mirror of
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff.git
synced 2025-10-21 15:52:34 +00:00
1f8297cfe6
## Summary - Type checkers (and type-checker authors) think in terms of types, but I think most Python users think in terms of values. Rather than saying that a _type_ `X` "has no attribute `foo`" (which I think sounds strange to many users), say that "an object of type `X` has no attribute `foo`" - Special-case certain types so that the diagnostic messages read more like normal English: rather than saying "Type `<class 'Foo'>` has no attribute `bar`" or "Object of type `<class 'Foo'>` has no attribute `bar`", just say "Class `Foo` has no attribute `bar`" ## Test Plan Mdtests and snapshots updated |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| conditionals | ||
| assert.md | ||
| assignment.md | ||
| bool-call.md | ||
| boolean.md | ||
| complex_target.md | ||
| hasattr.md | ||
| isinstance.md | ||
| issubclass.md | ||
| match.md | ||
| post_if_statement.md | ||
| truthiness.md | ||
| type.md | ||
| type_guards.md | ||
| while.md | ||