## Summary
fix#13602
Currently, `UP043` only applies to typing.Generator, but it should also
support collections.abc.Generator.
This update ensures `UP043` correctly handles both
`collections.abc.Generator` and `collections.abc.AsyncGenerator`
### UP043
> `UP043`
> Python 3.13 introduced the ability for type parameters to specify
default values. As such, the default type arguments for some types in
the standard library (e.g., Generator, AsyncGenerator) are now optional.
> Omitting type parameters that match the default values can make the
code more concise and easier to read.
```py
Generator[int, None, None] -> Generator[int]
```
## Summary
...and remove periods from messages that don't span more than a single
sentence.
This is more consistent with how we present user-facing messages in uv
(which has a defined style guide).
## Summary
You can now call `return_ty_result` to operate on a `Result` directly
thereby using your own diagnostics, as in:
```rust
return dunder_getitem_method
.call(self.db, &[slice_ty])
.return_ty_result(self.db, value.as_ref().into(), self)
.unwrap_or_else(|err| {
self.add_diagnostic(
(&**value).into(),
"call-non-callable",
format_args!(
"Method `__getitem__` is not callable on object of type '{}'.",
value_ty.display(self.db),
),
);
err.return_ty()
});
```
While looking into https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/13545 I
noticed that we return `None` here if you pass a block of comments. This
is annoying because it causes `adjust_indentation` to fall back to
LibCST which panics when it cannot find a statement.
Adds a diagnostic for division by the integer zero in `//`, `/`, and
`%`.
Doesn't handle `<int> / 0.0` because we don't track the values of float
literals.
This variant shows inference that is not yet implemented..
## Summary
PR #13500 reopened the idea of adding a new type variant to keep track
of not-implemented features in Red Knot.
It was based off of #12986 with a more generic approach of keeping track
of different kind of unknowns. Discussion in #13500 agreed that keeping
track of different `Unknown` is complicated for now, and this feature is
better achieved through a new variant of `Type`.
### Requirements
Requirements for this implementation can be summed up with some extracts
of comment from @carljm on the previous PR
> So at the moment we are leaning towards simplifying this PR to just
use a new top-level variant, which behaves like Any and Unknown but
represents inference that is not yet implemented in red-knot.
> I think the general rule should be that Todo should propagate only
when the presence of the input Todo caused the output to be unknown.
>
> To take a specific example, the inferred result of addition must be
Unknown if either operand is Unknown. That is, Unknown + X will always
be Unknown regardless of what X is. (Same for X + Unknown.) In this
case, I believe that Unknown + Todo (or Todo + Unknown) should result in
Unknown, not result in Todo. If we fix the upstream source of the Todo,
the result would still be Unknown, so it's not useful to propagate the
Todo in this case: it wrongly suggests that the output is unknown
because of a todo item.
## Test Plan
This PR does not introduce new tests, but it did required to edit some
tests with the display of `[Type::Todo]` (currently `@Todo`), which
suggests that those test are placeholders requirements for features we
don't support yet.
While working on https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/13576 I noticed
that it was really hard to tell which assertion failed in some of these
test cases. This could be expanded to elsewhere, but I've heard this
test suite format won't be around for long?
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
There was a typo in the links of the docs of PTH116, where Path.stat
used to link to Path.group.
Another rule, PTH202, does it correctly:
ec72e675d9/crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/flake8_use_pathlib/rules/os_path_getsize.rs (L33)
This PR only fixes a one word typo.
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
I did not test that the doc generation framework picked up these
changes, I assume it will do it successfully.
## Summary
Following #13449, this PR adds custom handling for the bool constructor,
so when the input type has statically known truthiness value, it will be
used as the return value of the bool function.
For example, in the following snippet x will now be resolved to
`Literal[True]` instead of `bool`.
```python
x = bool(1)
```
## Test Plan
Some cargo tests were added.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Implement inference for `f-string`, contributes to #12701.
### First Implementation
When looking at the way `mypy` handles things, I noticed the following:
- No variables (e.g. `f"hello"`) ⇒ `LiteralString`
- Any variable (e.g. `f"number {1}"`) ⇒ `str`
My first commit (1ba5d0f13fdf70ed8b2b1a41433b32fc9085add2) implements
exactly this logic, except that we deal with string literals just like
`infer_string_literal_expression` (if below `MAX_STRING_LITERAL_SIZE`,
show `Literal["exact string"]`)
### Second Implementation
My second commit (90326ce9af5549af7b4efae89cd074ddf68ada14) pushes
things a bit further to handle cases where the expression within the
`f-string` are all literal values (string representation known at static
time).
Here's an example of when this could happen in code:
```python
BASE_URL = "https://httpbin.org"
VERSION = "v1"
endpoint = f"{BASE_URL}/{VERSION}/post" # Literal["https://httpbin.org/v1/post"]
```
As this can be sightly more costly (additional allocations), I don't
know if we want this feature.
## Test Plan
- Added a test `fstring_expression` covering all cases I can think of
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
Related to https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/13524
Doesn't offer a valid fix, opting to instead just not offer a fix at
all. If someone points me to a good way to handle parenthesis here I'm
down to try to fix the fix separately, but it looks quite hard.
## Summary
Building ruff on AIX breaks on `tiki-jemalloc-sys` due to OS header
incompatibility
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
Co-authored-by: Henry Jiang <henry.jiang1@ibm.com>
In https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/13503, we added supported for
detecting variadic keyword arguments as dictionaries, here we use the
same strategy for detecting variadic positional arguments as tuples.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/13266
Avoids false negatives for shadowed bindings that aren't actually
references to the loop variable. There are some shadowed bindings we
need to support still, e.g., `del` requires the loop variable to exist.
## Summary
I think we should also make the change that @BurntSushi recommended in
the linked issue, but this gets rid of the panic.
See: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/13483
See: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/13442
## Test Plan
```
warning: `ruff analyze graph` is experimental and may change without warning
{
"/Users/crmarsh/workspace/django/django/__init__.py": [
"/Users/crmarsh/workspace/django/django/apps/__init__.py",
"/Users/crmarsh/workspace/django/django/conf/__init__.py",
"/Users/crmarsh/workspace/django/django/urls/__init__.py",
"/Users/crmarsh/workspace/django/django/utils/log.py",
"/Users/crmarsh/workspace/django/django/utils/version.py"
],
"/Users/crmarsh/workspace/django/django/__main__.py": [
"/Users/crmarsh/workspace/django/django/core/management/__init__.py"
ruff failed
Cause: Broken pipe (os error 32)
```
