mirror of
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff.git
synced 2025-08-19 01:51:30 +00:00
059e90a98f
## Summary Part of #18972 This PR makes [for-loop-writes (FURB122)](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/for-loop-writes/#for-loop-writes-furb122)'s example error out-of-the-box. I also had to re-name the second case's variables to get both to raise at the same time, I suspect because of limitations in ruff's current semantic model. New names subject to bikeshedding, I just went with the least effort `_b` for binary suffix. [Old example](https://play.ruff.rs/19e8e47a-8058-4013-aef5-e9b5eab65962) ```py with Path("file").open("w") as f: for line in lines: f.write(line) with Path("file").open("wb") as f: for line in lines: f.write(line.encode()) ``` [New example](https://play.ruff.rs/e96b00e5-3c63-47c3-996d-dace420dd711) ```py from pathlib import Path with Path("file").open("w") as f: for line in lines: f.write(line) with Path("file").open("wb") as f_b: for line_b in lines_b: f_b.write(line_b.encode()) ``` The "Use instead" section was also modified similarly. ## Test Plan <!-- How was it tested? --> N/A, no functionality/tests affected |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| ruff | ||
| ruff_annotate_snippets | ||
| ruff_benchmark | ||
| ruff_cache | ||
| ruff_db | ||
| ruff_dev | ||
| ruff_diagnostics | ||
| ruff_formatter | ||
| ruff_graph | ||
| ruff_index | ||
| ruff_linter | ||
| ruff_macros | ||
| ruff_notebook | ||
| ruff_options_metadata | ||
| ruff_python_ast | ||
| ruff_python_ast_integration_tests | ||
| ruff_python_codegen | ||
| ruff_python_formatter | ||
| ruff_python_index | ||
| ruff_python_literal | ||
| ruff_python_parser | ||
| ruff_python_semantic | ||
| ruff_python_stdlib | ||
| ruff_python_trivia | ||
| ruff_python_trivia_integration_tests | ||
| ruff_server | ||
| ruff_source_file | ||
| ruff_text_size | ||
| ruff_wasm | ||
| ruff_workspace | ||
| ty | ||
| ty_ide | ||
| ty_project | ||
| ty_python_semantic | ||
| ty_server | ||
| ty_static | ||
| ty_test | ||
| ty_vendored | ||
| ty_wasm | ||