We already had support for homogeneous tuples (`tuple[int, ...]`). This
PR extends this to also support mixed tuples (`tuple[str, str,
*tuple[int, ...], str str]`).
A mixed tuple consists of a fixed-length (possibly empty) prefix and
suffix, and a variable-length portion in the middle. Every element of
the variable-length portion must be of the same type. A homogeneous
tuple is then just a mixed tuple with an empty prefix and suffix.
The new data representation uses different Rust types for a fixed-length
(aka heterogeneous) tuple. Another option would have been to use the
`VariableLengthTuple` representation for all tuples, and to wrap the
"variable + suffix" portion in an `Option`. I don't think that would
simplify the method implementations much, though, since we would still
have a 2×2 case analysis for most of them.
One wrinkle is that the definition of the `tuple` class in the typeshed
has a single typevar, and canonically represents a homogeneous tuple.
When getting the class of a tuple instance, that means that we have to
summarize our detailed mixed tuple type information into its
"homogeneous supertype". (We were already doing this for heterogeneous
types.)
A similar thing happens when concatenating two mixed tuples: the
variable-length portion and suffix of the LHS, and the prefix and
variable-length portion of the RHS, all get unioned into the
variable-length portion of the result. The LHS prefix and RHS suffix
carry through unchanged.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
## Summary
Part of [#111](https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/111).
After this change, dataclasses with two or more `KW_ONLY` field will be
reported as invalid. The duplicate fields will simply be ignored when
computing `__init__`'s signature.
## Test Plan
Markdown tests.
## Summary
Part of [#117](https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/117).
`TypeIs[]` is a special form that allows users to define their own
narrowing functions. Despite the syntax, `TypeIs` is not a generic and,
on its own, it is meaningless as a type.
[Officially](https://typing.python.org/en/latest/spec/narrowing.html#typeis),
a function annotated as returning a `TypeIs[T]` is a <i>type narrowing
function</i>, where `T` is called the <i>`TypeIs` return type</i>.
A `TypeIs[T]` may or may not be bound to a symbol. Only bound types have
narrowing effect:
```python
def f(v: object = object()) -> TypeIs[int]: ...
a: str = returns_str()
if reveal_type(f()): # Unbound: TypeIs[int]
reveal_type(a) # str
if reveal_type(f(a)): # Bound: TypeIs[a, int]
reveal_type(a) # str & int
```
Delayed usages of a bound type has no effect, however:
```python
b = f(a)
if b:
reveal_type(a) # str
```
A `TypeIs[T]` type:
* Is fully static when `T` is fully static.
* Is a singleton/single-valued when it is bound.
* Has exactly two runtime inhabitants when it is unbound: `True` and
`False`.
In other words, an unbound type have ambiguous truthiness.
It is possible to infer more precise truthiness for bound types;
however, that is not part of this change.
`TypeIs[T]` is a subtype of or otherwise assignable to `bool`. `TypeIs`
is invariant with respect to the `TypeIs` return type: `TypeIs[int]` is
neither a subtype nor a supertype of `TypeIs[bool]`. When ty sees a
function marked as returning `TypeIs[T]`, its `return`s will be checked
against `bool` instead. ty will also report such functions if they don't
accept a positional argument. Addtionally, a type narrowing function
call with no positional arguments (e.g., `f()` in the example above)
will be considered invalid.
## Test Plan
Markdown tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
## Summary
Minor documentation update to make `mypy_primer` instructions a bit more
verbose/helpful for running against a local branch
## Test Plan
N/A
## Summary
This optimizes some of the logic added in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/18444. In general, we only
calculate information for subdiagnostics if we know we'll actually emit
the diagnostic. The check to see whether we'll emit the diagnostic is
work we'll definitely have to do whereas the the work to gather
information for a subdiagnostic isn't work we necessarily have to do if
the diagnostic isn't going to be emitted at all.
This PR makes us lazier about gathering the information we need for the
subdiagnostic, and moves all the subdiagnostic logic into one function
rather than having some `unresolved-reference` subdiagnostic logic in
`infer.rs` and some in `diagnostic.rs`.
## Test Plan
`cargo test -p ty_python_semantic`
This updates our representation of functions to more closely match our
representation of classes.
The new `OverloadLiteral` and `FunctionLiteral` classes represent a
function definition in the AST. If a function is generic, this is
unspecialized. `FunctionType` has been updated to represent a function
type, which is specialized if the function is generic. (These names are
chosen to match `ClassLiteral` and `ClassType` on the class side.)
This PR does not add a separate `Type` variant for `FunctionLiteral`.
Maybe we should? Possibly as a follow-on PR?
Part of https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/462
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
## Summary
This is a practice I followed on previous projects. Should hopefully
further help developers who want to update the documentation.
The big downside is that it's annoying to see this *as a user of the
documentation* if you don't open the Markdown file in the browser. But
I'd argue that those files don't really follow the original Markdown
spirit anyway with all the inline HTML.
## Summary
It doesn't seem to be necessary for our generics implementation to carry
the `GenericContext` in the `ClassBase` variants. Removing it simplifies
the code, fixes many TODOs about `Generic` or `Protocol` appearing
multiple times in MROs when each should only appear at most once, and
allows us to more accurately detect runtime errors that occur due to
`Generic` or `Protocol` appearing multiple times in a class's bases.
In order to remove the `GenericContext` from the `ClassBase` variant, it
turns out to be necessary to emulate
`typing._GenericAlias.__mro_entries__`, or we end up with a large number
of false-positive `inconsistent-mro` errors. This PR therefore also does
that.
Lastly, this PR fixes the inferred MROs of PEP-695 generic classes,
which implicitly inherit from `Generic` even if they have no explicit
bases.
## Test Plan
mdtests
## Summary
I think `division-by-zero` is a low-value diagnostic in general; most
real division-by-zero errors (especially those that are less obvious to
the human eye) will occur on values typed as `int`, in which case we
don't issue the diagnostic anyway. Mypy and pyright do not emit this
diagnostic.
Currently the diagnostic is prone to false positives because a) we do
not silence it in unreachable code, and b) we do not implement narrowing
of literals from inequality checks. We will probably fix (a) regardless,
but (b) is low priority apart from division-by-zero.
I think we have many more important things to do and should not allow
false positives on a low-value diagnostic to be a distraction. Not
opposed to re-enabling this diagnostic in future when we can prioritize
reducing its false positives.
References https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/443
## Test Plan
Existing tests.
## Summary
Support direct uses of `typing.TypeAliasType`, as in:
```py
from typing import TypeAliasType
IntOrStr = TypeAliasType("IntOrStr", int | str)
def f(x: IntOrStr) -> None:
reveal_type(x) # revealed: int | str
```
closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/392
## Ecosystem
The new false positive here:
```diff
+ error[invalid-type-form] altair/utils/core.py:49:53: The first argument to `Callable` must be either a list of types, ParamSpec, Concatenate, or `...`
```
comes from the fact that we infer the second argument as a type
expression now. We silence false positives for PEP695 `ParamSpec`s, but
not for `P = ParamSpec("P")` inside `Callable[P, ...]`.
## Test Plan
New Markdown tests
## Summary
If the user tries to use a new builtin on an old Python version, tell
them what Python version the builtin was added on, what our inferred
Python version is for their project, and what configuration settings
they can tweak to fix the error.
## Test Plan
Snapshots and screenshots:
## Summary
Updates the `--python` flag to accept Python executables in virtual
environments. Notably, we do not query the executable and it _must_ be
in a canonical location in a virtual environment. This is pretty naive,
but solves for the trivial case of `ty check --python .venv/bin/python3`
which will be a common mistake (and `ty check --python $(which python)`)
I explored this while trying to understand Python discovery in ty in
service of https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/272, I'm not attached
to it, but figure it's worth sharing.
As an alternative, we can add more variants to the
`SearchPathValidationError` and just improve the _error_ message, i.e.,
by hinting that this looks like a virtual environment and suggesting the
concrete alternative path they should provide. We'll probably want to do
that for some other cases anyway (e.g., `3.13` as described in the
linked issue)
This functionality is also briefly mentioned in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/193
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/318
## Test Plan
e.g.,
```
uv run ty check --python .venv/bin/python3
```
needs test coverage still
