ruff/fuzz
Micha Reiser b34278e0cd
Introduce LinterSettings
## Stack Summary

This stack splits `Settings` into `FormatterSettings` and `LinterSettings` and moves it into `ruff_workspace`. This change is necessary to add the `FormatterSettings` to `Settings` without adding `ruff_python_formatter` as a dependency to `ruff_linter` (and the linter should not contain the formatter settings). 

A quick overview of our settings struct at play:

* `Options`: 1:1 representation of the options in the `pyproject.toml` or `ruff.toml`.  Used for deserialization.
* `Configuration`: Resolved `Options`, potentially merged from multiple configurations (when using `extend`). The representation is very close if not identical to the `Options`.
* `Settings`: The resolved configuration that uses a data format optimized for reading. Optional fields are initialized with their default values. Initialized by `Configuration::into_settings` .

The goal of this stack is to split `Settings` into tool-specific resolved `Settings` that are independent of each other. This comes at the advantage that the individual crates don't need to know anything about the other tools. The downside is that information gets duplicated between `Settings`. Right now the duplication is minimal (`line-length`, `tab-width`) but we may need to come up with a solution if more expensive data needs sharing.

This stack focuses on `Settings`. Splitting `Configuration` into some smaller structs is something I'll follow up on later. 

## PR Summary

This PR extracts the linter-specific settings into a new `LinterSettings` struct and adds it as a `linter` field to the `Settings` struct. This is in preparation for moving `Settings` from `ruff_linter` to `ruff_workspace`

## Test Plan

`cargo test`
2023-09-20 17:02:34 +02:00
..
corpus Create fuzzers for testing correctness of parsing, linting and fixing (#4822) 2023-06-07 14:57:07 +02:00
fuzz_targets Introduce LinterSettings 2023-09-20 17:02:34 +02:00
.gitignore Improve ruff_parse_simple to find UTF-8 violations (#5008) 2023-06-12 12:10:23 -04:00
Cargo.toml Rename ruff crate to ruff_linter (#7529) 2023-09-20 08:38:27 +02:00
init-fuzzer.sh Rename ruff crate to ruff_linter (#7529) 2023-09-20 08:38:27 +02:00
README.md Rename ruff crate to ruff_linter (#7529) 2023-09-20 08:38:27 +02:00
reinit-fuzzer.sh Rename ruff crate to ruff_linter (#7529) 2023-09-20 08:38:27 +02:00

ruff-fuzz

Fuzzers and associated utilities for automatic testing of Ruff.

Usage

To use the fuzzers provided in this directory, start by invoking:

./fuzz/init-fuzzers.sh

This will install cargo-fuzz and optionally download a dataset which improves the efficacy of the testing. This step is necessary for initialising the corpus directory, as all fuzzers share a common corpus. The dataset may take several hours to download and clean, so if you're just looking to try out the fuzzers, skip the dataset download, though be warned that some features simply cannot be tested without it (very unlikely for the fuzzer to generate valid python code from "thin air").

Once you have initialised the fuzzers, you can then execute any fuzzer with:

cargo fuzz run -s none name_of_fuzzer -- -timeout=1

Users using Apple M1 devices must use a nightly compiler and omit the -s none portion of this command, as this architecture does not support fuzzing without a sanitizer. You can view the names of the available fuzzers with cargo fuzz list. For specific details about how each fuzzer works, please read this document in its entirety.

IMPORTANT: You should run ./reinit-fuzzer.sh after adding more file-based testcases. This will allow the testing of new features that you've added unit tests for.

Debugging a crash

Once you've found a crash, you'll need to debug it. The easiest first step in this process is to minimise the input such that the crash is still triggered with a smaller input. cargo-fuzz supports this out of the box with:

cargo fuzz tmin -s none name_of_fuzzer artifacts/name_of_fuzzer/crash-...

From here, you will need to analyse the input and potentially the behaviour of the program. The debugging process from here is unfortunately less well-defined, so you will need to apply some expertise here. Happy hunting!

A brief introduction to fuzzers

Fuzzing, or fuzz testing, is the process of providing generated data to a program under test. The most common variety of fuzzers are mutational fuzzers; given a set of existing inputs (a "corpus"), it will attempt to slightly change (or "mutate") these inputs into new inputs that cover parts of the code that haven't yet been observed. Using this strategy, we can quite efficiently generate testcases which cover significant portions of the program, both with expected and unexpected data. This is really quite effective for finding bugs.

The fuzzers here use cargo-fuzz, a utility which allows Rust to integrate with libFuzzer, the fuzzer library built into LLVM. Each source file present in fuzz_targets is a harness, which is, in effect, a unit test which can handle different inputs. When an input is provided to a harness, the harness processes this data and libFuzzer observes the code coverage and any special values used in comparisons over the course of the run. Special values are preserved for future mutations and inputs which cover new regions of code are added to the corpus.

Each fuzzer harness in detail

Each fuzzer harness in fuzz_targets targets a different aspect of Ruff and tests them in different ways. While there is implementation-specific documentation in the source code itself, each harness is briefly described below.

ruff_parse_simple

This fuzz harness does not perform any "smart" testing of Ruff; it merely checks that the parsing and unparsing of a particular input (what would normally be a source code file) does not crash. It also attempts to verify that the locations of tokens and errors identified do not fall in the middle of a UTF-8 code point, which may cause downstream panics. While this is unlikely to find any issues on its own, it executes very quickly and covers a large and diverse code region that may speed up the generation of inputs and therefore make a more valuable corpus quickly. It is particularly useful if you skip the dataset generation.

ruff_parse_idempotency

This fuzz harness checks that Ruff's parser is idempotent in order to check that it is not incorrectly parsing or unparsing an input. It can be built in two modes: default (where it is only checked that the parser does not enter an unstable state) or full idempotency (the parser is checked to ensure that it will always produce the same output after the first unparsing). Full idempotency mode can be used by enabling the full-idempotency feature when running the fuzzer, but this may be too strict of a restriction for initial testing.

ruff_fix_validity

This fuzz harness checks that fixes applied by Ruff do not introduce new errors using the existing ruff_linter::test::test_snippet testing utility. It currently is only configured to use default settings, but may be extended in future versions to test non-default linter settings.