Commit graph

29 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Micha Reiser
b51c4f82ea
Rename Red Knot (#17820) 2025-05-03 19:49:15 +02:00
Andrew Gallant
405878a128 ruff_db: render file paths in diagnostics as relative paths if possible
This is done in what appears to be the same way as Ruff: we get the CWD,
strip the prefix from the path if possible, and use that. If stripping
the prefix fails, then we print the full path as-is.

Fixes #17233
2025-04-28 14:32:34 -04:00
justin
d2246278e6
[red-knot] Don't ignore hidden files by default (#17655) 2025-04-28 08:21:11 +02:00
justin
4443f6653c
[red-knot] Add --respect-ignore-files flag (#17645)
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
2025-04-27 10:55:41 +01:00
Micha Reiser
6044f04137
Revert "[red-knot] Add --respect-ignore-files flag (#17569)" (#17642) 2025-04-26 10:30:50 +00:00
justin
2e95475f57
[red-knot] Add --respect-ignore-files flag (#17569)
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
2025-04-26 10:02:03 +00:00
Andrew Gallant
049280a3bc red_knot_project: sort diagnostics from checking files
Previously, we could iterate over files in an unspecified order (via
`HashSet` iteration) and we could accumulate diagnostics from files in
an unspecified order (via parallelism).

Here, we change the status quo so that diagnostics collected from files
are sorted after checking is complete. For now, we sort by severity
(with higher severity diagnostics appearing first) and then by
diagnostic ID to give a stable ordering.

I'm not sure if this is the best ordering.
2025-04-25 12:38:31 -04:00
Andrew Gallant
c12640fea8 red_knot_python_semantic: migrate types/diagnostic to new diagnostics 2025-04-22 12:08:03 -04:00
Andrew Gallant
27a377f077 red_knot_python_semantic: migrate types/infer to new diagnostic model
I gave up trying to do this one lint at a time and just (mostly)
mechanically translated this entire file in one go.

Generally the messages stay the same (with most moving from an
annotation message to the diagnostic's main message). I added a couple
of `info` sub-diagnostics where it seemed to be the obvious intent.
2025-04-22 12:08:03 -04:00
Dhruv Manilawala
44ad201262
[red-knot] Add support for overloaded functions (#17366)
## Summary

Part of #15383, this PR adds support for overloaded callables.

Typing spec: https://typing.python.org/en/latest/spec/overload.html

Specifically, it does the following:
1. Update the `FunctionType::signature` method to return signatures from
a possibly overloaded callable using a new `FunctionSignature` enum
2. Update `CallableType` to accommodate overloaded callable by updating
the inner type to `Box<[Signature]>`
3. Update the relation methods on `CallableType` with logic specific to
overloads
4. Update the display of callable type to display a list of signatures
enclosed by parenthesis
5. Update `CallableTypeOf` special form to recognize overloaded callable
6. Update subtyping, assignability and fully static check to account for
callables (equivalence is planned to be done as a follow-up)

For (2), it is required to be done in this PR because otherwise I'd need
to add some workaround for `into_callable_type` and I though it would be
best to include it in here.

For (2), another possible design would be convert `CallableType` in an
enum with two variants `CallableType::Single` and
`CallableType::Overload` but I decided to go with `Box<[Signature]>` for
now to (a) mirror it to be equivalent to `overload` field on
`CallableSignature` and (b) to avoid any refactor in this PR. This could
be done in a follow-up to better split the two kind of callables.

### Design

There were two main candidates on how to represent the overloaded
definition:
1. To include it in the existing infrastructure which is what this PR is
doing by recognizing all the signatures within the
`FunctionType::signature` method
2. To create a new `Overload` type variant

<details><summary>For context, this is what I had in mind with the new
type variant:</summary>
<p>

```rs
pub enum Type {
	FunctionLiteral(FunctionType),
    Overload(OverloadType),
    BoundMethod(BoundMethodType),
    ...
}

pub struct OverloadType {
	// FunctionLiteral or BoundMethod
    overloads: Box<[Type]>,
	// FunctionLiteral or BoundMethod
    implementation: Option<Type>
}

pub struct BoundMethodType {
    kind: BoundMethodKind,
    self_instance: Type,
}

pub enum BoundMethodKind {
    Function(FunctionType),
    Overload(OverloadType),
}
```

</p>
</details> 

The main reasons to choose (1) are the simplicity in the implementation,
reusing the existing infrastructure, avoiding any complications that the
new type variant has specifically around the different variants between
function and methods which would require the overload type to use `Type`
instead.

### Implementation

The core logic is how to collect all the overloaded functions. The way
this is done in this PR is by recording a **use** on the `Identifier`
node that represents the function name in the use-def map. This is then
used to fetch the previous symbol using the same name. This way the
signatures are going to be propagated from top to bottom (from first
overload to the final overload or the implementation) with each function
/ method. For example:

```py
from typing import overload

@overload
def foo(x: int) -> int: ...
@overload
def foo(x: str) -> str: ...
def foo(x: int | str) -> int | str:
	return x
```

Here, each definition of `foo` knows about all the signatures that comes
before itself. So, the first overload would only see itself, the second
would see the first and itself and so on until the implementation or the
final overload.

This approach required some updates specifically recognizing
`Identifier` node to record the function use because it doesn't use
`ExprName`.

## Test Plan

Update existing test cases which were limited by the overload support
and add test cases for the following cases:
* Valid overloads as functions, methods, generics, version specific
* Invalid overloads as stated in
https://typing.python.org/en/latest/spec/overload.html#invalid-overload-definitions
(implementation will be done in a follow-up)
* Various relation: fully static, subtyping, and assignability (others
in a follow-up)

## Ecosystem changes

_WIP_

After going through the ecosystem changes (there are a lot!), here's
what I've found:

We need assignability check between a callable type and a class literal
because a lot of builtins are defined as classes in typeshed whose
constructor method is overloaded e.g., `map`, `sorted`, `list.sort`,
`max`, `min` with the `key` parameter, `collections.abc.defaultdict`,
etc. (https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/17343). This makes up
most of the ecosystem diff **roughly 70 diagnostics**. For example:

```py
from collections import defaultdict

# red-knot: No overload of bound method `__init__` matches arguments [lint:no-matching-overload]
defaultdict(int)
# red-knot: No overload of bound method `__init__` matches arguments [lint:no-matching-overload]
defaultdict(list)

class Foo:
    def __init__(self, x: int):
        self.x = x

# red-knot: No overload of function `__new__` matches arguments [lint:no-matching-overload]
map(Foo, ["a", "b", "c"])
```

Duplicate diagnostics in unpacking
(https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/16514) has **~16
diagnostics**.

Support for the `callable` builtin which requires `TypeIs` support. This
is **5 diagnostics**. For example:
```py
from typing import Any

def _(x: Any | None) -> None:
    if callable(x):
        # red-knot: `Any | None`
        # Pyright: `(...) -> object`
        # mypy: `Any`
        # pyrefly: `(...) -> object`
        reveal_type(x)
```

Narrowing on `assert` which has **11 diagnostics**. This is being worked
on in https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/17345. For example:
```py
import re

match = re.search("", "")
assert match
match.group()  # error: [possibly-unbound-attribute]
```

Others:
* `Self`: 2
* Type aliases: 6
* Generics: 3
* Protocols: 13
* Unpacking in comprehension: 1
(https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/17396)

## Performance

Refer to
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/17366#issuecomment-2814053046.
2025-04-18 09:57:40 +05:30
Andrew Gallant
28b64064f5 ruff_db: tweak how the revealed type diagnostic is rendered
In the new diagnostic data model, we really should have a main
diagnostic message *and* a primary span (with an optional message
attached to it) for every diagnostic.

In this commit, I try to make this true for the "revealed type"
diagnostic. Instead of the annotation saying both "revealed type is"
and also the revealed type itself, the annotation is now just the
revealed type and the main diagnostic message is "Revealed type."

I expect this may be controversial. I'm open to doing something
different. I tried to avoid redundancy, but maybe this is a special case
where we want the redundancy. I'm honestly not sure. I do *like* how it
looks with this commit, but I'm not working with Red Knot's type
checking daily, so my opinion doesn't count for much.

This did also require some tweaking to concise diagnostic formatting in
order to preserve the essential information.

This commit doesn't update every relevant snapshot. Just a few. I split
the rest out into the next commit.
2025-04-10 13:21:00 -04:00
Andrew Gallant
75b15ea2d0 red_knot: add explicit test for concise reveal_type diagnostic
This test reflects the status quo before we change things.
2025-04-10 13:21:00 -04:00
David Peter
3657f798c9
[red-knot] Add --python-platform CLI option (#17284)
## Summary

Add a new `--python-platform` command-line option, in analogy to
`--python-version`.

## Test Plan

Added new integration test.
2025-04-07 21:04:44 +02:00
Andrew Gallant
bd9eab059f red_knot: update diagnostic output snapshots
These should all be minor cosmetic changes. To summarize:

* In many cases, `-` was replaced with `^` for primary annotations.
This is because, previously, whether `-` or `^` was used depended
on the severity. But in the new data model, it's based on whether
the annotation is "primary" or not. We could of course change this
in whatever way we want, but I think we should roll with this for now.

* The "secondary messages" in the old API are rendered as
sub-diagnostics. This in turn results in a small change in the output
format, since previously, the secondary messages were represented as
just another snippet. We use sub-diagnostics because that's the intended
way to enforce relative ordering between messages within a diagnostic.

* The "info:" prefix used in some annotation messages has been dropped.
We could re-add this, but I think I like it better without this prefix.

I believe those 3 cover all of the snapshot changes here.
2025-03-17 12:46:49 -04:00
Andrew Gallant
2bcd2b4147 red_knot: plumb through DiagnosticFormat to the CLI
The CLI calls this `OutputFormat`, and so does the type where the CLI is
defined. But it's called `DiagnosticFormat` in `ruff_db` to be
consistent with `DisplayDiagnosticConfig`.

Ref https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/15697#issuecomment-2706477278
2025-03-14 14:46:17 -04:00
Shunsuke Shibayama
78b5f0b165
[red-knot] detect invalid return type (#16540)
## Summary

This PR closes #16248.

If the return type of the function isn't assignable to the one
specified, an `invalid-return-type` error occurs.
I thought it would be better to report this as a different kind of error
than the `invalid-assignment` error, so I defined this as a new error.

## Test Plan

All type inconsistencies in the test cases have been replaced with
appropriate ones.

---------

Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
2025-03-12 01:58:59 +00:00
Micha Reiser
c4578162d5
[red-knot] Add support for knot check <paths> (#16375)
## Summary

This PR adds support for an optional list of paths that should be
checked to `knot check`.

E.g. to only check the `src` directory

```sh
knot check src
```

The default is to check all files in the project but users can reduce
the included files by specifying one or multiple optional paths.

The main two challenges with adding this feature were:

* We now need to show an error when one of the provided paths doesn't
exist. That's why this PR now collects errors from the project file
indexing phase and adds them to the output diagnostics. The diagnostic
looks similar to ruffs (see CLI test)
* The CLI should pick up new files added to included folders. For
example, `knot check src --watch` should pick up new files that are
added to the `src` folder. This requires that we now filter the files
before adding them to the project. This is a good first step to
supporting `include` and `exclude`.


The PR makes two simplifications:

1. I didn't test the changes with case-insensitive file systems. We may
need to do some extra path normalization to support those well. See
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/16400
2. Ideally, we'd accumulate the IO errors from the initial indexing
phase and subsequent incremental indexing operations. For example, we
should preserve the IO diagnostic for a non existing `test.py` if it was
specified as an explicit CLI argument until the file gets created and we
should show it again when the file gets deleted. However, this is
somewhat complicated because we'd need to track which files we revisited
(or were removed because the entire directory is gone). I considered
this too low a priority as it's worth dealing with right now.

The implementation doesn't support symlinks within the project but that
is the same as Ruff and is unchanged from before this PR.



Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/14193

## Test Plan

Added CLI and file watching integration tests. Manually testing.
2025-03-03 12:59:56 +00:00
Micha Reiser
af832560fc
[red-knot] User-level configuration (#16021)
## Summary

This PR adds support for user-level configurations
(`~/.config/knot/knot.toml`) to Red Knot.

Red Knot will watch the user-level configuration file for changes but
only if it exists
when the process start. It doesn't watch for new configurations, 
mainly to simplify things for now (it would require watching the entire
`.config` directory because the `knot` subfolder might not exist
either).

The new `ConfigurationFile` struct seems a bit overkill for now but I
plan to use it for
hierarchical configurations as well. 


Red Knot uses the same strategy as uv and Ruff by using the etcetera
crate.

## Test Plan

Added CLI and file watching test
2025-02-10 16:44:23 +01:00
Micha Reiser
678b0c2d39
[red-knot] Resolve Options to Settings (#16000)
## Summary

This PR generalize the idea that we may want to emit diagnostics for 
invalid or incompatible configuration values similar to how we already 
do it for `rules`. 

This PR introduces a new `Settings` struct that is similar to `Options`
but, unlike
`Options`, are fields have their default values filled in and they use a
representation optimized for reads.

The diagnostics created during loading the `Settings` are stored on the
`Project` so that we can emit them when calling `check`.

The motivation for this work is that it simplifies adding new settings.
That's also why I went ahead and added the `terminal.error-on-warning`
setting to demonstrate how new settings are added.

## Test Plan

Existing tests, new CLI test.
2025-02-10 15:28:45 +01:00
Andrew Gallant
d47088c8f8
[red-knot] fix unresolvable import range (#15976)
This causes the diagnostic to highlight the actual unresovable import
instead of the entire `from ... import ...` statement.

While we're here, we expand the test coverage to cover all of the
possible ways that an `import` or a `from ... import` can fail.

Some considerations:

* The first commit in this PR adds a regression test for the current
behavior.
* This creates a new `mdtest/diagnostics` directory. Are folks cool
with this? I guess the idea is to put tests more devoted to diagnostics
than semantics in this directory. (Although I'm guessing there will
be some overlap.)

Fixes #15866
2025-02-05 14:01:58 -05:00
InSync
30d5e9a2af
[red-knot] Support --exit-zero and --error-on-warning (#15746)
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
2025-02-03 07:35:30 +00:00
Andrew Gallant
b58f2c399e
[red-knot] ruff_db: make diagnostic rendering prettier (#15856)
This change does a simple swap of the existing renderer for one that
uses our vendored copy of `annotate-snippets`. We don't change anything
about the diagnostic data model, but this alone already makes
diagnostics look a lot nicer!
2025-01-31 16:37:02 -05:00
Micha Reiser
9353482a5a
Add check command (#15692) 2025-01-24 17:00:30 +01:00
Micha Reiser
4e3982cf95
[red-knot] Add --ignore, --warn, and --error CLI arguments (#15689) 2025-01-24 16:20:15 +01:00
Micha Reiser
43160b4c3e
Tidy knot CLI tests (#15685) 2025-01-23 14:06:07 +01:00
Micha Reiser
05ea77b1d4
Create Unknown rule diagnostics with a source range (#15648) 2025-01-23 12:50:43 +01:00
Micha Reiser
7b17c9c445
Add rules table to configuration (#15645) 2025-01-23 10:56:58 +01:00
Micha Reiser
39e2df7ada
[red-knot] Anchor relative paths in configurations (#15634) 2025-01-23 10:14:01 +01:00
Micha Reiser
eb47a6634d
Add support for configuring knot in pyproject.toml files (#15493)
## Summary

This PR adds support for configuring Red Knot in the `tool.knot` section
of the project's
`pyproject.toml` section. Options specified on the CLI precede the
options in the configuration file.

This PR only supports the `environment` and the `src.root` options for
now.
Other options will be added as separate PRs.

There are also a few concerns that I intentionally ignored as part of
this PR:

* Handling of relative paths: We need to anchor paths relative to the
current working directory (CLI), or the project (`pyproject.toml` or
`knot.toml`)
* Tracking the source of a value. Diagnostics would benefit from knowing
from which configuration a value comes so that we can point the user to
the right configuration file (or CLI) if the configuration is invalid.
* Schema generation and there's a lot more; see
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/15491

This PR changes the default for first party codes: Our existing default
was to only add the project root. Now, Red Knot adds the project root
and `src` (if such a directory exists).

Theoretically, we'd have to add a file watcher event that changes the
first-party search paths if a user later creates a `src` directory. I
think this is pretty uncommon, which is why I ignored the complexity for
now but I can be persuaded to handle it if it's considered important.

Part of https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/15491

## Test Plan

Existing tests, new file watching test demonstrating that changing the
python version and platform is correctly reflected.
2025-01-17 09:41:06 +01:00