## Summary
This PR updates the revision of `LibCST` dependency to 9c263aa897
inorder to fix https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/4899
## Test Plan
The test case including the carriage return (`\r`) character was added for
`F504` and then `cargo test`.
fixes: #4899
If a user has `import collections, functools, operator`, and we try to
import from `functools` and `operator`, we end up adding two identical
synthetic edits to preserve that import statement. We need to dedupe
them.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7059.
## Summary
This PR moves `ruff/jupyter` into its own `ruff_notebook` crate. Beyond
the move itself, there were a few challenges:
1. `ruff_notebook` relies on the source map abstraction. I've moved the
source map into `ruff_diagnostics`, since it doesn't have any
dependencies on its own and is used alongside diagnostics.
2. `ruff_notebook` has a couple tests for end-to-end linting and
autofixing. I had to leave these tests in `ruff` itself.
3. We had code in `ruff/jupyter` that relied on Python lexing, in order
to provide a more targeted error message in the event that a user saves
a `.py` file with a `.ipynb` extension. I removed this in order to avoid
a dependency on the parser, it felt like it wasn't worth retaining just
for that dependency.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
I think the fallthrough here for some branches is a little confusing.
Now each branch either runs a command that returns `Result<ExitStatus>`,
or runs a command that returns `Result<()>` and then explicitly returns
`Ok(ExitStatus::SUCCESS)`.
## Summary
This PR refactors the error-handling cases around Jupyter notebooks to
use errors rather than `Box<Diagnostics>`, which creates some oddities
in the downstream handling. So, instead of formatting errors as
diagnostics _eagerly_ (in the notebook methods), we now return errors
and convert those errors to diagnostics at the last possible moment (in
`diagnostics.rs`). This is more ergonomic, as errors can be composed and
reported-on in different ways, whereas diagnostics require a `Printer`,
etc.
See, e.g.,
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/7013#discussion_r1311136301.
## Test Plan
Ran `cargo run` over a Python file labeled with a `.ipynb` suffix, and
saw:
```
foo.ipynb:1:1: E999 SyntaxError: Expected a Jupyter Notebook, which must be internally stored as JSON, but found a Python source file: expected value at line 1 column 1
```
## Summary
This PR modifies our between-statement comment handling such that
comments that are not separated by a statement by any newlines continue
to be treated as leading comments on the statement, but comments that
_are_ separated are instead formatted as trailing comments on the
preceding statement.
See, e.g., the originating snippet:
```python
DEFAULT_TEMPLATE = "flatpages/default.html"
# This view is called from FlatpageFallbackMiddleware.process_response
# when a 404 is raised, which often means CsrfViewMiddleware.process_view
# has not been called even if CsrfViewMiddleware is installed. So we need
# to use @csrf_protect, in case the template needs {% csrf_token %}.
# However, we can't just wrap this view; if no matching flatpage exists,
# or a redirect is required for authentication, the 404 needs to be returned
# without any CSRF checks. Therefore, we only
# CSRF protect the internal implementation.
def flatpage(request, url):
pass
```
Here, we need to ensure that the `def flatpage` is precede by two empty
lines. However, we want those two empty lines to be enforced from the
_end_ of the comment block, _unless_ the comments are directly atop the
`def flatpage`.
I played with this a bit, and I think the simplest conceptual model and
implementation is to instead treat those as trailing comments on the
preceding node. The main difficulty with this approach is that, in order
to be fully compatible with Black, we'd sometimes need to insert
newlines _between_ the preceding node and its trailing comments. See,
e.g.:
```python
def func():
...
# comment
x = 1
```
In this case, we'd need to insert two blank lines between `def func():
...` and `# comment`, but `# comment` is trailing comment on `def
func(): ...`. So, we'd need to take this case into account in the
various nodes that _require_ newlines after them: functions, classes,
and imports. After some discussion, we've opted _not_ to support this,
and just treat these as trailing comments -- so we won't insert newlines
there. This means our handling is still identical to Black's on
Black-formatted code, but avoids moving such trailing comments on
unformatted code.
I dislike that the empty handling is so complex, and that it's split
between so many different nodes, but this is really tricky. Continuing
to treat these as leading comments is very difficult too, since we'd
need to do similar tricks for the leading comment handling in those
nodes, and influencing leading comments is even harder, since they're
all formatted _before_ the node itself.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/6761.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
Surprisingly, it doesn't change the similarity at all (apart from a
0.00001 change in CPython), but I manually confirmed that it did fix the
originating issue in Django.
Before:
| project | similarity index |
|--------------|------------------|
| cpython | 0.76082 |
| django | 0.99921 |
| transformers | 0.99854 |
| twine | 0.99982 |
| typeshed | 0.99953 |
| warehouse | 0.99648 |
| zulip | 0.99928 |
After:
| project | similarity index |
|--------------|------------------|
| cpython | 0.76081 |
| django | 0.99921 |
| transformers | 0.99854 |
| twine | 0.99982 |
| typeshed | 0.99953 |
| warehouse | 0.99648 |
| zulip | 0.99928 |
## Summary
This PR modifies a few of our rules related to which statements (and how
many) are allowed in function bodies within `.pyi` files, to improve
compatibility with flake8-pyi and improve the interplay dynamics between
them. Each change fixes a deviation from flake8-pyi:
- We now always trigger the multi-statement rule (PYI048) regardless of
whether one of the statements is a docstring.
- We no longer trigger the `...` rule (PYI010) if the single statement
is a docstring or a `pass` (since those are covered by other rules).
- We no longer trigger the `...` rule (PYI010) if the function body
contains multiple statements (since that's covered by PYI048).
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7021.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
This PR attempts to address a problem in the parser related to the
range's of `WithItem` nodes in certain contexts -- specifically,
`WithItem` nodes in parentheses that do not have an `as` token after
them.
For example,
[here](https://play.ruff.rs/71be2d0b-2a04-4c7e-9082-e72bff152679):
```python
with (a, b):
pass
```
The range of the `WithItem` `a` is set to the range of `(a, b)`, as is
the range of the `WithItem` `b`. In other words, when we have this kind
of sequence, we use the range of the entire parenthesized context,
rather than the ranges of the items themselves.
Note that this also applies to cases
[like](https://play.ruff.rs/c551e8e9-c3db-4b74-8cc6-7c4e3bf3713a):
```python
with (a, b, c as d):
pass
```
You can see the issue in the parser here:
```rust
#[inline]
WithItemsNoAs: Vec<ast::WithItem> = {
<location:@L> <all:OneOrMore<Test<"all">>> <end_location:@R> => {
all.into_iter().map(|context_expr| ast::WithItem { context_expr, optional_vars: None, range: (location..end_location).into() }).collect()
},
}
```
Fixing this issue is... very tricky. The naive approach is to use the
range of the `context_expr` as the range for the `WithItem`, but that
range will be incorrect when the `context_expr` is itself parenthesized.
For example, _that_ solution would fail here, since the range of the
first `WithItem` would be that of `a`, rather than `(a)`:
```python
with ((a), b):
pass
```
The `with` parsing in general is highly precarious due to ambiguities in
the grammar. Changing it in _any_ way seems to lead to an ambiguous
grammar that LALRPOP fails to translate. Consensus seems to be that we
don't really understand _why_ the current grammar works (i.e., _how_ it
avoids these ambiguities as-is).
The solution implemented here is to avoid changing the grammar itself,
and instead change the shape of the nodes returned by various rules in
the grammar. Specifically, everywhere that we return `Expr`, we instead
return `ParenthesizedExpr`, which includes a parenthesized range and the
underlying `Expr` itself. (If an `Expr` isn't parenthesized, the ranges
will be equivalent.) In `WithItemsNoAs`, we can then use the
parenthesized range as the range for the `WithItem`.
Per discussion at https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/discussions/6998
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Adds a `--preview` and `--no-preview` option to the CLI for `ruff check`
and corresponding settings. The CLI options are hidden for now.
Available in the settings as `preview = true` or `preview = false`.
Does not include environment variable configuration, although we may add
it in the future.
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
`cargo build`
Future work will build on this setting, such as toggling the mode during
a test.
## Summary
This PR adds comment handling for comments between the `=` and the
`value` for keywords, as in the following cases:
```python
func(
x # dangling
= # dangling
# dangling
1,
** # dangling
y
)
```
(Comments after the `**` were already handled in some cases, but I've
unified the handling with the `=` handling.)
Note that, previously, comments between the `**` and its value were
rendered as trailing comments on the value (so they'd appear after `y`).
This struck me as odd since it effectively re-ordered the comment with
respect to its closest AST node (the value). I've made them leading
comments, though I don't know that that's a significant improvement. I
could also imagine us leaving them where they are.
## Summary
Attempt at a small improvement to two `perflint` rules using the new
type inference capabilities to only flag `PERF401` and `PERF402` for
values we infer to be lists. This makes the rule more conservative, as
it only flags values that we _know_ to be lists, but it's overall a
desirable change, as it favors false negatives over false positives for
a "nice-to-have" rule.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/6995.
## Test Plan
Add non-list value cases and make sure all old cases are still caught.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Rewriting the `if`-comparison to focus on the meaning of rule ` assert
S101`.
Fixes#6984
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
Ensures that we use the same error types and messages. Also renames
those struct to `FormatCommand*` for consistency, and removes the
`FormatCommandResult::Skipped` variant in favor of skipping in the
iterator directly.
## Summary
Returns an exit code of 1 if any files would be reformatted:
```
ruff on charlie/format-check:main [$?⇡] is 📦 v0.0.286 via 🐍 v3.11.2 via 🦀 v1.72.0
❯ cargo run -p ruff_cli -- format foo.py --check
Compiling ruff_cli v0.0.286 (/Users/crmarsh/workspace/ruff/crates/ruff_cli)
Finished dev [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 1.69s
Running `target/debug/ruff format foo.py --check`
warning: `ruff format` is a work-in-progress, subject to change at any time, and intended only for experimentation.
1 file would be reformatted
ruff on charlie/format-check:main [$?⇡] is 📦 v0.0.286 via 🐍 v3.11.2 via 🦀 v1.72.0 took 2s
❯ echo $?
1
```
Closes#6966.
## Summary
This is similar to `commands::check` vs. `commands::check_stdin`, and
gets the logic out of the parent file (`lib.rs`). It also ensures that
we avoid formatting files that should be excluded when `--force-exclude`
is provided.
## Summary
This PR adds a new helper method on the `Cursor` called `eat_char2`
which is similar to `eat_char` but accepts 2 characters instead of 1. It'll
`bump` the cursor twice if both characters are found on lookahead.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
