ruff/crates/ty_python_semantic
Douglas Creager 130d4e1135
[ty] Don't panic with argument that doesn't actually implement Iterable (#19602)
This eliminates the panic reported in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/909, though it doesn't address
the underlying cause, which is that we aren't yet checking the types of
the fields of a protocol when checking whether a class implements the
protocol. And in particular, if a class explictly opts out of iteration
via

```py
class NotIterable:
    __iter__ = None
```

we currently treat that as "having an `__iter__`" member, and therefore
implementing `Iterable`.

Note that the assumption that was in the comment before is still
correct: call binding will have already checked that the argument
satisfies `Iterable`, and so it shouldn't be an error to iterate over
said argument. But arguably, the new logic in this PR is a better way to
discharge that assumption — instead of panicking if we happen to be
wrong, fall back on an unknown iteration result.
2025-07-28 12:09:54 -04:00
..
resources [ty] Minor: test isolation (#19597) 2025-07-28 15:52:59 +02:00
src [ty] Don't panic with argument that doesn't actually implement Iterable (#19602) 2025-07-28 12:09:54 -04:00
tests [ty] Track open files in the server (#19264) 2025-07-18 19:33:35 +05:30
build.rs Rename Red Knot (#17820) 2025-05-03 19:49:15 +02:00
Cargo.toml [ty] Split ScopedPlaceId into ScopedSymbolId and ScopedMemberId (#19497) 2025-07-25 13:54:33 +02:00
mdtest.py Rename Red Knot (#17820) 2025-05-03 19:49:15 +02:00
mdtest.py.lock Rename Red Knot (#17820) 2025-05-03 19:49:15 +02:00