## Summary
Running `mkdocs server -f mkdocs.insiders.yml` gave warnings about these
broken links.
## Test plan
I built the docs locally and verified that the updated links work
properly.
Since `ruff-lsp` has been (semi-)deprecated for sometime, it wouldn't
make sense to mention it in the most prominent sections of the `README`.
Instead, they should point to the new <i>[Editor
Integrations](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/editors/)</i> documentation
page.
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
- Add the popular LLM Ops project Dify to the user list in Readme, as
Dify introduced Ruff for lining since Feb 2024 in
https://github.com/langgenius/dify/pull/2366
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Just updating the README to reflect that IBM has been using ruff for a
year already: https://github.com/Qiskit/qiskit/pull/10116.
## Summary
We recently updated our old formatting and linting setup in Streamlit to
use ruff: https://github.com/streamlit/streamlit/pull/8849
Thanks for this excellent tool :)
## Test Plan
This PR only contains changes to the Readme.
## Summary
- Ever since https://github.com/godotengine/godot/pull/90457 was merged
into the `master` branch, Godot has been using ruff for linting and
formatting Python files. As such, this PR adds Godot to the "Who's Using
Ruff?" section of the main `README.md` file.
## Test Plan
- N/A
## Summary
After checking the links, I found that one link leads to 404. Correct me
if i'm wrong, but I think the link I changed to is the supposed one
## Summary
Modified the license badge so instead of `LICENSE`, it is now the full
path, and hoepfully will resolve the issue appeared in PyPI with the
license badge redirection
## Summary
Stoked to have found` ruff` and migrated over - quick testimonial ->
> Our smooth and fast migration to ruff allowed us to deprecate 4+ other
disjointed tools (pycln, pyupgrade, black, isort, flake8) that each had
their own CLI subcommands, different enabling/disabling semantics, and
pre-commit hooks. I can't wait to add pylint to the list. It's such a no
brainer to replace all this with the Ferrari of linters.`--add-no-qa`
and `--ignore-noqa` are so convenient, but `--fix` takes it home!
## Summary
Added Nokia to the "Who's Using Ruff?" section in the README.
## Test Plan
Multiple teams in my department alone moved to Ruff (either exclusively
or partially) 🚀
## Summary
See feedback in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/4725#issuecomment-1994615409.
In the docs, we use a tabbed interface for express `ruff.toml` vs.
`pyproject.toml`. Here, it might be clearer to default to `ruff.toml`,
since it's more obviously _not_ `pyproject.toml`. But either way, this
PR attempts to clarify that there's a difference.
## Summary
This PR modifies the documentation to use `ruff check` instead of `ruff
check .`, and `ruff format` instead of `ruff format .`, as discussed
[here](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/10168#discussion_r1509976904)
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
