as I had trouble understanding the documentation at
first. The "known problems" section is now "fix safety" but the content
is largely similar.
The diff of the documentation changes looks a little difficult unless
you look at the individual commits.
