Most of the work here was doing some light refactoring to facilitate
sensible testing. That is, we don't want to list every builtin included
in most tests, so we add some structure to the completion type returned.
Tests can now filter based on whether a completion is a builtin or not.
Otherwise, builtins are found using the existing infrastructure for
`object.attr` completions (where we hard-code the module name
`builtins`).
I did consider changing the sort order based on whether a completion
suggestion was a builtin or not. In particular, it seemed like it might
be a good idea to sort builtins after other scope based completions,
but before the dunder and sunder attributes. Namely, it seems likely
that there is an inverse correlation between the size of a scope and
the likelihood of an item in that scope being used at any given point.
So it *might* be a good idea to prioritize the likelier candidates in
the completions returned.
Additionally, the number of items introduced by adding builtins is quite
large. So I wondered whether mixing them in with everything else would
become too noisy.
However, it's not totally clear to me that this is the right thing to
do. Right now, I feel like there is a very obvious lexicographic
ordering that makes "finding" the right suggestion to activate
potentially easier than if the ranking mechanism is less clear.
(Technically, the dunder and sunder attributes are not sorted
lexicographically, but I'd put forward that most folks don't have an
intuitive understanding of where `_` ranks lexicographically with
respect to "regular" letters. Moreover, since dunder and sunder
attributes are all grouped together, I think the ordering here ends up
being very obvious after even a quick glance.)
We achieve this by setting the "sort text" field of every completion.
Since we are trying to be smart about the order, we want the client to
respect our order.
Prior to this change, VS Code was re-sorting completions in
lexicographic order. This in turn resulted in dunder attributes
appearing before "normal" attributes.
## Summary
PR adding support for it in the VS Code extension:
https://github.com/astral-sh/ty-vscode/pull/36
This PR adds support for `python.ty.disableLanguageServices` to the ty
language server by accepting this as server setting.
This has the same issue as https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/282 in
that it only works when configured globally. Fixing that requires
support for multiple workspaces in the server itself.
I also went ahead and did a similar refactor as the Ruff server to use
"Options" and "Settings" to keep the code consistent although the
combine functionality doesn't exists yet because workspace settings
isn't supported in the ty server.
## Test Plan
Refer to https://github.com/astral-sh/ty-vscode/pull/36 for the test
demo.
Specifically, this PR reverts "Make completions an opt-in LSP feature
(#17921)",
corresponding to commit 51e2effd2d.
In practice, this means you don't need to opt into completions working
by enabling experimental features. i.e., I was able to remove this from
my LSP configuration:
```
"experimental": {
"completions": {
"enable": true
}
},
```
There's still a lot of work left to do to make completions awesome, but
I think it's in a state where it would be useful to get real user
feedback. It's also meaningfully using ty to provide completions that
use type information.
Ref astral-sh/ty#86
## Summary
This PR moves the diagnostics API for the language server out from the
request handler module to the diagnostics API module.
This is in preparation to add support for publishing diagnostics.
## Summary
This PR updates the language server to avoid panicking when there are
multiple workspace folders passed during initialization. The server
currently picks up the first workspace folder and provides a warning and
a log message.
## Test Plan
<img width="1724" alt="Screenshot 2025-05-17 at 11 43 09"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1a7ddbc3-198d-4191-a28f-9b69321e8f99"
/>
## Summary
This PR is a first step toward integration of the new `Diagnostic` type
into ruff. There are two main changes:
- A new `UnifiedFile` enum wrapping `File` for red-knot and a
`SourceFile` for ruff
- ruff's `Message::SyntaxError` variant is now a `Diagnostic` instead of
a `SyntaxErrorMessage`
The second of these changes was mostly just a proof of concept for the
first, and it went pretty smoothly. Converting `DiagnosticMessage`s will
be most of the work in replacing `Message` entirely.
## Test Plan
Existing tests, which show no changes.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
## Summary
We now expect the client to send initialization options to opt-in to
experimental (but LSP-standardized) features, like completion support.
Specifically, the client should set `"experimental.completions.enable":
true`.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/74.
