Commit graph

12 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alex Waygood
454ad15aee
[red-knot] Fix MRO inference for protocol classes; allow inheritance from subscripted Generic[]; forbid subclassing unsubscripted Generic (#17452) 2025-04-18 19:55:53 +00:00
Douglas Creager
787bcd1c6a
[red-knot] Handle explicit class specialization in type expressions (#17434)
You can now use subscript expressions in a type expression to explicitly
specialize generic classes, just like you could already do in value
expressions.

This still does not implement bidirectional checking, so a type
annotation on an assignment does not influence how we infer a
specialization for a (not explicitly specialized) constructor call. You
might get an `invalid-assignment` error if (a) we cannot infer a class
specialization from the constructor call (in which case you end up e.g.
trying to assign `C[Unknown]` to `C[int]`) or if (b) we can infer a
specialization, but it doesn't match the annotation.

Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/17432
2025-04-18 11:49:22 -04:00
Brent Westbrook
9c47b6dbb0
[red-knot] Detect version-related syntax errors (#16379)
## Summary
This PR extends version-related syntax error detection to red-knot. The
main changes here are:

1. Passing `ParseOptions` specifying a `PythonVersion` to parser calls
2. Adding a `python_version` method to the `Db` trait to make this
possible
3. Converting `UnsupportedSyntaxError`s to `Diagnostic`s
4. Updating existing mdtests  to avoid unrelated syntax errors

My initial draft of (1) and (2) in #16090 instead tried passing a
`PythonVersion` down to every parser call, but @MichaReiser suggested
the `Db` approach instead
[here](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/16090#discussion_r1969198407),
and I think it turned out much nicer.

All of the new `python_version` methods look like this:

```rust
fn python_version(&self) -> ruff_python_ast::PythonVersion {
    Program::get(self).python_version(self)
}
```

with the exception of the `TestDb` in `ruff_db`, which hard-codes
`PythonVersion::latest()`.

## Test Plan

Existing mdtests, plus a new mdtest to see at least one of the new
diagnostics.
2025-04-17 14:00:30 -04:00
Douglas Creager
914095d08f
[red-knot] Super-basic generic inference at call sites (#17301)
This PR adds **_very_** basic inference of generic typevars at call
sites. It does not bring in a full unification algorithm, and there are
a few TODOs in the test suite that are not discharged by this. But it
handles a good number of useful cases! And the PR does not add anything
that would go away with a more sophisticated constraint solver.

In short, we just look for typevars in the formal parameters, and assume
that the inferred type of the corresponding argument is what that
typevar should map to. If a typevar appears more than once, we union
together the corresponding argument types.

Cases we are not yet handling:

- We are not widening literals.
- We are not recursing into parameters that are themselves generic
aliases.
- We are not being very clever with parameters that are union types.

---------

Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
2025-04-16 15:07:36 -04:00
Mike Perlov
3b24fe5c07
[red-knot] improve function/bound method type display (#17294)
## Summary

* Partial #17238
* Flyby from discord discussion - `todo_type!` now statically checks for
no parens in the message to avoid issues between debug & release build
tests

## Test Plan

many mdtests are changing
2025-04-14 15:56:18 -07:00
Andrew Gallant
7e2eb591bc red_knot_python_semantic: replace one use of "old" secondary diagnostic messages
This is the first use of the new `lint()` reporter.

I somewhat skipped a step here and also modified the actual diagnostic
message itself. The snapshots should tell the story.

We couldn't do this before because we had no way of differentiating
between "message for the diagnostic as a whole" and "message for a
specific code annotation." Now we can, so we can write more precise
messages based on the assumption that users are also seeing the code
snippet.

The downside here is that the actual message text can become quite vague
in the absence of the code snippet. This occurs, for example, with
concise diagnostic formatting. It's unclear if we should do anything
about it. I don't really see a way to make it better that doesn't
involve creating diagnostics with messages for each mode, which I think
would be a major PITA.

The upside is that this code gets a bit simpler, and we very
specifically avoid doing extra work if this specific lint is disabled.
2025-04-10 13:21:00 -04:00
David Peter
5fef4d4572
Use python.typing.org for typing documentation links (#17323)
## Summary

There is a new official URL for the typing documentation:
https://typing.python.org/

Change all https://typing.readthedocs.io/ links to use the new sub
domain, which is slightly shorter and looks more official.

## Test Plan

Tested to see if each and every new URL is accessible. I noticed that
some links go to https://typing.python.org/en/latest/source/stubs.html
which seems to be outdated, but that is a separate issue. The same page
shows up for the old URL.
2025-04-09 20:38:20 +02:00
Douglas Creager
ff376fc262
[red-knot] Allow explicit specialization of generic classes (#17023)
This PR lets you explicitly specialize a generic class using a subscript
expression. It introduces three new Rust types for representing classes:

- `NonGenericClass`
- `GenericClass` (not specialized)
- `GenericAlias` (specialized)

and two enum wrappers:

- `ClassType` (a non-generic class or generic alias, represents a class
_type_ at runtime)
- `ClassLiteralType` (a non-generic class or generic class, represents a
class body in the AST)

We also add internal support for specializing callables, in particular
function literals. (That is, the internal `Type` representation now
attaches an optional specialization to a function literal.) This is used
in this PR for the methods of a generic class, but should also give us
most of what we need for specializing generic _functions_ (which this PR
does not yet tackle).

---------

Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
2025-04-09 11:18:46 -04:00
Matthew Mckee
63e78b41cd
[red-knot] Ban most Type::Instance types in type expressions (#16872)
## Summary

Catch some Instances, but raise type error for the rest of them
Fixes #16851 

## Test Plan

Extend invalid.md in annotations

---------

Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
2025-03-20 15:19:56 -07:00
Shunsuke Shibayama
78b5f0b165
[red-knot] detect invalid return type (#16540)
## Summary

This PR closes #16248.

If the return type of the function isn't assignable to the one
specified, an `invalid-return-type` error occurs.
I thought it would be better to report this as a different kind of error
than the `invalid-assignment` error, so I defined this as a new error.

## Test Plan

All type inconsistencies in the test cases have been replaced with
appropriate ones.

---------

Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
2025-03-12 01:58:59 +00:00
David Peter
820a31af5d
[red-knot] Attribute access and the descriptor protocol (#16416)
## Summary

* Attributes/method are now properly looked up on metaclasses, when
called on class objects
* We properly distinguish between data descriptors and non-data
descriptors (but we do not yet support them in store-context, i.e.
`obj.data_descr = …`)
* The descriptor protocol is now implemented in a single unified place
for instances, classes and dunder-calls. Unions and possibly-unbound
symbols are supported in all possible stages of the process by creating
union types as results.
* In general, the handling of "possibly-unbound" symbols has been
improved in a lot of places: meta-class attributes, attributes,
descriptors with possibly-unbound `__get__` methods, instance
attributes, …
* We keep track of type qualifiers in a lot more places. I anticipate
that this will be useful if we import e.g. `Final` symbols from other
modules (see relevant change to typing spec:
https://github.com/python/typing/pull/1937).
* Detection and special-casing of the `typing.Protocol` special form in
order to avoid lots of changes in the test suite due to new `@Todo`
types when looking up attributes on builtin types which have `Protocol`
in their MRO. We previously
looked up attributes in a wrong way, which is why this didn't come up
before.

closes #16367
closes #15966

## Context

The way attribute lookup in `Type::member` worked before was simply
wrong (mostly my own fault). The whole instance-attribute lookup should
probably never have been integrated into `Type::member`. And the
`Type::static_member` function that I introduced in my last descriptor
PR was the wrong abstraction. It's kind of fascinating how far this
approach took us, but I am pretty confident that the new approach
proposed here is what we need to model this correctly.

There are three key pieces that are required to implement attribute
lookups:

- **`Type::class_member`**/**`Type::find_in_mro`**: The
`Type::find_in_mro` method that can look up attributes on class bodies
(and corresponding bases). This is a partial function on types, as it
can not be called on instance types like`Type::Instance(…)` or
`Type::IntLiteral(…)`. For this reason, we usually call it through
`Type::class_member`, which is essentially just
`type.to_meta_type().find_in_mro(…)` plus union/intersection handling.
- **`Type::instance_member`**: This new function is basically the
type-level equivalent to `obj.__dict__[name]` when called on
`Type::Instance(…)`. We use this to discover instance attributes such as
those that we see as declarations on class bodies or as (annotated)
assignments to `self.attr` in methods of a class.
- The implementation of the descriptor protocol. It works slightly
different for instances and for class objects, but it can be described
by the general framework:
- Call `type.class_member("attribute")` to look up "attribute" in the
MRO of the meta type of `type`. Call the resulting `Symbol` `meta_attr`
(even if it's unbound).
- Use `meta_attr.class_member("__get__")` to look up `__get__` on the
*meta type* of `meta_attr`. Call it with `__get__(meta_attr, self,
self.to_meta_type())`. If this fails (either the lookup or the call),
just proceed with `meta_attr`. Otherwise, replace `meta_attr` in the
following with the return type of `__get__`. In this step, we also probe
if a `__set__` or `__delete__` method exists and store it in
`meta_attr_kind` (can be either "data descriptor" or "normal attribute
or non-data descriptor").
  - Compute a `fallback` type.
    - For instances, we use `self.instance_member("attribute")`
- For class objects, we use `class_attr =
self.find_in_mro("attribute")`, and then try to invoke the descriptor
protocol on `class_attr`, i.e. we look up `__get__` on the meta type of
`class_attr` and call it with `__get__(class_attr, None, self)`. This
additional invocation of the descriptor protocol on the fallback type is
one major asymmetry in the otherwise universal descriptor protocol
implementation.
- Finally, we look at `meta_attr`, `meta_attr_kind` and `fallback`, and
handle various cases of (possible) unboundness of these symbols.
- If `meta_attr` is bound and a data descriptor, just return `meta_attr`
- If `meta_attr` is not a data descriptor, and `fallback` is bound, just
return `fallback`
- If `meta_attr` is not a data descriptor, and `fallback` is unbound,
return `meta_attr`
- Return unions of these three possibilities for partially-bound
symbols.

This allows us to handle class objects and instances within the same
framework. There is a minor additional detail where for instances, we do
not allow the fallback type (the instance attribute) to completely
shadow the non-data descriptor. We do this because we (currently) don't
want to pretend that we can statically infer that an instance attribute
is always set.

Dunder method calls can also be embedded into this framework. The only
thing that changes is that *there is no fallback type*. If a dunder
method is called on an instance, we do not fall back to instance
variables. If a dunder method is called on a class object, we only look
it up on the meta class, never on the class itself.

## Test Plan

New Markdown tests.
2025-03-07 22:03:28 +01:00
Douglas Creager
ebd172e732
[red-knot] Several failing tests for generics (#16509)
To kick off the work of supporting generics, this adds many new
(currently failing) tests, showing the behavior we plan to support.

This is still missing a lot!  Not included:

- typevar tuples
- param specs
- variance
- `Self`

But it's a good start! We can add more failing tests for those once we
tackle these.

---------

Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
2025-03-05 17:21:19 -05:00