## Summary
This builds off of the work in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/10652 to implement a command
executor, backwards compatible with the commands from the previous LSP
(`ruff.applyAutofix`, `ruff.applyFormat` and
`ruff.applyOrganizeImports`).
This involved a lot of refactoring and tweaks to the code action
resolution code - the most notable change is that workspace edits are
specified in a slightly different way, using the more general `changes`
field instead of the `document_changes` field (which isn't supported on
all LSP clients). Additionally, the API for synchronous request handlers
has been updated to include access to the `Requester`, which we use to
send a `workspace/applyEdit` request to the client.
## Test Plan
7932e30f-d944-4e35-b828-1d81aa56c087
## Summary
When a language server initializes, it is passed a serialized JSON
object, which is known as its "initialization options". Until now, `ruff
server` has ignored those initialization options, meaning that
user-provided settings haven't worked. This PR is the first step for
supporting settings from the LSP client. It implements procedures to
deserialize initialization options into a settings object, and then
resolve those settings objects into concrete settings for each
workspace.
One of the goals for user settings implementation in `ruff server` is
backwards compatibility with `ruff-lsp`'s settings. We won't support all
settings that `ruff-lsp` had, but the ones that we do support should
work the same and use the same schema as `ruff-lsp`.
These are the existing settings from `ruff-lsp` that we will continue to
support, and which are part of the settings schema in this PR:
| Setting | Default Value | Description |
|----------------------------------------|---------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| `codeAction.disableRuleComment.enable` | `true` | Whether to display
Quick Fix actions to disable rules via `noqa` suppression comments. |
| `codeAction.fixViolation.enable` | `true` | Whether to display Quick
Fix actions to autofix violations. |
| `fixAll` | `true` | Whether to register Ruff as capable of handling
`source.fixAll` actions. |
| `lint.enable` | `true` | Whether to enable linting. Set to `false` to
use Ruff exclusively as a formatter. |
| `organizeImports` | `true` | Whether to register Ruff as capable of
handling `source.organizeImports` actions. |
To be clear: this PR does not implement 'support' for these settings,
individually. Rather, it constructs a framework for these settings to be
used by the server in the future.
Notably, we are choosing *not* to support `lint.args` and `format.args`
as settings for `ruff server`. This is because we're now interfacing
with Ruff at a lower level than its CLI, and converting CLI arguments
back into configuration is too involved.
We will have support for linter and formatter specific settings in
follow-up PRs. We will also 'hook up' user settings to work with the
server in follow up PRs.
## Test Plan
### Snapshot Tests
Tests have been created in
`crates/ruff_server/src/session/settings/tests.rs` to ensure that
deserialization and settings resolution works as expected.
### Manual Testing
Since we aren't using the resolved settings anywhere yet, we'll have to
add a few printing statements.
We want to capture what the resolved settings look like when sent as
part of a snapshot, so modify `Session::take_snapshot` to be the
following:
```rust
pub(crate) fn take_snapshot(&self, url: &Url) -> Option<DocumentSnapshot> {
let resolved_settings = self.workspaces.client_settings(url, &self.global_settings);
tracing::info!("Resolved settings for document {url}: {resolved_settings:?}");
Some(DocumentSnapshot {
configuration: self.workspaces.configuration(url)?.clone(),
resolved_client_capabilities: self.resolved_client_capabilities.clone(),
client_settings: resolved_settings,
document_ref: self.workspaces.snapshot(url)?,
position_encoding: self.position_encoding,
url: url.clone(),
})
}
```
Once you've done that, build the server and start up your extension
testing environment.
1. Set up a workspace in VS Code with two workspace folders, each one
having some variant of Ruff file-based configuration (`pyproject.toml`,
`ruff.toml`, etc.). We'll call these folders `folder_a` and `folder_b`.
2. In each folder, open up `.vscode/settings.json`.
3. In folder A, use these settings:
```json
{
"ruff.codeAction.disableRuleComment": {
"enable": true
}
}
```
4. In folder B, use these settings:
```json
{
"ruff.codeAction.disableRuleComment": {
"enable": false
}
}
```
5. Finally, open up your VS Code User Settings and un-check the `Ruff >
Code Action: Disable Rule Comment` setting.
6. When opening files in `folder_a`, you should see logs that look like
this:
```
Resolved settings for document <file>: ResolvedClientSettings { fix_all: true, organize_imports: true, lint_enable: true, disable_rule_comment_enable: true, fix_violation_enable: true }
```
7. When opening files in `folder_b`, you should see logs that look like
this:
```
Resolved settings for document <file>: ResolvedClientSettings { fix_all: true, organize_imports: true, lint_enable: true, disable_rule_comment_enable: false, fix_violation_enable: true }
```
8. To test invalid configuration, change `.vscode/settings.json` in
either folder to be this:
```json
{
"ruff.codeAction.disableRuleComment": {
"enable": "invalid"
},
}
```
10. You should now see these error logs:
```
<time> [info] <duration> ERROR ruff_server::session::settings Failed to deserialize initialization options: data did not match any variant of untagged enum InitializationOptions. Falling back to default client settings...
<time> [info] <duration> WARN ruff_server::server No workspace settings found for file:///Users/jane/testbed/pandas
<duration> WARN ruff_server::server No workspace settings found for file:///Users/jane/foss/scipy
```
11. Opening files in either folder should now print the following
configuration:
```
Resolved settings for document <file>: ResolvedClientSettings { fix_all: true, organize_imports: true, lint_enable: true, disable_rule_comment_enable: true, fix_violation_enable: true }
```
## Summary
This builds on top of the work in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/10597 to support `Ruff: Organize
imports` as an available source action.
To do this, we have to support `Clone`-ing for linter settings, since we
need to modify them in place to select import-related diagnostics
specifically (`I001` and `I002`).
## Test Plan
04282d01-dfda-4ac5-aa8f-6a92d5f85bfd
## Summary
`ruff server` now has source action `source.fixAll` as an available code
action.
This also fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10593 in the
process of revising the code for quick fix code actions.
## Test Plan
f4c07425-e68a-445f-a4ed-949c9197a6be
## Summary
Needed for https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/10686.
We no longer support `root_uri` as an initialization parameter, relying
solely on `workspace_folders` to find the working directories. This
means that the minimum supported LSP version is now `0.3.6`.
## Test Plan
When opening a folder in VS Code, you shouldn't see any errors in the
log which say `No workspace(s) were provided(...)`.
## Summary
Fixes#10589.
Code that violates `F401` or `F841` (in other words, unused variables or
imports) should now appear greyed out or 'unused' in an editor.
## Test Plan
Put the following test code in a new file within the extension
development host window:
```python
import math
def func():
if False:
unused = "<- this should be greyed out"
```
The following test code should have greyed out/unused import and
variable names, like so:
<img width="294" alt="Screenshot 2024-03-28 at 4 23 18 AM"
src="e84a6e7a-49e2-4fed-9624-f8f9559e0837">
## Summary
Fixes#10588.
Most diagnostics from `ruff server` now appear as a much less alarming
warning instead of an error. Three diagnostics still appear as errors:
`F821` (`undefined name <name>`), `E902` (`IOError`) and `E999`
(`SyntaxError`).
## Test Plan
With an extension using the path to a locally-built executable, open a
file with multiple highlighted problems. Toggle the `Experimental
Server` setting on and off. The highlights should stay as warnings.
Then, modify the file to have a syntactically incorrect element. The
start of the invalid syntax should now have a red highlight.
## Summary
Fixes#10618.
This PR introduces a proper API for sending requests to the client and
handling any response sent back. Dynamic capability registration now
uses this new API, fixing an issue where a much more simplistic response
handler silently flushes a code action request that needed a response.
## Test Plan
#10618 can no longer be reproduced. No errors about unhandled responses
should appear in the extension output, and you should see this new log
when the server starts:
```
<DATE> <TIME> [info] <DURATION> INFO ruff_server::server Configuration file watcher successfully registered
```
## Summary
This PR adds an overview and roadmap to the `README.md` for the
`ruff_server` crate along with a rudimentary `CONTRIBUTING.md` that
explains some of the technical decisions behind the project and basic
information about local testing.
## Summary
Fixes#10366.
`ruff server` now registers a file watcher on the client side using the
LSP protocol, and listen for events on configuration files. On such an
event, it reloads the configuration in the 'nearest' workspace to the
file that was changed.
## Test Plan
N/A
## Summary
I used `cargo-shear` (see
[tweet](https://twitter.com/boshen_c/status/1770106165923586395)) to
remove some unused dependencies that `cargo udeps` wasn't reporting.
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
Fixes#10324
This removes an overeager failure case where we would exit early if no
root directory or workspace folders were provided on server
initialization. We now fall-back to the current working directory as a
workspace for that file.
## Test Plan
N/A
## Summary
I used `codespell` and `gramma` to identify mispellings and grammar
errors throughout the codebase and fixed them. I tried not to make any
controversial changes, but feel free to revert as you see fit.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
This PR introduces the `ruff_server` crate and a new `ruff server`
command. `ruff_server` is a re-implementation of
[`ruff-lsp`](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-lsp), written entirely in
Rust. It brings significant performance improvements, much tighter
integration with Ruff, a foundation for supporting entirely new language
server features, and more!
This PR is an early version of `ruff_lsp` that we're calling the
**pre-release** version. Anyone is more than welcome to use it and
submit bug reports for any issues they encounter - we'll have some
documentation on how to set it up with a few common editors, and we'll
also provide a pre-release VSCode extension for those interested.
This pre-release version supports:
- **Diagnostics for `.py` files**
- **Quick fixes**
- **Full-file formatting**
- **Range formatting**
- **Multiple workspace folders**
- **Automatic linter/formatter configuration** - taken from any
`pyproject.toml` files in the workspace.
Many thanks to @MichaReiser for his [proof-of-concept
work](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/7262), which was important
groundwork for making this PR possible.
## Architectural Decisions
I've made an executive choice to go with `lsp-server` as a base
framework for the LSP, in favor of `tower-lsp`. There were several
reasons for this:
1. I would like to avoid `async` in our implementation. LSPs are mostly
computationally bound rather than I/O bound, and `async` adds a lot of
complexity to the API, while also making harder to reason about
execution order. This leads into the second reason, which is...
2. Any handlers that mutate state should be blocking and run in the
event loop, and the state should be lock-free. This is the approach that
`rust-analyzer` uses (also with the `lsp-server`/`lsp-types` crates as a
framework), and it gives us assurances about data mutation and execution
order. `tower-lsp` doesn't support this, which has caused some
[issues](https://github.com/ebkalderon/tower-lsp/issues/284) around data
races and out-of-order handler execution.
3. In general, I think it makes sense to have tight control over
scheduling and the specifics of our implementation, in exchange for a
slightly higher up-front cost of writing it ourselves. We'll be able to
fine-tune it to our needs and support future LSP features without
depending on an upstream maintainer.
## Test Plan
The pre-release of `ruff_server` will have snapshot tests for common
document editing scenarios. An expanded test suite is on the roadmap for
future version of `ruff_server`.
