ruff/crates/ruff_python_parser/tests
Brent Westbrook 37fbe58b13
Document LinterResult::has_syntax_error and add Parsed::has_no_syntax_errors (#16443)
Summary
--

This is a follow up addressing the comments on #16425. As @dhruvmanila
pointed out, the naming is a bit tricky. I went with `has_no_errors` to
try to differentiate it from `is_valid`. It actually ends up negated in
most uses, so it would be more convenient to have `has_any_errors` or
`has_errors`, but I thought it would sound too much like the opposite of
`is_valid` in that case. I'm definitely open to suggestions here.

Test Plan
--

Existing tests.
2025-03-04 08:35:38 -05:00
..
snapshots [syntax-errors] except* before Python 3.11 (#16446) 2025-03-02 18:20:18 +00:00
fixtures.rs Document LinterResult::has_syntax_error and add Parsed::has_no_syntax_errors (#16443) 2025-03-04 08:35:38 -05:00
generate_inline_tests.rs Replace LALRPOP parser with hand-written parser (#10036) 2024-04-18 17:57:39 +05:30