ruff/crates/red_knot_python_semantic/resources/mdtest/doc
David Peter 366ae1feaa
[red-knot] Document 'public type of undeclared symbols' behavior (#16096)
## Summary

After I was asked twice within the same day, I thought it would be a
good idea to write some *user facing* documentation that explains our
reasoning behind inferring `Unknown | T_inferred` for public uses of
undeclared symbols. This is a major deviation from the behavior of other
type checkers and it seems like a good practice to defend our choice
like this.
2025-02-12 08:52:11 +01:00
..
public_type_undeclared_symbols.md [red-knot] Document 'public type of undeclared symbols' behavior (#16096) 2025-02-12 08:52:11 +01:00
README.md [red-knot] Document 'public type of undeclared symbols' behavior (#16096) 2025-02-12 08:52:11 +01:00

This directory contains user-facing documentation, but also doubles as an extended test suite that makes sure that our documentation stays up to date.