## Summary
Part 1 of the big change introduced in #14828. This temporarily causes
all fixes for `round(...)` to be considered unsafe, but they will
eventually be enhanced.
## Test Plan
`cargo nextest run` and `cargo insta test`.
## Summary
Close#11243. Fix `pytest-parametrize-names-wrong-type (PT006)` to edit
both `argnames` and `argvalues` if both of them are single-element
tuples/lists.
```python
# Before fix
@pytest.mark.parametrize(("x",), [(1,), (2,)])
def test_foo(x):
...
# After fix:
@pytest.mark.parametrize("x", [1, 2])
def test_foo(x):
...
```
## Test Plan
New test cases
This PR introduces three changes to the diagnostic and fix behavior
(still under preview) for [boolean-chained-comparison
(PLR1716)](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/boolean-chained-comparison/#boolean-chained-comparison-plr1716).
1. We now offer a _fix_ in the case of parenthesized expressions like
`(a < b) and b < c`. The fix will merge the chains of comparisons and
then balance parentheses by _adding_ parentheses to one side of the
expression.
2. We now trigger a diagnostic (and fix) in the case where some
comparisons have multiple comparators like `a < b < c and c < d`.
3. When adjacent comparators are parenthesized, we prefer the left
parenthesization and apply the replacement to the whole parenthesized
range. So, for example, `a < (b) and ((b)) < c` becomes `a < (b) < c`.
While these seem like somewhat disconnected changes, they are actually
related. If we only offered (1), then we would see the following fix
behavior:
```diff
- (a < b) and b < c and ((c < d))
+ (a < b < c) and ((c < d))
```
This is because the fix which add parentheses to the first pair of
comparisons overlaps with the fix that removes the `and` between the
second two comparisons. So the latter fix is deferred. However, the
latter fix does not get a second chance because, upon the next lint
iteration, there is no violation of `PLR1716`.
Upon adopting (2), however, both fixes occur by the time ruff completes
several iterations and we get:
```diff
- (a < b) and b < c and ((c < d))
+ ((a < b < c < d))
```
Finally, (3) fixes a previously unobserved bug wherein the autofix for
`a < (b) and b < c` used to result in `a<(b<c` which gives a syntax
error. It could in theory have been fixed in a separate PR, but seems to
be on theme here.
----------
- Closes#13524
- (1), (2), and (3) are implemented in separate commits for ease of
review and modification.
- Technically a user can trigger an error in ruff (by reaching max
iterations) if they have a humongous boolean chained comparison with
differing parentheses levels.
Improves error message for [except*](https://peps.python.org/pep-0654/)
(Rules: B025, B029, B030, B904)
Example python snippet:
```python
try:
a = 1
except* ValueError:
a = 2
except* ValueError:
a = 2
try:
pass
except* ():
pass
try:
pass
except* 1: # error
pass
try:
raise ValueError
except* ValueError:
raise UserWarning
```
Error messages
Before:
```
$ ruff check --select=B foo.py
foo.py:6:9: B025 try-except block with duplicate exception `ValueError`
foo.py:11:1: B029 Using `except ():` with an empty tuple does not catch anything; add exceptions to handle
foo.py:16:9: B030 `except` handlers should only be exception classes or tuples of exception classes
foo.py:22:5: B904 Within an `except` clause, raise exceptions with `raise ... from err` or `raise ... from None` to distinguish them from errors in exception handling
Found 4 errors.
```
After:
```
$ ruff check --select=B foo.py
foo.py:6:9: B025 try-except* block with duplicate exception `ValueError`
foo.py:11:1: B029 Using `except* ():` with an empty tuple does not catch anything; add exceptions to handle
foo.py:16:9: B030 `except*` handlers should only be exception classes or tuples of exception classes
foo.py:22:5: B904 Within an `except*` clause, raise exceptions with `raise ... from err` or `raise ... from None` to distinguish them from errors in exception handling
Found 4 errors.
```
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/14791
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
## Summary
Airflow 3.0 removes various deprecated functions, members, modules, and
other values. They have been deprecated in 2.x, but the removal causes
incompatibilities that we want to detect. This PR deprecates the
following names.
* in `DAG`
* `sla_miss_callback` was removed
* in `airflow.operators.trigger_dagrun.TriggerDagRunOperator`
* `execution_date` was removed
* in `airflow.operators.weekday.DayOfWeekSensor`,
`airflow.operators.datetime.BranchDateTimeOperator` and
`airflow.operators.weekday.BranchDayOfWeekOperator`
* `use_task_execution_day` was removed in favor of
`use_task_logical_date`
The full list of rules we will extend
https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/44556
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
A test fixture is included in the PR.
When fixing an invalid escape sequence in an f-string, each f-string
element is analyzed for valid escape characters prior to creating the
diagnostic and fix. This allows us to safely prefix with `r` to create a
raw string if no valid escape characters were found anywhere in the
f-string, and otherwise insert backslashes.
This fixes a bug in the original implementation: each "f-string part"
was treated separately, so it was not possible to tell whether a valid
escape character was or would be used elsewhere in the f-string.
Progress towards #11491 but format specifiers are not handled in this
PR.
## Summary
This PR makes changes to the `AIR001` rule as per
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/14627#discussion_r1860212307.
Additionally,
* Avoid returning the `Diagnostic` and update the checker in the rule
logic for consistency
* Remove test case for different keyword position (I don't think it's
required here)
## Test Plan
Add test cases for multiple operators from various modules.
## Summary
Just some minor followups to the recently merged RUF052 rule, that was
added in bf0fd04:
- Some small tweaks to the docs
- A minor code-style nit
- Some more tests for my peace of mind, just to check that the new
methods on the semantic model are working correctly
I'm adding the "internal" label as this doesn't deserve a changelog
entry. RUF052 is a new rule that hasn't been released yet.
## Test Plan
`cargo test -p ruff_linter`
This PR extends the Decimal parsing used in [verbose-decimal-constructor
(FURB157)](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/verbose-decimal-constructor/)
to better handle non-finite `Decimal` objects, avoiding some false
negatives.
Closes#14587
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
## Summary
This PR implements new rule discussed
[here](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/discussions/14449).
In short, it searches for assert messages which were unintentionally
used as a expression to be matched against.
## Test Plan
`cargo test` and review of `ruff-ecosystem`
