Commit graph

15 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Micha Reiser
b51c4f82ea
Rename Red Knot (#17820) 2025-05-03 19:49:15 +02:00
Dhruv Manilawala
44ad201262
[red-knot] Add support for overloaded functions (#17366)
## Summary

Part of #15383, this PR adds support for overloaded callables.

Typing spec: https://typing.python.org/en/latest/spec/overload.html

Specifically, it does the following:
1. Update the `FunctionType::signature` method to return signatures from
a possibly overloaded callable using a new `FunctionSignature` enum
2. Update `CallableType` to accommodate overloaded callable by updating
the inner type to `Box<[Signature]>`
3. Update the relation methods on `CallableType` with logic specific to
overloads
4. Update the display of callable type to display a list of signatures
enclosed by parenthesis
5. Update `CallableTypeOf` special form to recognize overloaded callable
6. Update subtyping, assignability and fully static check to account for
callables (equivalence is planned to be done as a follow-up)

For (2), it is required to be done in this PR because otherwise I'd need
to add some workaround for `into_callable_type` and I though it would be
best to include it in here.

For (2), another possible design would be convert `CallableType` in an
enum with two variants `CallableType::Single` and
`CallableType::Overload` but I decided to go with `Box<[Signature]>` for
now to (a) mirror it to be equivalent to `overload` field on
`CallableSignature` and (b) to avoid any refactor in this PR. This could
be done in a follow-up to better split the two kind of callables.

### Design

There were two main candidates on how to represent the overloaded
definition:
1. To include it in the existing infrastructure which is what this PR is
doing by recognizing all the signatures within the
`FunctionType::signature` method
2. To create a new `Overload` type variant

<details><summary>For context, this is what I had in mind with the new
type variant:</summary>
<p>

```rs
pub enum Type {
	FunctionLiteral(FunctionType),
    Overload(OverloadType),
    BoundMethod(BoundMethodType),
    ...
}

pub struct OverloadType {
	// FunctionLiteral or BoundMethod
    overloads: Box<[Type]>,
	// FunctionLiteral or BoundMethod
    implementation: Option<Type>
}

pub struct BoundMethodType {
    kind: BoundMethodKind,
    self_instance: Type,
}

pub enum BoundMethodKind {
    Function(FunctionType),
    Overload(OverloadType),
}
```

</p>
</details> 

The main reasons to choose (1) are the simplicity in the implementation,
reusing the existing infrastructure, avoiding any complications that the
new type variant has specifically around the different variants between
function and methods which would require the overload type to use `Type`
instead.

### Implementation

The core logic is how to collect all the overloaded functions. The way
this is done in this PR is by recording a **use** on the `Identifier`
node that represents the function name in the use-def map. This is then
used to fetch the previous symbol using the same name. This way the
signatures are going to be propagated from top to bottom (from first
overload to the final overload or the implementation) with each function
/ method. For example:

```py
from typing import overload

@overload
def foo(x: int) -> int: ...
@overload
def foo(x: str) -> str: ...
def foo(x: int | str) -> int | str:
	return x
```

Here, each definition of `foo` knows about all the signatures that comes
before itself. So, the first overload would only see itself, the second
would see the first and itself and so on until the implementation or the
final overload.

This approach required some updates specifically recognizing
`Identifier` node to record the function use because it doesn't use
`ExprName`.

## Test Plan

Update existing test cases which were limited by the overload support
and add test cases for the following cases:
* Valid overloads as functions, methods, generics, version specific
* Invalid overloads as stated in
https://typing.python.org/en/latest/spec/overload.html#invalid-overload-definitions
(implementation will be done in a follow-up)
* Various relation: fully static, subtyping, and assignability (others
in a follow-up)

## Ecosystem changes

_WIP_

After going through the ecosystem changes (there are a lot!), here's
what I've found:

We need assignability check between a callable type and a class literal
because a lot of builtins are defined as classes in typeshed whose
constructor method is overloaded e.g., `map`, `sorted`, `list.sort`,
`max`, `min` with the `key` parameter, `collections.abc.defaultdict`,
etc. (https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/17343). This makes up
most of the ecosystem diff **roughly 70 diagnostics**. For example:

```py
from collections import defaultdict

# red-knot: No overload of bound method `__init__` matches arguments [lint:no-matching-overload]
defaultdict(int)
# red-knot: No overload of bound method `__init__` matches arguments [lint:no-matching-overload]
defaultdict(list)

class Foo:
    def __init__(self, x: int):
        self.x = x

# red-knot: No overload of function `__new__` matches arguments [lint:no-matching-overload]
map(Foo, ["a", "b", "c"])
```

Duplicate diagnostics in unpacking
(https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/16514) has **~16
diagnostics**.

Support for the `callable` builtin which requires `TypeIs` support. This
is **5 diagnostics**. For example:
```py
from typing import Any

def _(x: Any | None) -> None:
    if callable(x):
        # red-knot: `Any | None`
        # Pyright: `(...) -> object`
        # mypy: `Any`
        # pyrefly: `(...) -> object`
        reveal_type(x)
```

Narrowing on `assert` which has **11 diagnostics**. This is being worked
on in https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/17345. For example:
```py
import re

match = re.search("", "")
assert match
match.group()  # error: [possibly-unbound-attribute]
```

Others:
* `Self`: 2
* Type aliases: 6
* Generics: 3
* Protocols: 13
* Unpacking in comprehension: 1
(https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/17396)

## Performance

Refer to
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/17366#issuecomment-2814053046.
2025-04-18 09:57:40 +05:30
David Peter
ae2cf91a36
[red-knot] Decorators and properties (#17017)
## Summary

Add support for decorators on function as well as support
for properties by adding special handling for `@property` and `@<name of
property>.setter`/`.getter` decorators.

closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/16987

## Ecosystem results

- ✔️ A lot of false positives are fixed by our new
understanding of properties
- 🔴 A bunch of new false positives (typically
`possibly-unbound-attribute` or `invalid-argument-type`) occur because
we currently do not perform type narrowing on attributes. And with the
new understanding of properties, this becomes even more relevant. In
many cases, the narrowing occurs through an assertion, so this is also
something that we need to implement to get rid of these false positives.
- 🔴 A few new false positives occur because we do not
understand generics, and therefore some calls to custom setters fail.
- 🔴 Similarly, some false positives occur because we do not
understand protocols yet.
- ✔️ Seems like a true positive to me. [The
setter](e624d8edfa/src/packaging/specifiers.py (L752-L754))
only accepts `bools`, but `None` is assigned in [this
line](e624d8edfa/tests/test_specifiers.py (L688)).
  ```
+ error[lint:invalid-assignment]
/tmp/mypy_primer/projects/packaging/tests/test_specifiers.py:688:9:
Invalid assignment to data descriptor attribute `prereleases` on type
`SpecifierSet` with custom `__set__` method
  ```
- ✔️ This is arguable also a true positive. The setter
[here](0c6c75644f/rich/table.py (L359-L363))
returns `Table`, but typeshed wants [setters to return
`None`](bf8d2a9912/stdlib/builtins.pyi (L1298)).
  ```
+ error[lint:invalid-argument-type]
/tmp/mypy_primer/projects/rich/rich/table.py:359:5: Object of type
`Literal[padding]` cannot be assigned to parameter 2 (`fset`) of bound
method `setter`; expected type `(Any, Any, /) -> None`
  ```  

## Follow ups

- Fix the `@no_type_check` regression
- Implement class decorators

## Test Plan

New Markdown test suites for decorators and properties.
2025-04-02 09:27:46 +02:00
David Peter
141ba253da
[red-knot] Add support for @classmethods (#16305)
## Summary

Add support for `@classmethod`s.

```py
class C:
    @classmethod
    def f(cls, x: int) -> str:
        return "a"

reveal_type(C.f(1))  # revealed: str
```

## Test Plan

New Markdown tests
2025-02-24 09:55:34 +01:00
David Peter
15394a8028
[red-knot] MDTests: Do not depend on precise public-symbol type inference (#15691)
## Summary

Another small PR to focus #15674 solely on the relevant changes. This
makes our Markdown tests less dependent on precise types of public
symbols, without actually changing anything semantically in these tests.

Best reviewed using ignore-whitespace-mode.

## Test Plan

Tested these changes on `main` and on the branch from #15674.
2025-01-23 13:51:33 +00:00
InSync
15fe540251
Improve mdtests style (#14884)
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <alex.waygood@gmail.com>
2024-12-10 13:05:51 +00:00
David Peter
47f39ed1a0
[red-knot] Meta data for Type::Todo (#14500)
## Summary

Adds meta information to `Type::Todo`, allowing developers to easily
trace back the origin of a particular `@Todo` type they encounter.

Instead of `Type::Todo`, we now write either `type_todo!()` which
creates a `@Todo[path/to/source.rs:123]` type with file and line
information, or using `type_todo!("PEP 604 unions not supported")`,
which creates a variant with a custom message.

`Type::Todo` now contains a `TodoType` field. In release mode, this is
just a zero-sized struct, in order not to create any overhead. In debug
mode, this is an `enum` that contains the meta information.

`Type` implements `Copy`, which means that `TodoType` also needs to be
copyable. This limits the design space. We could intern `TodoType`, but
I discarded this option, as it would require us to have access to the
salsa DB everywhere we want to use `Type::Todo`. And it would have made
the macro invocations less ergonomic (requiring us to pass `db`).

So for now, the meta information is simply a `&'static str` / `u32` for
the file/line variant, or a `&'static str` for the custom message.
Anything involving a chain/backtrace of several `@Todo`s or similar is
therefore currently not implemented. Also because we currently don't see
any direct use cases for this, and because all of this will eventually
go away.

Note that the size of `Type` increases from 16 to 24 bytes, but only in
debug mode.

## Test Plan

- Observed the changes in Markdown tests.
- Added custom messages for all `Type::Todo`s that were revealed in the
tests
- Ran red knot in release and debug mode on the following Python file:
  ```py
  def f(x: int) -> int:
      reveal_type(x)
  ```
Prints `@Todo` in release mode and `@Todo(function parameter type)` in
debug mode.
2024-11-21 09:59:47 +01:00
David Peter
96b3c400fe
[red-knot] Minor follow-up on slice expression inference (#13982)
## Summary

Minor follow-up to #13917 — thanks @AlexWaygood for the post-merge
review.

- Add
SliceLiteralType::as_tuple
- Use .expect() instead of SAFETY
comment
- Match on ::try_from
result
- Add TODO comment regarding raising a diagnostic for `"foo"["bar":"baz"]`
2024-10-29 19:40:57 +00:00
David Peter
56c796acee
[red-knot] Slice expression types & subscript expressions with slices (#13917)
## Summary

- Add a new `Type::SliceLiteral` variant
- Infer `SliceLiteral` types for slice expressions, such as
`<int-literal>:<int-literal>:<int-literal>`.
- Infer "sliced" literal types for subscript expressions using slices,
such as `<string-literal>[<slice-literal>]`.
- Infer types for expressions involving slices of tuples:
`<tuple>[<slice-literal>]`.

closes #13853

## Test Plan

- Unit tests for indexing/slicing utility functions
- Markdown-based tests for
  - Subscript expressions `tuple[slice]`
  - Subscript expressions `string_literal[slice]`
  - Subscript expressions `bytes_literal[slice]`
2024-10-29 10:17:31 +01:00
TomerBin
35f007f17f
[red-knot] Type narrow in else clause (#13918)
## Summary

Add support for type narrowing in elif and else scopes as part of
#13694.

## Test Plan

- mdtest
- builder unit test for union negation.

---------

Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
2024-10-26 16:22:57 +00:00
Alex Waygood
3eb454699a
[red-knot] Format mdtest Python snippets more concisely (#13905) 2024-10-24 11:09:31 +00:00
David Peter
77ae0ccf0f
[red-knot] Infer subscript expression types for bytes literals (#13901)
## Summary

Infer subscript expression types for bytes literals:
```py
b = b"\x00abc\xff"

reveal_type(b[0])  # revealed: Literal[b"\x00"]
reveal_type(b[1])  # revealed: Literal[b"a"]
reveal_type(b[-1])  # revealed: Literal[b"\xff"]
reveal_type(b[-2])  # revealed: Literal[b"c"]

reveal_type(b[False])  # revealed: Literal[b"\x00"]
reveal_type(b[True])  # revealed: Literal[b"a"]
```


part of #13689
(https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/13689#issuecomment-2404285064)

## Test Plan

- New Markdown-based tests (see `mdtest/subscript/bytes.md`)
- Added missing test for `string_literal[bool_literal]`
2024-10-24 12:07:41 +02:00
Alex Waygood
36cb1199cc
[red-knot] Autoformat mdtest Python snippets using blacken-docs (#13809) 2024-10-19 15:57:06 +01:00
David Peter
c2f7c39987
[red-knot] mdtest suite: formatting and cleanup (#13806)
Minor cleanup and consistent formatting of the Markdown-based tests.

- Removed lots of unnecessary `a`, `b`, `c`, … variables.
- Moved test assertions (`# revealed:` comments) closer to the tested
object.
- Always separate `# revealed` and `# error` comments from the code by
two spaces, according to the discussion
[here](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/13746/files#r1799385758).
This trades readability for consistency in some cases.
- Fixed some headings
2024-10-18 11:07:53 +02:00
Alex
d77480768d
[red-knot] Port type inference tests to new test framework (#13719)
## Summary

Porting infer tests to new markdown tests framework.

Link to the corresponding issue: #13696

---------

Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
2024-10-15 11:23:46 -07:00