This PR handles a panic that occurs when applying unsafe fixes if a user
inserts a required import (I002) that has a "useless alias" in it, like
`import numpy as numpy`, and also selects PLC0414 (useless-import-alias)
In this case, the fixes alternate between adding the required import
statement, then removing the alias, until the recursion limit is
reached. See linked issue for an example.
Closes#14283
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
2 different fixers are available in ALE :
- ruff which runs `ruff check --fix` command (useful for example when
isort is enabled in lint config),
- ruff_format which runs `run format` command.
The documentation was missing `ruff` as a possible fixer in ALE.
---------
Co-authored-by: Dhruv Manilawala <dhruvmanila@gmail.com>
## Summary
This fixes several panics related to invalid assignment targets. All of
these led to some a crash, previously:
```py
(x.y := 1) # only name-expressions are valid targets of named expressions
([x, y] := [1, 2]) # same
(x, y): tuple[int, int] = (2, 3) # tuples are not valid targets for annotated assignments
(x, y) += 2 # tuples are not valid targets for augmented assignments
```
closes#14321closes#14322
## Test Plan
I symlinked four files from `crates/ruff_python_parser/resources` into
the red knot corpus, as they seemed like ideal test files for this exact
scenario. I think eventually, it might be a good idea to simply include *all*
invalid-syntax examples from the parser tests into red knots corpus (I believe
we're actually not too far from that goal). Or expand the scope of the corpus
test to this directory. Then we can get rid of these symlinks again.
## Summary
This avoids a panic inside `TypeInferenceBuilder::infer_type_parameters`
when encountering generic type aliases:
```py
type ListOrSet[T] = list[T] | set[T]
```
To fix this properly, we would have to treat type aliases as being their own
annotation scope [1]. The left hand side is a definition for the type parameter
`T` which is being used in the special annotation scope on the right hand side.
Similar to how it works for generic functions and classes.
[1] https://docs.python.org/3/reference/compound_stmts.html#generic-type-aliasescloses#14307
## Test Plan
Added new example to the corpus.
When we look up the types of class bases or keywords (`metaclass`), we
currently do this little dance: if there are type params, then look up
the type using `SemanticModel` in the type-params scope, if not, look up
the type directly in the definition's own scope, with support for
deferred types.
With inference of function parameter types, I'm now adding another case
of this same dance, so I'm motivated to make it a bit more ergonomic.
Add support to `definition_expression_ty` to handle any sub-expression
of a definition, whether it is in the definition's own scope or in a
type-params sub-scope.
Related to both #13693 and #14161.
## Summary
Use the memory address to uniquely identify AST nodes, instead of
relying on source range and kind. The latter fails for ASTs resulting
from invalid syntax examples. See #14313 for details.
Also results in a 1-2% speedup
(67349cf55f)
closes#14313
## Review
Here are the places where we use `NodeKey` directly or indirectly (via
`ExpressionNodeKey` or `DefinitionNodeKey`):
```rs
// semantic_index.rs
pub(crate) struct SemanticIndex<'db> {
// [...]
/// Map expressions to their corresponding scope.
scopes_by_expression: FxHashMap<ExpressionNodeKey, FileScopeId>,
/// Map from a node creating a definition to its definition.
definitions_by_node: FxHashMap<DefinitionNodeKey, Definition<'db>>,
/// Map from a standalone expression to its [`Expression`] ingredient.
expressions_by_node: FxHashMap<ExpressionNodeKey, Expression<'db>>,
// [...]
}
// semantic_index/builder.rs
pub(super) struct SemanticIndexBuilder<'db> {
// [...]
scopes_by_expression: FxHashMap<ExpressionNodeKey, FileScopeId>,
definitions_by_node: FxHashMap<ExpressionNodeKey, Definition<'db>>,
expressions_by_node: FxHashMap<ExpressionNodeKey, Expression<'db>>,
}
// semantic_index/ast_ids.rs
pub(crate) struct AstIds {
/// Maps expressions to their expression id.
expressions_map: FxHashMap<ExpressionNodeKey, ScopedExpressionId>,
/// Maps expressions which "use" a symbol (that is, [`ast::ExprName`]) to a use id.
uses_map: FxHashMap<ExpressionNodeKey, ScopedUseId>,
}
pub(super) struct AstIdsBuilder {
expressions_map: FxHashMap<ExpressionNodeKey, ScopedExpressionId>,
uses_map: FxHashMap<ExpressionNodeKey, ScopedUseId>,
}
```
## Test Plan
Added two failing examples to the corpus.
## Summary
Fixes a failing debug assertion that triggers for the following code:
```py
match some_int:
case x:=2:
pass
```
closes#14305
## Test Plan
Added problematic code example to corpus.
## Summary
Resolves#13217.
## Test Plan
`cargo nextest run` and `cargo insta test`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
This PR improves the fix for `PYI055` to be able to handle nested and
mixed type unions.
It also marks the fix as unsafe when comments are present.
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
`pytest-raises-too-broad (PT011)` should be raised when
`expected_exception` is provided as a keyword argument.
```python
def test_foo():
with pytest.raises(ValueError): # raises PT011
raise ValueError("Can't divide 1 by 0")
# This is minor but a valid pytest.raises call
with pytest.raises(expected_exception=ValueError): # doesn't raise PT011 but should
raise ValueError("Can't divide 1 by 0")
```
`pytest.raises` doc:
https://docs.pytest.org/en/8.3.x/reference/reference.html#pytest.raises
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
Unit tests
Signed-off-by: harupy <hkawamura0130@gmail.com>
## Summary
- Emit diagnostics when looking up (possibly) unbound attributes
- More explicit test assertions for unbound symbols
- Review remaining call sites of `Symbol::ignore_possibly_unbound`. Most
of them are something like `builtins_symbol(self.db,
"Ellipsis").ignore_possibly_unbound().unwrap_or(Type::Unknown)` which
look okay to me, unless we want to emit additional diagnostics. There is
one additional case in enum literal handling, which has a TODO comment
anyway.
part of #14022
## Test Plan
New MD tests for (possibly) unbound attributes.
## Summary
This adds a new diagnostic when possibly unbound symbols are imported.
The `TODO` comment had a question mark, do I'm not sure if this is
really something that we want.
This does not touch the un*declared* case, yet.
relates to: #14022
## Test Plan
Updated already existing tests with new diagnostics
## Summary
Apart from one small functional change, this is mostly a refactoring of
the `Symbol` API:
- Rename `as_type` to the more explicit `ignore_possibly_unbound`, no
functional change
- Remove `unwrap_or_unknown` in favor of the more explicit
`.ignore_possibly_unbound().unwrap_or(Type::Unknown)`, no functional
change
- Consistently call it "possibly unbound" (not "may be unbound")
- Rename `replace_unbound_with` to `or_fall_back_to` and properly handle
boundness of the fall back. This is the only functional change (did not
have any impact on existing tests).
relates to: #14022
## Test Plan
New unit tests for `Symbol::or_fall_back_to`
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
