## Summary
This PR removes the `ImportMap` implementation and all its routing
through ruff.
The import map was added in https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/3243
but we then never ended up using it to do cross file analysis.
We are now working on adding multifile analysis to ruff, and revisit
import resolution as part of it.
```
hyperfine --warmup 10 --runs 20 --setup "./target/release/ruff clean" \
"./target/release/ruff check crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/cpython -e -s --extend-select=I" \
"./target/release/ruff-import check crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/cpython -e -s --extend-select=I"
Benchmark 1: ./target/release/ruff check crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/cpython -e -s --extend-select=I
Time (mean ± σ): 37.6 ms ± 0.9 ms [User: 52.2 ms, System: 63.7 ms]
Range (min … max): 35.8 ms … 39.8 ms 20 runs
Benchmark 2: ./target/release/ruff-import check crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/cpython -e -s --extend-select=I
Time (mean ± σ): 36.0 ms ± 0.7 ms [User: 50.3 ms, System: 58.4 ms]
Range (min … max): 34.5 ms … 37.6 ms 20 runs
Summary
./target/release/ruff-import check crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/cpython -e -s --extend-select=I ran
1.04 ± 0.03 times faster than ./target/release/ruff check crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/cpython -e -s --extend-select=I
```
I suspect that the performance improvement should even be more
significant for users that otherwise don't have any diagnostics.
```
hyperfine --warmup 10 --runs 20 --setup "cd ../ecosystem/airflow && ../../ruff/target/release/ruff clean" \
"./target/release/ruff check ../ecosystem/airflow -e -s --extend-select=I" \
"./target/release/ruff-import check ../ecosystem/airflow -e -s --extend-select=I"
Benchmark 1: ./target/release/ruff check ../ecosystem/airflow -e -s --extend-select=I
Time (mean ± σ): 53.7 ms ± 1.8 ms [User: 68.4 ms, System: 63.0 ms]
Range (min … max): 51.1 ms … 58.7 ms 20 runs
Benchmark 2: ./target/release/ruff-import check ../ecosystem/airflow -e -s --extend-select=I
Time (mean ± σ): 50.8 ms ± 1.4 ms [User: 50.7 ms, System: 60.9 ms]
Range (min … max): 48.5 ms … 55.3 ms 20 runs
Summary
./target/release/ruff-import check ../ecosystem/airflow -e -s --extend-select=I ran
1.06 ± 0.05 times faster than ./target/release/ruff check ../ecosystem/airflow -e -s --extend-select=I
```
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
Fixes#11185Fixes#11214
Document path and package information is now forwarded to the Ruff
linter, which allows `per-file-ignores` to correctly match against the
file name. This also fixes an issue where the import sorting rule didn't
distinguish between third-party and first-party packages since we didn't
pass in the package root.
## Test Plan
`per-file-ignores` should ignore files as expected. One quick way to
check is by adding this to your `pyproject.toml`:
```toml
[tool.ruff.lint.per-file-ignores]
"__init__.py" = ["ALL"]
```
Then, confirm that no diagnostics appear when you add code to an
`__init__.py` file (besides syntax errors).
The import sorting fix can be verified by failing to reproduce the
original issue - an `I001` diagnostic should not appear in
`other_module.py`.
## Summary
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/11158.
A settings file in the ruff user configuration directory will be used as
a configuration fallback, if it exists.
## Test Plan
Create a `pyproject.toml` or `ruff.toml` configuration file in the ruff
user configuration directory.
* On Linux, that will be `$XDG_CONFIG_HOME/ruff/` or `$HOME/.config`
* On macOS, that will be `$HOME/Library/Application Support`
* On Windows, that will be `{FOLDERID_LocalAppData}`
Then, open a file inside of a workspace with no configuration. The
settings in the user configuration file should be used.
## Summary
I think the check included here does make sense, but I don't see why we
would allow it if a value is provided for the attribute -- since, in
that case, isn't it _not_ abstract?
Closes: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/11208.
## Summary
This PR changes the `DebugStatistics` and `ReleaseStatistics` structs so
that they implement a common `StatisticsRecorder` trait, and makes the
`KeyValueCache` struct generic over a type parameter bound to that
trait. The advantage of this approach is that it's much harder for the
`DebugStatistics` and `ReleaseStatistics` structs to accidentally grow
out of sync in the methods that they implement, which was the cause of
the release-build failure recently fixed in #11177.
## Test Plan
`cargo test -p red_knot` and `cargo build --release` both continue to
pass for me locally
* Adds `Symbol.flag` bitfield. Populates it from (the three renamed)
`add_or_update_symbol*` methods.
* Currently there are these flags supported:
* `IS_DEFINED` is set in a scope where a variable is defined.
* `IS_USED` is set in a scope where a variable is referenced. (To have
both this and `IS_DEFINED` would require two separate appearances of a
variable in the same scope-- one def and one use.)
* `MARKED_GLOBAL` and `MARKED_NONLOCAL` are **not yet implemented**.
(*TODO: While traversing, if you find these declarations, add these
flags to the variable.*)
* Adds `Symbol.kind` field (commented) and the data structure which will
populate it: `Kind` which is an enum of freevar, cellvar,
implicit_global, and implicit_local. **Not yet populated**. (*TODO: a
second pass over the scope (or the ast?) will observe the
`MARKED_GLOBAL` and `MARKED_NONLOCAL` flags to populate this field. When
that's added, we'll uncomment the field.*)
* Adds a few tests that the `IS_DEFINED` and `IS_USED` fields are
correctly set and/or merged:
* Unit test that subsequent calls to `add_or_update_symbol` will merge
the flag arguments.
* Unit test that in the statement `x = foo`, the variable `foo` is
considered used but not defined.
* Unit test that in the statement `from bar import foo`, the variable
`foo` is considered defined but not used.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
## Summary
This PR adds a basic README for the `ruff_python_parser` crate and
updates the CONTRIBUTING docs with the fuzzer and benchmark section.
Additionally, it also updates some inline documentation within the
parser crate and splits the `parse_program` function into
`parse_single_expression` and `parse_module` which will be called by
matching against the `Mode`.
This PR doesn't go into too much internal detail around the parser logic
due to the following reasons:
1. Where should the docs go? Should it be as a module docs in `lib.rs`
or in README?
2. The parser is still evolving and could include a lot of refactors
with the future work (feedback loop and improved error recovery and
resilience)
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
## Summary
`cargo build --release` currently fails to compile on `main`:
<details>
```
error[E0599]: no method named `hit` found for struct `ReleaseStatistics` in the current scope
--> crates/red_knot/src/cache.rs:22:29
|
22 | self.statistics.hit();
| ^^^ method not found in `ReleaseStatistics`
...
145 | pub struct ReleaseStatistics;
| ---------------------------- method `hit` not found for this struct
error[E0599]: no method named `miss` found for struct `ReleaseStatistics` in the current scope
--> crates/red_knot/src/cache.rs:25:29
|
25 | self.statistics.miss();
| ^^^^ method not found in `ReleaseStatistics`
...
145 | pub struct ReleaseStatistics;
| ---------------------------- method `miss` not found for this struct
error[E0599]: no method named `hit` found for struct `ReleaseStatistics` in the current scope
--> crates/red_knot/src/cache.rs:36:33
|
36 | self.statistics.hit();
| ^^^ method not found in `ReleaseStatistics`
...
145 | pub struct ReleaseStatistics;
| ---------------------------- method `hit` not found for this struct
error[E0599]: no method named `miss` found for struct `ReleaseStatistics` in the current scope
--> crates/red_knot/src/cache.rs:41:33
|
41 | self.statistics.miss();
| ^^^^ method not found in `ReleaseStatistics`
...
145 | pub struct ReleaseStatistics;
| ---------------------------- method `miss` not found for this struct
```
</details>
This is because in a release build, `CacheStatistics` is a type alias
for `ReleaseStatistics`, and `ReleaseStatistics` doesn't have `hit()` or
`miss()` methods. (In a debug build, `CacheStatistics` is a type alias
for `DebugStatistics`, which _does_ have those methods.)
Possibly we could make this less likely to happen in the future by
making both structs implement a common trait instead of using type
aliases that vary depending on whether it's a debug build or not? For
now, though, this PR just brings the two structs in sync w.r.t. the
methods they expose.
## Test Plan
`cargo build --release` now once again compiles for me locally
## Summary
This PR adds an override to the fixer to ensure that we apply any
`redefined-while-unused` fixes prior to `unused-import`.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10905.
## Summary
Implement duplicate code detection as part of `RUF100`, mirroring the
behavior of `flake8-noqa` (`NQA005`) mentioned in #850. The idea to
merge the rule into `RUF100` was suggested by @MichaReiser
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/10325#issuecomment-2025535444.
## Test Plan
Test cases were added to the fixture.
This syntax wasn't "deprecated" in Python 3; it was removed.
I started looking at this rule because I was curious how Ruff could even
detect this without a Python 2 parser. Then I realized that
"print >> f, x" is actually valid Python 3 syntax: it creates a tuple
containing a right-shifted version of the print function.
## Summary
Based on discussion in #10850.
As it stands today `RUF100` will attempt to replace code redirects with
their target codes even though this is not the "goal" of `RUF100`. This
behavior is confusing and inconsistent, since code redirects which don't
otherwise violate `RUF100` will not be updated. The behavior is also
undocumented. Additionally, users who want to use `RUF100` but do not
want to update redirects have no way to opt out.
This PR explicitly detects redirects with a new rule `RUF101` and
patches `RUF100` to keep original codes in fixes and reporting.
## Test Plan
Added fixture.
## Summary
Closes#10985.
The server now supports a custom TOML configuration file as a client
setting. The setting must be an absolute path to a file. If the file is
called `pyproject.toml`, the server will attempt to parse it as a
pyproject file - otherwise, it will attempt to parse it as a `ruff.toml`
file, even if the file has a name besides `ruff.toml`.
If an option is set in both the custom TOML configuration file and in
the client settings directly, the latter will be used.
## Test Plan
1. Create a `ruff.toml` file outside of the workspace you are testing.
Set an option that is different from the one in the configuration for
your test workspace.
2. Set the path to the configuration in NeoVim:
```lua
require('lspconfig').ruff.setup {
init_options = {
settings = {
configuration = "absolute/path/to/your/configuration"
}
}
}
```
3. Confirm that the option in the configuration file is used, regardless
of what the option is set to in the workspace configuration.
4. Add the same option, with a different value, to the NeoVim
configuration directly. For example:
```lua
require('lspconfig').ruff.setup {
init_options = {
settings = {
configuration = "absolute/path/to/your/configuration",
lint = {
select = []
}
}
}
}
```
5. Confirm that the option set in client settings is used, regardless of
the value in either the custom configuration file or in the workspace
configuration.
## Summary
This PR fixes the bug where the formatter would format an f-string and
could potentially change the AST.
For a triple-quoted f-string, the element can't be formatted into
multiline if it has a format specifier because otherwise the newline
would be treated as part of the format specifier.
Given the following f-string:
```python
f"""aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb ccccccccccc {
variable:.3f} ddddddddddddddd eeeeeeee"""
```
The formatter sees that the f-string is already multiline so it assumes
that it can contain line breaks i.e., broken into multiple lines. But,
in this specific case we can't format it as:
```python
f"""aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb ccccccccccc {
variable:.3f
} ddddddddddddddd eeeeeeee"""
```
Because the format specifier string would become ".3f\n", which is not
the original string (`.3f`).
If the original source code already contained a newline, they'll be
preserved. For example:
```python
f"""aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb ccccccccccc {
variable:.3f
} ddddddddddddddd eeeeeeee"""
```
The above will be formatted as:
```py
f"""aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb ccccccccccc {variable:.3f
} ddddddddddddddd eeeeeeee"""
```
Note that the newline after `.3f` is part of the format specifier which
needs to be preserved.
The Python version is irrelevant in this case.
fixes: #10040
## Test Plan
Add some test cases to verify this behavior.
## Summary
This is intended to address
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-vscode/issues/425, and is a follow-up
to https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/11062.
A new client setting is now supported by the server,
`prioritizeFileConfiguration`. This is a boolean setting (default:
`false`) that, if set to `true`, will instruct the configuration
resolver to prioritize file configuration (aka discovered TOML files)
over configuration passed in by the editor.
A corresponding extension PR has been opened, which makes this setting
available for VS Code:
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-vscode/pull/457.
## Test Plan
To test this with VS Code, you'll need to check out [the VS Code
PR](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-vscode/pull/457) that adds this
setting.
The test process is similar to
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/11062, but in scenarios where the
editor configuration would take priority over file configuration, file
configuration should take priority.
## Summary
Resolves#11102
The error stems from these lines
f5c7a62aa6/crates/ruff_linter/src/noqa.rs (L697-L702)
I don't really understand the purpose of incrementing the last index,
but it makes the resulting range invalid for indexing into `contents`.
For now I just detect if the index is too high in `blanket_noqa` and
adjust it if necessary.
## Test Plan
Created fixture from issue example.
## Summary
This PR updates the playground to display the AST even if it contains a
syntax error. This could be useful for development and also to give a
quick preview of what error recovery looks like.
Note that not all recovery is correct but this allows us to iterate
quickly on what can be improved.
## Test Plan
Build the playground locally and test it.
<img width="1688" alt="Screenshot 2024-04-25 at 21 02 22"
src="2b94934c-4f2c-4a9a-9693-3d8460ed9d0b">
