hikaru-kajita f7aab5ac69 [pylint] Fixed false-positive on the rule PLW1641 (eq-without-hash) (#10566) ... ## Summary Fixed false-positive on the rule `PLW1641`, where the explicit assignment on the `__hash__` method is not counted as an definition of `__hash__`. (Discussed in #10557). Also, added one new testcase. ## Test Plan Checked on `cargo test` in `eq_without_hash.py`. Before the change, for the assignment into `__hash__`, only `__hash__ = None` was counted as an explicit definition of `__hash__` method. Probably any assignment into `__hash__` property could be counted as an explicit definition of hash, so I removed `value.is_none_literal_expr()` check.		2024-03-25 14:40:01 +00:00
..
resources	[pylint] Fixed false-positive on the rule PLW1641 (eq-without-hash) (#10566)	2024-03-25 14:40:01 +00:00
src	[pylint] Fixed false-positive on the rule PLW1641 (eq-without-hash) (#10566)	2024-03-25 14:40:01 +00:00
__init__.py	[pylint] (Re-)Implement import-private-name (C2701) (#9553)	2024-01-16 14:03:11 -05:00
Cargo.toml	Bump version to v0.3.4 (#10515)	2024-03-21 18:08:21 +00:00