Hi!
I left out some of the functions in the migration rule which became
removed in NumPy 2.0:
- `np.alltrue`
- `np.anytrue`
- `np.cumproduct`
- `np.product`
Addressing: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/26493
## Summary
It turns out that `singledispatch` does end up evaluating all arguments,
even though only the first is used to dispatch.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/11520.
## Summary
Addresses #8451 by implementing rule 116 to add an unsafe fix when sleep
is used with a >24 hour interval to instead consider sleeping forever.
This rule is added as async instead as I my understanding was that these
trio rules would be moved to async anyway.
There are a couple of TODOs, which address further extending the rule by
adding support for lookups and evaluations, and also supporting `anyio`.
## Summary
Similar to #11414, this PR extends `UP037` to flag quoted annotations
that are located in positions that won't be evaluated at runtime.
For example, the quotes on `Tuple` are unnecessary in:
```python
from typing import TYPE_CHECKING
if TYPE_CHECKING:
from typing import Tuple
def foo():
x: "Tuple[int, int]" = (0, 0)
foo()
```
## Summary
Matching Pylint, we now omit the `try` body itself from branch counting.
Each `except` counts as a branch, as does the `else` and the `finally`.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/11205.
## Summary
If an annotation won't be evaluated at runtime, we don't need to flag
`from __future__ import annotations` as required. This applies both to
quoted annotations and annotations outside of runtime-evaluated
positions, like:
```python
def main() -> None:
a_list: list[str] | None = []
a_list.append("hello")
```
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/11397.
## Summary
This is a follow-up PR to #11445 update the `E27` rules to consider soft
keywords as well.
## Test Plan
Add test cases consisting of soft keywords and update the snapshot.
## Summary
We weren't treating the escaped newline as a valid condition to trigger
the safer fix (add an extra backslash before each invalid escape
sequence).
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/11461.
## Summary
We already have handling for "references that get quoted within our
quoted references", but we were assuming a specific ordering in the way
edits were generated.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/11449.
Followup on #11168 and resolve#10391
# User facing changes
* F401 now recommends a fix to add unused import bindings to to
`__all__` if a single `__all__` list or tuple is found in `__init__.py`.
* If there are no `__all__` found in the file, fall back to recommending
redundant-aliases.
* If there are multiple `__all__` or only one but of the wrong type (non
list or tuple) then diagnostics are generated without fixes.
* `fix_title` is updated to reflect what the fix/recommendation is.
Subtlety: For a renamed import such as `import foo as bees`, we can
generate a fix to add `bees` to `__all__` but cannot generate a fix to
produce a redundant import (because that would break uses of the binding
`bees`).
# Implementation changes
* Add `name` field to `ImportBinding` to contain the name of the
_binding_ we want to add to `__all__` (important for the `import foo as
bees` case). It previously only contained the `AnyImport` which can give
us information about the import but not the binding.
* Add `binding` field to `UnusedImport` to contain the same. (Naming
note: the field `name` field already existed on `UnusedImport` and
contains the qualified name of the imported symbol/module)
* Change `fix_by_reexporting` to branch on the size of `dunder_all:
Vec<&Expr>`
* For length 0 call the edit-producing function `make_redundant_alias`.
* For length 1 call edit-producing function `add_to_dunder_all`.
* Otherwise, produce no fix.
* Implement the edit-producing function `add_to_dunder_all` and add unit
tests.
* Implement several fixture tests: empty `__all__ = []`, nonempty
`__all__ = ["foo"]`, mis-typed `__all__ = None`, plus-eq `__all__ +=
["foo"]`
* `UnusedImportContext::Init` variant now has two fields: whether the
fix is in `__init__.py` and how many `__all__` were found.
# Other changes
* Remove a spurious pattern match and instead use field lookups b/c the
addition of a field would have required changing the unrelated pattern.
* Tweak input type of `make_redundant_alias`
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
## Summary
Should this consider the decorator only if the name is actually a
property or is the logic in this PR correct?
fixes: #11358
## Test Plan
Add test case.
## Summary
This PR fixes a bug where the auto-fix for `TCH005` would delete the
entire `if` statement.
The fix in this PR is to not consider it a violation if there are any
`elif`/`else` blocks. This also matches the behavior of the original
plugin.
fixes: #11368
## Test plan
Add test cases.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Resolves#11263
Detect `pathlib.Path.open` calls which do not specify a file encoding.
## Test Plan
Test cases added to fixture.
---------
Co-authored-by: Dhruv Manilawala <dhruvmanila@gmail.com>
Resolves https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/11313
## Summary
PLR0912(too-many-branches) did not count branches inside with: blocks.
With this fix, the branches inside with statements are also counted.
## Test Plan
Added a new test case.
## Summary
While I was here, I also updated the rule to use
`function_type::classify` rather than hard-coding `staticmethod` and
friends.
Per Carl:
> Enum instances are already referred to by the class, forming a cycle
that won't get collected until the class itself does. At which point the
`lru_cache` itself would be collected, too.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9912.
## Summary
Historically, we only ignored `flake8-blind-except` if you re-raised or
logged the exception as a _direct_ child statement; but it could be
nested somewhere. This was just a known limitation at the time of adding
the previous logic.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/11289.
Resolves#10390 and starts to address #10391
# Changes to behavior
* In `__init__.py` we now offer some fixes for unused imports.
* If the import binding is first-party this PR suggests a fix to turn it
into a redundant alias.
* If the import binding is not first-party, this PR suggests a fix to
remove it from the `__init__.py`.
* The fix-titles are specific to these new suggested fixes.
* `checker.settings.ignore_init_module_imports` setting is
deprecated/ignored. There is probably a documentation change to make
that complete which I haven't done.
---
<details><summary>Old description of implementation changes</summary>
# Changes to the implementation
* In the body of the loop over import statements that contain unused
bindings, the bindings are partitioned into `to_reexport` and
`to_remove` (according to how we want to resolve the fact they're
unused) with the following predicate:
```rust
in_init && is_first_party(checker, &import.qualified_name().to_string())
// true means make it a reexport
```
* Instead of generating a single fix per import statement, we now
generate up to two fixes per import statement:
```rust
(fix_by_removing_imports(checker, node_id, &to_remove, in_init).ok(),
fix_by_reexporting(checker, node_id, &to_reexport, dunder_all).ok())
```
* The `to_remove` fixes are unsafe when `in_init`.
* The `to_explicit` fixes are safe. Currently, until a future PR, we
make them redundant aliases (e.g. `import a` would become `import a as
a`).
## Other changes
* `checker.settings.ignore_init_module_imports` is deprecated/ignored.
Instead, all fixes are gated on `checker.settings.preview.is_enabled()`.
* Got rid of the pattern match on the import-binding bound by the inner
loop because it seemed less readable than referencing fields on the
binding.
* [x] `// FIXME: rename "imports" to "bindings"` if reviewer agrees (see
code)
* [x] `// FIXME: rename "node_id" to "import_statement"` if reviewer
agrees (see code)
<details>
<summary><h2>Scope cut until a future PR</h2></summary>
* (Not implemented) The `to_explicit` fixes will be added to `__all__`
unless it doesn't exist. When `__all__` doesn't exist they're resolved
by converting to redundant aliases (e.g. `import a` would become `import
a as a`).
---
</details>
# Test plan
* [x] `crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pyflakes/F401_24`
contains an `__init__.py` with*out* `__all__` that exercises the
features in this PR, but it doesn't pass.
* [x]
`crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pyflakes/F401_25_dunder_all`
contains an `__init__.py` *with* `__all__` that exercises the features
in this PR, but it doesn't pass.
* [x] Write unit tests for the new edit functions in
`fix::edits::make_redundant_alias`.
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
## Summary
I think the check included here does make sense, but I don't see why we
would allow it if a value is provided for the attribute -- since, in
that case, isn't it _not_ abstract?
Closes: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/11208.
## Summary
Implement duplicate code detection as part of `RUF100`, mirroring the
behavior of `flake8-noqa` (`NQA005`) mentioned in #850. The idea to
merge the rule into `RUF100` was suggested by @MichaReiser
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/10325#issuecomment-2025535444.
## Test Plan
Test cases were added to the fixture.
## Summary
Based on discussion in #10850.
As it stands today `RUF100` will attempt to replace code redirects with
their target codes even though this is not the "goal" of `RUF100`. This
behavior is confusing and inconsistent, since code redirects which don't
otherwise violate `RUF100` will not be updated. The behavior is also
undocumented. Additionally, users who want to use `RUF100` but do not
want to update redirects have no way to opt out.
This PR explicitly detects redirects with a new rule `RUF101` and
patches `RUF100` to keep original codes in fixes and reporting.
## Test Plan
Added fixture.
## Summary
Resolves#11102
The error stems from these lines
f5c7a62aa6/crates/ruff_linter/src/noqa.rs (L697-L702)
I don't really understand the purpose of incrementing the last index,
but it makes the resulting range invalid for indexing into `contents`.
For now I just detect if the index is too high in `blanket_noqa` and
adjust it if necessary.
## Test Plan
Created fixture from issue example.
## Summary
This allows `raise from` in BLE001.
```python
try:
...
except Exception as e:
raise ValueError from e
```
Fixes#10806
## Test Plan
Test case added.
## Summary
Fixes#10463
Add `FURB192` which detects violations like this:
```python
# Bad
a = sorted(l)[0]
# Good
a = min(l)
```
There is a caveat that @Skylion007 has pointed out, which is that
violations with `reverse=True` technically aren't compatible with this
change, in the edge case where the unstable behavior is intended. For
example:
```python
from operator import itemgetter
data = [('red', 1), ('blue', 1), ('red', 2), ('blue', 2)]
min(data, key=itemgetter(0)) # ('blue', 1)
sorted(data, key=itemgetter(0))[0] # ('blue', 1)
sorted(data, key=itemgetter(0), reverse=True)[-1] # ('blue, 2')
```
This seems like a rare edge case, but I can make the `reverse=True`
fixes unsafe if that's best.
## Test Plan
This is unit tested.
## References
https://github.com/dosisod/refurb/pull/333/files
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
The `operator.itemgetter` behavior changes where there's more than one
argument, such that `operator.itemgetter(0)` yields `r[0]`, rather than
`(r[0],)`.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/11075.
Resolves#10187
<details>
<summary>Old PR description; accurate through commit e86dd7d; probably
best to leave this fold closed</summary>
## Description of change
In the case of a printf-style format string with only one %-placeholder
and a variable at right (e.g. `"%s" % var`):
* The new behavior attempts to dereference the variable and then match
on the bound expression to distinguish between a 1-tuple (fix), n-tuple
(bug 🐛), or a non-tuple (fix). Dereferencing is via
`analyze::typing::find_binding_value`.
* If the variable cannot be dereferenced, then the type-analysis routine
is called to distinguish only tuple (no-fix) or non-tuple (fix). Type
analysis is via `analyze::typing::is_tuple`.
* If any of the above fails, the rule still fires, but no fix is
offered.
## Alternatives
* If the reviewers think that singling out the 1-tuple case is too
complicated, I will remove that.
* The ecosystem results show that no new fixes are detected. So I could
probably delete all the variable dereferencing code and code that tries
to generate fixes, tbh.
## Changes to existing behavior
**All the previous rule-firings and fixes are unchanged except for** the
"false negatives" in
`crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pyupgrade/UP031_1.py`. Those
previous "false negatives" are now true positives and so I moved them to
`crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pyupgrade/UP031_0.py`.
<details>
<summary>Existing false negatives that are now true positives</summary>
```
crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pyupgrade/UP031_0.py:134:1: UP031 Use format specifiers instead of percent format
|
133 | # UP031 (no longer false negatives)
134 | 'Hello %s' % bar
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ UP031
135 |
136 | 'Hello %s' % bar.baz
|
= help: Replace with format specifiers
crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pyupgrade/UP031_0.py:136:1: UP031 Use format specifiers instead of percent format
|
134 | 'Hello %s' % bar
135 |
136 | 'Hello %s' % bar.baz
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ UP031
137 |
138 | 'Hello %s' % bar['bop']
|
= help: Replace with format specifiers
crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pyupgrade/UP031_0.py:138:1: UP031 Use format specifiers instead of percent format
|
136 | 'Hello %s' % bar.baz
137 |
138 | 'Hello %s' % bar['bop']
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ UP031
|
= help: Replace with format specifiers
```
One of them newly offers a fix.
```
# UP031 (no longer false negatives)
-'Hello %s' % bar
+'Hello {}'.format(bar)
```
This fix occurs because the new code dereferences `bar` to where it was
defined earlier in the file as a non-tuple:
```python
bar = {"bar": y}
```
---
</details>
## Behavior requiring new tests
Additionally, we now handle a few cases that we didn't previously test.
These cases are when a string has a single %-placeholder and the
righthand operand to the modulo operator is a variable **which can be
dereferenced.** One of those was shown in the previous section (the
"dereference non-tuple" case).
<details>
<summary>New cases handled</summary>
```
crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pyupgrade/UP031_0.py:126:1: UP031 [*] Use format specifiers instead of percent format
|
125 | t1 = (x,)
126 | "%s" % t1
| ^^^^^^^^^ UP031
127 | # UP031: deref t1 to 1-tuple, offer fix
|
= help: Replace with format specifiers
crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pyupgrade/UP031_0.py:130:1: UP031 Use format specifiers instead of percent format
|
129 | t2 = (x,y)
130 | "%s" % t2
| ^^^^^^^^^ UP031
131 | # UP031: deref t2 to n-tuple, this is a bug
|
= help: Replace with format specifiers
```
One of these offers a fix.
```
t1 = (x,)
-"%s" % t1
+"{}".format(t1[0])
# UP031: deref t1 to 1-tuple, offer fix
```
The other doesn't offer a fix because it's a bug.
---
</details>
---
</details>
## Changes to existing behavior
In the case of a string with a single %-placeholder and a single
ambiguous righthand argument to the modulo operator, (e.g. `"%s" % var`)
the rule now fires and offers a fix. We explain about this in the "fix
safety" section of the updated documentation.
## Documentation changes
I swapped the order of the "known problems" and the "examples" sections
so that the examples which describe the rule are first, before the
exceptions to the rule are described. I also tweaked the language to be
more explicit, as I had trouble understanding the documentation at
first. The "known problems" section is now "fix safety" but the content
is largely similar.
The diff of the documentation changes looks a little difficult unless
you look at the individual commits.
