A small PR to reduce some of the code duplication between the various
branches, make it a little more readable and move the API closer to what
we already have for `KnownClass`
## Summary
The cause of this bug is from
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/12575 which was itself a bug fix
but the fix wasn't completely correct.
fixes: #14768
fixes: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-vscode/issues/644
## Test Plan
Consider the following three cells:
1.
```python
class Foo:
def __init__(self):
self.x = 1
def __str__(self):
return f"Foo({self.x})"
```
2.
```python
def hello():
print("hello world")
```
3.
```python
y = 1
```
The test case is moving cell 2 to the top i.e., cell 2 goes to position
1 and cell 1 goes to position 2.
Before this fix, it can be seen that the cells were pushed at the end of
the vector:
```
12.643269917s INFO ruff:main ruff_server::edit:📓 Before update: [
NotebookCell {
document: TextDocument {
contents: "class Foo:\n def __init__(self):\n self.x = 1\n\n def __str__(self):\n return f\"Foo({self.x})\"",
},
},
NotebookCell {
document: TextDocument {
contents: "def hello():\n print(\"hello world\")",
},
},
NotebookCell {
document: TextDocument {
contents: "y = 1",
},
},
]
12.643777667s INFO ruff:main ruff_server::edit:📓 After update: [
NotebookCell {
document: TextDocument {
contents: "y = 1",
},
},
NotebookCell {
document: TextDocument {
contents: "class Foo:\n def __init__(self):\n self.x = 1\n\n def __str__(self):\n return f\"Foo({self.x})\"",
},
},
NotebookCell {
document: TextDocument {
contents: "def hello():\n print(\"hello world\")",
},
},
]
```
After the fix in this PR, it can be seen that the cells are being pushed
at the correct `start` index:
```
6.520570917s INFO ruff:main ruff_server::edit:📓 Before update: [
NotebookCell {
document: TextDocument {
contents: "class Foo:\n def __init__(self):\n self.x = 1\n\n def __str__(self):\n return f\"Foo({self.x})\"",
},
},
NotebookCell {
document: TextDocument {
contents: "def hello():\n print(\"hello world\")",
},
},
NotebookCell {
document: TextDocument {
contents: "y = 1",
},
},
]
6.521084792s INFO ruff:main ruff_server::edit:📓 After update: [
NotebookCell {
document: TextDocument {
contents: "def hello():\n print(\"hello world\")",
},
},
NotebookCell {
document: TextDocument {
contents: "class Foo:\n def __init__(self):\n self.x = 1\n\n def __str__(self):\n return f\"Foo({self.x})\"",
},
},
NotebookCell {
document: TextDocument {
contents: "y = 1",
},
},
]
```
## Summary
[**Rendered version of the new test
suite**](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/blob/david/intersection-type-tests/crates/red_knot_python_semantic/resources/mdtest/intersection_types.md)
Moves most of our existing intersection-types tests to a dedicated
Markdown test suite, extends the test coverage, unifies the notation for
these tests, groups tests into a proper structure, and adds some
explanations for various simplification strategies.
This changeset also:
- Adds a new simplification where `~Never` is removed from
intersections.
- Adds a new simplification where adding `~object` simplifies the whole
intersection to `Never`
- Avoids unnecessary assignment-checks between inferred and declared
type. This was added to this changeset to avoid many false positive
errors in this test suite.
Resolves the task described in this old comment
[here](e01da82a5a..e7e432bca2 (r1819924085)).
## Test Plan
Running the new Markdown tests
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
Prompted by
> One nit: I think we need to consider `Any` and `Unknown` and `Todo` as
all (gradually) equivalent to each other, and thus `type & Any` and
`type & Unknown` and `type & Todo` as also equivalent. The distinction
between `Any` vs `Unknown` vs `Todo` is entirely about
provenance/debugging, there is no type level distinction. (And I've been
wondering if the `Any` vs `Unknown` distinction is really worth it.)
The thought here is that _most_ places want to treat `Any`, `Unknown`,
and `Todo` identically. So this PR simplifies things by having a single
`Type::Any` variant, and moves the provenance part into a new `AnyType`
type. If you need to treat e.g. `Todo` differently, you still can by
pattern-matching into the `AnyType`. But if you don't, you can just use
`Type::Any(_)`.
(This would also allow us to (more easily) distinguish "unknown via an
unannotated value" from "unknown because of a typing error" should we
want to do that in the future)
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
## Summary
This moves almost all of our existing `UnionBuilder` tests to a
Markdown-based test suite.
I see how this could be a more controversial change, since these tests
where written specifically for `UnionBuilder`, and by creating the union
types using Python type expressions, we add an additional layer on top
(parsing and inference of these expressions) that moves these tests away
from clean unit tests more in the direction of integration tests. Also,
there are probably a few implementation details of `UnionBuilder` hidden
in the test assertions (e.g. order of union elements after
simplifications).
That said, I think we would like to see all those properties that are
being tested here from *any* implementation of union types. And the
Markdown tests come with the usual advantages:
- More consice
- Better readability
- No re-compiliation when working on tests
- Easier to add additional explanations and structure to the test suite
This changeset adds a few additional tests, but keeps the logic of the
existing tests except for a few minor modifications for consistency.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: T-256 <132141463+T-256@users.noreply.github.com>
## Summary
The symlink-approach in the typeshed-sync workflow caused some problems
on Windows, even though it seemed to work fine in CI:
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/15138#issuecomment-2578642129
Here, we rely on `build.rs` to patch typeshed instead, which allows us
to get rid of the modifications in the workflow (thank you
@MichaReiser for the idea).
## Test Plan
- Made sure that changes to `knot_extensions.pyi` result in a recompile
of `red_knot_vendored`.
Stabilise [`slice-to-remove-prefix-or-suffix`](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/slice-to-remove-prefix-or-suffix/) (`FURB188`) for the Ruff 0.9 release.
This is a stylistic rule, but I think it's a pretty uncontroversial one. There are no open issues or PRs regarding it and it's been in preview for a while now.
More refinements to the panic messages for failing mdtests to mimic the
output of the default panic hook more closely:
- We now print out `Box<dyn Any>` if the panic payload is not a string
(which is typically the case for salsa panics).
- We now include the panic's backtrace if you set the `RUST_BACKTRACE`
environment variable.
## Summary
- Add a workflow to run property tests on a daily basis (based on
`daily_fuzz.yaml`)
- Mark `assignable_to_is_reflexive` as flaky (related to #14899)
- Add new (failing) `intersection_assignable_to_both` test (also related
to #14899)
## Test Plan
Ran:
```bash
export QUICKCHECK_TESTS=100000
while cargo test --release -p red_knot_python_semantic -- \
--ignored types::property_tests::stable; do :; done
```
Observed successful property_tests CI run
